北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1050-1054. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.06.020

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

cN0上颌恶性肿瘤颈淋巴结转移的临床分析

孙乾1,章文博1,高敏1,于森2,毛驰1,郭传瑸1,俞光岩1,彭歆1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,口腔颌面外科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081;2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,第二门诊部口腔颌面外科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100101)
  • 出版日期:2017-12-18 发布日期:2017-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 彭歆 E-mail: pxpengxin@263.net
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAI04B06)资助

Clinical analysis of cervical lymph node metastasis of cN0 maxillary malignant tumor

SUN Qian1, ZHANG Wen-bo1, GAO Min1, YU Sen2, MAO Chi1, GUO Chuan-bin1, YU Guang-yan1, PENG Xin1△   

  1. (1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Second Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100101, China)
  • Online:2017-12-18 Published:2017-12-18
  • Contact: PENG Xin E-mail: pxpengxin@263.net
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (2014BAI04B06)

摘要: 目的:探讨和比较不同病理类型临床颈淋巴结阴性(clinically negative neck lymph node,cN0)上颌恶性肿瘤的颈淋巴结转移率,为此类患者颈部淋巴结的处理提供参考。方法: 选择1990年至2010年就诊于北京大学口腔医院具有完整临床及随访资料的cN0上颌恶性肿瘤患者277例,记录颈淋巴结转移情况及相关临床信息,研究不同病理类型上颌恶性肿瘤颈淋巴结转移的发生规律,并通过SPSS 19.0统计学软件分析影响上颈恶性肿瘤淋巴结转移的相关因素。结果: 277例cN0上颌恶性肿瘤患者的总体颈淋巴结转移发生率为15.5%(43/277),上颌鳞状细胞癌因其较强的淋巴结转移倾向,颈淋巴结转移率为33.0%;腺源性癌的整体转移率较低,为7.6%,且发生颈淋巴结转移的时间较晚,但高度恶性腺源性癌的淋巴结转移率明显高于中、低度恶性腺源性癌(分别为P=0.037), 其中非特异性腺癌、低分化黏液表皮样癌、导管癌的颈淋巴结转移率高于15%,而同属于高度恶性肿瘤的腺样囊性癌与肌上皮癌的转移率较低;肉瘤类恶性肿瘤的整体淋巴结转移率很低,仅为4.9%。结论: 建议对cN0上颌鳞状细胞癌患者行选择性颈淋巴结清扫术,对于非特异性腺癌、低分化黏液表皮样癌、导管癌等高度恶性腺源性癌患者可行选择性颈淋巴结清扫术,对于肉瘤类患者可对颈部进行密切观察。

关键词: 淋巴结, 上颌骨肿瘤, 淋巴转移,

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the cervical lymphatic metastasis rates of clinically negative neck lymph node (cN0) maxillary malignant tumors, to compare the cervical lymphatic metastasis rates of the various pathological types, and to provide the reference for the treatment of the neck of the patients with cN0 maxillary malignant tumor. Methods: The clinical data of 277 cases with cN0 maxillary malignant tumor, treated in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from 1990 to 2010, were reviewed. The cervical lymph node metastasis and the related clinical information were recorded. The clinical information including histopathology type of the tumors, tumor grade, primary site and TNM staging, as well as other demographic and clinical data, were retrieved from the electronic medical record system (EMRS) of the hospital. The pathogenesis of cervical lymph node metastasis in maxillary malignant tumors of different histopathological types, and the factors related to lymph node metastasis of upper cervical malignancy were analyzed by SPSS 19.0 statistical software. Results: The overall cervical lymph node metastasis rate of the 277 patients with cN0 maxillary malignant tumor was 15.5% (43/277). Maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) had a strong cervical lymph node metastasis tendency and the rate was 33.0%. The overall metastatic rate of adenocarcinoma was 7.6% lower than that of SCC, and the occurrence of cervical lymph node metastasis time was relatively late, but the metastasis rate of highly malignant grade salivary gland carcinoma was significantly higher than that of intermediate and low grade carcinoma (P=0.037). The metastatic rates of some highly malignant cN0 salivary gland carcinomas including adenocarcinoma, not other specified, high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), and salivary duct carcinoma were exceeded 15%, while the metastasis rates of adenoid cystic carcinoma and myoepithelial carcinoma were lower. The metastasis rate of the sarcomas was very low with the rate of 4.9%. Conclusion: Selective neck dissection (SND) is recommended for cN0 maxillary SCC and feasible for some highly malignant cN0 salivary gland carcinomas including adenocarcinoma, not other specified, highgrade MEC, salivary duct carcinoma. The neck can be closely observed for the patients with maxillary sarcoma.

Key words: Lymph nodes, Maxillary neoplasms, Lymphatic metastasis, Neck

中图分类号: 

  • R739.8
[1] 张璐,胡小红,陈澄,蔡月明,王庆文,赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎初治患者颈椎失稳情况及临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1049-1054.
[2] 白鹏,王涛,周阳,陶立元,李刚,李正迁,郭向阳. 不同转流标准对颈动脉内膜切除术后脑梗死的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1144-1151.
[3] 叶剑飞,赵磊,王国良,洪锴,马潞林. 睾丸横纹肌肉瘤的诊治分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1178-1182.
[4] 周广平,周倩云,朱继红. TAFRO综合征1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 814-817.
[5] 戴翔,左美妮,张晓鹏,胡浩,徐涛. 经皮肾镜术中不同憩室颈部处理方式治疗肾盏憩室结石的长期预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 704-709.
[6] 林国中, 马长城, 王振宇, 谢京城, 刘彬, 陈晓东. 1~2硬膜外神经鞘瘤的显微微创治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 586-589.
[7] 张璐,胡小红,王庆文,蔡月明,赵金霞,刘湘源. 类风湿关节炎合并颈椎失稳的人群分布及临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1034-1039.
[8] 武颖超,蔡云龙,戎龙,张继新,刘金,汪欣. 早期胃癌淋巴结转移规律及内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的疗效评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1093-1097.
[9] 朱巧,任翠,张艳,李美娇,王晓华. 能谱CT诊断非小细胞肺癌纵隔淋巴结转移的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 730-737.
[10] 刘冰川,孙川,邢永,周方,田耘,姬洪全,张志山,郭琰,吕扬,杨钟玮,侯国进,高山. 中青年股骨颈骨折内固定术后发生缺血性股骨头坏死的相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 290-297.
[11] 贾子昌,李选,郑梅,栾景源,王昌明,韩金涛. 复合手术治疗无残端的症状性长段颈内动脉慢性闭塞[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 177-180.
[12] 张晔,张妮,刘晓筱,周传香. 唾液腺腺样囊性癌淋巴结转移相关的临床病理分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 30-34.
[13] 张晓鹏,张维宇,霍飞,胡浩,王起,许克新. 原发性女性膀胱出口梗阻的手术疗效随访及其发病机制[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1052-1055.
[14] 洪洪,钱宇婷,付磊,王武,李成辉,尹毅青. 困难气道中运用CT 三维重建技术指导硬质纤维气管镜行气管插管[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 870-874.
[15] 赵海燕,樊东升,韩金涛. 重度颈内动脉狭窄伴未破裂动脉瘤的治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 829-834.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .