Email Alert | RSS

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 570-577. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.03.026

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

144例维吾尔族与汉族女性子宫内膜癌微小RNA表达特点及临床意义

王晓1,贺丹1,李文婷2,阿迪拉·斯依提2,韩蕊1,董颖1,△()   

  1. 1. 北京大学第一医院病理科, 北京 100034
    2. 新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院病理科, 乌鲁木齐 830011
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-02 出版日期:2020-06-18 发布日期:2020-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 董颖 E-mail:dongying_999@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81360381)

Characteristic and clinical significance of microRNA expression between 144 Uygur and Han women with endometrial carcinoma

Xiao WANG1,Dan HE1,Wen-ting LI2,SIYITI Adila·2,Rui HAN1,Ying DONG1,△()   

  1. 1. Department of Pathology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
  • Received:2018-04-02 Online:2020-06-18 Published:2020-06-30
  • Contact: Ying DONG E-mail:dongying_999@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81360381)

RICH HTML

 1   

PDF (PC)

139

摘要：

目的 分析144例女性子宫内膜癌微小RNA(microRNA,miRNA)的表达特点,对比其在维吾尔族与汉族女性子宫内膜癌中的表达差异及其与临床病理特点的内在关联性,阐述临床意义。方法 144例维吾尔族与汉族女性(包括62例维吾尔族和82例汉族),采用Taqman低密度芯片对比两者子宫内膜癌miRNA的表达特点,选取5种miRNA,采用实时定量PCR法验证并分析这些miRNA的表达特点。结果 miRNA表达谱分析显示,Ⅱ型癌突出的特点是许多miRNA在一个民族中表达升高或降低,而在另一个民族中不表达或变化轻微。144例女性的子宫内膜癌miR-141、miR-200a、miR-205表达均升高,维吾尔族女性Ⅰ型癌miR-141/200a表达升高的肿瘤更具侵袭性,而汉族女性Ⅰ型癌的特点相反,miR-200a表达升高的肿瘤侵袭性呈减弱趋势,但Ⅱ型癌miR-200a表达升高的肿瘤趋向更具侵袭性。miR-145、miR-143在维吾尔族与汉族女性子宫内膜癌中的表达特点相反,在维吾尔族表达升高,在汉族显著降低(P<0.05)。维吾尔族中Ⅱ型癌miR-145、miR-143升高更明显,侵袭性相对弱的肿瘤的miR-145表达水平更高,肌层浸润深度<1/2组差异有统计学意义(P=0.042)。汉族女性Ⅰ/Ⅱ型癌中miR-145和miR-143的表达均降低,侵袭性强的Ⅰ型癌中两者降低得更明显,但差异无统计学意义;Ⅱ型癌不具此特点。结论 维吾尔族与汉族女性子宫内膜癌miRNA表达存在一定差异性,miR-141/200a/205在子宫内膜癌中普遍表达升高,但miR-141/200a在维吾尔族与汉族Ⅰ/Ⅱ型子宫内膜癌中扮演的角色可能不尽相同。miR-145/143在维吾尔族与汉族女性子宫内膜癌中的表达特点相反,但可能均发挥抑癌作用。

关键词: 子宫内膜癌, 癌, 子宫内膜样, 微RNAs

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the expression patterns of microRNA (miRNA) between 144 Uygur and Han women with endometrial carcinoma and to investigate their clinical significance.Methods: Taqman miRNA low-density array was used to compare miRNA profiles between Uygur and Han women with non-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (NEEC). Five miRNAs were further analyzed in the 144 endometrial cancers including 62 Uygur and 82 Han samples via real-time PCR to determine their expression patterns.Results: MiRNA expression profiles revealed that many miRNAs overexpressed or downregula-ted in one ethnic group, but did not express or changed slightly in the other ethnic group. Further detection in the 144 endometrial cancers showed that miR-141, miR-200a, and miR-205 overexpressed in both ethnic groups. In Uygur endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC), tumors with miR-141/200a overexpression tended to be more aggressive in behavior, whereas in the Han group, EEC with miR-200a overexpression was relative mild. However, the NEEC with miR-200a overexpression also had aggressive clinicopathologic features in the Han women. MiR-145 and miR-143 expressed differentially between Uygur and Han groups, they overexpressed in the former and decreased in the latter (P<0.05). In the Uygur women miR-145/143 increased significantly in NEEC and there was a trend that NEEC exhibiting favorable clinicopathologic factors had higher miR-145 expression, and was statistically significant in tumors with myometrial invasion less than 1/2 thickness (P=0.042). By contrary, miR-145/143 decreased in Han group and EEC with worse clinicopathologic variables had lower expression although without statistical significance. NEEC in Han group had no such tendency.Conclusion: Uygur and Han women might have different miRNA expression profiles. MiR-141/200a/205 overexpressed in endometrial carcinomas and miR-141/200a might behave differently between these two ethnic groups as well as in EEC and in NEEC. Although miR-145/143 showed inverse expression patterns between Uygur and Han women with endometrial cancer, they all exerted tumor suppression effect on endometrial cancer.

Key words: Endometrial carcinoma, Carcinoma, endometrioid, MicroRNAs

中图分类号: 

  • R737.33

表1

维吾尔族与汉族Ⅱ型子宫内膜癌中表达差异的miRNAs"

miRNA log2 (relative quantity)
Uygur Han
hsa-miR-101#-002143 0.071 15.513
hsa-miR-876-3p-4395336 0.053 10.105
hsa-miR-299-5p-4373188 0.037 87.624
hsa-miR-885-5p-4395407 0.019 47.159
hsa-miR-218-2#-002294 0.012 32.331
hsa-let-7c#-002405 0.012 526.021
hsa-miR-450b-5p-4395318 0.003 334.49
hsa-miR-876-5p-4395316 0.003 334.728
hsa-miR-643-001594 0.003 516.767
hsa-miR-497#-002368 0.001 265.121
hsa-miR-29b-1#-002165 0.001 295.243
hsa-miR-504-4395195 0 363.642
hsa-miR-296-3p-4395212 0 2 683.919
hsa-miR-941-002183 0 4 023.437
hsa-miR-1267-002885 94 877.297 0
hsa-miR-486-3p-4395204 14 529.595 0
hsa-miR-654-5p-4381014 3 411.37 0.001
hsa-miR-541-4395312 3 315.935 0
hsa-miR-431-4395173 3 306.269 0.001
hsa-miR-486-5p-4378096 1 747.636 0.075
hsa-miR-452#-002330 169.787 0.004
hsa-miR-548J-002783 85.613 0.004
hsa-miR-523-4395497 19.512 0.049

图1

miR-141、miR-200a、miR-205、miR-143和miR-145在维吾尔族和汉族患者中的表达"

表2

miR-141、miR-200a、miR-205、miR-143、miR-145在维吾尔族女性EEC (n=49)和NEEC (n=13)中的表达"

Variable log2 (relative quantity),mean±SE
miR-141 miR-200a miR-205 miR-143 miR-145
EEC NEEC EEC NEEC EEC NEEC EEC NEEC EEC NEEC
Histologic type 4.60±0.42 3.65±0.79 5.12±0.42 4.45±0.69 4.44±0.40 4.02±0.69 0.52±0.51 2.04±0.73 1.99±0.56 3.95±0.83
P <0.001 0.003 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.504 0.040 0.013 <0.001
Age
Premenopause (n=25) 4.69±0.68 3.65±0.24 4.93±0.72 2.44±1.71 4.27±0.75 4.21±0.64 0.52±0.68 1.92±2.04 2.25±0.98 3.54±0.95
Postmenopause (n=37) 4.53±0.55 3.65±1.04 5.28±0.50 5.05±0.68 4.58±0.61 3.97±0.90 0.53±0.75 2.07±0.81 1.79±0.65 4.07±1.06
P 0.854 0.999 0.687 0.115 0.751 0.894 0.991 0.935 0.688 0.801
Grade (EEC)
Low (n=21) 4.33±0.68 - 4.87±0.45 - 4.49±0.78 - 1.08±0.93 - 2.20±0.62 -
High (n=28) 4.81±0.55 - 6.93±0.76 - 4.41±0.59 - 0.10±0.55 - 0.52±1.06 -
P 0.580 0.044 0.934 0.371 0.376
Myometrial invasiona
<1/2 (n=35) 4.17±0.55 1.28±1.77 4.76±0.56 1.53±0.88 3.81±0.61 1.85±1.62 -0.39±0.57 3.90±1.20 1.40±0.76 5.98±1.13
≥1/2 (n=13) 5.72±0.81 4.48±0.66 6.14±0.81 5.53±0.47 4.83±1.73 4.84±0.52 -0.88±0.75 1.11±0.90 0.65±0.99 2.86±1.08
P 0.284 0.167 0.225 0.011 0.547 0.160 0.617 0.099 0.945 0.042
Lymph node metastasesb
No (n=37) 4.35±0.62 4.04±0.71 5.03±0.60 4.53±0.79 3.88±0.74 4.28±0.68 -0.36±0.63 2.46±0.90 1.61±0.87 4.08±1.07
Yes (n=4) 5.40±1.07 3.44 5.69±1.09 3.26 3.98±1.82 4.63 -0.80±0.47 -0.56 0.51±0.74 1.86
P 0.590 0.807 0.704 0.343 0.964 0.879 0.588 0.337 0.809 0.527
Vessel invasiona
No (n=38) 4.36±0.54 3.00±1.17 4.86±0.54 3.66±1.04 3.96±0.62 3.65±0.85 -0.58±0.54 2.11±1.27 1.24±0.75 3.92±1.05
Yes (n=10) 4.55±1.40 3.97±1.21 5.53±1.26 4.94±0.85 3.90±1.61 4.11±1.41 0.30±1.30 1.95±0.90 1.62±1.23 3.88±1.73
P 0.900 0.586 0.909 0.465 0.970 0.771 0.547 0.924 0.450 0.935
Stagea
Ⅰ or Ⅱ (n=40) 4.30±0.53 3.81±1.21 4.89±0.53 4.21±1.12 3.95±0.61 3.47±0.85 -0.43±0.54 1.47±1.03 1.37±0.72 4.57±2.06
Ⅲ or Ⅳ (n=8) 5.40±1.07 2.85±1.11 5.69±1.09 4.16±0.76 3.98±1.82 4.37±1.37 -0.80±0.47 2.84±1.30 0.51±0.74 3.43±0.66
P 0.546 0.588 0.358 0.194 0.989 0.570 0.617 0.422 0.932 0.570

表3

miR-141、miR-200a、miR-205、miR-143、miR-145在汉族女性EEC (n=53)和NEEC (n=29)中的表达"

Variable log2 (relative quantity), mean±SE
miR-141 miR-200a miR-205 miR-143 miR-145
EEC NEEC EEC NEEC EEC NEEC EEC NEEC EEC NEEC
Histologic type 2.63±0.34 4.82±1.01 2.61±0.38 5.81±1.30 4.51±0.52 4.31±0.79 -2.43±0.34 -0.13±1.16 -2.61±0.32 -2.70±0.92
P 0.023 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.012 0.015 <0.001 0.009 0.001 0.187
Age
Premenopause (n=28) 2.78±0.56 4.79±1.84 1.76±0.70 8.21±1.64 4.97±0.84 5.18±1.55 -2.22±0.53 -2.54±1.34 -1.94±0.53 0.84±2.81
Postmenopause (n=54) 2.55±0.43 4.62±0.98 3.12±0.42 5.03±1.31 4.23±0.67 4.35±0.71 -2.85±0.39 -1.73±0.69 -2.73±0.44 0.01±0.83
P 0.751 0.934 0.082 0.247 0.499 0.606 0.334 0.596 0.267 0.702
Grade (EEC)
Low (n=28) 2.60±0.46 - 2.64±0.42 - 3.89±0.80 - -2.39±0.46 - -2.36±0.37 -
High (n=25) 2.68±0.51 - 2.43±0.86 - 5.20±0.64 - -2.86±0.43 - -2.92±0.80 -
P 0.907 0.694 0.212 0.470 0.446
Myometrial invasiona
<1/2 (n=62) 2.55±0.43 4.62±0.98 2.63±0.41 5.43±1.49 4.67±0.54 4.40±0.71 -2.32±0.35 -2.43±0.82 -2.26±0.36 -0.73±1.33
≥1/2 (n=19) 2.88±0.46 4.31±1.95 2.55±0.81 7.08±3.16 4.06±1.30 3.95±1.56 -3.41±0.66 -1.70±0.85 -2.90±0.83 1.91±2.22
P 0.603 0.876 0.817 0.614 0.609 0.762 0.129 0.609 0.431 0.160
Lymph node metastasesb
No (n=32) 2.72±0.58 5.05±1.20 3.19±0.63 5.70±2.05 4.35±1.12 4.53±0.85 -2.15±0.58 -1.92±0.89 -1.84±0.69 -0.02±1.57
Yes (n=8) 2.29±1.32 5.21±0.90 2.71±1.69 6.36±1.35 4.02±1.13 2.00±1.65 -2.82±0.79 -4.97±1.90 -2.51±1.05 -3.23±1.71
P 0.738 0.956 0.411 0.671 0.879 0.229 0.567 0.172 0.457 0.457
Vessel invasiona
No (n=67) 2.69±0.38 4.47±1.03 2.77±0.38 5.68±1.57 4.48±0.61 4.39±0.78 -2.45±0.36 -2.54±0.76 -2.35±0.37 -0.35±1.44
Yes (n=14) 2.37±0.78 4.78±1.70 1.84±1.25 6.42±2.81 4.65±0.70 3.80±1.19 -3.40±0.62 -0.96±0.67 -2.81±0.88 0.93±0.90
P 0.733 0.891 0.255 0.867 0.906 0.727 0.260 0.322 0.602 0.073
Stagea
Ⅰ or Ⅱ (n=68) 2.63±0.37 3.81±0.99 2.71±0.38 4.53±1.60 4.49±0.59 4.21±0.66 -2.45±0.34 -1.83±0.70 -2.27±0.36 -0.42±1.28
Ⅲ or Ⅳ (n=13) 2.67±0.94 6.97±1.73 1.98±1.53 9.77±1.91 4.64±0.87 4.49±1.96 -3.64±0.77 -3.56±1.38 -3.51±0.97 0.98±2.63
P 0.970 0.134 0.587 0.570 0.925 0.862 0.204 0.252 0.172 0.507

图2

DNMT3B在维吾尔族和汉族女性中的过表达率"

表4

维吾尔族与汉族女性子宫内膜癌中DNMT3B的表达特点"

Variable DNMT3B overexpression
Uygur Han
EEC NEEC EEC NEEC
Histologic type 67.3% (33/49) 84.6% (11/13) 60.4% (32/53) 41.4% (12/29)
P 0.312 0.099
Grade (EEC)
Low 65.1% (28/43) - 58.7% (27/46) -
High 83.3%(5/6) - 71.4% (5/7) -
P 0.690 0.649
Myometrial invasion
<1/2 64.5% (20/31) 50.0% (2/4) 61.5% (24/39) 33.3% (7/21)
≥1/2 100.0% (5/5) 100.0% (8/8) 57.1% (4/7) 57.1% (4/7)
P 0.295 0.091 0.773 0.381
Lymph node metastases
No 66.7% (18/27) 90.0% (9/10) 47.1% (8/17) 57.1% (8/14)
Yes 50.0% (1/2) 100.0% (1/1) 80.0% (4/5) 50.0% (2/4)
P 0.323 >0.999 0.534 >0.999
Vessel invasion
No 66.7% (21/31) 71.4% (5/7) 59.1% (26/44) 40.9% (9/22)
Yes 80.0% (4/5) 100.0% (5/5) 66.7% (6/9) 33.3% (2/6)
P 1.000 0.470 >0.999 >0.999
Stage
Ⅰ or Ⅱ 66.7% (22/33) 71.4% (5/7) 58.1% (27/46) 38.1% (8/21)
Ⅲ or Ⅳ 100.0% (3/3) 100.0% (5/5) 71.4% (5/7) 42.9% (3/7)
P 0.538 0.470 0.690 >0.999
[1] 廖秦平, 杨曦. 子宫内膜癌筛查及早期诊断的现状及展望. 实用妇产科杂志, 2015,31(7):481-484.
[2] Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Network. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Nature, 2013,497(7447):67-73.
[3] Schimp VL, Ali-Fehmi R, Solomon LA, et al. The racial disparity in outcomes in endometrial cancer: could this be explained on a molecular level?[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2006,102(3):440-446.
[4] Srivastava SK, Ahmad A, Zubair H, et al. MicroRNAs in gynecological cancers: Small molecules with big implications[J]. Cancer Lett, 2017,407:123-138.
[5] Robert JK, Maria LC, Herrington CS, et al. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs[M]. Lyon, France: World Health Organization, 2014: 121-154.
[6] 董颖, 周梅, 巴晓军, 等. 子宫内膜癌中DNA甲基转移酶3B的表达特点与临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016,48(5):788-794.
[7] Chen T, Ding L, Shan G, et al. Prevalence and racial differences in pterygium: a cross-sectional study in Han and Uygur adults in Xinjiang, China[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2015,56(2):1109-1117.
[8] Lee JW, Park YA, Choi JJ, et al. The expression of the miRNA-200 family in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011,120(1):56-62.
[9] Ratner ES, Tuck D, Richter C, et al. MicroRNA signatures differentiate uterine cancer tumor subtypes[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2010,118(3):251-257.
[10] Chung TK, Cheung TH, Huen NY, et al. Dysregulated micro-RNAs and their predicted targets associated with endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma in Hong Kong women[J]. Int J Can-cer, 2009,124(6):1358-1365.
[11] 刘霞, 夏伟, 代荫梅, 等. 子宫内膜腺癌组织中miRNA的差异表达[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2009,89(19):1365-1367.
[12] Wu W, Lin Z, Zhuang Z, et al. Expression profile of mammalian microRNAs in endometrioid adenocarcinoma[J]. Eur J Cancer Prev, 2009,18(1):50-55.
[13] Hiroki E, Akahira J, Suzuki F, et al. Changes in microRNA expression levels correlate with clinicopathological features and prognoses in endometrial serous adenocarcinomas[J]. Cancer Sci, 2010,101(1):241-249.
[14] Devor EJ, Hovey AM, Goodheart MJ, et al. microRNA expression profiling of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas and serous adenocarcinomas reveals profiles containing shared, unique and differentiating groups of microRNAs[J]. Oncol Rep, 2011,26(4):995-1002.
pmid: 21725615
[15] Snowdon J, Zhang X, Childs T, et al. The microRNA-200 family is upregulated in endometrial carcinoma[J]. PLoS One, 2011,6(8):e22828.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022828 pmid: 21897839
[16] Torres A, Torres K, Pesci A, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of miRNA signatures in tissues and plasma of endome-trioid endometrial carcinoma patients[J]. Int J Cancer, 2013,132(7):1633-1645.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.27840 pmid: 22987275
[17] Bauer KM, Hummon AB. Effects of the miR-143/-145 microRNA cluster on the colon cancer proteome and transcriptome[J]. J Proteome Res, 2012,11(9):4744-4754.
doi: 10.1021/pr300600r
[18] Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006,103(7):2257-2261.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510565103 pmid: 16461460
[19] Zhang X, Dong Y, Ti H, et al. Down-regulation of miR-145 and miR-143 might be associated with DNA methyltransferase 3B overexpression and worse prognosis in endometrioid carcinomas[J]. Hum Pathol, 2013,44(11):2571-2580.
doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.07.002
[1] 周传香,周正,张晔,刘晓筱,高岩. 28例口腔基底样鳞状细胞癌的临床病理分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 62-67.
[2] 苏俊琪,宋扬,谢尚. 口腔鳞状细胞癌患者修复重建术后感染的病原学特征及感染风险预测模型的构建[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 68-76.
[3] 穆东亮,薛铖,安彬,王东信. 硬膜外阻滞与结直肠癌患者术后远期生存状态的关系:一项倾向性评分匹配的回顾性研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1152-1158.
[4] 田雨,程晓悦,贺慧颖,王国良,马潞林. 肾细胞癌合并尿路瘤栓的临床病理特征: 6例报道及文献回顾[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 928-932.
[5] 庞泳,张沙,杨华,周柔丽. LAPTM4B-35蛋白作为肝癌血清学诊断新标志物的探讨[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 710-715.
[6] 肖若陶,刘承,徐楚潇,何为,马潞林. 术前血小板参数与局部进展期肾细胞癌预后[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 647-652.
[7] 白杲琛,宋毅,金杰,虞巍,何志嵩. 多西他赛联合卡铂治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的临床疗效[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 686-691.
[8] 于妍斐,何世明,吴宇财,熊盛炜,沈棋,李妍妍,杨风,何群,李学松. 延胡索酸水合酶缺陷型肾细胞癌的临床病理特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 640-646.
[9] 孙争辉,黄晓娟,董靖晗,刘茁,颜野,刘承,马潞林. 临床T1期肾细胞癌肾窦侵犯的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 659-664.
[10] 赵勋,颜野,黄晓娟,董靖晗,刘茁,张洪宪,刘承,马潞林. 癌栓粘连血管壁对非转移性肾细胞癌合并下腔静脉癌栓患者手术及预后的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 665-670.
[11] 韩松辰,黄子雄,刘慧鑫,徐涛. 单侧肾细胞癌根治性切除术后的肾功能代偿[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 680-685.
[12] 洪鹏,田晓军,赵小钰,杨飞龙,刘茁,陆敏,赵磊,马潞林. 肾移植术后双侧乳头状肾癌1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 811-813.
[13] 周川, 马雪, 邢云昆, 李璐迪, 陈洁, 姚碧云, 傅娟玲, 赵鹏. 基于肿瘤基因组图谱数据库探索性筛选潜在泛癌生物标志物[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 602-607.
[14] 廖栩鹤,王荣福,刘萌,陈雪祺,熊焰,农琳,殷雷,张炳晔,杜毓菁. 18F-FDG PET/CT半定量参数、表皮生长因子受体和间变淋巴瘤激酶基因突变对肺腺癌患者预后评估的价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 246-254.
[15] 王迎春,黄永辉,常虹,姚炜,闫秀娥,李柯,张耀鹏,郑炜. 十二指肠乳头息肉良、恶性病变比较及活检准确性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 204-209.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[6] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[7] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[8] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[9] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[10] 燕太强, 杨荣利, 郭卫, 沈丹华. 胫骨平滑肌肉瘤伴全身多发骨转移一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 369 -373 .
ISSN 1671-167X
CN 11-4691/R
主管单位：中华人民共和国教育部
主办单位：北京大学
地址： 北京市海淀区学院路38号 北京大学医学部 《北京大学学报（医学版）》
邮编：100191
电话：010-82801551
Email： xbbjb2@bjmu.edu.cn

《北京大学学报（医学版）》
微信公众号
版权所有 © 2018 《北京大学学报（医学版）》编辑部