北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1115-1121. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

有幽门螺杆菌感染家族史儿童胃部菌群的特点

王子靖,李在玲()   

  1. 北京大学第三医院儿科, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-11 出版日期:2021-12-18 发布日期:2021-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 李在玲 E-mail:topbj163@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    儿童示范性新药临床评价技术平台建设(2017ZX09304029)

Characteristics of gastric microbiota in children with Helicobacter pylori infection family history

WANG Zi-jing,LI Zai-ling()   

  1. Department of Pediatric, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2019-12-11 Online:2021-12-18 Published:2021-12-13
  • Contact: Zai-ling LI E-mail:topbj163@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    Construction of Technical Platform for Clinical Evaluation of Children’s Demonstrative New Drugs(2017ZX09304029)

摘要:

目的:探究有幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori, H. pylori)感染家族史,发生和未发生H. pylori感染的儿童胃部菌群特点。方法:分别采集患儿胃体和胃窦的黏膜标本,通过标本DNA提取、16S核糖体DNA(ribosomal DNA,rDNA)V3-V4区域PCR扩增、高通量测序、数据处理等步骤后,得到胃部黏膜菌群分析结果,将结果中有H. pylori感染家族史的标本根据是否发生H. pylori感染分为感染组(n=18)和非感染组(n=24),比较两组间菌群的α和β多样性、菌群丰度变化等指标,找出差异菌群,并对菌群功能进行预测分析。结果:感染组与非感染组胃部菌群α多样性和β多样性之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05), 感染组的菌群多样性要低于非感染组。菌群相对丰度方面,门水平占优势的主要有变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)、放线菌门(Actinobacteria)和梭杆菌门(Fusobacteria);属水平上,非感染组中拟杆菌(Bacteroides)、普雷沃氏菌(Prevotella)、链球菌(Streptococcus)和奈瑟菌(Neisseria)为优势菌种。差异物种方面,通过LEfSe分析,发现非感染组中属水平的拟杆菌属等的相对丰度显著高于感染组。功能预测发现,拟杆菌属与一些氨基酸和维生素代谢、丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(mitogen-activated protein kinase,MAPK)、哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mammalian target of rapamycin, mTOR)信号通路、安沙霉素(ansamycin)的合成相关通路均呈显著正相关。结论:H. pylori感染家族史的儿童中,发生H. pylori感染和未发生感染者的胃部菌群存在显著差异,拟杆菌可能与儿童是否发生H. pylori感染存在关联。

关键词: 胃肠道微生物组, 儿童, 幽门螺杆菌, 病史记录

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the characteristics of gastric microbiota in children with and without (Helicobacter pylori, H. pylori) infection who had family history of H. pylori infection. Methods: Mucosal biopsy samples of the gastric corpus and gastric antrum were collected during the gastroscope. And the gastric mucosa flora’s information of the two groups of children were obtained after sample DNA extraction, PCR amplification of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) V3-V4 region, high-throughput sequencing and data processing. All the samples with family history of H. pylori infection were divided into two groups, the H. pylori infection group (n=18) and the H. pylori non-infection group (n=24). Then the α-, β-diversity and bacteria abundance of the gastric microbiota were compared between the H. pylori infection and non-infection groups at different taxonomic levels. The differential microbiota was found out by LEfSe analysis, and then the function of microbiota predicted using phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) method. Results: There was statistically significant difference in α-diversity (P<0.05) between the two groups, indicating that the H. pylori non-infection group had higher microbial richness than the H. pylori infection group. Moreover, the β-diversity was significantly different as well (P<0.05), which meant that the microbiota composition of the two groups was different. At the phyla level, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria were dominant in the two groups. At the genus level, Bacteroides, Prevotella, Streptococcus, and Neisseria, etc. were dominant in the H. pylori non-infected group. Meanwhile, Helicobacter and Haemophilus etc. were dominant in the H. pylori infected group. LEfSe analysis showed that the relative abundance of Bacteroides etc. at the genus level in the H. pylori non-infected group was significantly higher than that in the H. pylori infected group. Functional prediction showed that Bacteroides were positively correlated with amino acid and vitamin metabolism, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway and ansamycin synthesis pathway. Conclusion: The gastric microbiota between H. pylori positive and H. pylori negative in children with family history of H. pylori infection is significant different. Some gastric microbiota, such as Bacteroides, may have a potential relationship with H. pylori infection in children.

Key words: Gastrointestinal microbiome, Child, Helicobacter pylori, Medical history taking

中图分类号: 

  • R725.7

图1

家族史阳性的H. pylori感染组和非感染组的α多样性和β多样性比较"

图2

家族史阳性的H. pylori感染组和非感染组物种相对丰度比较"

表1

家族史阳性的H. pylori感染组和非感染组菌群丰度情况"

Items % Items %
Phylum level Genus level
Positive Positive
Proteobacteria 74.16 Helicobacter 61.89
Firmicutes 10.89 Haemophilus 5.16
Bacteroidetes 10.13 Prevotella 5.16
Actinobacteria 2.05 Neisseria 5.11
Fusobacteria 1.89 Streptococcus 5.10
Negative Negative
Firmicutes 33.46 Bacteroides 9.10
Bacteroidetes 32.09 Prevotella 8.25
Proteobacteria 18.99 Escherichia 5.33
Actinobacteria 4.74 Streptococcus 4.00
Fusobacteria 3.51 Rothia 3.75

图3

家族史阳性的H. pylori感染组和非感染组的差异菌群分析"

图4

家族史阳性的H. pylori感染组和非感染组的菌群功能分析"

[1] Misak Z, Hojsak I, Homan M. Review: Helicobacter pylori in pediatrics[J]. Helicobacter, 2019, 24(Suppl 1):e12639.
[2] Weyermann M, Rothenbacher D, Brenner H. Acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection in early childhood: Independent contributions of infected mothers, fathers, and siblings[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2009, 104(1):182-189.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.61 pmid: 19098867
[3] Ueno T, Suzuki H, Hirose M, et al. Influence of living environment during childhood on Helicobacter pylori infection in Japanese young adults[J]. Digestion, 2020, 101(6):779-784.
doi: 10.1159/000502574
[4] Polk DB, Peek RM. Helicobacter Pylori: Gastric cancer and beyond[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2010, 10(6):403-414.
doi: 10.1038/nrc2857
[5] Waskito LA, Salama NR, Yamaoka Y. Pathogenesis of Helicobac-ter pylori infection[J]. Helicobacter, 2018, 23(Suppl 1):e12516.
doi: 10.1111/hel.2018.23.issue-S1
[6] Yan R, Guo Y, Gong Q, et al. Microbiological evidences for gastric cardiac microflora dysbiosis inducing the progression of inflammation[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 35(6):1032-1041.
doi: 10.1111/jgh.v35.6
[7] 中华医学会儿科学分会消化学组, 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 儿童幽门螺杆菌感染诊治专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015, 53(7):496-498.
[8] Llorca L, Pérez-Pérez G, Urruzuno P, et al. Characterization of the gastric microbiota in a pediatric population according to Helicobacter pylori status[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2017, 36(2):173-178.
doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001383 pmid: 27820723
[9] 彭贤慧, 周丽雅, 何利华, 等. 幽门螺杆菌感染者胃内菌群特征分析[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2017, 26(6):658-663.
[10] Bik EM, Eckburg PB, Gill SR, et al. Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomach[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006, 103(3):732-737.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506655103
[11] Bruno G, Rocco G, Zaccari P, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric dysbiosis: Can probiotics administration be useful to treat this condition?[J]. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol, 2018, 2018:6237239.
[12] Delgado S, Leite AM, Ruas-Madiedo P, et al. Probiotic and technological properties of Lactobacillus spp. strains from the human stomach in the search for potential candidates against gastric microbial dysbiosis[J]. Front Microbiol, 2015, 5:766.
[13] Ascencio F, Gama NL, Philippis RD, et al. Effectiveness of Cyanothece spp. and Cyanospira capsulata exocellular polysaccharides as antiadhesive agents for blocking attachment of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric cells[J]. Folia Microbiol (Praha), 2004, 49(1):64-70.
doi: 10.1007/BF02931648
[14] Lorca GL, Wadstrom T, Valdez GF, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus autolysins inhibit Helicobacter pylori in vitro[J]. Curr Micro-biol, 2001, 42(1):39-44.
[15] Nedenskov P. Nutritional requirements for growth of Helicobacter pylori[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1994, 60(9):3450-3453.
doi: 10.1128/aem.60.9.3450-3453.1994
[16] Hayashi S, Sugiyama T, Asaka M, et al. Modification of Helicobacter pylori adhesion to human gastric epithelial cells by antiadhesion agents[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 1998, 43(Suppl 9):56S-60S.
[17] Dunne C, Dolan B, Clyne M. Factors that mediate colonization of the human stomach by Helicobacter pylori[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(19):5610-5624.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i19.5610
[18] Slomiany BL, Slomiany A. Involvement of p38 MAPK-dependent activator protein (AP-1) activation in modulation of gastric mucosal inflammatory responses to Helicobacter pylori by ghrelin[J]. Inflammopharmacology, 2013, 21(1):67-78.
doi: 10.1007/s10787-012-0141-9 pmid: 22669511
[1] 闫辉,逄璐,李雪迎,杨文双,蒋世菊,刘平,闫存玲. 单中心就诊2~18岁儿童胆固醇水平异常发生率及病因分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 217-221.
[2] 张宏,董继元,王建军,范临夏,曲强,刘洋. 兰州市臭氧对儿童哮喘的短期影响及其季节性差异[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 227-235.
[3] 冯莎蔚,国慧,王勇,赵一姣,刘鹤. 乳牙数字化参考牙冠模型的初步构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 327-334.
[4] 刘雅菲,宋琳琳,邢茂炜,蔡立新,王东信. 全身麻醉下小儿开颅术术中心脏前负荷动态指标的一致性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 946-951.
[5] 陈曼曼,杨招庚,苏彬彬,李艳辉,高迪,马莹,马涛,董彦会,马军. 中山市儿童青少年青春期身高生长突增规律[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 506-510.
[6] 杨雪,孙伟,王哲,姬爱平,白洁. 儿童和青少年牙外伤急诊患者临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 384-389.
[7] 张子一,夏斌,徐明明,李毅萍,唐瞻贵,陈泳清. 湖南韶山地区儿童口腔卫生干预效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 913-918.
[8] 陈小贤,钟洁,闫文娟,张红梅,姜霞,黄芊,薛世华,刘星纲. 树脂冠修复乳前牙的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 907-912.
[9] 李军,顾芳,李在玲,吕愈敏. 北京单中心回顾性分析儿童肠镜临床特点及疾病谱12年演变[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 819-823.
[10] 陶春燕,李红霞,李雪迎,唐朝枢,金红芳,杜军保. 体位性心动过速综合征儿童及青少年在直立试验中血流动力学变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 414-421.
[11] 高玲,刘云,杨旭东. 鼻喷右美托咪定在儿童口腔门诊全身麻醉前的镇静效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 1078-1082.
[12] 吴鹏辉,谢瑶,赵卫红,华瑛,孙青,李硕,吴晔,卢新天. 血液病/肿瘤患儿并发可逆性后部白质脑病综合征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 662-665.
[13] 董彦会,宋逸,董彬,邹志勇,王政和,杨招庚,王西婕,李艳辉,马军. 2014年中国7~18岁学生血压状况与营养状况的关联分析——基于中国儿童青少年血压评价标准[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 422-428.
[14] 陈天麒,董彬,张文静,高迪思,董彦会,马军,马迎华. 儿童青少年睡眠时间与速度和耐力成绩的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 429-435.
[15] 王潇,王欣,秦满. 唾液基质金属蛋白酶2、9与儿童龋病相关性的初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 527-531.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .