北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 474-481. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.03.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于自我决定理论的糖尿病自我管理行为干预效果

刘胜兰,娜荷芽,李伟豪,云青萍,姜学文,刘婧楠,常春△   

  1. (北京大学公共卫生学院社会医学与健康教育学系,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2018-06-18 发布日期:2018-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 常春 E-mail:changchun@bjmu.edu.cn

Effectiveness of self-management behavior intervention on type 2 diabetes based on self-determination theory#br#

LIU Sheng-lan, NA He-ya, LI Wei-hao, YUN Qing-ping, JIANG Xue-wen, LIU Jing-nan, CHANG Chun△   

  1. (Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, Peking University School of Public Health, 100191)
  • Online:2018-06-18 Published:2018-06-18
  • Contact: CHANG Chun E-mail:changchun@bjmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的:探索基于自我决定理论,从专业、同伴、家庭三个维度提供自主性支持是否能提升糖尿病患者的自我管理行为及血糖控制水平,并分析干预效果的影响因素。方法:采用方便抽样方法,在北京市城区选择6个社区,各社区分别选择条件相似的服务站作为不同干预组别,该站管理的符合纳入标准的糖尿病患者即招募进该组。以社区站为单位分为3组,常规干预组仅发放知识手册并按基本公共卫生服务要求开展健康管理;同伴支持组按社区分为小组,开展医生主导的小组活动;自主性支持组在同伴支持活动的基础上,基于自我决定理论,设计活动材料及流程,并对医生、同伴进行自主性支持的培训,同时以手册形式培训家人,形成三者协同的自主性支持。干预期为3个月,主要评价指标为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)及患者自我管理行为、技能、知识、自我效能评分。结果:干预前后,常规干预组的HbA1c分别为7.40%±1.37%、7.30%±1.18%;同伴支持组的HbA1c分别为7.33%±1.15%、7.13%±1.27%;自主性支持组的HbA1c分别为7.42%±1.22%、6.78%±0.80%。干预前后,常规干预组自我管理行为得分分别为10.54±2.28、10.80±2.15,同伴支持组的得分分别为11.09±1.89、11.40±1.78,自主性支持组的得分分别为10.34±1.99、11.10±1.65。自主性支持组的HbA1c均值降低的绝对值高于其余两组,干预后达标率高于其余两组,自我管理行为提升高于其余两组。多因素分析结果显示,干预后HbA1c值与基线HbA1c呈正相关,与干预后自我管理行为得分呈负相关,自主性支持组的HbA1c低于常规干预组,干预后自我管理行为与基线行为得分、干预后自我效能、知识、技能、家庭支持、自主性支持、同伴支持、年龄均呈正相关。结论:基于自我决定理论开展糖尿病自我管理行为干预可以有效促进患者自我管理行为及血糖控制,效果优于单一同伴支持活动。

关键词: 糖尿病, 2型, 自我决定理论, 健康行为, 健康促进, 干预, 自我管理

Abstract: Objective: To provide autonomy support from three dimensions based on self-determination theory (SDT), i.e. professional support, peer support, family support, and to investigate whether this intervention can improve diabetes self-management behavior and glycemic control of diabetic patients, and to analyze the influencing factors of the effect. Methods: Using convenient sampling method, three communities were selected respectively in Beijing. Each community selected health service stations with similar conditions as different intervention groups. The diabetic patients managed by the station who were eligible for inclusion were recruited into this intervention group. The community stations were divided into three groups. The routine intervention group only issued knowledge manuals and conducted health ma-nagement according to the requirements of basic public health services. Peer support groups were divided into small groups and carried out doctorled group activities. Based on doctor-led peer support activities, the doctors and peers were trained to provide autonomy support based on self-determination theory, and their family members were trained in the form of manuals to provide autonomy support, forming a concerted support of the three dimensions. Activity processes and materials were also designed based on SDT. The intervention duration was 3 months, and the main evaluation indexes were HbA1c and patients’ self-management behaviors, skills, knowledge, and self-efficacy scores. Results: Before and after the intervention, the HbA1c of routine intervention group were 7.40%±1.37%, 7.30%±1.18%. The HbA1c of peer support group before and after the intervention were 7.33%±1.15% and 7.13%±1.27%. The HbA1c of autonomy support group before and after the intervention were 7.42%±1.22% and 6.78%±0.80%. Before and after the intervention, the self-management score in routine intervention group was 10.54±2.28 and 10.80±2.15, the score in peer support group was 11.09±1.89 and 11.40±1.78, the score in autonomy support group was 10.34±1.99 and 11.10±1.65, respectively. The HbA1c and self-management score increased higher in autonomy support group than in the other two groups. After intervention, the control rate in autonomy support group was higher than in the other two groups. According to the multi-factor analysis, the value of HbA1c after intervention was positively related to the baseline HbA1c, and negatively related to self-management behavior. The value in autonomy support group was higher than in routine intervention group. Baseline self-management behavior, self-efficacy, knowledge, skill, family support, autonomy support, peer support and age were positively correlated with the change of behavior. Conclusion: Self-management behavior intervention based on selfdetermination theory can effectively promote selfmanagement behavior and glycemic control of diabetic patients, and the effect is better than single peer support activities.

Key words: Diabetes mellitus, type 2, Self-determination theory, Health behavior, Health promotion, Intervention, Self-management

中图分类号: 

  • R587.1
[1] 徐欣然,霍芃呈,和璐,孟焕新,朱筠轩,靳东思奇. 伴与不伴糖尿病的牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗的疗效比较及其与白细胞水平的相关分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 48-53.
[2] 朱忆颖,闵赛南,俞光岩. 局部注射环孢素A对非肥胖糖尿病小鼠下颌下腺分泌功能及炎症的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 750-757.
[3] 尹雪倩, 张晓玄, 文婧, 刘思奇, 刘欣然, 周若宇, 王军波. 荞麦、燕麦、豌豆复配对糖尿病大鼠血糖的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 447-452.
[4] 吴俊慧,陈泓伯,武轶群,吴瑶,王紫荆,吴涛,王梦莹,王斯悦,王小文,王伽婷,于欢,胡永华. 2015—2017年北京市2型糖尿病患者骨关节炎患病的相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 518-522.
[5] 郭洪萍,赵艾,薛勇,马良坤,张玉梅,王培玉. 孕期营养素摄入与妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖控制效果的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 467-472.
[6] 樊理诗,高敏,Edwin B.FISHER,孙昕霙. 北京市通州区和顺义区747例2型糖尿病患者生存质量影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 523-529.
[7] 陈平,黎泽明,郭怡,孙昕霙,Edwin B.FISHER. 基于大五人格理论应用潜在剖面分析探究2型糖尿病患者的用药依从性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 530-535.
[8] 郜洪宇,徐菁玲,孟焕新,和璐,侯建霞. 牙周基础治疗对2型糖尿病伴慢性牙周炎患者红细胞、血小板相关指标的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 750-754.
[9] 郑鸿尘,薛恩慈,王雪珩,陈曦,王斯悦,黄辉,江锦,叶莺,黄春兰,周筠,高文静,余灿清,吕筠,吴小玲,黄小明,曹卫华,严延生,吴涛,李立明. 基于大家系设计的静息心率与常见慢性病双表型遗传度估计[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 432-437.
[10] 杨航,杨林承,张瑞涛,凌云鹏,葛庆岗. 合并高血压、冠心病、糖尿病的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者发生病死的危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 420-424.
[11] 黎泽明,高敏,陈雪莹,孙昕霙. 2型糖尿病患者大五人格特征与自我管理态度的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 506-513.
[12] 张勇,刘畅,陈彬,陈帆,段晋瑜,张孟钧,焦剑. 糖尿病前期患者糖代谢异常与慢性牙周炎的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 71-76.
[13] 段姣妞,杜伟,侯睿宏,许珂,张改连,张莉芸. 类脂质渐进性坏死1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1182-1184.
[14] 何姣,袁戈恒,张俊清,郭晓蕙. 早期糖尿病周围神经病变大鼠模型的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1150-1154.
[15] 谢江,李菲. 睡眠重叠综合征与糖尿病发病率的横断面调查研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(2): 252-255.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[2] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[3] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[4] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[5] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[6] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[7] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[8] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[9] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[10] 张宏文, 丁洁, 王芳, 杨惠霞. 一例X连锁Alport综合征女性妊娠期随访[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 351 -354 .