北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 221-227. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.02.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

miR-106b-5p在调节内皮细胞基因表达谱中的作用

张静,李素芳,陈红(),宋俊贤   

  1. 北京大学人民医院心血管内科,急性心肌梗死早期预警和干预北京市重点实验室,北京大学人民医院心血管转化医学研究中心, 北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-22 出版日期:2019-04-18 发布日期:2019-04-26
  • 通讯作者: 陈红 E-mail:chenhongbj@medmail.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81400264)

Role of miR-106b-5p in the regulation of gene profiles in endothelial cells

Jing ZHANG,Su-fang LI,Hong CHEN(),Jun-xian SONG   

  1. Center for Cardiovascular Translational Research, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China;
  • Received:2017-05-22 Online:2019-04-18 Published:2019-04-26
  • Contact: Hong CHEN E-mail:chenhongbj@medmail.com.cn
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81400264)

摘要:

目的: 评估miR-106b-5p对内皮细胞基因表达谱的影响。方法: 对动脉粥样硬化组(n=9)及对照组(n=9)血浆中miRNAs表达谱进行筛查,采用共表达网络分别对两组样本全体miRNAs 的共表达模式进行分析。选取从两组网络中得到的共表达地位差异最为显著的miR-106b-5p进一步研究,通过转染miR-106b-5p mimics上调人脐静脉内皮细胞的miR-106b-5p表达水平,筛查转染后差异基因表达谱,并进一步通过日本京都基因与基因组百科全书(Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes,KEGG)信号转导通路数据库对差异基因富集的信号通路进行分析。结果: 动脉粥样硬化组患者血浆中miRNAs的共表达模式(140个节点,1 154条连接线)与对照组(140个节点,612条连接线)相比存在明显差异,在过表达miR-106b-5p后人脐静脉内皮细胞有746个基因水平发生了显著变化(组间差异倍数≥1.5,芯片错误发现率<0.01),主要包括磷脂酰肌醇-3激酶(phosphoinositide 3-kinase,PI3K)/蛋白激酶B(protein kinase B,PKB,又称Akt)信号通路、哺乳动物雷帕霉素受体蛋白(mammalian target of rapamycin,mTOR)信号通路、转化生长因子-β(transforming growth factor-β,TGF-β)信号通路、酪氨酸激酶-信号转导及转录激活因子信号通路(janus kinase / signal transducer and activator of transcription,Jak-STAT)信号通路、肿瘤坏死因子(tumor necrosis factor,TNF)信号通路、toll样受体(toll-like receptor,TLR)信号通路、血管内皮生长因子(vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF)信号通路等20个信号通路。结论: 动脉粥样硬化患者血浆中miRNAs共表达模式发生了显著变化,其中共表达地位差异最为显著的miR-106b-5p可靶向调节血管内皮细胞多个信号通路。

关键词: 动脉粥样硬化, 微RNAs, 转录组, 内皮细胞

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the role of miR-106b-5p in the regulation of gene expression in endothelial cells.Methods: The Taqman low-density microRNAs (miRNAs) array (TLDA) was used to identify miRNA expression profiles in the plasma of patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) (atherosclerosis group, n=9) and individuals without atherosclerotic CAD disease (control group, n=9). A weighed and undirected miRNA coexpression network analysis was performed to investigate the interactions among miRNAs in the two groups. MiR-106b-5p, whose coexpression pattern in atherosclerosis group was most different from that of control group, was further studied. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were transfected with miR-106b-5p mimic or negative control mimic, and Affymetrix GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 was used to screen the differential gene expression profiles after transfection. And the signal transduction pathway of differential gene profiles was further analyzed in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signal pathway database. After parsing the whole KEGG database, all differentially expressed genes involved pathways were extracted, and the hypergeometric distribution was used to calculate the pathway enrichment.Results: The coexpression pattern of the patients with atherosclerosis (140 nodes, 1 154 edges) differed from that of the non-atherosclerosis control group (140 nodes, 612 edges). The analysis of array data with significant analysis of microarray (SAM) identified 746 significantly deregulated genes (fold change ≥ 1.5 and false discovery rate < 0.01) altered by overexpression of miR-106b-5p with miR-106b-5p mimic in HUVEC. By calculating the pathway enrichment, we found that multiple signaling pathways enriched in differential gene profiles were closely related to the process of formation and rupture of atherosclerotic plaque, including phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/ protein kinase B (PKB, also called Akt), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), janus kinase / signal transducer and activator of transcription (Jak-STAT), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), toll like receptor (TLR) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and other signal pathways.Conclusion: The coexpression pattern of miRNAs in plasma of patients with atherosclerosis is more significantly changed than that of individuals without atherosclerotic disease. MiR-106b-5p, which shows the most significant dif-ference between groups, targets multiple signal pathways in vascular endothelial cells, and might play an important role in the regulatory network of atherosclerotic gene expression.

Key words: Atherosclerosis, MicroRNAs, Transcriptome, Endothelial cells

中图分类号: 

  • R541.4

表1

miRNAs芯片试验研究对象的临床基线资料"

Items Control group (n=9) Atherosclerosis group (n=9) P value
Gender, Male/Female 5/4 5/4 >0.99
Age/years, x?±s 56.1±9.3 60.4±9.0 0.33
BMI/(kg/m2), x?±s 24.5±2.3 24.8±4.0 0.86
PLT/(×1012/L), x?±s 219.2±79.3 209.3±46.2 0.75
WBC/(×109/L), x?±s 6.9±2.8 5.8±1.5 0.31
LDL cholesterol/(mmol/l), x?±s 2.5±0.9 2.4±0.5 0.65
Hypertension, n(%) 5 (55.6) 8 (88.9) 0.11
Diabetes mellitus, n(%) 1 (11.1) 2 (22.2) 0.53
Hyperlipemia, n(%) 5 (55.6) 6 (66.7) 0.63
CCB, n(%) 2 (22.2) 3 (33.3) 0.60
Beta-blocker, n(%) 3 (33.3) 5 (55.6) 0.34
Aspirin, n(%) 1 (11.1) 4 (44.4) 0.11
Clopidogrel, n(%) 0 3 (33.3) 0.06
ACEI, n(%) 1 (11.1) 2 (22.2) 0.53
ARB, n(%) 1 (11.1) 2 (22.2) 0.53

图1

对照组(A)与动脉粥样硬化组(B)血浆中miRNAs的共表达网络分析图"

"

microRNA ID Degree in atherosclerosis Degree in controls K1-atherosclerosis K2-controls DiffK
miR-106-5p 43 7 1.00 0.21 0.78
miR-636 4 28 0.09 0.85 0.76
miR-302b 3 27 0.07 0.81 0.75
miR-15a* 3 24 0.07 0.73 0.66
miR-597 2 21 0.05 0.64 0.59
miR-543 31 5 0.72 0.15 0.57
miR-196b 15 29 0.35 0.88 0.53
miR-1271 6 22 0.14 0.67 0.53
miR-212 6 22 0.14 0.67 0.53
miR-29b 33 8 0.77 0.24 0.53
miR-365 25 2 0.58 0.06 0.52
miR-19b-1* 21 33 0.49 1.00 0.51
miR-452 16 29 0.37 0.88 0.51
miR-886-3p 27 4 0.63 0.12 0.51

图2

转染miR-106b-5p mimics后人脐静脉内皮细胞基因表达谱发生显著变化"

图3

人脐静脉内皮细胞中miR-106b-5p靶向调控的信号通路"

图4

人脐静脉内皮细胞中miR-106b-5p靶向调控基因及其上、下游基因所构建的全局信号转导网络"

[1] Bartel DP . MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function[J]. Cell, 2004,116(2):281-297.
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5
[2] Small EM, Olson EN . Pervasive roles of microRNAs in cardiovascular biology[J]. Nature, 2011,469(7330):336-342.
doi: 10.1038/nature09783
[3] Ren J, Zhang J, Xu N , et al. Signature of circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers in vulnerable coronary artery disease[J]. PLoS One, 2013,8(12):e80738.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080738
[4] Li P, Shen M, Gao F , et al. An antagomir to microRNA-106b-5p ameliorates cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats via inhibiting apoptosis and oxidative stress[J]. Mol Neurobiol, 2017,54(4):2901-2921.
doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9842-1
[5] Li N, Miao Y, Shan Y , et al. MiR-106b and miR-93 regulate cell progression by suppression of PTEN via PI3K/Akt pathway in breast cancer[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2017,8(5):e2796.
doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.119
[6] Wang J, Haubrock M, Cao KM , et al. Regulatory coordination of clustered microRNAs based on microRNA-transcription factor regulatory network[J]. BMC Syst Biol, 2011,5(12):199.
doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-199
[7] Prieto C, Risueño A, Fontanillo C , et al. Human gene coexpression landscape: confident network derived from tissue transcriptomic profiles[J]. PLoS One, 2008,3(12):e3911.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003911
[8] Zhang J, Li SF, Chen H , et al. MiR-106b-5p inhibits tumor necrosis factor-α-induced apoptosis by targeting phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 in vascular endothelial cells[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2016,129(12):1406-1412.
doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.183414
[9] Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K , et al. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 1999,27(1):29-34.
doi: 10.1093/nar/27.1.29
[10] Du J, Yuan Z, Ma Z , et al. KEGG-PATH: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes-based pathway analysis using a path analysis model[J]. Mol Biosyst, 2014,10(9):2441-2447.
doi: 10.1039/C4MB00287C
[11] Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y , et al. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012,40(Database issue):D109-114.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr988
[12] Ross R . Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999,340(2):115-126.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400207
[13] 任景怡, 许宁, 韩冠平 , 等. microRNAs 参与动脉粥样硬化疾病的发生[J]. 中国生物化学与分子生物学报, 2011,27(6):511-515.
[14] Zampetaki A, Willeit P, Drozdov I , et al. Profiling of circulating microRNAs: from single biomarkers to re-wired networks[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2012,93(4):555-562.
doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr266
[15] Weber C, Noels H . Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options[J]. Nat Med, 2011,17(11):1410-1422.
doi: 10.1038/nm.2538
[16] Zernecke A, Weber C . Chemokines in the vascular inflammatory response of atherosclerosis[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2010,86(2):192-201.
doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp391
[17] Lutgens E, Daemen MJ . Transforming growth factor-β: a local or systemic mediator of plaque stability?[J]. Circ Res, 2001,89(10):853-855.
doi: 10.1161/res.89.10.853
[18] Lutgens E, Gijbels M, Smook M , et al. Transforming growth factor-beta mediates balance between inflammation and fibrosis during plaque progression[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2002,22(6):975-982.
doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000019729.39500.2F
[1] 申杰, 杨迪, 陈梦圆, 郭新彪. 长度和化学修饰在多壁碳纳米管诱导内皮细胞活化中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 439-446.
[2] 黄丽东,宫玮玉,董艳梅. 生物活性玻璃对人脐静脉血管内皮细胞增殖及成血管的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 371-377.
[3] 刘滕飞,林涛,任利辉,李广平,彭建军. CMTM5基因与冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病的关联研究及机制探讨[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1082-1087.
[4] 刘滕飞,林涛,任利辉,李广平,彭建军. CMTM5基因与冠心病患者支架内再狭窄发生风险[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 856-862.
[5] 徐涛,韩敬丽,姚伟娟. 雄激素剥夺治疗相关心血管疾病的机制与临床对策[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 607-609.
[6] 轩艳,蔡宇,王啸轩,石巧,邱立新,栾庆先. 牙龈卟啉单胞菌感染对载脂蛋白e基因敲除小鼠动脉粥样硬化的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 743-749.
[7] 王晓,贺丹,李文婷,阿迪拉·斯依提,韩蕊,董颖. 144例维吾尔族与汉族女性子宫内膜癌微小RNA表达特点及临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 570-577.
[8] 任川,吴晓月,赵威,陶立元,刘萍,高炜. 心肺适能对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病高危患者的保护作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 152-157.
[9] 谢静,赵玉鸣,饶南荃,汪晓彤,方滕姣子,李晓霞,翟越,李静芝,葛立宏,王媛媛. 3种口腔颌面部来源的间充质干细胞成血管内皮分化潜能的比较研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 900-906.
[10] 张威,叶颖江,任仙文,黄晶,申占龙. 利用转录组二代测序探索直肠癌术前放化疗的敏感性分子特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 542-547.
[11] 康磊,霍焱,王荣福,张春丽,闫平,徐小洁. MicroRNA-155靶向的放射性标记探针对乳腺癌小鼠模型的活体显像[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(2): 326-330.
[12] 刘颖君,欧阳翔英,王宇光,吕培军,安娜. 生长停滞特异性蛋白6在牙龈卟啉单胞菌脂多糖诱导内皮细胞黏附因子及趋化因子表达中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 20-25.
[13] 蔡燚,郭浩,李汉忠,王文达,张玉石. 结节性硬化症细胞株TSC2-/- MEFs和正常细胞株TSC2+/+ MEFs微小RNA表达谱的差异分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 580-584.
[14] 梁乃文,石磊,黄颖,邓旭亮. 不同形貌纯钛表面对人脐静脉内皮细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 43-048.
[15] 肖天祎,刘焱,李继来,王瑞彤,杜继臣. 颈动脉粥样硬化评分与缺血性卒中的诊断[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(6): 1000-1005.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[2] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[3] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[4] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[5] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[6] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[7] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[8] 韩金涛, 赵军, 栾景源, 张龙. 多发结核性腹主动脉瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 361 -364 .
[9] 燕太强, 杨荣利, 郭卫, 沈丹华. 胫骨平滑肌肉瘤伴全身多发骨转移一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 369 -373 .
[10] 常杏芝, 卢红梅, 张月华, 秦炯. 以高血压与红斑肢痛为主要表现的汞中毒一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 377 -380 .