Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 989-995. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.06.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical and pathological characteristics of immune mediated necrotizing myopathy

Hong-xia YANG1,2,Xiao-lan TIAN2,Wei JIANG2,Wen-li LI2,Qing-yan LIU2,Qing-lin PENG2,Guo-chun WANG2,Xin LU1,()   

  1. 1. Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
    2. Department of Rheumatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2019-08-17 Online:2019-12-18 Published:2019-12-19
  • Contact: Xin LU E-mail:luxin_n@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission(Z171100001017208)

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the clinical and pathological features of immune-mediated necro-tic myopathies (IMNM) with different myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs).Methods: In the study, 104 IMNM patients who met any of the following three criteria were selected from idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients who had MSAs results and underwent muscle biopsy from 2008 to 2018 in China-Japan Friendship Hospital: (1) Anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) antibody positive; (2) Anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibody positive; (3) MSAs negative and consistent with the pathological diagnostic criteria of IMNM defined by the European Neuromuscular Centre in 2004. The clinical, laboratory and muscle pathological information of the IMNM patients were retrospectively collected and compared in anti-SRP, anti-HMGCR and MSAs negative groups.Results: Of 104 IMNM patients, 47 patients (45.2%) were positive for anti-SRP antibody, 23 (22.1%) were positive for anti-HMGCR antibody, and 34 (32.7%) were negative for MSAs. The common symptoms of IMNM patients were muscle weakness (92.3%), elevated serum creatine kinase level (92.3%), dysphagia (33.7%) and interstitial lung diseases (ILD) (49.5%). The anti-HMGCR-positive patients were more frequent to have “V” sign (30.4% vs. 4.3% and 5.9%, P<0.01) as compared with the anti-SRP-positive and MSAs-negative patients. The incidence of ILD in the anti-SRP-positive patients was higher than that in the anti-HMGCR-positive and MSAs negative patients (64.4% vs. 34.8% and 29.0%, P<0.01). The prevalence of the patients combined with other connective tissue diseases in MSAs-negative IMNM was higher than that in the other two groups (32.4% vs. 8.5% and 4.3%, P<0.01). 93.3% of the anti-SRP-positive patients were found with antinuclear antibody positivity, higher than those of the anti-HMGCR-positive and MSAs-negative patients (93.3% vs. 36.4% and 58.8%, P<0.001). The common pathological features of IMNM were muscle fibre necrosis (94.2%), regeneration (67.3%) and phagocytosis (65.4%), overexpression of major histocompatibility complex-1 on sarcolemma (78.8%), infiltration of CD4 + T cells (81.7%) and CD68 + macrophage (79.8%) and expression of membrane attack complex (MAC) (77.8%). The endomysial infiltration of CD4 + T cells and CD68 + macrophage and MAC expression on sarcolemma in the MSAs-negative group were more common than that in the anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR groups (88.2% vs. 57.4% and 60.9%, 91.2% vs. 59.1% and 38.1%, 76.5% vs. 45.5% and 42.9%, respectively, P<0.01).Conclusion: There is heterogeneity in anti-SRP-positive, anti-HMGCR-positive or MSAs-negative patients. The detection of MSAs and performing of muscle biopsy are useful for distinguishing different types of IMNM.

Key words: Myositis, Autoimmune diseases, Signal recognition particle, Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA reductases, Pathology

CLC Number: 

  • R593.26

Table 1

Comparisons of clinical features of different serological subgroups of IMNM"

Features IMNM(n=104) Anti-SRP(n=47) Anti-HMGCR(n=23) MSAs negative(n=34) P
Female 73 (70.2) 38 (80.9) 13 (56.5) 22 (64.7) 0.078
Age/years 46.24±15.38 47.49±15.76 46.09±18.08 44.62±12.02 0.712
Age of onset/years 44.63±16.03 46.11±16.21 44.13±20.83 42.91±11.82 0.671
Duration/months 20.85±27.79 19.01±25.08 25.5±35.03 10.23±26.36 0.652
Chronic progression (>12 months) 59 (56.7) 28 (59.6) 12 (52.2) 19 (55.9) 0.836
Fever 5 (4.8) 3 (6.4) 1 (4.3) 1 (2.9) 0.763
Loss of weight 31 (29.8) 14 (29.8) 4 (17.1) 13 (32.8) 0.241
Muscle weakness 96 (92.3) 44 (93.6) 21 (91.3) 31 (91.1) 0.902
Severe muscle weakness 48 (46.2) 22 (46.8) 9 (39.1) 17 (50.0) 0.716
Muscle atrophy 15/73(20.5) 5/33 (15.6) 4/17 (23.5) 6/24 (25.0) 0.651
Myalgia 29 (27.9) 13 (27.7) 8 (34.8) 8 (23.5) 0.649
Arthritis 10 (9.6) 4 (8.5) 1 (4.3) 5 (14.7) 0.404
Skin involvement 27 (26.0) 12 (25.5) 8 (34.8) 7 (20.6) 0.485
Heliotrope rash 7 (7.7) 3 (6.4) 2 (8.7) 3 (8.8) 0.902
Gottron’s sign 2 (1.9) 1 (2.1) 0 1 (2.9) 0.723
“V” sign 11 (10.6) 2 (4.3) 7 (30.4) 2 (5.9) 0.002*
Shawl sign 6 (5.8) 2 (4.3) 4 (17.4) 0 0.018
Raynaud phenomenon 4 (3.8) 3 (6.4) 0 1 (2.9) 0.404
ILD 46/99 (46.5) 29/45 (64.4) 7/23 (30.4) 10/31 (29.0) 0.004#
Cough 2/46 (4.3) 2/29 (6.9) 0/7 0/10 0.542
Dyspnea 4/46 (8.7) 3/29 (10.3) 0/7 1/10 (10.0) 0.675
Asymptomatic 41/46 (89.1) 25/29 (86.2) 7/7 (100.0) 9/10 (90.0) 0.572
Dysphagia 35 (33.7) 17 (36.2) 8 (34.8) 10 (29.4) 0.576
Cancer 4 (3.8) 3 (6.4) 1 (4.3) 0 0.334
With other CTD 16 (15.4) 4 (8.5) 1 (4.3) 11 (32.4) 0.003
Death 5 (4.8) 3 (6.4) 1 (4.3) 1 (2.9) 0.769

Table 2

Comparisons of laboratory characteristics of different serological subgroups of IMNM"

Features a IMNM (n=104) Anti-SRP (n=47) Anti-HMGCR (n=23) MSAs negative (n=34) P
Anti-Ro-52 25 (24.0) 16 (34.0) 1 (4.3) 8 (23.5) 0.024
ANA 74/101 (73.3) 42/45 (93.3) 8/22 (36.4) 20/34 (58.8) <0.001*
Peak CK/(IU/L) 5 100 (2 749, 9 916) 5 070 (2 975, 9 994) 5 728 (3 320, 11 435) 4 827 (1 324, 9 831) 0.546
ALT (0-40 U/L) 96 (51, 208) 120 (55, 221) 93 (51, 209) 92 (38, 154) 0.500
AST (0-40 U/L) 62 (36, 127) 83 (37, 151) 64 (36, 124) 54 (29, 114) 0.306
LDH (100-250 IU/L) 522 (317, 770) 587 (339, 783) 569 (330, 836) 387 (258, 615) 0.113
CK (26-200 IU/L) 2 157 (810, 4 645) 1 753 (771, 4 241) 2 157 (861, 5 481) 2 326 (612, 4 709) 0.956
CRP (<8 mg/L) 2.9 (1.9, 5.5) 2.9 (1.9, 5.2) 4.3 (2.2, 8.6) 2.6 (1.6, 5.2) 0.198
ESR (<20 mm/h) 8 (4, 16) 9 (4, 20) 8 (4, 20) 6 (3, 13) 0.466
Fet (11.0-306.8 μg/L) 123.0 (48.9, 231.1) 120.0 (58.9, 218.2) 172.0 (109.9, 716.7) 86.0 (22.0, 205.0) 0.126
IgG (6.94-16.20 g/L) 10.50 (8.28, 14.13) 11.60 (8.73, 15.65) 8.59 (6.03, 11.28) 10.50 (8.87, 13.40) 0.033#
IgA (0.68-3.78 g/L) 1.67 (1.17, 2.35) 1.86 (1.35, 2.58) 1.32 (1.03, 1.92) 1.56 (0.09, 2.54) 0.105
IgM (0.60-2.63 g/L) 1.12 (0.79, 1.45) 1.19 (0.82, 1.76) 0.88 (0.66, 1.21) 1.18 (0.84, 1.42) 0.109
C3 (0.70-1.28 g/L) 0.86 (0.75, 1.01) 0.87 (0.77, 0.99) 0.88 (0.78, 1.05) 0.82 (0.71, 1.03) 0.336
C4 (0.16-0.47 g/L) 0.18 (0.15, 0.22) 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.20 (0.17, 0.24) 0.17 (0.12, 0.20) 0.067
T cell (1 000-3 000 cell/mL) 2 060 (1 555, 2 650) 1 870 (1 480, 2 240) 1 990 (1 370, 2 350) 2 620 (1 570, 3 350) 0.027
CD3+ T cell (808-2 072 cell/mL) 1 500 (1 038, 1 877) 1 400 (999, 1 686) 1 458 (903, 1 978) 1 767 (1 125, 2 378) 0.760
CD4+ T cell (380-1 280 cell/mL) 853 (608, 1 283) 817 (604, 1 114) 758 (456, 1 123) 1 767 (1 125, 2 378) 0.042
CD8+ T cell (229-982 cell/μL) 493 (375, 761) 477 (378, 678) 653 (345, 797) 554 (348, 812) 0.586

Table 3

Comparisons of pathological features of different serological subgroups of IMNM"

Features IMNM (n=104) Anti-SRP (n=47) Anti-HMGCR (n=23) MSAs negative (n=34) P
Muscle fibre
Necrosis 98 (94.2) 43 (91.5) 21 (91.3) 34 (100.0) 0.213
Regeneration 70 (67.3) 33 (70.2) 11 (47.8) 26 (76.5) 0.066
Phagocytosis 68 (65.4) 27 (57.4) 14 (60.9) 27 (79.4) 0.107
Connective tissue proliferation 36 (34.6) 17 (36.2) 8 (34.8) 11 (32.4) 0.938
MHC-Ⅰ expression on sarcolemma 82 (78.8) 35 (74.5) 17(73.9) 30 (88.2) 0.263
Partial expression 56 (53.8) 24 (51.1) 11 (47.8) 21 (61.8) 0.512
Diffuse expression 26 (25.0) 11 (23.4) 6 (26.1) 9 (26.5) 0.953
Inflammation infiltration
CD4+T cell 85 (81.7) 35 (74.5) 18 (78.3) 32 (94.1) 0.045
Endomysial 71 (68.3) 27 (57.4) 14 (60.9) 30 (88.2) 0.009*
Perivascular 30 (28.8) 17 (36.2) 6 (26.1) 7 (20.6) 0.295
CD8+T cell 57 (54.8) 21 (44.7) 11 (47.8) 25 (73.5) 0.027#
Endomysial 48 (46.2) 17 (36.2) 8 (34.8) 23 (67.6) 0.009*
Perivascular 17 (16.3) 8 (17.0) 4 (17.4) 5 (14.7) 0.951
CD20+B cell 7 (6.7) 2 (4.3) 1 (4.3) 4 (11.8) 0.361
Endomysial 4 (3.8) 1 (2.1) 0 3 (8.8) 0.168
Perivascular 3 (2.9) 1(2.1) 1 (4.3) 1 (2.9) 0.124
CD68+ macrophage 79/99 (79.8) 35/44 (79.5) 11/21 (52.4) 32 (94.1) 0.002
Endomysial 65/99 (65.7) 26/44 (59.1) 8/21 (38.1) 31 (91.2) <0.001*
Perivascular 24/99 (24.2) 18/44 (40.9) 3/21 (15.0) 3 (8.8) 0.003#
MAC 77/99 (77.8) 34/44 (77.3) 11/21 (52.4) 32 (94.1) 0.001
Sarcolemma 55/99 (55.6) 20/44 (45.5) 9/21 (42.9) 26 (76.5) 0.015*
Sarcoplasm 18/99 (18.2) 8/44 (18.2) 3/21 (14.3) 7 (20.6) 0.841
Capillaries 31/99 (31.3) 19/44 (43.2) 4/21 (19.0) 8 (23.5) 0.070

Figure 1

The pathological features of IMNM The expression of MHC-Ⅰ on sarcolemma (B, F, J); the endomysial infiltration of CD68 (C, G); the perivascular infiltration of CD4 (K); the deposition of membrane attack complex (MAC) in muscle fiber (D) or sarcolemma (H); CD8 surrounding non-necrotic muscle fiber (L). A, E, I, scattered necrotic muscle fibres in HE staining; B-D, F-H, J-L, immunohistochemistry staining. "

[1] Hoogendijk JE, Amato AA, Lecky BR , et al. 119th ENMC international workshop: trial design in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies,with the exception of inclusion body myositis[J]. Neuromuscul Disord, 2004,14(5):337-345.
[2] Allenbach Y, Mammen AL, Benveniste O , et al. 224th ENMC International Workshop: clinico-sero-pathological classification of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies[J]. Neuromuscul Disord, 2018,28(1):87-99.
[3] Pinal-Fernandez I, Mammen AL . Spectrum of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies and their treatments[J]. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 2016,28(6):619-624.
[4] Lim J, Rietveld A, De Bleecker JL , et al. Seronegative patients form a distinctive subgroup of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy[J]. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm, 2018,6(1):e513.
[5] Bohan A, Peter JB . Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts)[J]. N Engl J Med, 1975,292(7):344-347.
[6] Bohan A, Peter JB . Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (second of two parts)[J]. N Engl J Med, 1975,292(8):403-407.
[7] Suzuki S, Nishikawa A, Kuwana M , et al. Inflammatory myopathy with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies: case series of 100 patients[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2015,5(13):10-61.
[8] Suzuki S, Hayashi YK, Kuwana M , et al. Myopathy associated with anti- bodies to signal recognition particle: disease progression and neurological outcome[J]. Arch Neurol, 2012,69(6):728-732.
[9] Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ , et al. An official ATSERSJRSALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2011,183(6):788-824.
[10] Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM , et al. An official American Thoracic Society European Respiratory Society statement: update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2013,188(6):733-748.
[11] Dalakas MC . Polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion-body myositis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991,325(21):1487-1498.
[12] Watanabe Y, Uruha A, Suzuki S , et al. Clinical features and prognosis in anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR necrotising myopathy[J]. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2016,87(10):1038-1044.
[13] Takada T, Hirakata M, Suwa A , et al. Clinical and histopatholo-gical features of myopathies in Japanese patients with anti-SRP autoantibodies[J]. Mod Rheumatol, 2009,19(2):156-164.
[14] Ge Y, Lu X, Peng Q , et al. Clinical characteristics of anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase antibodies in Chinese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(10):e0141616.
[15] Limaye V, Bundell C, Hollingsworth P , et al. Clinical and gene-tic associations of autoantibodies to 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme a reductase in patients with immune-mediated myositis and necrotizing myopathy[J]. Muscle Nerve, 2015,52(2):196-203.
[16] Christopher-Stine L, Casciola-Rosen LA, Hong G , et al. A novel autoantibody recognizing 200-kD and 100-kD proteins is associated with an immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2010,62(9):2757-2766.
[17] Mammens AL . Which nonautoimmune myopathies are most frequently misdiagnosed as myositis?[J]. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 2017,29(6):618-622.
[18] Wang Q, Li Y, Ji SQ , et al. Immunopathological characterization of muscle biopsy samples from immune-mediated necrotizing myo-pathy patients[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018,12(24):2189-2196.
[19] Wang L, Liu LL, Hao HJ , et al. Myopathy with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies: clinical and histopathological features in Chinese patients[J]. Neuromuscular Disorders, 2014,24(4):335-341.
[1] XUE Jiang,ZHANG Jian-yun,SHI Rui-rui,XIE Xiao-yan,BAI Jia-ying,LI Tie-jun. Clinicopathological analysis of 105 patients with fibrous dysplasia of cranio-maxillofacial region [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 54-61.
[2] Yun-shu XIAO,Feng-yun-zhi ZHU,Lan LUO,Xiao-yan XING,Yu-hui LI,Xue-wu ZHANG,Dan-hua SHEN. Clinical and immunological characteristics of 88 cases of overlap myositis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1088-1093.
[3] Lan LUO,Xiao-yan XING,Yun-shu XIAO,Ke-yan CHEN,Feng-yun-zhi ZHU,Xue-wu ZHANG,Yu-hui LI. Clinical and immunological characteristics of patients with anti-synthetase syndrome complicated with cardiac involvement [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1078-1082.
[4] Pu-li ZHANG,Hong-xia YANG,Li-ning ZHANG,Yong-peng GE,Qing-lin PENG,Guo-chun WANG,Xin LU. Value of serum YKL-40 in the diagnosis of anti-MDA5-positive patients with dermatomyositis complicated with severe pulmonary injury [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1055-1060.
[5] Wen-xia YI,Cui-jie WEI,Ye WU,Xin-hua BAO,Hui XIONG,Xing-zhi CHANG. Long-term rituximab treatment of refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: A report of 3 cases [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1191-1195.
[6] Mei-ge LIU,Pu FANG,Yan WANG,Lu CONG,Yang-yi FAN,Yuan YUAN,Yan XU,Jun ZHANG,Dao-jun HONG. Clinical, pathological and genetic characteristics of 8 patients with distal hereditary motor neuropathy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 957-963.
[7] Yi-ming ZHENG,Hong-jun HAO,Yi-lin LIU,Jing GUO,Ya-wen ZHAO,Wei ZHANG,Yun YUAN. Correlation study on anti-Ro52 antibodies frequently co-occur with other myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(6): 1088-1092.
[8] Yu-zhou GAN,Yu-hui LI,Li-hua ZHANG,Lin MA,Wen-wen HE,Yue-bo JIN,Yuan AN,Zhan-guo LI,Hua YE. Comparison of clinical and immunological features between clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis and typical dermatomyositis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(6): 1001-1008.
[9] Feng-yun-zhi ZHU,Xiao-yan XING,Xiao-fei TANG,Yi-min LI,Miao SHAO,Xue-Wu ZHANG,Yu-hui LI,Xiao-lin SUN,Jing HE. Clinical and immunological characteristics of myositis complicated with thromboembolism [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(6): 995-1000.
[10] Yi LIU,Zhi-jian LIU,Qi SHEN,Jing-yun WU,Yu FAN,De-run LI,Wei YU,Zhi-song HE. A clinical analysis of 14 cases of prostatic stromal tumor of uncertain malignant potential [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 621-624.
[11] Yi-chang HAO,Ye YAN,Fan ZHANG,Min QIU,Lang ZHOU,Ke LIU,Jian LU,Chun-lei XIAO,Yi HUANG,Cheng LIU,Lu-lin MA. Surgical strategy selection and experience summary of prostate cancer with positive single needle biopsy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 625-631.
[12] Ru MA,Xin-bao LI,Feng-cai YAN,Yu-lin LIN,Yan LI. Clinical evaluation of tumor-stroma ratio in pseudomyxoma peritonei from the appendix [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 240-246.
[13] Yan-jin WANG,Xiao-yan XIE,Ying-ying HONG,Jia-ying BAI,Jian-yun ZHANG,Tie-jun LI. Clinicopathological analysis of 844 cases of odontogenic keratocysts [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 35-42.
[14] Ye ZHANG,Ni ZHANG,Xiao-xiao LIU,Chuan-xiang ZHOU. Cervical lymph node metastasis in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: A clinicopathologic study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 30-34.
[15] Peng FU,Wen CHEN,Li-gang CUI,Hui-yu GE,Shu-min WANG. Applicational value of 2017 ACR TI-RADS stratification in diagnosing thyroid nodules [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 1067-1070.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Author. English Title Test[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .