北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 315-319. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.02.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

经锁孔入路显微外科切除腰椎管肿瘤54例临床研究

林国中,马长城(),吴超,司雨   

  1. 北京大学第三医院神经外科,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-19 出版日期:2022-04-18 发布日期:2022-04-13
  • 通讯作者: 马长城 E-mail:ma2001612@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都临床特色应用研究项目(Z171100001017120);国家自然科学基金(81601200)

Microscopic resection of lumbar intraspinal tumor through keyhole approach: A clinical study of 54 cases

LIN Guo-zhong,MA Chang-cheng(),WU Chao,SI Yu   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2020-01-19 Online:2022-04-18 Published:2022-04-13
  • Contact: Chang-cheng MA E-mail:ma2001612@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Capital Foundation for Clinical Characteristics and Application Research(Z171100001017120);National Natural Science Foundation of China(81601200)

摘要:

目的: 探讨经微通道锁孔显微手术切除腰椎管肿瘤的可行性和关键技术。方法: 回顾性分析2017年2月至2019年9月纳入研究的54例腰椎管肿瘤患者的临床资料,包括硬膜外肿瘤8例,硬膜内外肿瘤3例,髓外硬膜下肿瘤43例(脊髓圆锥腹侧肿瘤3例),肿瘤长径0.5~3.0 cm。患者的临床症状包括:相应神经支配区疼痛49例,肿瘤所在节段及以下感觉障碍(麻木)5例,肢体无力7例,大小便功能障碍2例。患者均采用显微镜下微通道锁孔技术进行手术。结果: 微通道下半椎板切除37例,半侧椎板间开窗14例,半椎板切除或半侧椎板间开窗+小关节内侧1/4切除3例,所有患者的肿瘤均得以全切除。手术时间75~135 min,平均93.3 min;术后住院时间4~7 d,平均5.7 d。术后组织病理检查结果为神经鞘瘤34例,脊膜瘤4例,室管膜瘤9例,肠源性囊肿1例,畸胎瘤/皮样囊肿/表皮样囊肿5例,副神经节瘤1例。所有患者术后无感染,无脑脊液漏,4例患者出现相应神经支配区的麻木感,1例患者出现排尿困难,其余患者无神经功能障碍加重。术后随访3~33个月,平均14.4个月,5例术后症状加重的患者均恢复正常,49例术前有疼痛症状者均完全缓解,7例术前肌力减退者和2例术前大小便功能障碍者均恢复正常,5例术前感觉减退者中有4例完全恢复,1例仍残余轻度感觉减退。未见脊柱不稳定或畸形,未见肿瘤复发或残留。按McCormick分级,均为Ⅰ级。结论: 经微通道锁孔显微手术切除腰椎管肿瘤应适当选择病例,两个节段以下的腰椎管髓外肿瘤(包括部分脊髓圆锥腹侧肿瘤)通过微通道技术可Ⅰ期全切除。微通道技术有利于保留腰椎的正常结构和肌肉附着,有利于保持腰椎的完整性及稳定性。

关键词: 微通道, 半椎板切除术, 椎管内肿瘤, 微创性外科手术

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the feasibility and key technology of microscopic resection of lumbar intraspinal tumor through microchannel keyhole approach. Methods: The clinical features, imaging characteristics and surgical methods of 54 cases of lumbar intraspinal tumor which were microscopically operated by microchannel from February 2017 to September 2019 were reviewed and analyzed. There were 8 cases of extradural tumor, 3 cases of extra-and intradural tumor and 43 cases of subdural extramedullary tumor (including 3 cases of ventral spinal tumor). The tumors were 0.5-3.0 cm in diameter. The clinical symptoms included 49 cases of pain in the corresponding innervation area, 5 cases of sensory disturbance (numbness) at or below the tumor segment, 7 cases of limb weakness and 2 cases of urination and defecation dysfunction. Results: In the study, 37 tumors were resected through hemilaminectomy, 14 tumors were resected through interlaminar fenestration, 3 tumors were resected through hemilaminectomy or interlaminar fenestration combined with facetectomy of medial 1/4 facet. All of the 54 tumors were totally resected. The operation time was 75-135 min, with an average of 93.3 min. The postoperative hospital stay was 4-7 days, with an average of 5.7 days. Postoperative pathology included 34 cases of schwannoma, 4 cases of meningioma, 9 cases of ependymoma, 1 case of enterogenous cyst, 5 cases of teratoma/epidermoid/dermoid cyst, and 1 case of paraganglioma. No infection or cerebrospinal fluid leakage was found after operation. No neurological dysfunction occurred except 1 case of urination dysfunction and 4 cases of limb numbness. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 33 months with an average of 14.4 months. Five patients with new onset symptoms returned to normal. The pain symptoms of 49 patients were completely relieved; 4 of 5 patients with hypoesthesia recovered completely, the other 1 patient had residual mild hypoesthesia; 7 patients with limb weakness, and 2 patients with urination and defecation dysfunction recovered to normal. No spinal instability or deformity was found, and no recurrence or residual tumors were found. According to McCormick classification, they were of all grade Ⅰ. Conclusion: The lumbar intraspinal extramedullary tumors within two segments (including the ventral spinal tumors) can be totally resected at stage Ⅰ through microchannel keyhole approach with appropriate selection of the cases. Microchannel technique is beneficial to preserve the normal structure and muscle attachment of lumbar spine, and to maintain the integrity and stability of lumbar spine.

Key words: Microchannel, Hemilaminectomy, Intraspinal tumor, Minimally invasive surgical procedures

中图分类号: 

  • R739.4

图1

腰椎管硬膜内外神经鞘瘤"

[1] 林国中, 马长城, 吴超. 显微镜下微通道锁孔技术在椎管肿物手术中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2019, 19(6):494-497.
[2] 马长城, 王振宇. 半椎板切除入路治疗颈椎管哑铃型肿瘤[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2001, 1(6):336-337.
[3] 吴超, 王振宇, 林国中, 等. 颈椎单侧半椎板及不同程度小关节切除术后生物力学变化的有限元分析[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2018, 17(4):352-356.
[4] 林国中, 王振宇, 谢京城, 等. 半椎板入路显微手术治疗颈椎椎管内肿瘤[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2010, 15(7):390-392.
[5] Zairi F, Nzokou A, Sunna T, et al. Minimally invasive costotransversectomy for the resection of large thoracic dumbbell tumors[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2017, 31(2):179-183.
doi: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1233317
[6] Mende K, Krätzig T, Mohme M, et al. Keyhole approaches to intradural pathologies[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 43(2):E5.
[7] Reisch R, Koechlin N, Marcus H. Minimally invasive keyhole approaches in spinal intradural tumor surgery: report of two cases and conceptual considerations[J]. J Neurosurg Sci, 2016, 60(3):392-397.
[8] Turel MK, D’Souza WP, Rajshekhar V. Hemilaminectomy approach for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: An analysis of 164 patients[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2015, 39(2):E9.
[9] Kaya RA. Surgical excition of spinal intradural meningiomas through a single-sided minimally invasive approach: Key-hole laminotomy[J]. Asian Spine J, 2015, 9(2):225-231.
doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.2.225
[10] 林国中, 马长城, 吴超. 显微镜下微通道锁孔技术切除脊髓腹侧肿瘤[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 20(1):52-54.
[11] Xu J, Liu C, Lin Y, et al. Microscopic minimally invasive keyhole technique for surgical resection of spinal dumbbell tumors[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 109:e110-e117.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.114
[12] 林国中, 王振宇, 刘彬, 等. 硬膜外哑铃形神经鞘瘤的手术治疗[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2018, 18(9):783-786.
[13] Zhuang Y, Cai G, Fu C, et al. Novel combination of paraspinal keyhole surgery with a tubular retractor system leads to significant improvements in lumbar intraspinal extramedullary schwannomas[J]. Oncol Lett, 2017, 14(6):7873-7879.
[14] Ito K, Aoyama T, Horiuchi T, et al. Utility of nonpenetrating titanium clips for dural closure during spinal surgery to prevent postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 23(6):812-819.
doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141215
[15] 林国中, 王振宇, 刘斌. 神经电生理监测技术在椎管内病变术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(5):776-779.
[1] 林国中,王振宇,刘彬,杨邵敏. 腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤椎管内转移1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1165-1168.
[2] 孙建军,杨军,谢京城,常青,马长城,郑梅,LIAO Hung-I,王涛,陈晓东,韩芸峰,林国中,于涛,张嘉,司雨. 少节段和多节段髓内肿瘤的临床对照[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 840-850.
[3] 许力,胡明洁,李玉玉,屈洪党,钱伟东,刘晓林. 圆锥马尾部黏液乳头型室管膜瘤继发中枢神经系统表面铁沉积症1例报道及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 769-774.
[4] 陈立华,杨艺,魏群,李运军,李文德,高进宝,于斌,赵浩,徐如祥. 颞下-乙状窦后联合锁孔入路显微手术治疗岩斜区脑膜瘤[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 738-742.
[5] 高阳旭,张宏武,沈笠雪,刘宝富,姚红新. 2例小儿颅内恶性肿瘤合并血友病A的围手术期处理[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 1037-1038.
[6] 肖宗宇, 陈晓娟, 杨艺, 徐如祥. 肿瘤干细胞样细胞RNA致敏树突状细胞治疗大鼠9L脑肿瘤[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(4): 661-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张岩, 霍勇. 推动我国医疗急救体系建设:从急性心肌梗死救治开始[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(6): 829 -831 .
[2] 郭应禄. 夯实人才培养,实现我国泌尿外科奋斗目标[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 633 -634 .
[3] 刘承,马潞林. 前入路机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术中改善排尿控制的经验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 635 -639 .
[4] 于妍斐,何世明,吴宇财,熊盛炜,沈棋,李妍妍,杨风,何群,李学松. 延胡索酸水合酶缺陷型肾细胞癌的临床病理特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 640 -646 .
[5] 王立新, 许晓, 倪耀丰, 孙海涛, 余日月, 魏世成. 载药脂质体修饰的聚醚醚酮植入物的抑菌和骨整合性能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 758 -763 .
[6] 敖英芳. 我国运动医学发展与北京冬奥会和健康中国建设[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 823 -827 .
[7] 蒋青,张雨. 新形势下运动损伤特点及细胞生物治疗的应用前景和挑战[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 828 -831 .
[8] 王新宇,崔哲,和清源,邓湘宁,郭歌,冯新恒,冯杰莉. 斑点追踪技术评价中国优秀男子举重运动员心脏的改变[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 832 -837 .
[9] 张学武. 痛风关节炎治疗中几个备受关注的问题[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1017 -1019 .
[10] 娄雪,廖莉,李兴珺,王楠,刘爽,崔若玫,徐健. 类风湿关节炎患者外周血TWEAK基因启动子区甲基化状态及其表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1020 -1025 .