有机溶剂对牙本质表面残留根管封闭剂的清除效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究根管治疗过程中残留在牙本质表面的环氧树脂类根管封闭剂对牙本质-复合树脂粘接强度的影响，对比不同有机溶剂对其清除的效果。方法：选取新鲜无龋人第三磨牙离体牙25颗，切除冠部釉质，制备牙本质平面试件。试件随机分为5组，每组5颗离体牙。阴性对照组牙本质表面不做处理，不涂根管封闭剂，其他4个实验组试件牙本质表面涂布环氧树脂根管封闭剂AHPlus 5 min后，采用不同的清除措施：阳性对照组使用干棉球擦拭；乙酸戊酯、丙酮及乙醇有机溶剂实验组，分别用蘸有99%（体积分数）乙酸戊酯、99.5%（体积分数）丙酮及95%（体积分数）乙醇的棉球擦拭牙本质表面，直至体视显微镜（×10）下观察无残留 AH-Plus，去离子水冲洗3 s。制备1.0 mm × 1.0 mm 条状粘接树脂试样（n=45）用于测定微拉伸强度，体视镜下观察断裂类型。制备1.0 mm厚片状试样（n=4）用于扫描电镜下观察粘接界面。采用单因素方差分析比较不同实验组的微拉伸粘接强度，应用卡方检验比较不同组之间断裂类型的差异。结果：五组间粘接强度差异有统计学意义（P<0.001）。干棉球组［（38.69±8.60）MPa ］、乙醇组［（37.14±12.01）MPa ］与阴性对照组［（43.86±7.99）MPa ］相比，粘接强度明显降低（P<0.05）。干棉球组与乙醇组粘接强度差异无统计学意义（P=0.426）。丙酮组、乙酸戊酯组、阴性对照组三者粘接强度差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），丙酮、乙酸戊酯清洁牙本质表面后粘接强度分别达到（45.94±10.37） MPa、（43.99±7.01） MPa。乙醇组粘接强度明显低于丙酮组和乙酸戊酯组（P<0.05）。扫描电镜下观察可见：干棉球组及乙醇组树脂突短小而稀疏，且在乙醇组的粘接界面可以看到残留的根管封闭剂；阴性对照组、乙酸戊酯组及丙酮组树脂突均匀致密。不同组之间断裂类型分布差异没有统计学意义（P=0.086）。结论：环氧树脂类根管封闭剂残留使牙本质树脂粘接强度下降。丙酮与乙酸戊酯对牙本质表面残留的AHPlus的清除效果较好，优于乙醇及干棉球。

关键词: 牙本质, 根管充填材料, 拉伸强度, 溶剂

Abstract: Objective： To evaluate the influence of an epoxy resin-based sealer on the bond strength of adhesive resins to dentin and the cleaning efficacy of different solvents in removing sealer residues. Methods: The occlusal enamel of 25 freshly extracted human third molars without caries were removed to expose flat surfaces of dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the treatment received: For negative control group, the dentin surfaces were not contaminated with AH-Plus; For the other 4 experimental groups, the samples were contaminated with AH-Plus for 5 min and different mea-sures were taken:For positive control group, the sealer were wiped with dry cotton pellets; For solvents experimental groups: cotton pellets saturated with 95% (volume fraction) ethanol, 99.5% (volume fraction) acetone or 99% (volume fraction) amyl acetate were used to wipe the sealer until the surface appeared clean when viewed through a stereomicroscope under ×10 magnification, then rinsed with de-ionized water for 3 s. After sealer removal, a self-etching adhesive system was applied on the surfaces with resin composite. The samples were sectioned into 1.0 mm×1.0 mm stick specimens (n=45) for microtensile test. Failure modes at the dentin-resin interface were observed using a stereomicroscope. The samples were sectioned into 1.0 mm piece specimens (n=4) for scanning electron microscope observation. The microtensile bond strength data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Chi-square test were used to analyse the failure modes between the groups. Results: There was significant difference among the five groups (P<0.001). For dry cotton pellet group (38.69±8.60) MPa and the ethanol group (37.14±12.01) MPa, the microtensile bond strength significantly declined when compared with negative control group (43.86±7.99) MPa (P<0.05). No significant difference of bond strength was found between the dry cotton pellet group and the ethanol group (P=0.426). There was no statistical significant difference among acetone group, amyl acetate group and negative control group (P>0.05). The bond strength of acetone group and amyl acetate group were (45.94±10.37) MPa and (43.99±7.01) MPa, respectively. The ethanol group exhibited lower bond strength than that of acetone group and amyl acetate group (P<0.05). Scanning electronic microscope observation revealed that in dry cotton pellet group and ethanol group, the resin tags were short and loose. Moreover, sealer residues were identified in the interface in the ethanol group samples, while the resin tags in the acetone and amyl acetate group were as dense and uniform as in negative control group. The distribution of failure modes showed no significant difference in the five groups (P=0.086). Conclusion: The microtensile bond strength of dentin to composite resin was lower after exposure to sealer. Compared with ethanol and dry cotton pellets, the clea-ning effect of acetone and amyl acetate on sealer-contaminated dentin surface were better.

Key words: Dentin, Root canal filling materials, Tensile strength, Solvents

中图分类号:

R783.1

臧海玲，王月，梁宇红. 有机溶剂对牙本质表面残留根管封闭剂的清除效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 63-68.

ZANG Hai-ling, WANG Yue, LIANG Yu-hong. Cleaning efficacy of different solvents on sealer-contaminated dentin surface[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 63-68.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	马欣蓉,朱晓鸣,李静,李德利,李和平,谭建国. 新型大气压冷等离子体射流处理对牙本质胶原纤维交联化的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 83-88.
[2]	骆池怡,彭楚芳,杨媛,秦满,王媛媛. 3种自酸蚀粘接系统和轻度唾液污染对乳牙釉质及牙本质粘接耐久性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 46-53.
[3]	李秋菊,宫玮玉,董艳梅. 生物活性玻璃预处理对牙本质粘接界面耐久性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 931-937.
[4]	潘怡湘,李秀花,田福聪,王晓燕. 髓腔内压对树脂水门汀与牙本质粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(2): 321-326.
[5]	李芳,刘洋,刘浩辰,冯海兰. 乳光牙本质患者的基因变异分析及患牙的组织学观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 666-671.
[6]	贾维茜，赵玉鸣，葛立宏. 人重组转化生长因子β1促进牙髓干细胞的增殖和矿化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 680-681.
[7]	李皓，刘玉华，罗志强. 生物活性玻璃用于缓解活髓牙全冠预备后敏感的效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 709-713.
[8]	信义，王赛楠，崔彩云，董艳梅. 生物活性玻璃和牙本质浸提蛋白对人牙髓细胞的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 331-336.
[9]	傅昭然，田福聪，张路，韩冰，王晓燕. 通用型粘接剂对双固化树脂水门汀牙本质粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 101-104.
[10]	郭惠杰，高承志，林斐，刘伟，岳林. 唾液污染对复合树脂间粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 96-100.
[11]	王月，梁宇红. 次氯酸钠溶液表面处理对牙本质粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 105-109.
[12]	范聪，袁重阳，张继川，王晓燕. 牙胶类根管充填材料导热性对根尖封闭的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 110-114.
[13]	郭怡丹，张笋. Er:YAG激光用于比格犬牙髓切断术[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 714-719.
[14]	乔迪，董艳梅，高学军. 体外评价新型根尖倒充填材料iRoot的生物学性能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(2): 324-329.
[15]	张路，袁重阳，田福聪，王晓燕，高学军. 自酸蚀粘接剂系统对变形链球菌的抑制作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 57-62.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed