Email Alert | RSS

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 111-114. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.020

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

CAD/CAM钛合金表面处理工艺联合树脂粘接剂对硬质复合树脂粘接强度和耐久性的影响

李贝贝1,2,邸萍1,△()   

  1. 1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,口腔种植科　国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心　口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室　口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京　100081
    2. 首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院口腔种植科, 北京　100050
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-17 出版日期:2019-02-18 发布日期:2019-02-26
  • 通讯作者: 邸萍 E-mail:diping2008@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生发展科研专项基金(2018-2-4102)

Effects of CAD/CAM titanium alloy surface treatment and resin luting on shear bond strength and durability of composite resin

Bei-bei LI1,2,Ping DI1,△()   

  1. 1. Department of Oral Implantology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Oral Implantology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2018-08-17 Online:2019-02-18 Published:2019-02-26
  • Contact: Ping DI E-mail:diping2008@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Capital Special Fund for Health Development and Scientific Research(2018-2-4102)

RICH HTML

 13   

PDF (PC)

259

摘要：

目的:研究喷砂和微弧氧化两种金属表面处理方式及树脂粘结剂对钛合金与硬质复合树脂粘结强度和耐久性的影响。方法:应用CAD/CAM技术切削出80个底面直径10 mm、高8 mm的圆柱形钛合金试件。根据表面处理方式分为两组:喷砂组(sandblasting,SB)试件表面进行Al2O3 颗粒喷砂,微弧氧化组(microarc-oxidation,MAO)试件表面处理后形成疏松多孔的陶瓷膜结构。每组内根据是否应用树脂粘结剂分为SB-resin luting-N组(不使用)、SB-resin luting-Y组(使用)、MAO-resin luting-N组(不使用)、MAO-resin luting-Y组(使用)4个亚组。试件与Cemerage硬质复合树脂粘结固化,每组的各一半测试冷热循环0次和5 000次后的粘结强度,对比分析测试结果。扫描电镜观察粘结强度试验前后钛合金试件表面形貌。结果:喷砂联合树脂粘结剂组冷热循环0次后,钛合金与硬质复合树脂的粘结强度最高(16.2±1.8) MPa;微弧氧化未联合树脂粘结剂组冷热循环5 000次后,两者的粘结强度最低(8.9±1.5) MPa,喷砂和微弧氧化未联合树脂粘结剂组冷热循环5 000次后粘结强度分别为(10.7±2.2) MPa和(8.9±1.5) MPa,相比循环0次组降低,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000和P=0.001);喷砂和微弧氧化处理联合树脂粘结剂5 000次冷热循环后粘结强度分别为(15.5±2.1) MPa和(11.7±1.3) MPa,相比循环0次组降低,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.087和P=0.234)。结论:喷砂和微弧氧化两种表面处理方式联合树脂粘结剂均可提高钛合金与硬质复合树脂的粘结强度和耐久性,以喷砂组提高更为显著;目前受微弧氧化技术参数的限制,喷砂效果优于微弧氧化。

关键词: 钛合金, 微弧氧化, 复合树脂, 粘结强度

Abstract:

Objective: To assess the effects of two surface treatments (sandblasting, SB; microarc-oxidation, MAO) and resin luting on shear bond strength and durability of titanium alloy and composite-resin. Methods: Eighty cylindrical titanium alloy specimens with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 8 mm were fabricated by CAD/CAM technique. It was divided into two groups according to the surface treatment methods: sandblasting with Al2O3 particles on the surface of SB specimens; porous ceramic film structure could be formed on the surface of MAO specimens after surface treatment. Each group was classified into SB-resin luting-N group (not used), SB-resin luting-Y group (used), MAO-resin luting-N group (not used), MAO-resin luting-Y group (used) depending on whether or not resin luting was applied. Each specimen was bonded and cured with the Cemerage resin, and the shear bond strength after 0 and 5 000 thermocycling was tested. The results were statistically analyzed. The surface morphology of titanium alloy specimens before and after the shear bond strength test was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results:The shear bond strength between titanium alloy and composite-resin was the highest in the SB combined with resin luting group after 0 thermocycling (16.2±1.8) MPa; was the lowest in MAO group after 5 000 thermocycling (8.9±1.5) MPa. The shear bond strength of SB and MAO surface treatment methods combined without resin luting group after 5 000 thermocycling were (10.7±2.2) MPa and (8.9±1.5) MPa, which were statistically lower than those in the thermocycling 0 (P=0.000 and P=0.001). The shear bond strength of SB and MAO surface treatment methods combined with resin luting group after 5 000 thermocycling were (15.5±2.1) MPa and (11.7±1.3) MPa, respectively, which were lower than those in the thermocycling 0 group, but there was no statistical significance (P=0.087 and P=0.234). Conclusion: Both the surface treatment methods of SB and MAO combined with resin luting can improve the shear bond strength and durability of titanium alloy and composite-resin. The SB combined with resin luting is more significant. At present, the effect of SB is better than that of MAO due to the limitation of technical parameters of micro-arc oxidation.

Key words: Titanium alloy, Micro-arc oxidation, Composite resin, Shear bonding strength

中图分类号: 

  • R783.1

表1

各组钛合金与硬质复合树脂粘结强度值"

Thermocycling Group Samples Shear bond strength
0 SB resin luting-N 10 12.9±2.5
SB resin luting-Y 10 16.2±1.8
MAO resin luting-N 10 10.0±1.9
MAO resin luting-Y 10 12.0±1.8
5 000 SB resin luting-N 10 10.7±2.2
SB resin luting-Y 10 15.5±2.1
MAO resin luting-N 10 8.9±1.5
MAO resin luting-Y 10 11.7±1.3

图1

喷砂(A)与微弧氧化(B)处理后钛合金试件表面形貌"

图2

剪切试验后钛合金试件表面形貌"

[1] Guo CY, Tang ATH, Matinlinna JP . Insights into surface treatment methods of titanium dental implants[J]. J Adhes Sci Tech-nol, 2012,26(1/2/3):189-205.
doi: 10.1163/016942411X569390
[2] Abduo J . Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review[J]. J Oral Implantlol, 2014,40(6):758-766.
doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00117.1 pmid: 23009670
[3] Molitor P, Barron V, Young T . Surface treatment of titanium for adhesive bonding to polymer composites: a review[J]. Int J Adhes, 2001,21(2):129-136.
doi: 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-0
[4] Egoshi T, Taira Y, Soeno K , et al. Effects of sandblasting, H2SO4/HCl etching, and phosphate primer application on bond strength of veneering resin composite to commercially pure titanium grade 4[J]. Dent Mater J, 2013,32(2):219-227.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-261 pmid: 23538756
[5] Yang G, Xianyi L, Bai Y , et al. The effects of current density on the phase composition and microstructure properties of micro-arc oxidation coating[J]. J Alloy Compd, 2002,345(1/2):196-200.
doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00289-X
[6] Taira Y, Yanagida H, Matsumura H , et al. Adhesive bonding of titanium with a thione-phosphate dual functional primer and self-curing luting agents[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2000,108(5):456-460.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108005456.x pmid: 11037763
[7] 马志玲, 刘杰 . 钛基底表面处理对钛-树脂粘接强度的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017,44(1):45-49.
doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2017.01.009
[8] Darvell BW, Samman N, Luk WK , et al. Contamination of titanium castings by aluminium oxide blasting[J]. J Dent, 1995,23(5):319-322.
doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(94)00003-X pmid: 7560379
[9] Ban S, Taniki T, Sato H , et al. Acid etching of titanium for bonding with veneering composite resins[J]. Dent Mater J, 2006,25(2):382.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.25.382 pmid: 16916245
[10] Nie X, Leyland A, Matthews A . Deposition of layered bioceramic hydroxyapatite/TiO2, coatings on titanium alloys using a hybrid technique of micro-arc oxidation and electrophoresis[J]. Surf Coat Tech, 2000,125(1/2/3):407-414.
doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00612-X
[11] 蒋百灵, 张菊梅, 时惠英 . 钛合金微弧氧化膜表面形貌对膜/环氧树脂结合强度的影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2004,14(4):539-542.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-0609.2004.04.004
[12] Tian J, Luo Z, Qi S , et al. Structure and antiwear behavior of micro-arc oxidized coatings on aluminum alloy[J]. Surf Coat Tech, 2002,154(1):1-7.
doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01671-1
[13] De SG, Hennig D, Aggarwal A , et al. The use of MDP-based materials for bonding to zirconia[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014,112(4):895-902.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.016 pmid: 24767903
[14] Lindgren J, Smeds J, Sjögren G . Effect of surface treatments and aging in water on bond strength to zirconia[J]. Oper Dent, 2008,33(6):675-681.
doi: 10.2341/08-12 pmid: 19051861
[1] 李媛,林红,张铁军. 对比传统成像与数字成像对牙科复合树脂X射线阻射性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 995-1001.
[2] 杨洋,浦婷婷,陈立,谭建国. 比较两种改良式印章法辅助后牙树脂牙合贴面修复的形态准确性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 977-982.
[3] 穆海丽,田福聪,王晓燕,高学军. 玻璃体和通用型复合树脂耐磨性的临床对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 120-125.
[4] 于鹏,王晓燕. 填料折射率与比例对复合树脂折射率和透明度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 790-793.
[5] 唐仁韬,李欣海,于江利,冯琳,高学军. 复合树脂与玻璃陶瓷微拉伸粘接强度的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 755-761.
[6] 郭惠杰，高承志， 林斐，刘伟，岳林. 唾液污染对复合树脂间粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 96-100.
[7] 林斐, 刘伟, 闫鹏, 岳林. 复合树脂间粘接的微拉伸强度研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 47(1): 124-128.
[8] 蔡雪, 聂杰, 王祖华, 田洪琰, 赵莹, 王晓燕. 洞缘形态对复合树脂颜色匹配的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 47(1): 120-123.
[9] 田福聪，王晓燕，高学军. 不同粘接系统用于楔状缺损直接修复的临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 46(1): 58-61.
[10] 袁慎坡, 林红, 潘硕, 娄丽丽, 徐永祥. Polident义齿清洁剂对义齿基托树脂性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(6): 946-949.
[11] 徐永祥, 韩建民, 林红. 自黏性流动树脂的性能研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2012, 44(2): 303-306.
[12] 高博韬, 郑刚, 林红, 徐永祥. 实时动态分析牙科光固化复合树脂固化收缩的新方法[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(6): 895-899.
[13] 韩冰, 董艳梅, 王晓燕, 高学军. 光照模式对复合树脂聚合收缩率和表面硬度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(5): 770-773.
[14] 赵奇*, 薛世华*, 吴艳, 王世明. 应用龈色树脂修复前牙颈部缺损的临床评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(1): 44-47.
[15] 韩冰, 王晓燕, 高学军. 光功率密度对光固化复合树脂耐老化性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(1): 58-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
ISSN 1671-167X
CN 11-4691/R
主管单位：中华人民共和国教育部
主办单位：北京大学
地址： 北京市海淀区学院路38号 北京大学医学部 《北京大学学报（医学版）》
邮编：100191
电话：010-82801551
Email： xbbjb2@bjmu.edu.cn

《北京大学学报（医学版）》
微信公众号
版权所有 © 2018 《北京大学学报（医学版）》编辑部