单侧肾细胞癌根治性切除术后的肾功能代偿

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.04.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探讨单侧肾细胞癌根治性肾切除术(radical nephrectomy,RN)后留存肾肾功能代偿(renal functional compensation,RFC)的影响因素。方法: 回顾性分析286例在北京大学人民医院接受RN的肾细胞癌患者的临床资料,记录术前体重指数(body mass index,BMI)、收缩压、吸烟史、慢性疾病史等基础信息和术前血生化、尿常规、影像学等辅助检查结果。所有患者均在术前行^99m锝-二乙三胺五乙酸(^99mtechnetium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid,^99mTc-DTPA)肾动态显像检查。记录手术方式、术后病理结果和术后1~60个月的血肌酐数值。术前、术后估计肾小球滤过率(estimate the glomerular filtration rate,eGFR)由慢性肾脏疾病流行病学合作组(chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration,CKD-EPI)公式计算,RFC百分比定义为RN术后留存肾eGFR较术前eGFR变化的百分比。采用单因素和多因素线性回归分析确定影响留存肾RFC的独立预测因素。结果: 患者中位年龄61岁,65.4%为男性,83.6%的病例为早期肾细胞癌(T1期和T2期)。18.5%的患者术前合并糖尿病,39.5%合并高血压,19.2%既往有吸烟史,27.6%在术前影像学检查中发现健侧肾囊肿。226例患者行腹腔镜RN,60例行开腹RN。肾透明细胞癌是最主要的病理类型,占88.5%,中位肿瘤最大径为4.5 cm(0.7~13.5 cm)。术后1个月时中位RFC百分比为27%,在随后5年内保持稳定。单因素变量分析结果显示年龄、性别、术前血尿酸水平、术前是否存在蛋白尿、是否存在健侧肾囊肿以及术前健侧肾的分肾功能百分比与RN术后留存肾RFC百分比具有相关性(P<0.05),其中,术前血尿酸水平和术前健侧肾分肾功能百分比与术后RFC百分比呈极强负相关性。多因素线性回归分析结果显示,年龄(P<0.001)、术前血尿酸水平(P<0.001)、术前是否存在蛋白尿(P=0.002)、术前eGFR(P<0.001)和术前健侧肾分肾功能百分比(P<0.001)是术后RFC的独立预测因素。结论: 术前血生化、尿常规和肾动态显像等基本辅助检查对于预测RN术后留存肾的代偿能力意义很大,临床决策时需综合考虑多方面因素对术后基线eGFR的影响。

关键词: 肾细胞癌, 根治性肾切除术, ^99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像, 肾功能性代偿

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate factors influencing renal functional compensation(RFC) of the preserved kidney after radical nephrectomy (RN). Methods: A total of 286 patients treated with RN in Peking University People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), history of smoking, history of chronic diseases and other basic information, as well as preoperative blood biochemistry, urine routine, imaging examination results were recorded. All the patients underwent ^99mtechnetium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (^99mTc-DTPA) renal scans before operation. The surgical method, pathology and blood creatinine values from 1 month to 60 months after RN were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula. Renal functional compensation was defined as percent change in eGFR of the preserved kidney after RN compared with the preoperative eGFR. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify predictive factors of RFC. Results: Median age was 61 years and 65.4% of the patients were male. Early stage (T1 or T2) tumors were found in 83.6% of the cases. 18.5% of the patients had preoperative diabetes mellitus, 39.5% had hypertension, 19.2% had a history of smoking, and 27.6% were found to have renal cyst on the contralateral side. In the study, 226 cases underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and 60 cases underwent open radical nephrectomy. Renal clear cell carcinoma was the most common pathological type, accounting for 88.5%. The median tumor maximum diameter was 4.5 cm (0.7-13.5 cm). Median renal function compensation was 27% one month after radical nephrectomy. Functional stability was then observed to 5 years. The results of univariate analysis showed that age, gender, preoperative blood uric acid, preoperative urine protein, contralateral renal cyst, and percentage of split renal function of contralateral kidney were correlated with RFC (P<0.05). Among them, UA level and split renal function of contralateral kidney were strongly negatively correlated with RFC. The results of multivariate linear regression analysis showed age (P<0.001), blood uric acid (P<0.001), urine protein (P=0.002), preoperative eGFR (P<0.001) and the split renal function of contralateral kidney (P<0.001) were independent predictors of RFC. Conclusion: The basic examinations, such as blood biochemistry, urine routine and renal scan before RN are of great significance in predicting the compen-satory ability of the preserved kidney after RN, which is supposed to be taken into consideration when making clinical decision.

Key words: Renal cell carcinoma, Radical nephrectomy, ^99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging, Renal functional compensation

中图分类号:

R737.11

韩松辰,黄子雄,刘慧鑫,徐涛. 单侧肾细胞癌根治性切除术后的肾功能代偿[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 680-685.

HAN Song-chen,HUANG Zi-xiong,LIU Hui-xin,XU Tao. Renal functional compensation after unilateral radical nephrectomy of renal cell carcinoma[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 680-685.

图/表 5

表1

图1

表2

表3

图2

参考文献 23

[1]	Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.v70.1
[2]	Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, et al. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline [J]. J Urol, 2017, 198(3):520-529. doi: S0022-5347(17)59870-5 pmid: 28479239
[3]	Patel N, Mason P, Rushton S, et al. Renal function and cardiovascular outcomes after living donor nephrectomy in the UK: Qua-lity and safety revisited [J]. BJU Int, 2013, 112(2):134-142.
[4]	Lee SH, Kim DS, Cho S, et al. Comparison of postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate between kidney donors and radical nephrectomy patients, and risk factors for postoperative chronic kidney disease [J]. Int J Urol, 2015, 22(7):674-678. doi: 10.1111/iju.2015.22.issue-7
[5]	Srivastava T, Hariharan S, Alon US, et al. Hyperfiltration-mediated injury in the remaining kidney of a transplant donor [J]. Transplantation, 2018, 102(10):1624-1635. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002304 pmid: 29847501
[6]	Aguilar Palacios D, Caraballo ER, Tanaka H, et al. Compensatory changes in parenchymal mass and function after radical nephrectomy [J]. J Urol, 2020, 204(1):42-49. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000797 pmid: 32073996
[7]	Zabor EC, Furberg H, Lee B, et al. Long-term renal function recovery following radical nephrectomy for kidney cancer: Results from a multicenter confirmatory study [J]. J Urol, 2018, 199(4):921-926. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.027
[8]	Kawamura N, Yokoyama M, Fujii Y, et al. Recovery of renal function after radical nephrectomy and risk factors for postoperative severe renal impairment: A Japanese multicenter longitudinal study [J]. Int J Urol, 2016, 23(3):219-223. doi: 10.1111/iju.13028 pmid: 26663437
[9]	Park BH, Sung HH, Jeong BC, et al. Tumor size is associated with compensatory hypertrophy in the contralateral kidney after radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma [J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2016, 48(6):977-983. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1250-y
[10]	Anderson RG, Bueschen AJ, Lloyd LK, et al. Short-term and long-term changes in renal function after donor nephrectomy [J]. J Urol, 1991, 145(1):11-13. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38232-0
[11]	Okada T, Omoto-Kitao M, Mukamoto M, et al. Compensatory renal growth in uninephrectomized immature rats: Proliferative acti-vity and epidermal growth factor [J]. J Vet Med Sci, 2010, 72(8):975-980. doi: 10.1292/jvms.09-0496
[12]	Shehab AB, Shaheen FA, Fallatah A, et al. Early changes in vo-lume and function of the remaining kidney after unilateral donor nephrectomy [J]. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 1994, 5(4):474-478. pmid: 18583774
[13]	Vergho D, Burger M, Schrammel M, et al. Matched-pair analysis of renal function in the immediate postoperative period: A comparison of living kidney donors versus patients nephrectomized for renal cell cancer [J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33(5):725-731. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1423-1
[14]	Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Sylvester R, et al. Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: Results from EORTC randomized trial 30904 [J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(2):372-377. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044 pmid: 23850254
[15]	Sarkar D, Agrawal A, Agrawal DK. Clinical assessment of stabilisation of renal function after nephrectomy [J/OL]. Urologia, 2021. .
[16]	Takagi T, Mir MC, Sharma N, et al. Compensatory hypertrophy after partial and radical nephrectomy in adults [J]. J Urol, 2014, 192(6):1612-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.018
[17]	Jeon HG, Choo SH, Jeong BC, et al. Uric acid levels correlate with baseline renal function and high levels are a potent risk factor for postoperative chronic kidney disease in patients with renal cell carcinoma [J]. J Urol, 2013, 189(4):1249-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.043
[18]	Cho A, Lee JE, Jang HR, et al. Association between pre-donation serum uric acid concentration and change in renal function after living kidney donation in women [J]. Intern Med J, 2014, 44(12a):1217-1222. doi: 10.1111/imj.12591 pmid: 25266773
[19]	Yim K, Bindayi A, Mckay R, et al. Rising serum uric acid level is negatively associated with survival in renal cell carcinoma [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2019, 11(4):536. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040536
[20]	Khosla UM, Zharikov S, Finch JL, et al. Hyperuricemia induces endothelial dysfunction [J]. Kidney Int, 2005, 67(5):1739-1742. pmid: 15840020
[21]	Guo B, Guo Y, Liu C. Predictive factors of progression in renal function after unilateral nephrectomy in renal malignancy [J]. J buon, 2020, 25(3):1650-1657.
[22]	Zhang Z, Zhao J, Zabell J, et al. Proteinuria in patients undergoing renal cancer surgery: Impact on overall survival and stability of renal function [J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2016, 2(6):616-622.
[23]	杜晓英, 李林法, 何强, 等. ^99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像检测肾小球滤过率的临床应用评价 [J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2006, 22(5):266-270.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Items	Data
Age/years, M (range)	61 (22-85)
Gender, n(%)
Male	187 (65.4)
Femal	99 (34.6)
BMI/(kg/m²), M (range)	24.91 (16.59-41.97)
SBP/mmHg, M (range)	131 (86-188)
Concomitant diabetes mellitus, n(%)
Yes	53 (18.5)
No	233 (81.5)
Concomitant hypertension, n(%)
Yes	113 (39.5)
No	173 (60.5)
Smoking status, n(%)
Current or former	74 (25.9)
Never	212 (74.1)
Alcohol intaking, n(%)
Current or former	55 (19.2)
Never	231 (80.8)
Glucose/(mmol/L), M (range)	5.35 (3.49-13.45)
BUN/(mmol/L), M (range)	5.00 (2.58-16.52)
Scr/((mol/L), M (range)	73 (38-315)
UA/((mol/L), M (range)	329 (107-655)
eGFR [mL/(min·1.73 m²), M (range)	92.35 (17.16-141.88)
SG, M (range)	1.015 (1.000-1.040)
Preoperative proteinuria, n(%)
Positive	37 (12.9)
Negtive	249 (87.1)
Renal cyst of contraleteral side, n(%)
≥1	79 (27.6)
0	207 (72.4)
Renal cyst of affected side, n(%)
≥1	82 (28.7)
0	204 (71.3)
Maximum diameter of tumors/cm, M (range)	4.5 (0.7-13.5)
Histology, n(%)
Clear cell	253 (88.5)
Papillary	6 (2.1)
Chromophobe	9 (3.1)
Others	18 (6.3)
T stage, n(%)
T1	227 (79.4)
T2	12 (4.2)
T3	46 (16.1)
T4	1 (0.3)
Nephrectomy, n(%)
Laparoscopic	226 (79.0)
Open	60 (21.0)

Items	Data
Preoperative
CKD stage, n(%)
Grade 1: eGFR≥90 mL/(min·1.73 m²)		165 (57.7)
Grade 2: eGFR 60-89 mL/(min·1.73 m²)		101 (35.3)
Grade 3: eGFR 30-59 mL/(min·1.73 m²)		18 (6.3)
Grade 4: eGFR 15-29 mL/(min·1.73 m²)		2 (0.7)
eGFR/[mL/(min·1.73 m²)], M (range)
Global		92.3 (17.2-141.9)
Contraleteral kidney		46.6 (9.41-93.3)
Affected kidney		44.9 (7.7-74.0)
rGFR/[mL/(min·1.73 m²)], M (range)
Global		91.2 (24.8-185.30)
Contraleteral kidney		47.4 (14.2-88.7)
Affected kidney		45.2 (8.8-103.5)
Split renal function/%, M (range)
Contraleteral kidney		51 (26-83)
Affected kidney		49 (17-74)
Postoperateve
eGFR/[mL/(min·1.73 m²)], M (range)
1 months		64.1 (15.0-107.0)
3-12 months		63.3 (17.4-123.1)
18-36 months		63.2 (6.3-119.3)
48-60 months		66.6 (6.0-118.0)
RFC/%, M (range)
1 months		27 (-25-67)
3-12 months		28 (-36-69)
24-36 months		26 (-54-60)
48-60 months		26 (-56-70)

Items	Univariable		Multivariable
Items	Coefficient	P value	Coefficient	Standard error	Standardized coefficient	P value
Age	-0.004	0.042	-0.009	0.002	-0.313	<0.001
Gender (Male vs. Female)	0.129	0.004	0.070	0.043	0.094	0.099
BMI	-0.004	0.519	0.001	0.005	0.014	0.794
Smoking (Yes vs. No)	0.001	0.977	0.005	0.044	0.006	0.914
Hypertension (Yes vs. No)	-0.017	0.704	-0.003	0.039	-0.004	0.937
Diabetes mellitus (Yes vs. No)	-0.087	0.112	-0.053	0.048	-0.058	0.266
Preoperative UA	-0.001	<0.001	-0.001	0.218×10^-3	-0.305	<0.001
Preoperative proteinuria (Yes vs. No)	-0.145	0.021	-0.093	0.029	0.157	0.002
Renal cyst of contraleteral side (Yes vs. No)	-0.114	0.016	-0.075	0.040	-0.094	0.060
Preoperative eGFR	-0.001	0.210	-0.008	0.001	-0.420	<0.001
Split renal function of contraleteral kidney	-1.878	<0.001	-2.092	0.250	-0.424	<0.001