北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (2): 286-292. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.02.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

脊柱手术后深部切口感染患者多次清创的危险因素

周柏林,李危石(),孙垂国,齐强,陈仲强,曾岩   

  1. 北京大学第三医院骨科,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-14 出版日期:2021-04-18 发布日期:2021-04-21
  • 通讯作者: 李危石 E-mail:wslee72@163.com

Risk factors for multiple debridements of the patients with deep incisional surgical site infection after spinal surgery

ZHOU Bo-lin,LI Wei-shi(),SUN Chui-guo,QI Qiang,CHEN Zhong-qiang,ZENG Yan   

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2019-01-14 Online:2021-04-18 Published:2021-04-21
  • Contact: Wei-shi LI E-mail:wslee72@163.com

摘要:

目的: 探讨可能导致脊柱手术患者切口感染接受多次清创术的危险因素,以引起医务人员的警惕和重视,并探讨预防措施。方法: 回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月就诊于北京大学第三医院骨科,行脊柱手术后发生切口感染并进行清创术的84例患者资料,所有患者切口感染均发生于术后30 d内,诊断符合美国疾病预防控制中心(Centers for Disease Control,CDC)制定的深部手术切口感染的诊断标准。治疗采用早期清创术、一期关闭切口、置管对口冲洗引流,并根据细菌培养结果合理应用抗生素。清创术后密切关注患者生命体征、临床表现、抽血化验结果及引流液性状、细菌培养结果,如果不能控制感染或好转后再次出现原手术切口感染则行二次清创术。60例患者行单次清创术,包括男性36例、女性24例,年龄36~77岁,平均57.2岁;24例患者行多次清创术(14例接受2次清创,6例接受3次清创,1例接受4次清创,2例接受5次清创,1例接受6次清创),包括男性17例、女性7例,年龄21~70岁,平均49.5岁。对单次清创组和多次清创组之间变量进行单因素分析,将单因素分析有统计学意义(P<0.05)的变量纳入二元Logistic回归模型进行多因素分析。结果: 本组二次清创率为28.6%。多次清创组累计住院时间(82.4±46.3) d,单次清创组累计住院时间(40.4±31.5) d(P=0.018);多次清创组6例取出内置物,单次清创组4例取出内置物(P=0.049);多次清创组7例行皮瓣移植术修复创面,单次清创组无病例行皮瓣移植(P<0.001)。单因素分析显示,原始手术时间大于3 h、原始手术出血量大于400 mL、合并糖尿病、感染后细菌学检验结果、伴有远隔部位感染等变量在两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,原始手术时间大于3 h(OR=3.60,95%CI:1.12~11.62)、合并糖尿病(OR=3.74,95%CI:1.06~13.22)、细菌学检验结果为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,MRSA)(OR=16.87,95%CI:0.50~5.45)与脊柱手术后切口感染接受多次清创术显著相关。接受多次清创术的患者住院时间明显延长,面临内置物取出风险增高,部分患者还需皮瓣移植修复创面。结论: 原始手术时间大于3 h、合并糖尿病、细菌培养结果为MRSA是脊柱手术后切口感染接受多次清创术的独立危险因素,这些因素需要引起医务人员的重视并进行积极干预。

关键词: 脊柱, 外科伤口感染, 清创术, 危险因素

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the risk factors that contribute to multiple debridements in patients suffering from deep incisional surgical site infection after spinal surgery and advise medical personnel to pay special attention to these risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 84 patients who got deep incisional surgical site infection after spinal surgery from Jan. 2012 to Dec. 2017. The infections occurred within 30 days after the surgery, and the identification met the criteria of deep incisional surgical site infection of Centers of Disease Control (CDC). Early debridement with first stage closure of the wound and a continuous inflow-outflow irrigation system was used, and reasonable antibiotics were chosen according to the bacterial culture results. During the treatment, the vital signs, clinical manifestations, blood test results, drainage fluid colour and bacterial culture results were acquired. If the infection failed to be controlled or relapsed, a second debridement was performed. Of the 84 cases, 60 undergwent single debridement which included 36 male cases and 24 female cases, and the age ranged from 36 to 77 years, with a mean of 57.2 years. Twenty four had multiple debridements (twice in 14 cases, three times in 6 cases, four times in 1 case, five times in 2 cases, six times in 1 cases) which included 17 male cases and 7 female cases, and the age ranged from 21 to 70 years, with a mean of 49.5 years. Risk factors that predispose patients to multiple debridements were identified using univariate analysis. Risk factors with P values less than 0.05 in univariate analysis were included together in a multivariate Logistic regression model using back-forward method. Results: Multiple debridements were performed in 28.6% of all cases. The hospital stay of multiple debridements group was (82.4±46.3) days compared with (40.4±31.5) days in single debridement group (P=0.018). Instrumentation was removed in 6 cases in multiple debridements group and 4 cases in single debridement group (P=0.049). Flap transplantation was performed in 7 cased in multiple debridements group while none in single debridement group (P<0.001). Diabetes, primary operation duration longer than 3 hours, primary operation blood loss more than 400 mL, bacteriology examination results, distant site infection were significantly different between the two groups in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, primary operation duration longer than 3 hours (OR=3.60, 95%CI: 1.12-11.62), diabetes (OR=3.74, 95%CI: 1.06-13.22), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infected (OR=16.87, 95%CI: 2.59-109.73) were the most important risk factors related to multiple debridements in the patients with deep incisional surgical site infection after spinal surgery. Conclusion: Diabetes, primary operation duration more than 3 hours, MRSA infected are independent risk factors for multiple debridements in patients suffering from deep incisional surgical site infection after spinal surgery. Special caution and prophylaxis interventions are suggested for these factors.

Key words: Spine, Surgical wound infection, Debridement, Risk factors

中图分类号: 

  • R619.3

表1

单次清创组与多次清创组相关变量及单因素分析结果(n)"

Items Single debridement Multiple debridement χ2 P
Gender 0.864 0.353
Male 36 17
Female 24 7
Age >60 years old 26 10 0.019 0.889
BMI≥28 22 10 0.182 0.670
Primary operation duration >3 h 16 13 5.735 0.017
Blood loss >400 mL 24 17 6.523 0.011
Segments number 0.120 0.942
2-3 29 12
4-5 27 10
>5 4 2
Systemic inflammatory response 22 13 2.160 0.142
Diabetes 10 9 4.251 0.039
Bacterial culture results 13.581 0.002
MRSA 2 7
Methicillin-sensitive Gram-positive bacteria 20 9
Others 18 8
Distal infection 10 10 6.906 0.015
Diagnosis 3.635 0.162
Tumor 1 1
Trauma 3 4
Degenerative 56 19
Implement used 44 21 1.966 0.161
Surgical approach 0.000 1.000
Posterior 59 23
Anterior and posterior 1 1
Surgical location 5.597 0.061
Cervical 16 2
Thoracic 3 4
Lumbar 41 18

表2

脊柱手术后切口感染行多次清创术的多因素分析"

Items OR 95%CI P
Primary operation duration >3 h 3.60 1.12-11.62 0.032
Diabetes 3.74 1.06-13.22 0.041
Bacterial culture results*
MRSA 16.87 2.59-109.73 0.003
Methicillin-sensitive Gram-positive bacteria 1.66 0.50-5.45 0.407
[1] Pull ter Gunne AF, Mohamed AS, Skolasky RL, et al. The presentation, incidence, etiology, and treatment of surgical site infections after spinal surgery[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010,35(13):1323-1328.
[2] Gerometta A, Rodriguez OJC, Bitan F. Infections in spinal instrumentation[J]. Int Orthop, 2012,36(2):457-464.
pmid: 22218913
[3] Fang XT, Wood KB. Management of postoperative instrumented spinal wound infection[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2013,126(20):3817-3821.
[4] Chen SH, Lee CH, Huang KC, et al. Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: Analysis of long-term treatment outcomes[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015,24(3):561-570.
pmid: 25351841
[5] Pull ter Gunne AF, Hosman AJ, Cohen DB, et al. A methodolo-gical systematic review on surgical site infections following spinal surgery: Part 1: risk factors[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012,37(24):2017-2033.
[6] Cahill PJ, Warnick DE, Lee MJ, et al. Infection after spinal fusion for pediatric spinal deformity: Thirty years of experience at a single institution[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010,35(12):1211-1217.
[7] Kim JI, Suh KT, Kim SJ, et al. Implant removal for the management of infection after instrumented spinal fusion[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010,23(4):258-265.
pmid: 20084022
[8] 仉建国, 李书纲, 杨新宇, 等. 脊柱侧凸后路矫形融合术术后感染的治疗[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2001,21(8):453-456.
[9] Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee[J]. Am J Infect Control, 1999,27(2):97-132; Quiz 133-134; Discussion 96.
pmid: 10196487
[10] Blackmur JP, Tang EY, Dave J, et al. Use of broth cultures peri-operatively to optimise the microbiological diagnosis of musculoskeletal implant infections[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(11):1566-1570.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.33852 pmid: 25371476
[11] Tomov M, Mitsunaga L, Durbin-Johnson B, et al. Reducing surgical site infection in spinal surgery with betadine irrigation and intrawound vancomycin powder[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015,40(7):491-499.
[12] 郑召民, 王冰, 齐强, 等. 脊柱术后切口深部感染内置物的归宿[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2015(11):965-970.
[13] Lonjon G, Dauzac C, Fourniols E, et al. Early surgical site infections in adult spinal trauma: A prospective, multicentre study of infection rates and risk factors[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012,98(7):788-794.
[14] Dubory A, Giorgi H, Walter A, et al. Surgical-site infection in spinal injury: Incidence and risk factors in a prospective cohort of 518 patients[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015,24(3):543-554.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3523-4 pmid: 25148864
[15] Martin ET, Kaye KS, Knott C, et al. Diabetes and risk of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2016,37(1):88-99.
pmid: 26503187
[16] Saeedinia S, Nouri M, Azarhomayoun A, et al. The incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after clean spinal operations: A prospective cohort study and review of the literature[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2015,6:154.
pmid: 26500800
[17] Huysman E, Mathieu C. Diabetes and peripheral vascular disease[J]. Acta Chir Belg, 2009,109(5):587-594.
doi: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680493 pmid: 19994800
[18] Gallacher SJ, Thomson G, Fraser WD, et al. Neutrophil bactericidal function in diabetes mellitus: Evidence for association with blood glucose control[J]. Diabet Med, 1995,12(10):916-920.
pmid: 8846684
[19] Rajagopalan S. Serious infections in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2005,40(7):990-996.
pmid: 15824991
[20] Kim DH, Spencer M, Davidson SM, et al. Institutional prescreening for detection and eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010,92(9):1820-1826.
pmid: 20610773
[21] Takahashi Y, Takesue Y, Uchino M, et al. Value of pre- and postoperative meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening in patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery[J]. J Hosp Infect, 2014,87(2):92-97.
pmid: 24836292
[22] Kalra L, Camacho F, Whitener CJ, et al. Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection in patients with nasal MRSA colonization[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2013,41(12):1253-1257.
pmid: 23973424
[23] Levy PY, Ollivier M, Drancourt M, et al. Relation between nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and surgical site infection in orthopedic surgery: The role of nasal contamination. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2013,99(6):645-651.
pmid: 23992764
[24] Yano K, Minoda Y, Sakawa A, et al. Positive nasal culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a risk factor for surgical site infection in orthopedics[J]. Acta Orthop, 2009,80(4):486-490.
[25] Yano M, Doki Y, Inoue M, et al. Preoperative intranasal mupirocin ointment significantly reduces postoperative infection with Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery[J]. Surg Today, 2000,30(1):16-21.
pmid: 10648077
[26] De Lucas-Villarrubia JC, Lopez-Franco M, Granizo JJ, et al. Strategy to control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus post-operative infection in orthopaedic surgery[J]. Int Orthop, 2004,28(1):16-20.
pmid: 12750847
[27] Veeravagu A, Patil CG, Lad SP, et al. Risk factors for postoperative spinal wound infections after spinal decompression and fusion surgeries[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009,34(17):1869-1872.
[28] Boston KM, Baraniuk S, O’Heron S, et al. Risk factors for spinal surgical site infection, Houston, Texas[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2009,30(9):884-889.
pmid: 19642902
[1] 李君,刘旭红,王工,程程,庄洪卿,杨瑞杰. 手臂位置对射波刀放射治疗脊柱肿瘤患者的剂量学影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 182-186.
[2] 苏俊琪,宋扬,谢尚. 口腔鳞状细胞癌患者修复重建术后感染的病原学特征及感染风险预测模型的构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 68-76.
[3] 许昊,张国栋,范桄溥,陈彧. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后新发心房颤动的血浆预测因子:倾向性评分匹配研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1139-1143.
[4] 牛占岳,薛艳,张静,张贺军,丁士刚. 胃腺瘤性息肉的内镜和病理特点及癌变的危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1122-1127.
[5] 朱敬先,鲁胜楠,蒋艳芳,姜玲,王健全. 老年肩袖损伤手术患者术前肺功能的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 902-906.
[6] 王佳文,刘敬超,孟令峰,张威,刘晓东,张耀光. 间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征患者生活质量及相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 653-658.
[7] 孙争辉,黄晓娟,董靖晗,刘茁,颜野,刘承,马潞林. 临床T1期肾细胞癌肾窦侵犯的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 659-664.
[8] 夏芳芳,鲁芙爱,吕慧敏,杨国安,刘媛. 系统性红斑狼疮伴间质性肺炎的临床特点及相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 266-272.
[9] 刘晓强,杨洋,周建锋,刘建彰,谭建国. 640例单牙种植术对血压和心率影响的队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 390-395.
[10] 侯国进,周方,田耘,姬洪全,张志山,郭琰,吕扬,杨钟玮,张雅文. 后路短节段跨伤椎椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰段爆裂骨折术后再发后凸的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 167-174.
[11] 柯岩,张蔷,马云青,李儒军,陶可,桂先革,李克鹏,张洪,林剑浩. 全髋关节置换术治疗脊柱骨骺发育不良患者Tönnis 3级髋关节骨关节炎的早期疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 175-182.
[12] 孟昭婷,穆东亮. 肺叶切除术中少尿与术后急性肾损伤的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 188-194.
[13] 王迎春,黄永辉,常虹,姚炜,闫秀娥,李柯,张耀鹏,郑炜. 十二指肠乳头息肉良、恶性病变比较及活检准确性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 204-209.
[14] 唐果,龙丽,韩雅欣,彭清,刘佳君,尚华. 类风湿关节炎合并结核感染的临床特点及相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1029-1033.
[15] 陈家丽,金月波,王一帆,张晓盈,李静,姚海红,何菁,李春. 老年发病类风湿关节炎的临床特征及其心血管疾病危险因素分析:一项大样本横断面临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1040-1047.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .