北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 303-309. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.02.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

荧光及磁示踪法观测脑组织液的引流分区特征

赵越1,2,3,李昀倩2,3,李怀业1,2,3,李玉亮4,刘兰祥5,袁兰2△,张殊佳1△,韩鸿宾3,6△   

  1. (1. 大连大学环境与化学工程学院,辽宁大连116622; 2. 北京大学医药卫生分析中心,北京100191; 3. 北京市磁共振成像设备与技术重点实验室,北京100191; 4. 山东大学第二医院介入科,济南250033; 5. 秦皇岛市第一医院磁共振室,河北秦皇岛066000; 6.北京大学第三医院放射科,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2017-04-18 发布日期:2017-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 袁兰,张殊佳,韩鸿宾 E-mail:hanhongbin@bjmu.edu.cn, yuan_lan@bjmu.edu.cn, shujiazhang@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(91330103、81471633)、中国博士后科学基金(2015M570901)、博士点优先发展领域基金(20130001130013)和北京大学第三医院院重点项目(BYSY201301)资助

Drainage characteristic of the brain interstitial fluid detected by using fluorescence and magnetic tracer method

ZHAO Yue1,2,3, LI Yun-qian2,3, LI Huai-ye1,2,3, LI Yu-liang4, LIU Lan-xiang5, YUAN Lan2△, ZHANG Shu-jia1△, #br# HAN Hong-bin3,6△   

  1. (1. College of Environment and Chemical Engineering, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, Liaoning, China; 2. Peking University Medical and Health Analysis Center, Beijng 100191, China; 3. Beijing Key Lab of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Device and Technique, Beijing 100191, China; 4. Department of Intervention, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, China; 5. Department of Magnetic Resonace Imaging, Qinghuangdao First Hospital, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China; 6. Radiology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2017-04-18 Published:2017-04-18
  • Contact: YUAN Lan, ZHANG Shu-jia, HAN Hong-bin E-mail:hanhongbin@bjmu.edu.cn, yuan_lan@bjmu.edu.cn, shujiazhang@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91330103, 81471633), China Postdoctoal Science Foundation (2015M570901), Doctoral Degree Priority Development Fund(20130001130013) and Key Project of Peking University Third Hospital (BYSY201301).

摘要:

目的:对比光、磁两种探针示踪显示脑组织间隙(interstitial space, ISS)内分子扩散与团流运动的结果,研究脑组织液(interstitial fluid, ISF)在ISS内的分区引流特征。方法: 36只 SD大鼠随机分为荧光检查组(18只)和磁示踪组(18只),每组再随机分为尾状核(caudate nucleus, Cn)、丘脑(thalamus, T)和黑质(substantia nigra, Sn)3个亚组,每亚组6只。荧光检查组:参考脑立体定位图谱,选取冠状位苍白球为中心层面,以Cn、T和Sn为靶点进行穿刺定位,分别导入2 μL 10 mmol/L荧光黄(lucifer yellow,LY)于相应脑区的中心位置,于Cn 3 h、T 2 h和Sn 1 h对大鼠用4%(体积分数)多聚甲醛进行心脏灌注固定后,将取出的鼠脑置于脑切片模具中,沿视交叉向后切片,以进针位点所在的冠状切片为中心层面,计为1片,前取3片,后取2片,每片厚约1 mm,共6片待检测,应用激光扫描共聚焦显微镜(laser scanning confocal microscope,LSCM)对离体切片进行采集,测量离体切片LY扩散的面积;磁示踪组大鼠也以Cn、T和Sn为靶点进行穿刺定位导入2 μL 10 mmol/L钆喷酸葡胺(gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acidm,Gd-DTPA), 应用磁共振(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)动态监测示踪剂在大鼠脑内的扩散,并利用Radiant软件测量Gd-DTPA的扩散面积。结果:LY与Gd-DTPA在Cn、T和Sn的ISS内扩散区域各不相同,Cn亚组LY与Gd-DTPA导入3 h后,比较1~6层LY与Gd-DTPA扩散面积为:(10.95±4.27) mm2 vs. (8.33±2.25) mm2、(18.16±4.74) mm2 vs. (16.42±2.88) mm2、(24.57±3.65) mm2 vs. (20.75±2.29) mm2、(34.81±3.32) mm2 vs. (28.88±1.51) mm2、(30.53±3.12) mm2 vs. (20.92±2.75) mm2、(12.15±4.92) mm2 vs. (10.00±1.89) mm2,对其在每层两组间扩散面积进行t检验,扩散面积差异均无统计学意义(t=0.940,P=0.400;t=0.546,P=0.614;t=1.534,P=0.200;t=2.809,P=0.480;t=2.693,P=0.055;t=0.707,P=0.518);T亚组中LY与Gd-DTPA导入2 h后,比较1~6层LY与Gd-DTPA扩散面积为: (5.56±4.61) mm2 vs. (3.33±2.25) mm2、(16.21±3.36) mm2 vs. (11.42±2.88) mm2、(19.00±5.21) mm2 vs. (15.75±2.29) mm2、(25.32±5.49) mm2 vs. (22.33±3.25) mm2、(17.34±5.31) mm2 vs. (15.92±2.75) mm2、(7.67±6.19) mm2 vs. (5.00±1.89) mm2,对其在每层两组间扩散面积进行t检验,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.753,P=0.493;t=1.875,P=0.134;t=0.990,P=0.378;t=0.810,P=0.464;t=0.413,P=0.701;t=0.716,P=0.514);Sn亚组LY与Gd-DTPA导入1 h后,比较1~6层LY与Gd-DTPA扩散面积为:(6.78±4.56) mm2 vs. (4.75±2.00) mm2、(12.65±5.04) mm2 vs. (10.44±1.13) mm2、(19.51±6.54) mm2 vs. (17.55±0.30) mm2、(28.72±5.45) mm2 vs. (24.48±1.32) mm2、(21.34±4.42) mm2 vs. (17.72±0.25) mm2、(13.00±5.46) mm2 vs. (12.00±2.88) mm2,对其在每层间扩散面积进行t检验,扩散面面积的差异均无统计学意义(t=0.705,P=0.519;t=0.743,P=0.499;t=0.517,P=0.656;t=1.310,P=0.260;t=1.416,P=0.292;t=0.281,P=0.793),但LY扩散面积略大于Gd-DTPA。结论: 荧光法证实了磁示踪法发现的ISF在ISS内的分区引流特征,并且可为磁示踪法提供离体验证的技术与方法。荧光ISS成像法具有更高的对比度和分辨率,得到了更加精细的ISF引流分区区域。

关键词: 脑, 分子探针技术, 显微镜检查, 共焦, 磁共振成像

Abstract:

Objective:Compare the results of molecular diffusion and mass flow in the interstitial space(ISS) displayed by using optical and magnetic probes and study partitioned drainage of the brain interstitial fluid (ISF).Methods: In the study, 36 male SD rats were randomly divided into fluorescent inspection group (18), magnetic tracer group (18). Then they were divided equally into caudate nucleus (Cn), thalamus (T) and substantia nigra (Sn) subgroup, 6 rats in each subgroup. Referencing the brain stereotaxic atlas, the coronal globus pallidus as center level, Cn, T or Sn were acted as puncture positioning target. A 10 μL microsyringe was stereotaxically positioned and the lucifer yellow (LY) solution of 2 μL 10 mmol/L was infused into centric position. The coronary slices undergo cardiac perfusion and fix respectively in time point Cn 3 h, T 2 h and Sn 1 h. The rat brain was placed in rat stainless steel brain matrices and cut backward along visual intersection. The injection point of coronal slice as the center level, take 3 slices in front of the center level and 2 slices behind of it. 1 mm for each slice and 6 slices in total. Then slices were detected by laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM). Simultaneous, in the same coordinate brain regions of another three groups, a gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acidm (Gd-DTPA) solution of 2 μL 10 mmol/L was infused into different injection and detected by MRI tracer-based method. Then the Radiant can be used to measure distribution area of Gd-DTPA. Results: LY and Gd-DTPA have different distribution regions in Cn, T and Sn. After LY and Gd-DTPA were introduced into the Cn subgroup 3 h, compare the 1 to 6 levels distribution area of LY and Gd-DTPA as follows: (10.95±4.27) mm2 vs. (8.33±2.25) mm2, (18.16±4.74) mm2 vs. (16.42±2.88) mm2, (24.57±3.65) mm2 vs. (20.75±2.29) mm2, (34.81±3.32) mm2 vs. (28.88±1.51) mm2, (30.53±3.12) mm2 vs. (20.92±2.75) mm2, (12.15±4.92) mm2 vs. (10.00±1.89) mm2. The statistical analysis of every level was made by T test, and the difference of the distribution area between the two tracers were not statistically significant (t=0.940, P=0.400; t=0.546, P=0.614; t=1.534, P=0.200; t=2.809, P=0.480; t=2.693, P=0.055; t=0.707, P=0.518); After LY and Gd-DTPA were introduced into the T subgroup 2 h, compare the 1-6 levels distribution area of LY and GdDTPA as follows: (5.56±4.61) mm2 vs. (3.33±2.25) mm2, (16.21±3.36) mm2 vs. (11.42±2.88) mm2, (19.00±5.21) mm2 vs. (15.75±2.29) mm2, (25.32±5.49) mm2 vs. (22.33±3.25) mm2, (17.34±5.31) mm2 vs. (15.92±2.75) mm2, (7.67±6.19) mm2 vs. (5.00±1.89) mm2. The statistical analysis of every level was made by T test, and the difference of the distribution area between the two tracers were not statistically significant (t=0.753, P=0.493; t=1.875, P=0.134; t=0.990, P=0.378; t=0.810, P=0.464; t=0.413, P=0.701; t=0.716, P=0.514); After LY and Gd-DTPA were introduced into the Sn subgroup 1 h, compare the 1-6 levels distribution area of LY and Gd-DTPA as follows: (6.78±4.56) mm2 vs. (4.75±2.00) mm2, (12.65±5.04) mm2 vs. (10.44±1.13) mm2, (19.51±6.54) mm2 vs. (17.55±0.30) mm2, (28.72±5.45) mm2 vs. (24.48±1.32) mm2, (21.34±4.42) mm2 vs. (17.72±0.25) mm2, (13.00±5.46) mm2 vs. (12.00±2.88) mm2. The statistical analysis of every level was made by T test and the difference of the distribution area between the two tracers were not statistically significant (t=0.705, P=0.519; t=0.743, P=0.499; t=0.517, P=0.656; t=1.310, P=0.260; t=1.416, P=0.292; t=0.281, P=0.793), but the distribution area of LY is slightly more than Gd-DTPA.Conclusion: LSCM imaging technology confirmed partitioned drainage of the brain ISF found by MRI tracer-based method and provided technology and method validation for MRI tracerbased method. LSCM imaging technology with higher contrast and resolution, therefore more sophisticated partitioned drainage of the brain interstitial fluid were got.

Key words: Brain, Molecular probe techniques, Microscopy, confocal, Magnetic resonance imaging

中图分类号: 

  •  
[1] 孟广艳,张筠肖,张渝昕,刘燕鹰. IgG4相关性疾病中枢神经系统受累的临床特点分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1043-1048.
[2] 任国勇,吴雪梅,李颖,李婕妤,孙伟平,黄一宁. 大血管闭塞性脑卒中亚急性期磁敏感血管征的表现[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1133-1138.
[3] 白鹏,王涛,周阳,陶立元,李刚,李正迁,郭向阳. 不同转流标准对颈动脉内膜切除术后脑梗死的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1144-1151.
[4] 苗欣,黄红拾,胡晓青,时会娟,任爽,敖英芳. 膝关节前交叉韧带断裂后单腿位置觉测试时脑电功率谱的变化特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 871-876.
[5] 吴一凡,张晓圆,任爽,玉应香,常翠青. 基于磁共振的青年男性股四头肌的测量和评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 843-849.
[6] 盛荟,梁磊,周童亮,贾彦兴,王彤,袁兰,韩鸿宾. 光磁双模态探针钆-[4,7-双-羧甲基-10-(2-荧光素硫脲乙基)-1,4,7,10-四氮杂环十二烷-1-基]-乙酸络合物合成方法的改进[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 959-963.
[7] 候越,赵旭彤,谢志颖,袁云,王朝霞. 线粒体DNA 8344 A>G突变导致的MELAS/MERRF/Leigh重叠综合征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 851-855.
[8] 赵世明,杨铁军,许春苗,郭孝峰,马永康,陈学军,李祥,何朝宏. 3.0T磁共振成像在接受过经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术膀胱癌中诊断肌层浸润的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 701-704.
[9] 唐迅,张杜丹,刘晓非,刘秋萍,曹洋,李娜,黄少平,窦会东,高培,胡永华. China-PAR脑卒中模型在北方农村人群中预测脑卒中发病风险的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 444-450.
[10] 宋宇,韩鸿宾,杨军,王艾博,和清源,李媛媛,赵国梅,高亚娟,王睿,韩易兴,刘爱连,宋清伟. 脑对流增强给药对老年大鼠脑细胞外间隙微观结构的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 362-367.
[11] 吴静云,米悦,刘水,姚林,唐琦,何志嵩,王霄英. MRI对肾细胞癌静脉瘤栓侵犯下腔静脉壁的术前评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 673-677.
[12] 贾子昌,卞焕菊,韩金涛,赵海燕,栾景源,王昌明,李选. 颈动脉支架成形术后脑高灌注综合征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 733-736.
[13] 许力,胡明洁,李玉玉,屈洪党,钱伟东,刘晓林. 圆锥马尾部黏液乳头型室管膜瘤继发中枢神经系统表面铁沉积症1例报道及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 769-774.
[14] 徐帅,王旸烁,李纾,刘海鹰. 肾癌及脑膜瘤术后并发吉兰-巴雷综合征1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 775-777.
[15] 韩鸿宾. 脑组织液引流途径与脑内新分区系统的发现[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 397-401.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .