复合手术治疗无残端的症状性长段颈内动脉慢性闭塞

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.028

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的:总结采用复合手术方法治疗无残端症状性长段颈内动脉慢性闭塞(chronic internal carotid artery occlusion,CICAO)病变的初步经验。方法:回顾性总结分析2015年7月至2017年12月北京大学第三医院介入血管外科采取复合手术的方法进行治疗的12例无残端的症状性长段CICAO患者资料,初步分析手术的安全性及有效性。结果:11例患者获得技术成功,技术成功率91.7%(11/12),仅1例发生主要并发症,该患者术中出现颈内动脉海绵窦瘘,结扎颈内动脉近端后好转。全部12例患者无缺血性及出血性卒中,无死亡病例。10例患者获得随访,随访10~32个月,平均随访时间(19±9)个月,其中1例出现症状性支架内再狭窄,予再次手术治疗后好转。结论:对于经严格筛选的无残端的症状性长段CICAO患者,复合开通手术在技术上可行,有较高的手术安全性及技术成功率。

关键词: 颈动脉狭窄, 颈内动脉, 支架, 血管成形术

Abstract:

Objective: To summarize the preliminary experience of hybrid operation for the treatment of symptomatic long-segment chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) without stump. Methods: Clinical data of 12 patients of symptomatic long-segment CICAO without stump undergoing hybrid operation treatment from July 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The safety and efficacy of hybrid operation for the treatment of symptomatic long-segment CICAO without stump were preliminarily assessed. CICAO was defined as occlusion time being more than 4 weeks. The primary outcome was defined as any stroke (including ischemic or hemorrhagic) or deaths from any cause after hybrid operation within 30 days. The secondary outcome was defined as successful revascularization and occurrence of >50% in-stent restenosis during the follow-up period. Results: In this group, the symptomatic long-segment CICAO of 11 patients were successfully recanalized. Technical success rate was 91.7% (11/12). The main complication rate was 8.3% (1/12). This patient encountered iatrogenic internal carotid artery cavernous sinus fistula caused by micro-guide wire in the midway of the hybrid operation, the pro-ximal segment of this internal carotid artery was ligated and the iatrogenic internal carotid artery cavernous sinus fistula disappeared in the following digital subtraction angiography image. No patient encountered hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic stroke. No death complications occurred. In this group 10 patients of them were followed up. The follow-up period ranged from 10 to 32 months [mean, (19±9) months]. During the follow-up period, 1 patients developed in-stent restenosis and improved after reoperation of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty by the right size balloon without stenting treatment. Conclusion: Hybrid operation for the treatment of highly screened patients with symptomatic long-segment CICAO without stump is safe and effective, could reduce the incidence of complications and improve procedural success rate.

Key words: Carotid stenosis, Carotid artery,internal, Stents, Angioplasty

中图分类号:

R543.4

贾子昌,李选,郑梅,栾景源,王昌明,韩金涛. 复合手术治疗无残端的症状性长段颈内动脉慢性闭塞[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 177-180.

Zi-chang JIA,Xuan LI,Mei ZHENG,Jing-yuan LUAN,Chang-ming WANG,Jin-tao HAN. Hybrid treatment for symptomatic long-segment chronic internal carotid artery occlusion without stump[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 177-180.

图/表 2

图1

图2

参考文献 12

[1]	Iwata T, Mori T, Tajiri H , et al. Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome following stenting by flow reversal technique for chronic occlusions older than 3 months of the cervical carotid or vertebral artery[J]. Neurosurgery, 2012,70(1):82-90.
[2]	Sundaram S, Kannoth S, Thomas B , et al. Collateral assessment by CT angiography as a predictor of outcome in symptomatic cervical internal carotid artery occlusion[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017,38(1):52-57.
[3]	Zirak P, Delgado-mederos R, Dinia L , et al. Microvascular versus macrovascular cerebral vasomotor reactivity in patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion[J]. Acad Radiol, 2014,21(2):168-174.
[4]	Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Liapis CD . Internal carotid artery occlusion: association with atherosclerotic disease in other arterial beds and vascular risk factors[J]. Angiology, 2007,58(3):329-335.
[5]	Alexander JJ, Moawad J, Super D . Outcome analysis of carotid artery occlusion[J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2007,41(5):409-416.
[6]	Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RL Jr . Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study randomized trial[J]. JAMA, 2011,306(18):1983-1992.
[7]	Jiao L, Song G, Hua Y , et al. Recanalization of extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion: A 12-year retrospective study[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2013,8(23):2204-2206.
[8]	Lee CW, Lin YH, Liu HM , et al. Predicting procedure successful rate and 1-year patency after endovascular recanalization for chro-nic carotid artery occlusion by CT angiography[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2016,221(15):772-776.
[9]	Chen YH, Leong WS, Lin MS , et al. Predictors for successful endovascular intervention in chronic carotid artery total occlusion[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016,9(17):1825-1832.
[10]	Park S, Park ES, Kwak JH , et al. Endovascular management of long segmental petrocavernous internal carotid artery (Carotid S) occlusion[J]. Stroke, 2015,17(3):336-343.
[11]	中国医师协会介入医师分会神经介入专业委员会, 中华医学会放射学分会介入放射学组, 中国卒中学会复合介入神经外科分会, 国家脑卒中防治工程委员会缺血性卒中专业委员会. 慢性颈内动脉闭塞再通治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019,7(1):1-6.
[12]	Namba K, Shojima M, Nemoto S . Wire-probing technique to revascularize subacute or chronic internal carotid artery occlusion[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2012,18(3):288-296.

相关文章 15

[1]	白鹏,王涛,周阳,陶立元,李刚,李正迁,郭向阳. 不同转流标准对颈动脉内膜切除术后脑梗死的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1144-1151.
[2]	朱正达,高岩,何汶秀,方鑫,刘洋,魏攀,闫志敏,华红. 红色诺卡氏菌细胞壁骨架治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[3]	庄金满,李天润,李选,栾景源,王昌明,冯琦琛,韩金涛. Rotarex 旋切导管在下肢动脉硬化闭塞症支架内再狭窄中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 740-743.
[4]	董文敏,王明瑞,胡浩,王起,许克新,徐涛. Allium覆膜金属输尿管支架长期留置治疗输尿管-回肠吻合口狭窄的初期临床经验及随访结果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 637-641.
[5]	曹春玲,杨聪翀,屈小中,韩冰,王晓燕. 可注射羟乙基壳聚糖基水凝胶理化性能及其对人牙髓细胞增殖和成牙本质向分化的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 10-17.
[6]	赵海燕,樊东升,韩金涛. 重度颈内动脉狭窄伴未破裂动脉瘤的治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(5): 829-834.
[7]	贾子昌,卞焕菊,李选,栾景源,王昌明,刘启佳,韩金涛. Neuroform EZ支架在治疗复杂症状性颅内动脉重度狭窄中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(5): 835-839.
[8]	贾子昌,卞焕菊,韩金涛,赵海燕,栾景源,王昌明,李选. 颈动脉支架成形术后脑高灌注综合征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(4): 733-736.
[9]	贾子昌,李选,李小刚,曾祥柱,栾景源,王昌明,韩金涛. 机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中单中心研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(2): 256-259.
[10]	李榕,陈科龙,王勇,刘云松,周永胜,孙玉春. 骨组织工程支架3D打印系统的建立与支架宏微结构精度的可控性评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 115-119.
[11]	张倩莉,袁重阳,刘力,温世鹏,王晓燕. 胶原静电纺纳米纤维膜对人牙髓细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 28-34.
[12]	李金勇，孙宏亮，叶志东，樊雪强，刘鹏. 颈动脉斑块成分和体积的多排螺旋计算机断层扫描血管成像技术评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 833-839.
[13]	冯琦琛，李选，栾景源，王昌明，李天润. 肾滤过分数评价肾动脉支架植入术对动脉硬化性肾动脉狭窄的治疗效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 158-163.
[14]	蒋京军, 卿洪琨, 张小明, 张学民, 李伟, 沈晨阳, 李清乐, 焦洋. 经皮穿刺缝合与股动脉切开在主动脉瘤腔内修复术中的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(5): 850-854.
[15]	庄金满，李选，李天润，傅军，栾景源，王昌明. 股腘动脉病变球囊扩张与支架植入的疗效对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 160-165.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed