北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 590-593. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.025

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

170例巨指(趾)患者临床特点分析

武竞衡Δ(),田光磊,田萌萌,陈山林   

  1. 北京积水潭医院手外科, 北京 100035
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-05 出版日期:2021-06-18 发布日期:2021-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 武竞衡 E-mail:wujingheng1@gmail.com

Clinical characteristics of 170 cases of macrodactyly

WU Jing-hengΔ(),TIAN Guang-lei,TIAN Meng-meng,CHEN Shan-lin   

  1. Department of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2020-12-05 Online:2021-06-18 Published:2021-06-16
  • Contact: Jing-heng WU E-mail:wujingheng1@gmail.com

摘要:

目的: 分析170例巨指(趾)患者的临床特点。方法: 回顾性分析2006年3月至2019年10月收治的170例巨指(趾)患者的资料,统计分析其发病情况、受累指(趾)的分布及特征、X线及病理检查结果,对基因检测的12例患者进行临床分析。结果: 巨指(趾)的发病与性别和地理分布无明显相关关系。多指(趾)受累是单指(趾)发病的3.9倍,两指(趾)受累多于三指,且多为相邻指(趾);巨指中,中指受累最为多见,其次为示指、拇指;巨趾中,以第2、3趾最多。进展型巨指(趾)多于静止型,且多为出生后即发现。病变的巨指多发生在正中神经支配区(79.4%), 并伴有脂肪浸润,称之为神经区域定向性巨指。巨趾多发生在足底内侧神经支配区(89.1%),脂肪浸润不明显伴有神经增粗,称之为脂肪瘤病性巨趾。仅17例巨指(趾)合并并指(趾)畸形。掌、跖骨肥大仅见于进展型巨指(趾)。12例患者进行PIK3CA基因检测,10例发现基因突变结果阳性,受累组织中基因突变水平在7%~27%。在收集的病变组织检查中,脂肪组织中突变率最高,其次是皮肤和神经组织。患者携带的PIK3CA基因突变均未在患者自身的外周血检测出来。结论: 巨指多发生在正中神经支配区,主要累及中指、示指,并伴有正中神经脂肪浸润;巨趾多发生在足底内侧神经支配区,以第2、3趾多见。神经区域定向性巨指(趾)多发生在手部,而脂肪瘤病性巨指(趾)多发生在足部。巨指(趾)患者中检测到的 PIK3CA基因突变率高达83%;受累脂肪、神经及皮肤组织均为理想的基因检测组织来源。

关键词: 手畸形, 足畸形, 巨指(趾), 先天性, PIK3CA

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics of 170 cases of macrodactyly. Methods: Medical records of 170 macrodactyly patients at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital between March 2006 and October 2019, including demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, anatomical distributions, X-rays, pathological findings, and treatments, were reviewed. PIK3CA mutation analyses of 12 patients were also reviewed. Results: Disease incidence was similar across sex and geographical regions. Multiple-digit involvement was 3.9 times more frequent than single-digit involvement. In upper deformities, the index finger, middle finger and thumb were mostly involved, and the second and third toes were the most affected on the foot. Two digits were affected more often than three digits, with the affected multiple digits were adjacent most time. The cases of progressive macrodactyly, in which the affected digits grew at a faster rate than the unaffected digits, were found more than static type. Most of progressive macrodactyly were noticed at birth. In terms of nerve involvement, affected fingers mostly occurred in the median nerve innervation area (79.4%) accompanied by median nerve and brunches enlargement and fat infiltration, i.e., nerve territory oriented; affected toes mostly occurred in the medial plantar nerve innervation area (89.1%), marked with overgrowth of adipose tissue with a lesser degree of neural overgrowth, i.e., lipomatous. Only 17 cases had comorbid of syndactyly. The metacarpal bones were involved only in progressive type of macrodactyly. Ten of the 12 cases subjected to PIK3CA mutation analysis were positive. Among all tested specimens, PIK3CA mutation levels ranged from 7% to 27%. In terms of tissue sources in which a mutation was found, adipose tissue had the highest mutation detection rate, followed by nerve and skin. All the DNA samples of blood from the 12 PIK3CA mutation-positive patients were negative. Conclusion: Macrodactyly fingers mostly occurred in the median nerve innervation area accompanied by median nerve and brunches enlargement and fat infiltration. The index and middle fingers were mostly involved. Macrodactyly toes mostly occurred in the medial plantar nerve innervation area, marked with overgrowth of adipose tissue with a lesser degree of neural overgrowth. The second and third toes were the most affected on the foot. A high proportion (83%) of isolated macrodactyly patients carry activating PIK3CA mutations. Adipose, nerve, and skin tissues provide the highest PIK3CA mutation detection yield among all types of tissue studied.

Key words: Hand deformities, Foot deformities, Macrodactyly, Congenital, PIK3CA

中图分类号: 

  • R681.1
[1] Ezaki M, Beckwith T, Oishi SN. Macrodactyly: decision-making and surgery timing, involving both hands and both feet[J]. J Hand Surg Eur, 2019,44(1):32-42.
doi: 10.1177/1753193418796441
[2] 武竞衡, 陈山林, 田光磊, 等. 单纯性巨指(趾)症PIK3CA基因突变位点研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018,56(7):538-542.
[3] 武竞衡, 田光磊, 赵俊会, 等. 73例巨指(趾)畸形患者临床疗效分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2008,46(7):514-518.
[4] Kalen V, Burwell DS, Omer GE. Macrodactyly of the hands and feet[J]. J Pediatr Orthop, 1988,8(3):311-315.
doi: 10.1097/01241398-198805000-00011
[5] Barsky AJ. Macrodactyly[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1967,49(7):1255-1266.
pmid: 4293291
[6] Ofodile FA, Oluwasanmi J. Pedal macrodactyly: report of seven cases[J]. East Afr Med J, 1979,56(6):283-287.
pmid: 467302
[7] Khanna N, Gupta S, Khanna S, et al. Macrodactyly[J]. Hand, 1975,7(3):215-222.
pmid: 1205357
[8] Gluck JS, Ezaki M. Surgical treatment of macrodactyly[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2015,40(7):1461-1468.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.017
[9] Ishida O, Ikuta Y. Long-term results of surgical treatment for macrodactyly of the hand[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1998,102(5):1586-1590.
pmid: 9774014
[10] Ezaki M. Insights into the pathogenesis of macrodactyly[J]. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 2019,44(1):25-31.
doi: 10.1177/1753193418790928
[11] Cerrato F, Eberlin KR, Waters P, et al. Presentation and treatment of macrodactyly in children[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2013,38(11):2112-2123.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.095
[12] Hucthagowder V, Shenoy A, Corliss M, et al. Utility of clinical high depth next generation sequencing for somatic variant detection in the PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum[J]. Clin Genet, 2017,91(1):79-85.
doi: 10.1111/cge.2017.91.issue-1
[13] Keppler-Noreuil KM, Sapp JC, Lindhurst MJ, et al. Clinical delineation and natural history of the PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum[J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2014,164A(7):1713-1733.
[14] Freed D, Eric L, Stevens EL, et al. Somatic mosaicism in the human genome[J]. Genes, 2014,5(4):1064-1094.
doi: 10.3390/genes5041064
[15] Keppler-Noreuil KM, Parker VE, Darling TN, et al. Somatic overgro wth disorders of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway & therapeutic strategies[J]. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 2016,172(4):402-421.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31531
[1] 吴君怡,余淼,孙仕晨,樊壮壮,郑静蕾,张刘陶,冯海兰,刘洋,韩冬. 少汗性外胚层发育不良患者EDA基因突变检测及表型分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 24-33.
[2] 李宁宁,季丽娜,晁爽,袁珂,孟洪,黄振宇,张华斌. 新生儿先天性肾脏和泌尿道畸形的超声筛查及随访[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1062-1066.
[3] 王皓,刘洋,刘浩辰,韩冬,冯海兰. 先天性缺牙患者中BMP2基因突变检测及功能分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 9-15.
[4] 李纯青,王东信,韦晓昱. 先天性纤维蛋白原缺乏症产妇的围术期管理:4例报道及文献回顾[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 932-936.
[5] 曲艳吉, 刘小清, 麦劲壮, 聂志强, 欧艳秋, 高向民, 吴勇, 陈寄梅. 不同先天性心脏病类型的环境危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(3): 420-430.
[6] 褚亚明, 周一新, 寇玉辉, 杨德金. 股骨转子下截骨全髋置换术治疗Hartofilakidis C1和C2型髋关节发育不良的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(2): 232-236.
[7] 常杏芝, 金怡汶, 王静敏, 袁云, 熊晖, 王爽, 秦炯. RYR1热点突变筛查在先天性肌病诊断中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(5): 691-697.
[8] 张乐, 孙美平, 高卫线, 洪世欣, 张亚黎. 县、乡级超声医生开展胎儿期复杂先天性心脏病超声筛查的可行性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(3): 373-378.
[9] 张琰琴, 丁洁, 王芳, 张宏文. 儿童遗传性肾脏疾病[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(2): 182-.
[10] 徐佳露, 杨茹莱, 毛华庆, 赵正言. 浙江省不同地域新生儿先天性甲状腺功能低下症筛查分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(5): 816-818.
[11] 姜辉, 田杨, 黄锦, 赵连明, 唐文豪, 洪锴, 毛加明. 重视染色体基因缺陷对男性生育的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(4): 504-506.
[12] Wong KEONG. 超声检查在出生缺陷预防中的应用(英文稿)[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 492-499.
[13] 王延宙, 王晓雯, 张鹏, 王兴山. Ponseti方法在6个月以上先天性马蹄内翻足患儿中的应用(英文稿)[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 452-455.
[14] 李瑛, 刘晓红, 王粉燕, 赵心亮, 张羲, 张运平. 北京61 272例新生儿出生缺陷监测结果分析(英文稿)[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 414-417.
[15] 张琳, 王海宁, 洪天配. 17α-羟化酶缺乏症一例的诊治经验及文献回顾[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(2): 221-222.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .