北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 446-450. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.03.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2型糖尿病患者血糖控制与内脏脂肪指数的关系

曹亚英1,唐迅1,孙可欣1,刘志科1,项骁1,隽娟1,宋菁1,殷琼洲1,扎西德吉1,胡亚楠1,#br# 杨燕芬1,史末也1,田耀华1,黄少平2,刘晓芬2,李娜3,李劲1,吴涛1,陈大方1,胡永华1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系, 北京 100191; 2. 北京市房山区疾病预防控制中心, 北京 102401; 3. 北京市房山区科学技术委员会, 北京 102488)
  • 出版日期:2017-06-18 发布日期:2017-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 胡永华 E-mail: yhhu@bjmu.edu.cn

Relationship between glycemic control and visceral adiposity index among the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

CAO Ya-ying1, TANG Xun1, SUN Ke-xin1, LIU Zhi-ke1, XIANG Xiao1, JUAN Juan1, SONG Jing1, YIN Qiong-zhou1, ZHAXI De-ji1, HU Ya-nan1, YANG Yanfen1, SHI Mo-ye1, TIAN Yao-hua1, HUANG Shao-ping2, LIU Xiao-fen2, LI Na3, LI Jin1, WU Tao1, CHEN Da-fang1, HU Yong-hua1△   

  1. (1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China; 2. Fangshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102401, China; 3. Fangshan District Science and Technology Commission, Beijing 102488, China)
  • Online:2017-06-18 Published:2017-06-18
  • Contact: HU Yong-hua E-mail: yhhu@bjmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的:探讨2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes mellitus, T2DM)患者血糖控制情况与内脏脂肪指数(visceral adiposity index, VAI)的关系。方法:采用流行病学现场调查的方法,对社区40岁及以上T2DM患者人口学特征、生活习惯、疾病史、家族史、服药史等资料进行收集,并进行体格检查及空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白(glycosylated hemoglobin, HbA1c)、血脂等指标的血生化检测。以HbA1c ≥7.0%作为血糖控制不良的标准,分析其与不同水平VAI的关系。结果:共纳入1 607例研究对象,平均年龄为(59.4±8.1)岁,平均糖尿病病程为(7.0±6.4)年,其中78.3%在接受降糖治疗。按VAI四分位数升高的次序将研究对象分为Q1、Q2、Q3和Q4组,其血糖控制不良率依次为60.6%、65.7%、70.1%和71.0% (趋势χ2=12.20, P<0.001)。Logistic回归模型调整年龄、性别、收缩压、舒张压、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、吸烟情况、心脑血管疾病史、降糖治疗情况、糖尿病病程及家族史后显示,T2DM患者血糖控制情况与VAI水平关联显著。与Q1组研究对象相比,Q2、Q3和Q4组血糖控制不良的OR值分别为1.239 (95% CI 0.918~1.672)、1.513 (95% CI 1.117~2.050)和1.535 (95% CI 1.128~2.088, 趋势P=0.003);VAI每升高一个四分位数,血糖控制不良OR值为1.162 (95% CI 1.054~1.282)。结论:T2DM患者血糖控制情况与VAI显著相关,VAI水平高预示血糖控制不佳。

关键词:  内脏脂肪, 糖尿病, 2型, 血红蛋白A, 糖基化

Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between glycemic control and visceral adiposity index (VAI) among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Methods: A community-based epidemiological field study for patients with T2DM aged ≥ 40 years was conducted in China.Every participant underwent physical examinations, biochemical tests of fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and so on, and a questionnaire, including anthropometric characteristics, lifestyle, disease history, family history, and medication use. Those participants with HbA1c ≥7.0% were classified as the poorly controlled in our analysis of relationship between glycemic control and VAI. Anthropometric characteristics, lifestyle, and biochemical indexes of the participants were compared among the groups of different VAI levels. Logistic models were applied in multiple analysis adjusting for possible confounders. Results: A total of 1 607 patients with T2DM were recruited in our analysis with a mean age of (59.4±8.1) years and an average T2DM duration of (7.0±6.4) years. Among them, 78.3% were on hypoglycemic therapy. The cutoff points of quartiles of VAI were calculated for the males and females, respectively. According to the ascending order of the quartiles of VAI, the participants were divided into four groups, i.e. Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4. The poor glycemic control rate for these groups were 60.6%, 65.7%, 70.1%, and 71.0%, respectively (Trendχ2=12.20, P<0.001). After adjustment for age, gender, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), LDL-C, smoking, cardio-cerebral vascular disease (CVD) history, hypoglycemic therapy, T2DM duration, and family history of diabetes, the Logistic regression models showed that the glycemic control rate was significantly associated with VAI levels among the patients with T2DM. Compared with the participants in group Q1, the ORs of poor glycemic control for those in groups Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 1.239 (95%CI 0.918 to 1.672), 1.513 (95%CI 1.117 to 2.050), and 1.535 (95%CI 1.128to 2.088), respectively (trend P=0.003). With each quartile increase in VAI, the OR of poor glycemic control was 1.162 (95%CI 1.054 to 1.282). Conclusion: The glycemic control among the patients with T2DM is significantly associated with VAI. High level of VAI is an indicator of poor glycemic control.

Key words: Visceral adipose, Diabetes mellitus, type 2, Hemoglobin A, glycosylated

中图分类号: 

  •  
[1] 徐欣然,霍芃呈,和璐,孟焕新,朱筠轩,靳东思奇. 伴与不伴糖尿病的牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗的疗效比较及其与白细胞水平的相关分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 48-53.
[2] 朱忆颖,闵赛南,俞光岩. 局部注射环孢素A对非肥胖糖尿病小鼠下颌下腺分泌功能及炎症的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 750-757.
[3] 尹雪倩, 张晓玄, 文婧, 刘思奇, 刘欣然, 周若宇, 王军波. 荞麦、燕麦、豌豆复配对糖尿病大鼠血糖的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 447-452.
[4] 樊理诗,高敏,Edwin B.FISHER,孙昕霙. 北京市通州区和顺义区747例2型糖尿病患者生存质量影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 523-529.
[5] 郭洪萍,赵艾,薛勇,马良坤,张玉梅,王培玉. 孕期营养素摄入与妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖控制效果的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 467-472.
[6] 吴俊慧,陈泓伯,武轶群,吴瑶,王紫荆,吴涛,王梦莹,王斯悦,王小文,王伽婷,于欢,胡永华. 2015—2017年北京市2型糖尿病患者骨关节炎患病的相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 518-522.
[7] 陈平,黎泽明,郭怡,孙昕霙,Edwin B.FISHER. 基于大五人格理论应用潜在剖面分析探究2型糖尿病患者的用药依从性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 530-535.
[8] 李峥,王霄,洪天配,王浩杰,高展翼,万蒙. 晚期糖基化终末产物抑制大鼠外周血单个核细胞及成骨细胞增殖的作用机制[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 355-363.
[9] 郜洪宇,徐菁玲,孟焕新,和璐,侯建霞. 牙周基础治疗对2型糖尿病伴慢性牙周炎患者红细胞、血小板相关指标的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 750-754.
[10] 郑鸿尘,薛恩慈,王雪珩,陈曦,王斯悦,黄辉,江锦,叶莺,黄春兰,周筠,高文静,余灿清,吕筠,吴小玲,黄小明,曹卫华,严延生,吴涛,李立明. 基于大家系设计的静息心率与常见慢性病双表型遗传度估计[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 432-437.
[11] 杨航,杨林承,张瑞涛,凌云鹏,葛庆岗. 合并高血压、冠心病、糖尿病的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者发生病死的危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 420-424.
[12] 黎泽明,高敏,陈雪莹,孙昕霙. 2型糖尿病患者大五人格特征与自我管理态度的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 506-513.
[13] 张勇,刘畅,陈彬,陈帆,段晋瑜,张孟钧,焦剑. 糖尿病前期患者糖代谢异常与慢性牙周炎的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 71-76.
[14] 段姣妞,杜伟,侯睿宏,许珂,张改连,张莉芸. 类脂质渐进性坏死1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1182-1184.
[15] 何姣,袁戈恒,张俊清,郭晓蕙. 早期糖尿病周围神经病变大鼠模型的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1150-1154.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[6] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[7] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[8] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[9] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[10] 燕太强, 杨荣利, 郭卫, 沈丹华. 胫骨平滑肌肉瘤伴全身多发骨转移一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 369 -373 .