北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 982-986. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.06.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗collectin 11抗体在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的意义

邓晓莉1,钟丽君2,孙琳1,李常虹1,刘湘源1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学第三医院风湿免疫科,北京100191;2. 北京大学医药卫生分析中心,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2016-12-18 发布日期:2016-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 刘湘源 E-mail:13683657545@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(81501390)资助

Diagnostic significance of anti-collectin 11 in systemic lupus erythematosus

DENG Xiao-li1, ZHONG Li-jun2, SUN Lin1, LI Chang-hong1, LIU Xiang-yuan1△   

  1. (1. Department of Rheumatolgoy and Immunology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 2.Medical and Health Analytical Center, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2016-12-18 Published:2016-12-18
  • Contact: LIU Xiang-yuan E-mail:13683657545@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81501390)

摘要:

目的:评价抗collectin 11抗体在系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE)的诊断和病情活动性判断中的作用。方法: 本研究为横断面研究,同时纳入SLE活动组、SLE缓解组、类风湿关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis,RA)组、原发性干燥综合征(Sj-gren syndrome,SS)组以及健康对照(healthy control,HC)组5组患者,应用ELISA方法检测血清抗collectin 11抗体水平,比较各组差异并进行受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析。结果: 5组各纳入30例患者,SLE活动组和SLE缓解组之间抗collectin 11抗体水平差异无统计学意义(88.8±16.8 vs. 89.7±24.7,P=0.896)。SLE组作为一个整体,其抗collectin 11抗体水平(89.1±19.4)显著高于RA组(49.1±22.0)、SS组(56.9±30.1)以及HC组(72.7±24.6)(P<0.001,P<0.001,P=0.007)。抗collectin 11抗体诊断SLE的ROC曲线下面积为0.806,提示具有一定的诊断价值,并且与其他SLE特异性自身抗体有一定的互补作用。结论: 血清抗collectin 11抗体在SLE组中显著高于RA组、SS组以及HC组,并具有一定的诊断价值,有可能成为SLE新的特异性自身抗体之一。

关键词: 红斑狼疮, 系统性, 胶原凝集素, 诊断

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the role of anti-collectin 11 in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and in the evaluation of disease activity. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Five groups of patients were enrolled: SLE active (SLE disease activity index-2000,SLEDAI-2000≥9), SLE remission (SLEDAI-2000≤4 and there was no organ involvement), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), primary Sj-gren Syndrome (SS) and healthy control (HC). Serum anticollectin 11 was detected in all the groups by ELISA. One-way ANOVA analysis and LSD-t test as post-hoc analysis were used to compare the levels of anticollectin 11 among all the groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under curve (AUC) were used to analyze the value of anticollectin 11 in the diagnosis of SLE. Results: In the study, 30 patients were enrolled in each group, including 13 males and 137 females with an average age of (34±14) years (18-77 years). The age and gender of the other three groups were comparable to the two SLE groups. The difference of serum anti-collectin 11 between the SLE active group and SLE remission group was not statistically significant (88.8±16.8 vs. 89.7±24.7, P=0.896). The level of serum anti-collectin 11 was significantly higher in SLE group (as a whole) (89.1±19.4) than in RA group (49.1±22.0), SS group (56.9±30.1) and HC group (72.7±24.6) (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.007, respectively). The AUC was 0.806 for the diagnosis of SLE by serum anti-collectin 11. Further descriptive analysis showed that the positive rate of anti-collectin 11 was very high in the patients of SLE in whom both anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and Sm antibody were negative. The nervous system and gastrointestinal system involvement were the most common in the patients with positive anti-collectin 11. Conclusion: The level of serum anti-collectin 11 was significantly higher in SLE than in RA, SS and HC. Anti-collectin 11 antibody had a relatively high value in the diagnosis of SLE and it might have some complementary function in the diagnosis of SLE. It might be a relatively specific autoantibody for SLE.

Key words: Lupus erythematosus, systemic, Collectins, Diagnosis

中图分类号: 

  • R593.241
[1] 田佳宜,张霞,程功,刘庆红,王世阳,何菁. 系统性红斑狼疮患者血清白细胞介素-2受体α水平及其临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1083-1087.
[2] 孟广艳,张筠肖,张渝昕,刘燕鹰. IgG4相关性疾病中枢神经系统受累的临床特点分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1043-1048.
[3] 翟莉,邱楠,宋惠. 多中心网状组织细胞增生症1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1183-1187.
[4] 邹健梅,武丽君,罗采南,石亚妹,吴雪. 血清25-羟维生素D与系统性红斑狼疮活动的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 938-941.
[5] 李正芳,吴雪,武丽君,罗采南,石亚妹,钟岩,陈晓梅,孟新艳. Rhupus综合征的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 933-937.
[6] 马向波,张学武,贾汝琳,高颖,刘洪江,刘玉芳,李英妮. 外周血淋巴细胞亚群检测在系统性硬化症治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 721-727.
[7] 邱敏,费月阳,邓绍晖,刘承,卢剑,何为,陆敏,田晓军,张树栋,马潞林. 后肾腺瘤的诊治经验及文献回顾[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 417-419.
[8] 夏芳芳,鲁芙爱,吕慧敏,杨国安,刘媛. 系统性红斑狼疮伴间质性肺炎的临床特点及相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 266-272.
[9] 孟圆,张丽琪,赵雅宁,柳登高,张祖燕,高岩. 67例上颌根尖周囊肿的三维影像特点分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 396-401.
[10] 王昱,邓雪蓉,季兰岚,张晓慧,耿研,张卓莉. 超声检测痛风患者肌腱受累的危险因素和诊断价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 143-149.
[11] 高璐,谷岩. 中国人群腭中缝形态特点分期与Demirjian牙龄的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 133-138.
[12] 袁源,郎宁,袁慧书. CT能谱曲线在脊柱转移瘤和感染性病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 183-187.
[13] 贾园,栗占国. 成人巨噬细胞活化综合征诊断困境和个体化治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 991-994.
[14] 赵静,孙峰,李云,赵晓珍,徐丹,李英妮,李玉慧,孙晓麟. 抗α-1C微管蛋白抗体在系统性硬化症中的表达及临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1009-1013.
[15] 康琦,张继新,高莹,张俊清,郭晓蕙. 100例甲状腺嗜酸细胞腺瘤的诊治分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1098-1101.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .