Email Alert | RSS

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 699-704. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.04.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷的研制及临床应用

谢晓炜1,2,李芬1,凌光辉1,谢希1,许素清1,2,陈谊月1,2,*()   

  1. 1. 中南大学湘雅二医院风湿免疫科，长沙 410011
    2. 中南大学湘雅二医院临床护理教研室，长沙 410011
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-14 出版日期:2022-08-18 发布日期:2022-08-11
  • 通讯作者: 陈谊月 E-mail:chenyiyue01@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省财政厅医疗卫生与计划生育项目(湘财社指[2018]95号)

Development and clinical application of the health education knowledge assessment questionnaire for gout

Xiao-wei XIE1,2,Fen LI1,Guang-hui LING1,Xi XIE1,Su-qing XU1,2,Yi-yue CHEN1,2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
    2. Department of Clinical Nursing, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
  • Received:2021-08-14 Online:2022-08-18 Published:2022-08-11
  • Contact: Yi-yue CHEN E-mail:chenyiyue01@csu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the Medical Health and Family Planning Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Finance(湘财社指[2018]95号)

RICH HTML

 9   

PDF (PC)

124

摘要：

目的: 编制痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷并检测其信效度，调查痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度。方法: 选择2019年1—6月入住中南大学湘雅二医院风湿免疫科的痛风患者150例，根据文献回顾及痛风患者健康教育需求调查初步形成健康教育知识体系框架，通过2轮的德尔菲(Delphi)专家函询得到预试问卷，对150名痛风患者进行测量，问卷项目的分析与筛选采用变异系数法、决断值分析、条目与总分的相关系数法、探索性因素分析法。信度采用内部一致性信度、分半信度进行评价。效度检验主要包括内容效度、建构效度。另选择2019年6—12月中南大学湘雅二医院住院及门诊痛风患者150例调查痛风患者健康教育知识知晓情况。结果: 问卷一级指标的指标重要性为3.83~5.00，二级指标的指标重要性为3.00~4.83，各条目的变异系数为0.31~1.23，问卷各条目决断值(critical ratio, CR)为3.168~8.333。研究各条目与总分的Pearson相关系数为0.319~0.544。经探索性因素分析后，4个维度均有题目删除，最后问卷共有16个条目。问卷的Cronbach’ s α系数为0.715，分半信度Spearman-Brown系数为0.785。问卷各因素与总问卷之间的相关系数为0.300~0.701，问卷各条目与各因素之间的相关系数为0.402~0.732，结果具有统计学意义(P均＜0.05)。经问卷调查，痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷总得分为(6.85±3.22)分，痛风相关知识得分为(2.03±1.24)分，饮食指导得分为(1.53±1.06)分，运动指导得分为(2.19±1.24)分，药物指导得分为(1.24±1.22)分。结论: 痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷对于测量相关内容方面具有较好的信度及效度，编制过程较科学，涉及内容较全面，可进一步应用于临床。痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度较低，对痛风药物相关知识尤为缺乏。

关键词: 痛风, 健康教育, 问卷, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective: To develop and test the health education knowledge assessment questionnaire for gout and to investigate the understanding degree of health education knowledge in patients with gout. Methods: From June 2019 to June 2019, 150 cases of gout patients were enrolled.According to the literature review and the healthy education requirements of gout patients, the framework of education knowledge system was preliminarily formed.The pre-test questionnaire was obtained through two rounds of he Delphi technique.A survey of 150 patients with gout was carried out.The analysis and selection of the questionnaire were based on the coefficient of variation, the analysis of determination value, the correlation coefficient of the items and the total scores, and the exploratory factor analysis.In this study, we evaluated the reliability of internal consistency, semi-reliability.Validity test mainly included content validity and construct validity.In addition, a total of 150 patients with gout in our hospital and outpatient gout were selected to investigate the understanding degree of health education knowledge from June 2019 to December 2019. Results: The significance of the first level index of the questionnaire was 3.83-5.00, the secondary index was 3.00-4.83, and the variation coefficient of each item was 0.31-1.23, and the critical ratio(CR) value of each item in this questionnaire was 3.168-8.333.The Pearson correlation coefficient of each item and the total score of this study was 0.319-0.544.After exploratory factor analysis, some topics were deleted in four dimensions, and there were 16 entries in the final questionnaire.Cronbach' s α coefficient of this questionnaire was 0.715, split-half reliability Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.785, and retest reliability coefficient was 0.729. The correlation coefficient between each factor of this questionnaire and the total questionnaire was 0.300-0.701, and the correlation coefficient between each item of the questionnaire and each factor was 0.402-0.732, all P < 0.05. The results were statistically significant. By questionnaire investigation, the total score of questionnaire was (6.85±3.22), the score of disease-related knowledge was (2.03±1.24), the score of dietary guidance was (1.53± 1.06), the score of exercise guidance was (2.19±1.24), the score of medication guide was (1.24±1.22). Conclusion: The Health Education Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire For Gout has a good reliability and validity for measuring related content, the compilation process is scientific and the content is comprehensive, which can be further applied in clinic.The understanding degree of health education knowledge is low in Chinese patients with gout, and knowledge of gout medicine is lacking especially.

Key words: Gout, Health education, Questionnaire, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号: 

  • R169.1

表1

问卷各条目与各因素之间的因子负荷矩阵"

Items Disease-related knowledge Items Dietary guidance Items Exercise guidance Items Medication guide
3 0.513# 12 0.402# 18 0.599# 22 0.571#
5 0.608# 15 0.651# 19 0.729# 25 0.605#
7 0.732# 16 0.677# 20 0.692# 26 0.624#
8 0.655# 17 0.611# 21 0.632# 27 0.606#

表2

问卷各因素与总问卷之间的相关系数矩阵"

Factors Disease-related knowledge Dietary guidance Exercise guidance Medication guide Total questionnaire
Disease-related knowledge 1
Dietary guidance 0.379# 1
Exercise guidance 0.321# 0.300# 1
Medication guide 0.302# 0.393# 0.362# 1
Total questionnaire 0.701# 0.697# 0.692# 0.685# 1
1 Sun M , Vazquez AI , Reynolds RJ , et al. Untangling the complex relationships between incident gout risk, serum urate, and its comorbidities[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2018, 20 (1): 90.
doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1558-3
2 Kuo CF , Grainge MJ , Zhang W , et al. Global epidemiology of gout: Prevalence, incidence and risk factors[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2015, 11 (11): 649- 662.
doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.91
3 Neogi T , Jansen TL , Dalbeth N , et al. 2015 gout classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2015, 74 (10): 1789- 1798.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208237
4 曾学军. 《2015年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿联盟痛风分类标准》解读[J]. 中华临床免疫和变态反应杂志, 2015, 9 (4): 235- 238.
5 Hirsch JD , Lee SJ , Terkeltaub R , et al. Evaluation of an instrument assessing influence of gout on health-related quality of life[J]. J Rheumatol, 2008, 35 (12): 2406- 2414.
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080506
6 Spaetgens B , Pustjens T , Scheepers LEJM , et al. Knowledge, illness perceptions and stated clinical practice behaviour in management of gout: A mixed methods study in general practice[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2016, 35 (8): 2053- 2061.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3212-2
7 Zhang LY , Schumacher HR , Su HH , et al. Development and evaluation of a survey of gout patients concerning their knowledge about gout[J]. J Clin Rheumatol, 2011, 17 (5): 242- 248.
doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e318228b4e2
8 Harrold LR , Mazor KM , Peterson D , et al. Patients'knowledge and beliefs concerning gout and its treatment: A population based study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2012, 13, 180.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-180
9 卢丽琴, 卢洪敏. 痛风患者的健康教育及康复护理干预[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2010, 25 (16): 1527- 1528.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6975.2010.16.045
10 Day RO , Frensham LJ , Nguyen AD , et al. Effectiveness of an electronic patient-centred self-management tool for gout sufferers: A cluster randomised controlled trial protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7 (10): e017281.
11 徐小青, 郑国华. 授权教育在痛风患者健康教育中的应用[J]. 全科护理, 2015, 13 (35): 3628- 3629.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4748.2015.35.046
12 闫冬菊. 痛风患者的社区健康教育效果评价[J]. 中国社区医师(医学专业), 2012, 14 (311): 402.
13 FitzGerald JD , Dalbeth N , Mikuls T , et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the management of gout[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2020, 72 (6): 744- 760.
doi: 10.1002/acr.24180
14 Fu T , Cao H , Yin R , et al. Depression and anxiety correlate with disease-related characteristics and quality of life in Chinese patients with gout: A case-control study[J]. Psychol Health Med, 2018, 23 (4): 400- 410.
15 Rogenmoser S , Arnold MH . Chronic gout: Barriers to effective management[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2018, 47 (6): 351- 356.
doi: 10.31128/AJGP-11-17-4384
16 Li QH , Dai L , Li ZX , et al. Questionnaire survey evaluating disease-related knowledge for 149 primary gout patients and 184 doctors in South China[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2013, 32 (11): 1633- 1640.
17 风湿免疫疾病慢病管理全国护理协作组. 强直性脊柱炎患者慢性病管理护理专家建议(2019版)[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2020, 24 (5): 292- 296.
[1] 叶一林,刘恒,潘利平,柴卫兵. 全膝关节置换术后假体周围痛风发作误诊1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(2): 362-365.
[2] 王昱,张慧敏,邓雪蓉,刘伟伟,陈璐,赵宁,张晓慧,宋志博,耿研,季兰岚,王玉,张卓莉. 尿枸橼酸定量检测在原发性痛风患者肾结石诊断中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1134-1140.
[3] 徐菱忆,惠淼,朱树宏,杨照,李梦蕊,杨宏宇,郑茜子,吕继成,杨莉. 社区慢性肾脏病的筛查与管理现状[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(5): 1056-封三.
[4] 闵鹤葳,吴一波,孙昕霙. 我国18岁及以上人群家庭健康功能、大五人格与吸烟的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(3): 483-489.
[5] 彭喆,丁亚敏,裴林,姚海红,张学武,唐素玫. 痛风患者发生关节及肌腱内晶体沉积的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1067-1071.
[6] 张学武. 痛风关节炎治疗中几个备受关注的问题[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1017-1019.
[7] 王贵红,左婷,李然,左正才. 瑞巴派特在大鼠痛风性关节炎急性发作中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 716-720.
[8] 李雪莹, 毛康娜, 弭小艺, 高玲玲, 杨晓, 陶惠芬, 张迎武, 陈敬, 王行, 沈丽娟, 袁洁铃, 苗淼, 周虹. 育儿胜任感量表在学龄前儿童母亲中应用的信效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 479-484.
[9] 谢一帆,王昱,邓雪蓉,耿研,季兰岚,张卓莉. 影响双能CT尿酸盐结晶检出率的因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 261-265.
[10] 王昱,邓雪蓉,季兰岚,张晓慧,耿研,张卓莉. 超声检测痛风患者肌腱受累的危险因素和诊断价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 143-149.
[11] 周行红,黄莹,袁超,郑树国,张杰,张建国. 1 483名北京市居民对口腔癌及相关知识的认知情况调查[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(2): 323-331.
[12] 季兰岚,郝燕捷,张卓莉. 原发性骨髓纤维化引起的继发性痛风1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 50(6): 1117-1119.
[13] 吴双胜，杨鹏，李海月，马春娜，王全意. 传染病健康素养水平与传染病症状发生之间的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 937-940.
[14] 秦东亮，金宪宁，王世娟，王菁菁，娜扎开提·买买提，王富江，王莹，申梓安，盛立刚，Mikael Forsman，杨丽云，王生，张忠彬，何丽华. 作业人员姿势负荷评价信效度分析及与肌肉骨骼疾患关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 488-494.
[15] 张倩茹，王昱，张卓莉. 2015 ACR/EULAR痛风分类标准与既往标准诊断价值的比较研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(6): 979-984.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王军, 肖水芳, 秦永, 王全桂, 陈丽. 以面神经麻痹为首诊表现的Wegener肉芽肿病一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 434 -436 .
[2] 柳晓辉, 那加, 刘玲玲, 罗斌. 头颈部血管肉瘤3例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2001, 33(3): 288 -289 .
[3] 张震康. 口腔医学科学研究的重要进展和方向[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2002, 34(2): 97 -98 .
[4] 梁成, 王兴, 伊彪, 李自力, 王晓霞. 骨性颞下颌关节强直伴小颌畸形及阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的牵引成骨治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2002, 34(2): 112 -116 .
[5] 张勇, 栾庆先. 牙周维护治疗在保持牙周长期疗效中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(1): 29 -33 .
[6] 夏永华, 刘冬, 张彩凤, 付丹丹, 李敏, 李占国, 田中伟. NF-κB信号通路的阻断对皮肤鳞癌SCL-1细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(2): 179 -182 .
[7] 孙宇, 刘毅强, 冯国双, 李吉友. 转化生长因子β1在萎缩性胃炎发生中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(6): 635 -639 .
[8] 张少衡, 贾竹青, 郭静萱, 张萍, 马康涛, 王淑玲, 刘永刚, 李凌松, 周春燕. 骨髓细胞移植上调血管内皮生长因子及其受体的表达并改善缺血心脏功能[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2003, 35(4): 429 -433 .
[9] 李文海, 张建中. 二期梅毒皮疹中梅毒螺旋体基因检测和浸润细胞研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2003, 35(5): 485 -487 .
[10] 李海霞, 屈晨雪, 徐国宾, 闫存玲, 张国华, 李传保, 王建中, 夏铁安. 检验科SARS标本检测安全管理介绍[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2003, 35(z1): 92 -94 .
ISSN 1671-167X
CN 11-4691/R
主管单位：中华人民共和国教育部
主办单位：北京大学
地址： 北京市海淀区学院路38号 北京大学医学部 《北京大学学报（医学版）》
邮编：100191
电话：010-82801551
Email： xbbjb2@bjmu.edu.cn

《北京大学学报（医学版）》
微信公众号
版权所有 © 2018 《北京大学学报（医学版）》编辑部