鼻喷右美托咪定在儿童口腔门诊全身麻醉前的镇静效果

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.06.024

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 观察全身麻醉下牙病治疗患儿鼻喷右美托咪定(dexmedetomidine,DEX)对术前紧张情绪、父母分离焦虑、面罩接受程度和术后躁动的影响。方法: 选择北京大学口腔医院儿童口腔门诊全身麻醉下牙病治疗的患儿60例,年龄2~9岁,随机分为2组:对照组术前30 min经鼻喷入生理盐水0.02 mL/kg,DEX组喷入DEX 2 μg/kg(药物使用原液)。观察和记录患儿给药前及给药后10、20、25、30 min的心率(heart rate,HR)、脉搏血氧饱和度(oxygen saturation,SpO₂)以及给药30 min后的Ramsay镇静评分、分离焦虑评分、面罩吸入诱导接受度评分和术后躁动评分及并发症的情况。结果: 两组患儿的年龄、体重、性别构成、手术时间、拔管时间和苏醒时间相似,差异无统计学意义。DEX组患儿与父母的分离焦虑、面罩接受程度明显优于对照组(56.7% vs. 26.7%,73.3% vs. 40%,P均<0.05),术后躁动评分在两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与对照组相比,DEX组患儿给药20 min后HR有所下降,差异有统计学意义[(97.13±12.93)次/min vs. (104.53±11.97)次/min, P<0.05]。两组患儿的SpO₂未见明显差异,且均未见心动过缓、低氧血症的发生。结论: 全身麻醉前经鼻喷入DEX可以产生良好的术前镇静作用,改善与父母的分离焦虑,提高面罩接受度。两组患儿苏醒质量高,无明显的苏醒期躁动、呼吸抑制等并发症。鼻喷DEX 2 μg/kg是一种安全有效的儿童术前给药方式。

关键词: 右美托咪定, 给药, 鼻内, 清醒镇静, 手术前护理, 儿童

Abstract:

Objective: To observe the preoperative sedation, the status of separation from parents, compliance with the mask, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative agitation of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) premedication on children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia.Methods:In the study, 60 children of American Society of Anesthesiology classification (ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ), aged 2-9 years, were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups. Thirty minutes before operation, control group received intranasal placebo (0.9% saline) 0.02 mL/kg, and DEX group received intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg. The preoperative sedation score, the status of separation from parents, comp-liance with the mask and hemodynamic parameters were recorded by an anesthesiologists until anesthesia induction. Recovery conditions, postoperative agitation were also recorded.Results:There was no signi-ficant difference between the two groups in patient characteristics, operation time, extubation time and recovery time. Compared with the children in control group, those in DEX group were significantly more sedated when they were separated from their parents (56.7% vs. 26.7%, P<0.05). Satisfactory compliance with mask application was 40% in control group vs. 73.3% in DEX group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidences of postoperative agitation and oxygen saturation (SpO₂). Compared with control group, the heart rate (HR) of DEX group was decreased after 20 minutes of drug administration [(97.13±12.93) beats/min vs.(104.53±11.97) beats/min, P<0.05]. The changes of the HR and SpO₂in the two groups were within the normal range. There were no incidences of bradycardia and hypoxemia in either of the groups during study observation.Conclusion:Premedication with intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg for children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia produces good preoperative sedation. The levels of sedation, scores of parental separation and compliance with the mask were satisfied. The children have good recovery conditions, and no obvious postoperative agitation and respiratory depression after DEX administration. Intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg is an effective and safe alternative for premedication in children.

Key words: Dexmedetomidine, Administration, intranasal, Conscious sedation, Preoperative care, Child

中图分类号:

R782.05

高玲,刘云,杨旭东. 鼻喷右美托咪定在儿童口腔门诊全身麻醉前的镇静效果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 50(6): 1078-1082.

Ling GAO,Yun LIU,Xu-dong YANG. Effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine for children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 1078-1082.

图/表 7

图1

表1

表2

表3

图2

图3

参考文献 19

[1]	夏斌, 秦满, 马文利 , 等. 693例儿童全身麻醉下牙齿治疗的特征分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013,45(6):984-988. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2013.06.032
[2]	Kain ZN, Mayes LC , O’Connor TZ, et al. Preoperative anxiety in children. Predictors and outcomes[J]. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 1996,150(12):1238-1245. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170370016002
[3]	Wstson AT, Visram A . Children’s preoperative anxiety and postoperative behavior[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2003,13(3):188-204. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00848.x pmid: 12641680
[4]	Wolfe TR, Braude DA . Intranasl medication delivery for children: A brief review and update[J]. Pediatrics, 2010,126(3):532-537. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0616 pmid: 20696726
[5]	Peng K, Wu SR, Ji FH , et al. Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clinics, 2014,69(11):777-786. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(11)12 pmid: 4255070
[6]	Piao G, Wu J . Systematic assessment of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic agent: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2014,10(1):19-24. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.40730 pmid: 3953974
[7]	Kuang H, Johnson JA, Mulqueen JM , et al. The efficacy of benzodiazepines as acute anxiolytics in children: A meta-analysis[J]. Depress Anxiety, 2017,34(10):888-896. doi: 10.1002/da.22643 pmid: 28504861
[8]	Deshmukh PV, Kulkami SS, Parchandekar MK , et al. Comparison of preanesthetic sedation in pediatric patients with oral and intranasal midazolam[J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2016,32(3):353-358. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.168205 pmid: 5009843
[9]	Iirola T, Vilo S, Manner T , et al. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2011,67(8):825-831. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1002-y
[10]	Lee Y, Kim J, Kim S , et al. Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a premedication for pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for dental treatment[J]. J Dent Anesth Pain Med, 2016,16(1):25-29. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.1.25 pmid: 5564115
[11]	Sheta SA, Al-Sarheed MA, Abdelhalim AA . Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Pediatric Anesth, 2014,24(2):181-189. doi: 10.1111/pan.12287 pmid: 24237879
[12]	Yuen VM, Irwin MG, Hui TW , et al. A double-blind, crossover assessment of the sedative and analgesic effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine[J]. Anesth Analg, 2007,105(2):374-380. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000269488.06546.7c pmid: 17646493
[13]	Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG , et al. Optimal timing for the administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for premedication in children[J]. Anaesthesia, 2010,65(9):922-929. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06453.x
[14]	Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG , et al. A randomised comparison of two intranasal dexmedetomidine doses for premedication in children[J]. Anaesthesia, 2012,67(11):1210-1216. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07309.x pmid: 22950484
[15]	Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG , et al. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Anesth Analg, 2008,106(6):1715-1721. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816c8929 pmid: 18499600
[16]	Wolfe TR, Bemstone T . Intranasal drug delivery: An alternative to intravenous administration in selected emergency cases[J]. J Emerg Nurs, 2004,30(2):141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2004.01.006
[17]	Talon MD, Woodson LC, Sherwood ER , et al. Intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication is comparable with midazolam in burn children undergoing reconstructive surgery[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2009,30(4):599-605. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181abff90 pmid: 19506498
[18]	Jun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY , et al. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2017,64(9):947-961. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0917-x pmid: 28639236
[19]	Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I , et al. Predicting which child-parent pair will benefit from parental presence during induction of anesthesia: A decision-making approach[J]. Anesth Analg, 2006,102(1):81-84. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181100.27931.A1 pmid: 16368808

相关文章 15

[1]	王子靖,李在玲. 有幽门螺杆菌感染家族史儿童胃部菌群的特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1115-1121.
[2]	刘雅菲,宋琳琳,邢茂炜,蔡立新,王东信. 全身麻醉下小儿开颅术术中心脏前负荷动态指标的一致性分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 946-951.
[3]	陈曼曼,杨招庚,苏彬彬,李艳辉,高迪,马莹,马涛,董彦会,马军. 中山市儿童青少年青春期身高生长突增规律[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 506-510.
[4]	杨雪,孙伟,王哲,姬爱平,白洁. 儿童和青少年牙外伤急诊患者临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 384-389.
[5]	张子一,夏斌,徐明明,李毅萍,唐瞻贵,陈泳清. 湖南韶山地区儿童口腔卫生干预效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 913-918.
[6]	陈小贤,钟洁,闫文娟,张红梅,姜霞,黄芊,薛世华,刘星纲. 树脂冠修复乳前牙的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 907-912.
[7]	宋宇,韩鸿宾,杨军,王艾博,和清源,李媛媛,赵国梅,高亚娟,王睿,韩易兴,刘爱连,宋清伟. 脑对流增强给药对老年大鼠脑细胞外间隙微观结构的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(2): 362-367.
[8]	李军,顾芳,李在玲,吕愈敏. 北京单中心回顾性分析儿童肠镜临床特点及疾病谱12年演变[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(5): 819-823.
[9]	陶春燕,李红霞,李雪迎,唐朝枢,金红芳,杜军保. 体位性心动过速综合征儿童及青少年在直立试验中血流动力学变化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(3): 414-421.
[10]	李岩，王辉，邓莹，姚瑶，李民. 静脉输注右美托咪定对臂丛阻滞效果的随机对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 845-849.
[11]	吴鹏辉，谢瑶，赵卫红，华瑛，孙青，李硕，吴晔，卢新天. 血液病/肿瘤患儿并发可逆性后部白质脑病综合征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 662-665.
[12]	董彦会，宋逸，董彬，邹志勇，王政和，杨招庚，王西婕，李艳辉，马军. 2014年中国7~18岁学生血压状况与营养状况的关联分析——基于中国儿童青少年血压评价标准[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 422-428.
[13]	陈天麒，董彬，张文静，高迪思，董彦会，马军，马迎华. 儿童青少年睡眠时间与速度和耐力成绩的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 429-435.
[14]	王潇，王欣，秦满. 唾液基质金属蛋白酶2、9与儿童龋病相关性的初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 527-531.
[15]	王荣丽，周志浩，席宇诚，王启宁，王宁华，黄真. 机器人辅助脑瘫儿童踝关节康复临床初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(2): 207-212.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Score	Observation
1	Anxious, agitated, or restless
2	Cooperative, oriented, and tranquil
3	Responsive to commands
4	Asleep, but with brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
5	Asleep, sluggish response to glabellar tap or auditory stimulus
6	Asleep, no response

Score	Separation	Compliance with the mask	Postoperative agitation
1	Combative, clinging	Combative and angry	Calm
2	Anxious, consolable	Fear of the mask and not easily calmed	Not calm but could easily be consoled
3	Calm	Fear of the mask but easily calmed	Not easily calmed, moderately agitated, or restless
4	Sleeping	Calm and cooperative	Combative, excited, or disoriented, thrashing around

Items	Control group	DEX group	P
Age/months	43.60±12.92	46.20±10.07	0.403
Weight/kg	17.21±3.64	16.51±2.41	0.398
Male/Female	17/13	19/11	0.598
Operation time/min	177.50±33.91	181.33±39.10	0.661
Extubation time/min	5.07±1.68	5.93±2.03	0.114
Recovery time/min	25.77±12.63	29.50±12.40	0.432

	Control group	DEX group	P
Ramsay sedation score
Effective	0	18 (60.0)	<0.001
Uneffective	30 (100.0)	12 (40.0)
Separation from parent
Satisfactory	8 (26.7)	17 (56.7)	0.018
Unsatisfactory	22 (73.3)	13 (43.3)
Compliance with mask
Satisfactory	12 (40.0)	22 (73.3)	0.009
Unsatisfactory	18 (60.0)	8 (26.7)
Postoperative agitation
Satisfactory	28 (93.3)	27 (90.0)	0.640
Unsatisfactory	2 (6.7)	3 (10.0)