北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 1012-1018. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.06.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

切口妊娠介入治疗的临床应用及预后分析

鲁景元1,2,顾建平1△,徐文健2,楼文胜1,施万印1,汪涛1,邵泽锋1   

  1. (1. 南京医科大学附属南京医院介入科, 南京 210006;2. 南京医科大学附属南京妇幼保健院介入科, 南京 210004)
  • 出版日期:2016-12-18 发布日期:2016-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 顾建平 E-mail:gujianping@vip.163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(81541061)、江苏省科技发展基金临床医学专项(BL2014013)、南京市卫生科技发展基金重点项目(ZKX10004)、南京市科技发展项目(201402049)资助

Clinical application and prognostic analysis of interventional treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy

LU Jing-yuan1,2, GU Jian-ping1△, XU Wen-jian2, LOU Wen-sheng1, SHI Wan-yin1, WANG Tao1, SHAO Ze-feng1   

  1. (1. Department of Interventional Radiology,Affiliated Nanjing Hospital,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210006,China;2. Department of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Hospital,Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210004,China)
  • Online:2016-12-18 Published:2016-12-18
  • Contact: GU Jian-ping E-mail:gujianping@vip.163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81541061), Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Development Fund Clinical Medicine Special(BL2014013), the Key Project of Nanjing Health Science and Technology Development Fund(ZKX10004), and Nanjing Science and Technology Development Project(201402049)

摘要:

目的:分析子宫动脉栓塞(uterine artery embolization,UAE)治疗切口妊娠(cesarean scar pregnancy, CSP)的临床价值及预后。方法: 选取2011年1月至2014年12月收治于南京医科大学附属南京妇幼保健院的确诊CSP患者492例,其中高危组283例、低危组209例。根据是否行UAE治疗,将高危组分为高危UAE组(UAE+腹腔镜组)167例,高危非UAE组(化疗+腹腔镜组)116例;将低危组分为低危UAE组(UAE+清宫组)113例,低危非UAE组(化疗+清宫组) 96例。分别比较术中出血、住院时间、血人绒毛膜促性腺激素(beta human chorionic gonadotropin,β-HCG)降至正常时间、月经复潮时间及住院费用的差异,并通过多因素回归分析预测CSP再发风险。结果: 高危UAE组在术中出血[(36.5±14.8) mL vs. (76.5±39.7) mL)]、住院时间[(5.9±0.9) d vs.(9.6±1.3) d]、血β-HCG降至正常时间[(17.9±8.7) d vs. (28.7±10.1) d)]以及月经复潮时间[(18.1±1.6) d vs.(24.3±1.8) d]的比较中优于高危非UAE组,而低危UAE组在术中出血[(93.2±43.3) mL vs. (284.8±110.5) mL]、住院时间[(10.2±1.4) d vs.( 30.7±9.6) d]、血βHCG降至正常时间[(50.1±17.6) d vs. (67.5±22.9) d)]以及月经复潮时间[(56.3±6.7) d vs.(65.9±9.3) d)]的比较中优于低危非UAE组,均P<0.05;高危UAE组住院费用[(20 140±1 520)元 vs.(13 510±1 013)元)]高于高危非UAE组,而低危UAE组住院费用[(10 095±962)元 vs. (3 890±457)元)]高于低危非UAE组,P<0.01;多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,治疗方法是CSP再发风险的独立预测因素(OR 2.407, 95%CI 1.176~5.092,P<0.05),采用包含UAE在内的综合治疗方法可降低CSP再发风险。结论: UAE治疗CSP疗效迅速可靠、并发症少、恢复快、再发风险低,在有条件的医院,特别是针对有再次生育要求的CSP患者,应将含UAE治疗手段的综合治疗方案列为首选。

关键词: 妊娠, 异位, 子宫动脉栓塞术, 明胶海绵, 吸收性, 甲氨喋呤

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the clinical value and prognosis of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treated by uterine artery embolization (UAE). Methods: In the study, 492 cases of patients in Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University diagnosed as CSP between January 2011 and December 2014 were chosen, of which 283 were of high-risk group and 209 of low-risk group. According to whether to take UAE, the high-risk group was subdivided into high-risk UAE group(UAE+laparoscopic group), 167 cases, and high-risk non UAE group (chemotherapy+laparoscopic group), 116 cases, while the low-risk group was subdivided into low-risk UAE group (UAE+curettage group), 113 cases, and low-risk non UAE group(chemotherapy+curettage group), 96 cases. The differences of the intraoperative bleeding, length of stay, blood beta human chorionic go-nadotropin (βHCG) dropped to normal time, menstruation recovery time and the hospitalization expenses were compared. And multivariate regression analysis was used to predict the recurrence risk of CSP. Results: The high-risk UAE group was better than the high-risk non UAE group in comparison of intraoperative bleeding [(36.5±14.8) mL vs.(76.5±39.7) mL], length of stay [(5.9±0.9) d vs.(9.6±1.3) d], blood β-HCG dropped to normal time [(17.9±8.7) d vs.(28.7±10.1) d] and menstruation recovery time [(18.1±1.6) d vs.(24.3±1.8) d],while the low-risk UAE group was better than the low-risk non UAE group in comparison of intraoperative bleeding [(93.2±43.3) mL vs.(284.8±110.5) mL], length of stay [(10.2±1.4) d vs. (30.7±9.6) d], blood β-HCG dropped to normal time [(50.1±17.6)d vs.(67.5±22.9)d] and menstruation recovery time[(56.3±6.7)d vs.(65.9±9.3) d], all P<0.05. The highrisk UAE group was higher than the high-risk non UAE group in comparison of hospitalization expenses [(20 140±1 520 )Yuan vs.(13 510±1 013) Yuan], and the low-risk group UAE was also higher than the low-risk non UAE group in comparison of hospitalization expenses [(10 095±962 )Yuan vs.(3 890±457) Yuan], all P<0.01. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the treatment method was independent predictor of CSP recurrence risk (OR 2.407, 95%CI 1.176-5.092, P<0.05), and using the comprehensive treatment including UAE could reduce the risk of recurrent CSP. Conclusion: As the efficacy of interventional therapy for CSP was rapid and reliable, fewer complications, faster recovery and lower recurrence, hospitalization with good conditions, and particularly for those patients with CSP who want to fertility again, the comprehensive treatment including UAE treatment should be the first choice.

Key words: Pregnancy, ectopic, Uterine artery embolization, Gelatin sponge, absorbable, Methotre-xate

中图分类号: 

  • R714.22
[1] 宋沁峰,李宏田,杨静,原鹏波,程志浩,刘建蒙,赵扬玉. 双胎妊娠孕早期甲状腺功能及其与早产的关联性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 473-478.
[2] 郭洪萍,赵艾,薛勇,马良坤,张玉梅,王培玉. 孕期营养素摄入与妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖控制效果的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 467-472.
[3] 孟文颖,黄琬桐,张杰,焦明远,金蕾,靳蕾. 孕早期血清维生素E水平与妊娠期高血压疾病发病风险的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 470-478.
[4] 赵海岳,叶雄俊,陈伟男,安立哲,刘军,熊六林,黄晓波. 腹腔镜肾盂成型术中异位血管的处理方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 660-664.
[5] 李记,郑莉,石连杰,徐婧,舒建龙,张学武. 可溶性内皮糖蛋白在抗磷脂综合征患者的血清水平及临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 1027-1032.
[6] 郭晓玥,邵珲,赵扬玉. 系统性红斑狼疮患者孕期并发肺动脉高压1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 928-931.
[7] 孙颖,靳蕾. 中国北方3县妊娠妇女血液锰浓度及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 463-468.
[8] 王莎,张龑,赵杨玉,卢珊. 宫角妊娠2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 576-579.
[9] 任书堂, 王勇, 周建华, 龙进, 王翠华, 李冬蓓, 黄云洲. 心下型完全性肺静脉异位连接的超声心动图诊断[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 883-888.
[10] 樊华,李汉忠,徐维锋,纪志刚,张玉石. 异位促肾上腺皮质激素综合征的外科治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 652-656.
[11] 任秀莲,刘平,廉颖,黄锦,郑晓英,朱亚菊,乔杰. 不同的胚胎移植管对体外受精-胚胎移植技术结局的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(5): 905-909.
[12] 贾卓,张雷,李学松,周利群. 输尿管子宫内膜异位症的诊断与治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 650-654.
[13] 孙杰,曾鸿,王永清,赵扬玉. 合并大动脉炎产妇行剖宫产术的围术期管理[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 743-746.
[14] 王立芳,周虹,张妍,王燕. 孕前体质指数与早产的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(3): 414-417.
[15] 周华,孙宇,王少波,张凤山,张立,潘胜发,周非非. 椎管扩大成形术后颈椎后纵韧带骨化进展的再手术治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(2): 210-214.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 田增民, 陈涛, Nanbert ZHONG, 李志超, 尹丰, 刘爽. 神经干细胞移植治疗遗传性小脑萎缩的临床研究(英文稿)[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] 郭岩, 谢铮. 用一代人时间弥合差距——健康社会决定因素理论及其国际经验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[3] 卢恬, 朱晓辉, 柳世庆, 郑杰, 邱晓彦. 白细胞介素2促进宫颈癌细胞系HeLaS3免疫球蛋白G的表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[4] 袁惠燕, 张苑, 范田园. 离子交换型栓塞微球及其载平阳霉素的制备与性质研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[5] 徐莉, 孟焕新, 张立, 陈智滨, 冯向辉, 释栋. 侵袭性牙周炎患者血清中抗牙龈卟啉单胞菌的IgG抗体水平的研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[6] 董稳, 刘瑞昌, 刘克英, 关明, 杨旭东. 氯诺昔康和舒芬太尼用于颌面外科术后自控静脉镇痛的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[7] 祁琨, 邓芙蓉, 郭新彪. 纳米二氧化钛颗粒对人肺成纤维细胞缝隙连接通讯的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[8] 李宏亮*, 安卫红*, 赵扬玉, 朱曦. 妊娠合并高脂血症性胰腺炎行血液净化治疗1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
[9] 李伟军, 邢晓芳, 曲立科, 孟麟, 寿成超. PRL-3基因C104S位点突变体和CAAX缺失体的构建及表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(5): 516 -520 .
[10] 丰雷, 王玉凤, 曹庆久. 哌甲酯对注意缺陷多动障碍儿童平衡功能影响的开放性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 304 -309 .