Email Alert | RSS

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (3): 548-552. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.03.023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析

欧蒙恩1,丁云1,唐卫峰1,周永胜2,*()   

  1. 1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院第三门诊部, 国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心, 口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100083
    2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-23 出版日期:2023-06-18 发布日期:2023-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 周永胜 E-mail:kqzhouysh@hsc.pku.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学口腔医院临床新技术新疗法项目(PKUSSNCT-19B10);国家重大疾病多学科合作诊疗能力建设项目(PKUSSNMP-201901)

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cement flow in abutment margin-crown platform switching

Meng-en OU1,Yun DING1,Wei-feng TANG1,Yong-sheng ZHOU2,*()   

  1. 1. Third Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100083, China
    2. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Bejing 100081, China
  • Received:2021-04-23 Online:2023-06-18 Published:2023-06-12
  • Contact: Yong-sheng ZHOU E-mail:kqzhouysh@hsc.pku.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the Program for New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-19B10);the National Program for Multidisciplinary Cooperative Treatment on Major Diseases(PKUSSNMP-201901)

RICH HTML

 2   

PDF (PC)

138

摘要：

目的: 利用三维有限元分析方法分析基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂溢出的情况，旨在验证基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构在种植修复粘接固位中是否具有减小粘接剂流入深度的作用。方法: 利用ANSYS 19.0软件建立两个模型，一个是传统边缘及牙冠(模型一，常规组)，另一个是具有基台边缘-牙冠平台转移结构的边缘及牙冠(模型二，平台转移组)。两个模型中基台的周围均包绕着牙龈组织，边缘均位于龈下1.5 mm。利用ANSYS 19.0软件对两个模型进行双向流固耦合计算。在两个模型中，相同量的粘接剂充填于牙冠内侧壁及基台之间的间隙内，牙冠在基台上方约0.6 mm时开始进行模拟粘接的过程。牙冠匀速下落，用时为0.1 s。观察0.025 s、0.05 s、0.075 s、0.1 s时粘接剂溢出的情况，并测量0.1 s时粘接剂没过边缘的深度。结果: 在0 s、0.025 s、0.05 s时，两组模型中的粘接剂均在基台边缘以上。在0.075 s时，模型一中，牙龈被粘接剂挤压发生形变，与基台之间的间隙增加，粘接剂开始流入该间隙内；模型二中，由于牙冠颈部缩窄，粘接剂只受到来自牙龈和基台边缘向上的反作用力而向上溢出。在0.1 s时，模型一中，粘接剂由于受重力和压力的作用继续流入深处，没过基台边缘深度为1 mm；模型二中，粘接剂延续0.075 s时的状态，继续向外溢出，没过基台边缘深度为0 mm。结论: 在牙龈贴着基台的情况下，基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构在种植修复粘接固位中能有效减小粘接剂的流入深度。

关键词: 基台边缘-牙冠, 平台转移, 牙种植, 牙修复体固位, 三维有限元分析

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the cement flow in the abutment margin-crown platform switching structure by using the three-dimensional finite element analysis, in order to prove that whether the abutment margin-crown platform switching structure can reduce the inflow depth of cement in the implantation adhesive retention. Methods: By using ANSYS 19.0 software, two models were created, including the one with regular margin and crown (Model one, the traditional group), and the other one with abutment margin-crown platform switching structure (Model two, the platform switching group). Both abutments of the two models were wrapped by gingiva, and the depth of the abutment margins was 1.5 mm submucosal. Two-way fluid structure coupling calculations were produced in two models by using ANSYS 19.0 software. In the two models, the same amount of cement were put between the inner side of the crowns and the abutments. The process of cementing the crown to the abutment was simulated when the crown was 0.6 mm above the abutment. The crown was falling at a constant speed in the whole process spending 0.1 s. Then we observed the cement flow outside the crowns at the time of 0.025 s, 0.05 s, 0.075 s, 0.1 s, and measured the depth of cement over the margins at the time of 0.1 s. Results: At the time of 0 s, 0.025 s, 0.05 s, the cements in the two models were all above the abutment margins. At the time of 0.075 s, in Model one, the gingiva was squeezed by the cement and became deformed, and then a gap was formed between the gingiva and the abutment into which the cement started to flow. In Model two, because of the narrow neck of the crown, the cement flowed out from the gingival as it was pressed by the upward counterforce from the gingival and the abutment margin. At the time of 0.1 s, in Model one, the cement continued to flow deep inside with the gravity force and pressure, and the depth of the cement over the margin was 1 mm. In Model two, the cement continued to flow out from the gingival at the time of 0.075 s, and the depth of the cement over the margin was 0 mm. Conclusion: When the abutment was wrapped by the gingiva, the inflow depth of cement in the implantation adhesive retention can be reduced in the abutment margin-crown platform switching structure.

Key words: Abutment margin-crown, Platform switching, Dental implantation, Dental prosthesis retention, Three-dimensional finite element analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R783.6

图1

反转式边缘示意图"

图2

模型的基台-牙冠-牙龈结构示意图(紫色部分：基台；绿色部分：牙冠；蓝色部分：牙龈)"

图3

牙冠-基台-牙龈-粘接剂实验模型示意图"

图4

牙冠-基台-牙龈-粘接剂实验模型网格图"

图5

牙冠下落不同时间点粘接剂流动的流体体积法云图"

1 Wilson TG Jr . The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: A prospective clinical endoscopic study[J]. J Periodontol, 2009, 80 (9): 1388- 1392.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090115
2 Korsch M , Marten SM , Walther W , et al. Impact of dental cement on the peri-implant biofilm-microbial comparison of two different cements in an in vivo observational study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20 (5): 806- 813.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12650
3 Linkevicius T , Vindasiute E , Puisys A , et al. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement: A prospective clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24 (1): 71- 76.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02453.x
4 Dumbrigue HB , Abanomi AA , Cheng LL . Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87 (1): 112- 114.
doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.119418
5 Zaugg LK , Zehnder I , Rohr N , et al. The effects of crown venting or pre-cementing of CAD/CAM-constructed all-ceramic crowns luted on YTZ implants on marginal cement excess[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29 (1): 82- 90.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13071
6 Rayyan MM , Makarem HA . A modified technique for preventing excess cement around implant supported restoration margins[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 116 (6): 840- 842.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.007
7 Seo CW , Seo JM . A technique for minimizing subgingival residual cement by using rubber dam for cement-retained implant crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117 (2): 327- 328.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.024
8 Paulius A , Saulius Z , Jonas A , et al. Comparing effectiveness of rubber dam and gingival displacement cord with copy abutment in reducing residual cement in cement-retained implant crowns: A crossover RCT[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32 (5): 549- 558.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13724
9 Wadhwani C , Goodwin S , Chung KH . Cementing an implant crown: A novel measurement system using computational fluid dynamics approach[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18 (1): 97- 106.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12258
10 Sun B , Li Y , Wang Y , et al. Adhesion properties of modified cement-retained implant prostheses: In vitro mechanical tensile experiments and computational fluid dynamics analyses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 123 (2): 290.e1- 290.e8.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.008
11 Zhang JM , Zhong L , Su B , et al. Perspective on CFD studies of coronary artery disease lesions and hemodynamics: A review[J]. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng, 2014, 30 (6): 659- 680.
doi: 10.1002/cnm.2625
12 Yuzbasioglu E . A modified technique for extraoral cementation of implant retained restorations for preventing excess cement around the margins[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2014, 6 (2): 146- 149.
doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.146
13 Rutkunas V , Bukelskiene V , Sabaliauskas V , et al. Assessment of human gingival fibroblast interaction with dental implant abutment materials[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2015, 26 (4): 1- 9.
14 Brunot-Gohin C , Duval JL , Verbeke S , et al. Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2016, 46 (6): 362- 371.
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.362
[1] 孙菲,刘建,李思琪,危伊萍,胡文杰,王翠. 种植体黏膜下微生物在健康种植体和种植体周炎中的构成与差异：一项横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 30-37.
[2] 王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[3] 梁峰,吴敏节,邹立东. 后牙区单牙种植修复5年后的临床修复疗效观察[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 970-976.
[4] 刘晓强,杨洋,周建锋,刘建彰,谭建国. 640例单牙种植术对血压和心率影响的队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 390-395.
[5] 李蓬,朴牧子,胡洪成,王勇,赵一姣,申晓婧. 经嵴顶上颌窦底提升术后不植骨同期种植的影像研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 95-101.
[6] 周培茹, 蒋析, 华红. 口腔黏膜病患者口腔种植的时机及注意事项[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 5-8.
[7] 郝柯屹,罗佳,邸萍,郭厚佐,沈惠丹,刘焱萍,张宇,林野. 三维图像融合技术评价上颌全牙列种植固定修复前后的鼻唇软组织形态变化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 924-930.
[8] 李维婷,李蓬,朴牧子,张芳,邸杰. 不同备洞方法收集自体骨骨量[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 103-106.
[9] 释栋,曹婕,戴世爱,孟焕新. 植体周炎再生治疗短期疗效观察[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 58-63.
[10] 罗强,丁茜,张磊,谢秋菲. 后牙种植冠桥修复后局部咬合变化的定量分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(6): 1119-1123.
[11] 林春平,卢松鹤,朱浚鑫,胡洪成,岳兆国,唐志辉. 个性化根形种植体的螺纹形态对周围牙槽骨应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(6): 1130-1137.
[12] 刘潇倩,陈秋雯,冯海兰,王兵,屈健,孙振,衡墨迪,潘韶霞. 无牙颌患者locator附着体种植覆盖义齿修复后口腔卫生维护的纵向研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 136-144.
[13] 柴金友，刘建彰，王兵，屈健，孙振，高文慧，郭天晧，冯海兰，潘韶霞. 一种切削法制作的数字化种植手术导板加工精度评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 892-898.
[14] 吴敏节，邹立东，梁峰. 上前牙即刻种植即刻修复负载3年后软、硬组织变化的临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 694-699.
[15] 张海东，张立，释栋，韩劼，闫夏，谢也斯，孟焕新. 锥形锁柱种植体用于因牙周炎缺牙患者修复的临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(2): 300-307.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
ISSN 1671-167X
CN 11-4691/R
主管单位：中华人民共和国教育部
主办单位：北京大学
地址： 北京市海淀区学院路38号 北京大学医学部 《北京大学学报（医学版）》
邮编：100191
电话：010-82801551
Email： xbbjb2@bjmu.edu.cn

《北京大学学报（医学版）》
微信公众号
版权所有 © 2018 《北京大学学报（医学版）》编辑部