北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 270-275. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.02.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

JAK/STAT信号通路在卵巢高级别浆液性癌中的激活及预后意义

杨菁1,杜娟1,2,王玉湘1,2,刘从容1,2,*()   

  1. 1. 北京大学第三医院病理科, 北京 100191
    2. 北京大学基础医学院病理学系, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-19 出版日期:2023-04-18 发布日期:2023-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 刘从容 E-mail:congrong_liu@hsc.pku.edu.cn

Activation of JAK/STAT in ovarian high-grade serous cancers and its prognostic significance

Jing YANG1,Juan DU1,2,Yu-xiang WANG1,2,Cong-rong LIU1,2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Peking University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2022-09-19 Online:2023-04-18 Published:2023-04-12
  • Contact: Cong-rong LIU E-mail:congrong_liu@hsc.pku.edu.cn

摘要:

目的: Janus激酶(Janus kinase, JAK)、信号转导和转录活化因子(signal transducers and activators of transcription, STAT)构成的JAK/STAT信号通路的活化与卵巢高级别浆液性癌(high-grade serous carcinoma, HGSC)的预后和靶向治疗密切相关。本研究力求通过简单易行的检测手段, 评估JAK/STAT信号通路的活化在卵巢HGSC中的预后意义。方法: 运用免疫组织化学染色方法, 对73例卵巢HGSC的病理切片进行磷酸化STAT3(pSTAT3)和磷酸化STAT5(pSTAT5)染色, 并对二者的染色强度及染色范围进行定量评估。以此为标准, 将HGSC病例分为pSTAT3低/高表达组以及pSTAT5低/高表达组, 并对不同分组的患者预后情况进行分析, 探究pSTAT3和pSTAT5的表达与HGSC预后的关系。结果: 部分卵巢HGSC存在pSTAT3和pSTAT5蛋白的高表达, 且二者的表达与HGSC的预后相关。pSTAT3和pSTAT5蛋白的表达水平在预后较好组(生存期≥3年)和预后较差组(生存期 < 3年)中的差异有统计学意义, 伴有pSTAT3高表达、或pSTAT5高表达、或pSTAT3和pSTAT5皆高表达的HGSC病例预后更差, 表现为疾病无进展生存期以及总生存期均显著低于对应的低表达组(P < 0.001)。结论: 通过pSTAT3、pSTAT5蛋白的免疫组织化学染色, 可以实现对卵巢HGSC患者进行风险评估, 可协助判断预后同时筛选高危人群, 为STAT抑制剂及抗血管生成药物的适用人群提供有益的参考指标。

关键词: 信号转导和转录激活因子, Janus激酶类, 卵巢肿瘤, 高级别浆液性癌

Abstract:

Objective: The activation of Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) plays an important role in the prognosis and targeted therapy of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Utilizing simple and practicable technique, this study aimed to evaluate the activation of JAK/STAT signaling pathway in ovarian HGSC patients, and investigated the correlation between the activation of JAK/STAT signaling pathway and the prognosis of the HGSC patients. Methods: We performed immunohistochemistry of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) and phosphorylated STAT5 (pSTAT5) on paraffin imbedded slides of 73 ovarian HGSC patients, and evaluated the expression level and range of both markers. According to the grading score of the immunostaining of pSTAT3 and pSTAT5, we divided the 73 ovarian HGSC cases into STAT3 low/high expression and STAT5 low/high expression groups, and analyzed the prognosis of the patients in different groups, in order to explore the relationship between the expression of pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 proteins and the prognosis of the HGSC patients. Results: Some of the ovarian HGSC cases showed high expression of pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 protein level, which was related to the poorer prognosis of the HGSC patients. There was a significant difference in the expression level of pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 between the patients with better prognosis (survival time ≥3 years) and poorer prognosis (survival time < 3 years). The patients with higher protein expression of pSTAT3, pSTAT5 or both markers might have poorer prognosis, with significant shorter progression-free survival time and overall survival time (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Immunostaining of pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 proteins might be helpful to evaluate and predict the prognosis of the ovarian HGSC patients, and to identify the patients who might have higher chances to respond to the STAT inhibitors and anti-angiogenesis therapy.

Key words: Signal transducer and activator of transcription, Janus kinases, Ovarian neoplasms, High-grade serous carcinoma

中图分类号: 

  • R737.31

表1

pSTAT3、pSTAT5蛋白免疫组织化学染色结果评分标准及结果判定"

Positive cells Staining intensity Result evaluation
Percentage Score Intensity Score Group Final score*
< 10% 1 No staining 0 pSTAT3-low 0-4
10%-80% 2 Yellow 1 pSTAT3-high 5-9
>80% 3 Yellowish brown 2 pSTAT5-low 0-4
Brown 3 pSTAT5-high 5-9

表2

pSTAT蛋白表达水平与临床病理学特征的相关性"

Parameters Counts
(n=73)
pSTAT3 pSTAT5 pSTAT3+pSTAT5
Low
expression
(n=49)
High
expression
(n=24)
P value Low
expression
(n=48)
High
expression
(n=25)
P value Low
expression
(n=53)
High
expression
(n=20)
P value
Age/years 0.13 0.52 0.19
    < 50 27 (37.0) 21 (77.8) 6 (22.2) 19 (70.4) 8 (29.6) 22 (81.5) 5 (18.5)
    ≥50 46 (63.0) 28 (60.1) 18 (39.9) 29 (59.2) 17 (40.8) 31 (67.4) 15 (32.6)
FIGO stage 0.15 0.42 0.24
    Ⅰ 9 (12.3) 4 5 5 4 6 3
    Ⅱ 14 (19.2) 10 4 9 5 11 3
    Ⅲ 38 (52.1) 29 9 28 10 30 8
    Ⅳ 12 (16.4) 6 6 6 6 6 6
PFS < 0.01 < 0.001 < 0.001
    < 3 years 36 (49.3) 15 (20.5) 21 (28.8) 13 (17.8) 23 (31.5) 17 (23.3) 19 (26.0)
    ≥3 years 37 (50.7) 34 (46.6) 3 (4.1) 35 (48.0) 2 (2.7) 36 (49.3) 1 (1.4)
OS < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    < 3 years 30 (41.1) 10 (13.7) 20 (27.4) 8 (11.0) 22 (30.1) 12 (16.4) 18 (24.7)
    ≥3 years 43 (58.9) 39 (53.4) 4 (5.5) 40 (54.8) 3 (4.1) 41 (56.2) 2 (2.7)

图1

卵巢HGSC组织中pSTAT3和pSTAT5蛋白免疫组织化学染色"

图2

pSTAT3、pSTAT5蛋白表达水平与卵巢HGSC患者PFS和OS的相关性"

1 Roeser JC , Leach SD , McAllister F . Emerging strategies for cancer immunoprevention[J]. Oncogene, 2015, 34 (50): 6029- 6039.
doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.98
2 Frank DA . STAT3 as a central mediator of neoplastic cellular transformation[J]. Cancer Lett, 2007, 251 (2): 199- 210.
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.10.017
3 Suh YA , Jo SY , Lee HY . Inhibition of IL-6/STAT3 axis and targeting Axl and Tyro3 receptor tyrosine kinases by apigenin circumvent taxol resistance in ovarian cancer cells[J]. Int J Oncol, 2015, 46 (3): 1405- 1411.
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2808
4 Chen H , Ye D , Xie X , et al. VEGF, VEGFRs expressions and activated STATs in ovarian epithelial carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2004, 94 (3): 630- 635.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.056
5 Saini U , Naidu S , ElNaggar AC , et al. Elevated STAT3 expression in ovarian cancer ascites promotes invasion and metastasis: A potential therapeutic target[J]. Oncogene, 2017, 36 (2): 168- 181.
doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.197
6 Perez RP , Godwin AK , Hamilton TC , et al. Ovarian cancer biology[J]. Semin Oncol, 1991, 18 (3): 186- 204.
7 Zhang H , Liu T , Zhang Z , et al. Integrated proteogenomic characterization of human high-grade serous ovarian cancer[J]. Cell, 2016, 166 (3): 755- 765.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.069
8 Szubert S , Moszynski R , Szpurek D , et al. The expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs) and their correlation with overall survival of patients with ovarian cancer[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2019, 90 (5): 242- 249.
doi: 10.5603/GP.a2019.0045
9 Gadducci A , Lanfredini N , Sergiampietri C . Antiangiogenic agents in gynecological cancer: State of art and perspectives of clinical research[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2015, 96 (1): 113- 128.
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.05.009
10 Aravantinos G , Pectasides D . Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review[J]. J Ovarian Res, 2014, 7, 57.
doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-7-57
[1] 葛晓东,李妹玲,文曦琳,李易,邓小林,吴晓凤,文明,李少林. 超顺磁性氧化铁短发夹RNA双功能分子探针外转染卵巢癌细胞的最佳浓度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(5): 754-760.
[2] 马瑞琼,程洪艳,叶雪,陈军,崔恒,魏丽惠,昌晓红. 肿瘤坏死因子受体相关蛋白1在上皮性卵巢癌组织中的表达及意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(1): 120-124.
[3] 杨静, 张旗, 董建强, 昌晓红, 何湘君. 高迁移率蛋白A2在浆液性卵巢癌中高表达及其与let-7家族microRNA的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(5): 749-754.
[4] 王晓慧, 雷军强, 彭芝兰, 杨永秀. △Np63基因表达与卵巢癌生物学行为的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2011, 43(2): 304-306.
[5] 马丽萍, 李娜, 何湘君, 张旗. miR-449b和miR-34c对卵巢癌细胞SKOV3-ipl周期相关蛋白的下调及细胞周期阻滞作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2011, 43(1): 129-133.
[6] 赵旸, 王悦, 沈丹华, 宋荣娜, 许琦, 李艺, 崔恒, 唐军, 魏丽惠. 卵巢交界性肿瘤及Ⅰ期上皮性卵巢癌143例临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2011, 43(1): 123-128.
[7] 张超, 崔恒, 李小平, 叶雪, 付天云, 冯捷, 昌晓红, 魏丽惠. 卵巢癌抗抗独特型单克隆抗体3D12的制备及初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(2): 170-173.
[8] 陆红霞, 徐丛剑, 李斌, 康玉, 黄倩, 李立民, 陈庆华. 紫杉醇纳米粒腹腔给药对大鼠卵巢癌的抑制作用及淋巴靶向性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2006, 38(5): 483-486.
[9] 易晓芳, 范士明, 姚明, 丰有吉. 腹腔与静脉应用托泊替坎治疗人卵巢癌细胞株SKOV3裸小鼠网膜移植瘤的疗效比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2006, 38(1): 88-91.
[10] 卢媛, 刘惜时, 王跃祥, 宋后燕, Nanbert ZHONG. 上皮性卵巢癌中微卫星不稳定的研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2006, 38(1): 62-65.
[11] 昌晓红, 崔恒, 冯捷, 杨文兰, 李艺, 付天云, 叶雪, 祝洪澜, 程洪艳, 成夜霞, 郭惠方. 卵巢癌6B11抗独特型微抗体诱导抗肿瘤免疫应答的体外实验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2005, 37(5): 480-484.
[12] 袁碧波, 糜若然, 韩忠朝, 蔡英林, 周毓玲, 马月霞. hTERT基因反义cDNA转染对卵巢癌细胞系SKOV3生物学行为的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(6): 680-683.
[13] 崔恒, 冯捷, 钱和年. 抗独特型卵巢癌疫苗的研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(5): 570-573.
[14] 刘广芝, 冯捷, 叶雪, 付天云, 成夜霞. 人卵巢上皮癌细胞原代培养及细胞系BUPH:OVSC-1的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(3): 271-275.
[15] 温宏武. 雌激素受体β mRNA在卵巢上皮性癌中的表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2001, 33(5): 424-426.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王学庆, 万有, 于英心, 韩济生. 关节炎大鼠背根神经节细胞的膜电生理学特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2001, 33(1): 50 -53 .
[2] 唐志慧, 曾祥龙. 恒牙早期正常骨面型青少年上气道形态和舌骨位置的X线头影测量研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(2): 140 -143 .
[3] 关志忱, 魏本林, 孟作为. 远程无线排尿日记开发及20例年轻人客观排尿情况报告[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(4): 476 -479 .
[4] 张春丽, 王荣福, 李太华, 付占立. 新型有机锗倍半氧化物的抗肿瘤活性及其在荷瘤裸鼠的体内分布[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(2): 208 -210 .
[5] 胡维亨, 任军. 人乙型肝炎病毒DNA阳性血清对人骨髓间充质干细胞向肝细胞分化的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(5): 459 -464 .
[6] 王军, 肖水芳, 秦永, 王全桂, 陈丽. 以面神经麻痹为首诊表现的Wegener肉芽肿病一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 434 -436 .
[7] 柳晓辉, 那加, 刘玲玲, 罗斌. 头颈部血管肉瘤3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2001, 33(3): 288 -289 .
[8] 张震康. 口腔医学科学研究的重要进展和方向[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(2): 97 -98 .
[9] 梁成, 王兴, 伊彪, 李自力, 王晓霞. 骨性颞下颌关节强直伴小颌畸形及阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的牵引成骨治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(2): 112 -116 .
[10] 张勇, 栾庆先. 牙周维护治疗在保持牙周长期疗效中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2011, 43(1): 29 -33 .