罹患重度牙周病变磨牙拔牙后两种牙槽嵴保存方法的比较

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.030

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 579-585. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.030

罹患重度牙周病变磨牙拔牙后两种牙槽嵴保存方法的比较

赵丽萍^1,²,胡文杰^1△(),徐涛^1,²,詹雅琳^1,³,危伊萍¹,甄敏¹,王翠¹

北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院, 1. 牙周科
^2. 急诊科
^3. 第一门诊部综合科, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2019-03-18 出版日期:2019-06-18 发布日期:2019-06-26
作者简介:胡文杰,教授、主任医师、博士研究生导师,现任北京大学口腔医学院牙周科副主任(教学主任)、北京大学医学部口腔内科学住培基地主任和牙周专科医师培训基地主任。兼任中华口腔医学会牙周病学专业委员会常务委员、口腔种植专业委员会委员、口腔美学专业委员会委员、中国医药教育协会口腔医学专业委员会常务委员、北京市口腔医学会种植专业委员会常务委员、社区口腔分会常务委员、北京市健康科普专家、美国牙周病学会国际会员、国际牙科研究会会员等职。2011—2012年赴美国华盛顿大学牙医学院牙周科作为高级访问学者进行临床、教学和学术交流,曾多次出访美国、瑞典等国家和地区进行学术交流。
医疗专长:复杂牙周病的诊断和规范化治疗、牙周治疗和口腔各学科的综合治疗设计、前牙美学治疗、牙周病患者的种植治疗、锥束计算机断层扫描(cone beam computed tomography, CBCT)在疾病诊断和治疗中的应用、各种牙冠延长术。
研究方向:牙周病多学科综合治疗和设计、微笑美学和前牙美学系列问题的临床和基础研究、牙周病患者种植治疗相关的临床和基础研究、CBCT在牙周疾病诊断和治疗中的应用研究、牙周病和种植体周围病与口腔微生物组学和代谢组学研究、口腔与胃内幽门螺杆菌关系的研究等。
基金资助:
首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广基金(Z161100000516042)、北京大学临床科学家计划专项(BMU2019LCKXJ010)-中央高校基本科研业务费

Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis

Li-ping ZHAO^1,²,Wen-jie HU^1△(),Tao XU^1,²,Ya-lin ZHAN^1,³,Yi-ping WEI¹,Min ZHEN¹,Cui WANG¹

^1. Department of Periodontology
^2. Department of Emergency
^3. Department of General Dentistry, First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2019-03-18 Online:2019-06-18 Published:2019-06-26
Supported by:
Supported by the Capital Foundation for Clinical Characteristics Application Research (Z161100000516042), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Peking University Clinical Scientist Program (BMU2019LCKXJ010)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过临床及影像学方法,针对罹患重度牙周病变伴有骨壁缺损的磨牙拔牙即刻植入Bio-Oss?覆盖Bio-Gide?胶原膜,采用翻瓣后冠向复位和微翻瓣胶原蛋白覆盖两种创口封闭方法进行牙槽嵴保存,比较6个月后软、硬组织变化。方法纳入23名患者共24颗重度牙周炎拔除磨牙,根据纳入时间分为牙槽嵴保存一组(翻瓣后冠向复位)和牙槽嵴保存二组(微翻瓣胶原蛋白覆盖),每组各12颗磨牙。拔牙前及术后6个月测量颊侧角化龈宽度,术后即刻及术后6个月拍摄平行投照根尖片评价牙槽骨高度的变化。术中及术后6个月种植手术时测量牙槽嵴顶中央处骨宽度。结果牙槽嵴保存一组及牙槽嵴保存二组的颊侧角化龈宽度分别减少了(1.6±1.5) mm (P=0.004)和(0.3±1.6) mm (P>0.05)。术后6个月两组牙槽窝中央牙槽骨高度均显著增加,牙槽嵴保存一组增加了(5.53±4.20) mm,牙槽嵴保存二组增加了(7.70±4.35) mm, 差异无统计学意义(P=0.226)。种植手术时,牙槽嵴保存一组的牙槽嵴顶中央颊舌/腭侧骨宽度为(9.5±2.2) mm,牙槽嵴保存二组为(9.3±1.0) mm,差异无统计学意义。结论两种牙槽嵴保存方法均有利于达到保持并改善拔牙位点牙槽骨的高度、减少牙槽骨吸收的目的,术后6个月牙槽骨宽度满足种植要求,微翻瓣覆盖胶原蛋白方法有利于保存更多颊侧角化龈。

关键词: 牙周疾病, 牙槽嵴增量, 磨牙, 平行投照根尖片

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate and to compare dimensional alterations of hard and soft tissues in molar extraction sites with irregular deficiency of bone plates due to advanced periodontitis receiving two different procedures, namely the flapped and flapless techniques with Bio-Gide? membrane covering the Bio-Oss? material for ridge preservation. Methods: Twenty-three patients with 24 infected-molar extraction sites received ridge preservation procedure, the first consecutive 12 sites belonged to the flap group (a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap and primary soft tissue closure) and the following 12 sites belonged to the flapless group (minimal flap with a collagen sponge and a secondary soft tissue closure). Width of keratinized tissue was evaluated before tooth extraction and after 6-month healing. Parallel periapical radiographs were taken immediately and 6 months after extraction to evaluate vertical bone changes. The width of the ridge was measured in the center of the ridge at the time of tooth extraction and after 6 months at implant placement. Results: After 6 months, width of keratinized tissue decreased (1.6±1.5) mm in the flap group (P=0.004) when compared with (0.3±1.6) mm in the flapless group (P>0.05). Both groups showed increases in ridge height from the central aspect, (5.53±4.20) mm for flap group and (7.70±4.35) mm for flapless group. These differences between the groups were not statistically significant (P=0.226). The ridge widths were (9.5±2.2) mm for flap group and (9.3±1.0) mm for flapless group at the time of implant insertion, and no statistical significance was observed between the flap and flapless groups. Conclusion: The study points out that both ridge preservation techniques were effective in increasing ridge height and minimizing ridge resorption after tooth extraction, and the ridge width allowed the placement of implants 6 months after ridge preservation. The flapless technique gave positive outcome in terms of the keratinized gingival width than that of the flap technique.

Key words: Periodontal diseases, Alveolar ridge augmentation, Molars, Parallel periapical radiograph

中图分类号:

R782.1

赵丽萍,胡文杰,徐涛,詹雅琳,危伊萍,甄敏,王翠. 罹患重度牙周病变磨牙拔牙后两种牙槽嵴保存方法的比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(3): 579-585.

Li-ping ZHAO,Wen-jie HU,Tao XU,Ya-lin ZHAN,Yi-ping WEI,Min ZHEN,Cui WANG. Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 579-585.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

表1

患者及拔牙位点基本情况"

Items	Flap group	Flapless group	P
Age/years, $x ?$ ±s	49.3±7.4	46.1±5.9	0.247
Gender (male ∶female), n	9 ∶3	8 ∶4
Total number of teeth, n	12	12
Tooth position, n
Maxillary molar	2	2
Mandible molar	10	10
Probing depth/mm, $x ?$ ±s	5.9±1.4	5.9±2.0	0.972
Gingival recession/mm, $x ?$ ±s	1.0±0.9	1.4±1.2	0.442
Bleeding index, $x ?$ ±s	3.1±0.6	3.3±0.9	0.517
Healingtime/months, $x ?$ ±s	6.5±0.6	7.2±3.1	0.423

表1

表2

牙槽嵴保存术前及术后6个月角化龈宽度变化"

Items	Flap group	Flapless group	P
Baseline/mm, $x ?$ ±s	5.1±1.6	4.5±1.5	0.362
6 months/mm, $x ?$ ±s	3.5±2.1	4.2±1.3	0.325
Differences/mm, $x ?$ ±s	-1.6±1.5	-0.3±1.6	0.054
P	0.004	0.478

表2

表3

牙槽嵴保存术后6个月牙槽骨宽度变化及种植术前牙槽骨宽度"

Items	Flap group	Flapless group	P
BLWC/mm, $x ?$ ±s	-2.5±1.3	-1.9±2.5	0.510
BLW/mm, $x ?$ ±s	9.5±2.2	9.3±1.0	0.772

表3

表4

牙槽嵴保存后牙槽骨高度变化"

Items		Baseline	6 months	Differences	P
MHplate/mm, $x ?$ ±s	Flap group	4.47±3.18	3.80±1.38	0.67±2.39	0.875
	Flapless group	5.06±2.54	3.81±1.77	1.25±2.41	0.100
	P			0.561
CHplate/mm, $x ?$ ±s	Flap group	9.45±4.59	3.92±2.16	5.53±4.20	0.001
	Flapless group	11.86±4.39	4.17±2.26	7.70±4.35	0.000
	P			0.226
DHplate/mm, $x ?$ ±s	Flap group	5.35±3.45	3.07±1.84	2.28±2.46	0.008
	Flapless group	3.45±1.71	2.93±2.16	0.52±1.38	0.222
	P			0.044

表4

参考文献 23

[1]	Pietrokovski J, Massler M.Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1967, 17(1): 21-27. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7
[2]	Araujo MG, Lindhe J.Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(2): 212-218. doi: 10.1111/cpe.2005.32.issue-2
[3]	Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al.A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl5): 1-21.
[4]	Morton D, Martin WC, Ruskin JD.Single-stage Straumann dental implants in the aesthetic zone: considerations and treatment procedures[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 62(9 Suppl 2): 57-66.
[5]	Lopez-Martinez F, Gomez MG, Olivares-Ponce P, et al.Implants failures related to endodontic treatment. An observational retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(9): 992-995. doi: 10.1111/clr.2015.26.issue-9
[6]	Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a syste-matic review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(12): 1048-1058. doi: 10.1111/cpe.2009.36.issue-12
[7]	Horvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, et al.Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(2): 341-363. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5
[8]	Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M.Evidence-based know-ledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5): 80-82. doi: 10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-s5
[9]	Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D.Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(Suppl): 260-271.
[10]	Macbeth N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Donos N, et al.Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: a syste-matic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(8): 982-1004. doi: 10.1111/clr.2017.28.issue-8
[11]	Araujo MG, Da SJ, de Mendonca AF, et al. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(4): 407-412.
[12]	詹雅琳, 胡文杰, 甄敏, 等. 去蛋白牛骨基质和可吸收胶原膜的磨牙拔牙位点保存效果影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 19-26.
[13]	赵丽萍, 詹雅琳, 胡文杰, 等. 不同测量方法评价磨牙拔牙位点保存术后牙槽骨的变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 126-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.023
[14]	Zhao L, Xu T, Hu W, et al.Preservation and augmentation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis: a prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3): 333-344. doi: 10.1111/cid.2018.20.issue-3
[15]	Zhao L, Wei YP, Xu T, et al.Changes in alveolar process dimensions following extraction of molars with advanced periodontal disease: a clinical pilot study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(4): 324-335. doi: 10.1111/clr.2019.30.issue-4
[16]	Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Macbeth N, et al.Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(Suppl 11): 180-201.
[17]	Jambhekar S, Kernen F, Bidra AS.Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 113(5): 371-382. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.009
[18]	Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, et al.Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a comparative clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2011, 82(3): 377-387. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090342
[19]	Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, et al.Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5): 22-38.
[20]	Araujo M, Linder E, Lindhe J.Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(1): 1-6.
[21]	Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, et al.Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2014, 85(1): 14-23. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120711
[22]	Bragger U.Digital imagining in periodontal radiography: a review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1998, 15(9): 551-557.
[23]	Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al.Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(4): 313-323.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

罹患重度牙周病变磨牙拔牙后两种牙槽嵴保存方法的比较

Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	陈震,谷宝鑫,汤玉芳,闫子玉,倪方端,崔念晖. 应用Delphi法构建下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度评分量表[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 100-104.
[2]	姜又升,冯琳,高学军. 垫底材料弹性模量对髓腔固位冠修复后上颌前磨牙应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 764-769.
[3]	杨一帆,栾庆先. 北京某社区35岁以上居民吸烟与牙周健康状况关系的调查[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(6): 1144-1149.
[4]	王时敏,李峥,王冠博,叶红强,刘云松,佟岱,高文慧,周永胜. 全程数字化夜磨牙保护牙合垫的制作和初步应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 105-110.
[5]	雷玥,杨颖婷,战园. 生物陶瓷材料在乳牙牙髓切断术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 70-74.
[6]	李昕，王欣，吴迪，陈智滨，王梦醒，高艳霞，巩纯秀，秦满. 青少年糖尿病患者血浆及龈沟液中白细胞介素-1β和C反应蛋白水平[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 538-542.
[7]	窦桂丽，吴南，赵双云，夏斌. 乳磨牙牙髓切断术两年疗效观察及其影响因素回顾性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 170-175.
[8]	吴灵，刘筱菁，李自力，王兴. 磨牙非中性关系与虚拟环境下拼对终末咬合精度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 154-159.
[9]	王天骄，刘宇，关明. 咪达唑仑联合丙泊酚靶控输注静脉镇静对拔除下颌第三磨牙患者焦虑水平的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(6): 1044-1049.
[10]	战园，刘鹤. 第一乳磨牙与第一前磨牙异位埋伏阻生1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 181-183.
[11]	朱洁，欧阳翔英. 利用锥形束CT对下颌磨牙根分叉病变区骨嵴形态的观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 67-070.
[12]	李丹，郭传瑸，刘宇，王恩博. 超声骨刀在上颌死髓劈裂磨牙拔除中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 709-713.
[13]	赵丽萍，詹雅琳，胡文杰，徐涛，危伊萍，甄敏，王翠. 不同测量方法评价磨牙拔牙位点保存术后牙槽骨的变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 126-132.
[14]	景亚楠，叶欣，柳登高，粱宇红，马绪臣. 下颌前磨牙及磨牙根管构型的锥形束CT分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 1053-1056.
[15]	詹雅琳, 胡文杰, 甄敏, 徐涛, 路瑞芳. 去蛋白牛骨基质与可吸收胶原膜的磨牙拔牙位点保存效果影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 47(1): 19-26.