树脂冠修复乳前牙的临床效果评价

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的:评价对活髓乳前牙复面洞和多面洞龋坏采用Strip crowns透明成形冠进行复合树脂全冠修复的临床效果。方法:纳入的研究对象为2016年1—12月接受全身麻醉下牙齿治疗,且因乳前牙复面洞或多面洞龋坏需行树脂全冠修复的患儿。术中使用选择性酸蚀技术、Universal Bond粘接剂、3M Z350树脂制作全冠。术后6、12和18个月复查,由非治疗医师采用改良的美国公共卫生署(United States Public Health Service,USPHS)标准进行单盲评价。结果:共有127例儿童的418颗牙齿纳入统计,年龄为1.17~5.75岁(平均3.22岁),其中70例男性,57例女性。树脂冠6个月时的保留率为97.8%,12个月时的保留率为93.6%,18个月时的保留率为89.2%。18个月时共有28颗(6.7%)树脂冠完全脱落,17颗(4.1%)部分脱落,4颗(1.0%)树脂冠发生继发龋,6颗(1.4%)牙齿出现牙髓感染。修复体外观及邻接关系恢复较好,色泽协调性佳,可明显改善美观。93.1%的树脂冠牙龈健康,有29颗(6.9%)牙龈轻度红肿。有47颗(11.2%)树脂冠因菌斑堆积出现颜色变化,抛光可去除着色。树脂冠脱落主要与进食咬物相关。结论:树脂冠是修复乳前牙大面积龋坏和多面洞龋坏的较好方式,功能运动是导致脱落的重要原因。由于制作树脂冠技术敏感性高,需要儿童全程配合,更适用于年龄较大且可配合的儿童以及接受镇静或全身麻醉的儿童。

关键词: 乳前牙, 儿童, 牙冠, 龋齿

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the clinical success of the treatment of maxillary anterior primary incisors caries with composite resin strip crowns. Methods: Children who presented with severe early childhood caries and were treated comprehensive caries under general anesthesia from January to December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Composite crowns using preformed celluloid crown (3M ESPE, USA) called as “strip crown technique” were applied to treat vital primary incisors with two or multiple surface cavities. Selective etchings of enamel, Universal Bond adhesive and 3M Z350 resin were used to make strip crowns. The patients returned at the end of 6, 12 and 18 months and received clinical and radiologic examinations. Dentists who did not attend the treatment evaluated the strip crowns clinically by modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Results: Four hundred eighteen restorations, placed in 127 children aged 1.17-5.75 years (average of 3.22), were evaluated. The overall retention rate was 97.8% at the end of 6 months, 93.6% at 12 months and 89.2% at 18 months. After 18 months, 28 restorations (6.7%) were totally lost and 4.1% were rated as having lost some resin material. Only four teeth (1.0%) had secondary caries at the end of 18 months and 1.4% teeth had pulpal pathology requiring root canal treatment. Composite crowns had good performance in contour and adjacent contact and improved aesthetics significantly. Twenty-nine teeth (6.9%) showed mild gingivitis and 93.1% showed healthy gingival. 11.2% of the teeth demonstrated color change because plaque accumulation and the polish could remove the stains. The complete loss of strip crowns was mainly related to eating bites. Conclusion: Strip crowns performed well for restoring primary incisors with large or multisurface caries for periods of over 18 months. The strip crowns can be a durable and aesthetic restoration for vital carious primary incisors with adequate tooth structure after caries removal. Functional movement is an important cause of complete loss. Because of the high technical sensitivity and its requirement of the cooperation of children, strip crowns are more suitable for older and cooperative children as well as children receiving dental treatment under sedation or general anesthesia.

Key words: Primary incisors, Child, Tooth crown, Dental caries

中图分类号:

R783.3

陈小贤,钟洁,闫文娟,张红梅,姜霞,黄芊,薛世华,刘星纲. 树脂冠修复乳前牙的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 907-912.

Xiao-xian CHEN,Jie ZHONG,Wen-juan YAN,Hong-mei ZHANG,Xia JIANG,Qian HUANG,Shi-hua XUE,Xing-gang LIU. Clinical performance of rensin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 907-912.

图/表 4

表1

表2

图1

图2

参考文献 18

[1]	王兴. 第四次全国口腔健康流行病学调查报告 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 8.
[2]	Jeong M, Kim A, Shim Y, et al. Restoration of strip crown with a resin-bonded composite cement in early childhood caries[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2013(2):660-672.
[3]	Waggoner WF. Restorative dentistry for the primary dentition[M] // Pinkham JR. Pediatric dentistry: Infancy through adolescence. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1994: 298-325.
[4]	Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014[J]. Pediatr Dent, 2015,37(2):163-170. pmid: 25905657
[5]	Almeida AG, Roseman MM, Sheff M, et al. Future caries susceptibility in children with early childhood caries following treatment under general anesthesia[J]. Pediatr Dent, 2000,22(4):302-306. pmid: 10969437
[6]	Cuvillon P, Nouvellon E, Marret E, et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists’ physical status system: a multicentre Francophone study to analyses reasons for classification disagreement[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2011,28(10):742-747. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328348fc9d pmid: 21912242
[7]	中华口腔医学会. 口腔医学行业标准规范及指南 [M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2015.
[8]	Ryge G. Clinical criteria[J]. Int Dent J, 1980,30(4):347-358. pmid: 6935165
[9]	Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF, Galea J. The clinical and radiographic success of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors[J]. Pediatr Dent, 2003,25(6):577-581. pmid: 14733473
[10]	Al-Eheideb AA, Herman NG. Outcomes of dental procedures performed on children under general anesthesia[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2003,27(2):181-183. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.27.2.k3307186n7086r11 pmid: 12597693
[11]	李永吉, 滕立群, 张英华, 等. 透明成形冠在大面积龋损乳前牙修复中的应用[J]. 广东牙病防治, 2011,19(6):299-301.
[12]	Kupietzky A, Waggoner WE, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years[J]. Pediatr Dent, 2005,27(3):221-225. pmid: 16173227
[13]	Ram D, Fuks AB. Clinical performance of resin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors: a retrospective study[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2006,16(1):49-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00680.x pmid: 16364093
[14]	Duhan H, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, et al. Clinical comparison of various esthetic restorative options for coronal build-up of primary anterior teeth[J]. Dent Res J, 2015,12(6):574-580. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.170578
[15]	Eidelman E, Faibis S, Peretz B. A comparison of restorations for children treated under general anesthesia or conscious sedation[J]. Pediatr Dent, 2000,22(1):33-37. pmid: 10730284
[16]	Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, et al. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study[J]. Dent Mater, 1994,10(6):353-362. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90059-0 pmid: 7498599
[17]	Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, et al. Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2006,10(2):119-125. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0041-8 pmid: 16555069
[18]	El Shahawy OI, O’Connell AC. Successful restoration of severely mutilated primary incisors using a novel method to retain zirconia crowns—two year results[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2016,40(6):425-430. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.6.425 pmid: 27805887

相关文章 15

[1]	王子靖,李在玲. 有幽门螺杆菌感染家族史儿童胃部菌群的特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1115-1121.
[2]	刘雅菲,宋琳琳,邢茂炜,蔡立新,王东信. 全身麻醉下小儿开颅术术中心脏前负荷动态指标的一致性分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 946-951.
[3]	陈曼曼,杨招庚,苏彬彬,李艳辉,高迪,马莹,马涛,董彦会,马军. 中山市儿童青少年青春期身高生长突增规律[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 506-510.
[4]	杨雪,孙伟,王哲,姬爱平,白洁. 儿童和青少年牙外伤急诊患者临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 384-389.
[5]	赵思铭,赵晓含,张杰,王党校,王晓燕. 虚拟现实技术用于龋坏识别教学[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 139-142.
[6]	吴为良,曾筱,刘晓强,谭建国. 120例中国成年人上前牙美学比例分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(6): 1130-1134.
[7]	张子一,夏斌,徐明明,李毅萍,唐瞻贵,陈泳清. 湖南韶山地区儿童口腔卫生干预效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 913-918.
[8]	李军,顾芳,李在玲,吕愈敏. 北京单中心回顾性分析儿童肠镜临床特点及疾病谱12年演变[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(5): 819-823.
[9]	陶春燕,李红霞,李雪迎,唐朝枢,金红芳,杜军保. 体位性心动过速综合征儿童及青少年在直立试验中血流动力学变化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(3): 414-421.
[10]	周琼,彭楚芳,秦满. 近红外光透照技术诊断乳磨牙早期邻面龋[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 59-64.
[11]	高玲,刘云,杨旭东. 鼻喷右美托咪定在儿童口腔门诊全身麻醉前的镇静效果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 50(6): 1078-1082.
[12]	吴鹏辉，谢瑶，赵卫红，华瑛，孙青，李硕，吴晔，卢新天. 血液病/肿瘤患儿并发可逆性后部白质脑病综合征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 662-665.
[13]	董彦会，宋逸，董彬，邹志勇，王政和，杨招庚，王西婕，李艳辉，马军. 2014年中国7~18岁学生血压状况与营养状况的关联分析——基于中国儿童青少年血压评价标准[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 422-428.
[14]	陈天麒，董彬，张文静，高迪思，董彦会，马军，马迎华. 儿童青少年睡眠时间与速度和耐力成绩的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 429-435.
[15]	王潇，王欣，秦满. 唾液基质金属蛋白酶2、9与儿童龋病相关性的初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 527-531.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Characteristic	Rating	Criteria
Secondary caries	A	No evidence of caries contiguous with the margin of the restoration
	B	Caries evident contiguous with the margin of the restoration
Presence of restoration failure	A	Crown appears normal, no cracks, chips, or fracture
	B	Partly but noticeable areas of loss of material
	C	Complete loss of crown
Postoperative sensitivity and pulpitis	A	No postoperative sensitivity
	C	Postoperative sensitivity, spontaneous pain, pulpitis, no response to electrical activity test
Color match	A	No mismatch in color, shade and translucency between restoration and adjacent tooth structure
	B	Mismatch between restoration and tooth structure within the normal range of color, shade and translucency
	C	Mismatch between restoration and tooth structure outside the normal range of color, shade and translucency
Gingival health	A	No obvious signs of inflammation
	C	Marginal gingivitis

Characteristic	Rating	6 months, n (%)	12 months, n (%)	18 months, n (%)
Secondary caries	A	418 (100.0)	417 (99.8)	414 (99.0)
	B	0 (0)	1 (0.2)	4 (1.0)
Presence of restoration failure	A	409 (97.8)	383 (93.6)	373 (89.2)
	B	5 (1.2)	11 (1.5)	17 (4.1)
	C	4 (1.0)	24 (4.9)	28 (6.7)
Postoperative sensitivity and pulpitis	A	418 (100.0)	413 (98.8)	412 (98.6)
	C	0 (0)	5 (1.2)	6 (1.4)
Color match	A	416 (99.5)	386 (92.3)	371 (88.8)
	B	2 (0.5)	32 (7.7)	47 (11.2)
	C	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Gingival health	A	409 (97.8)	397 (95.0)	389 (93.1)
	C	9 (2.2)	21 (5.0)	29 (6.9)