Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 663-666. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Long-term analysis of safety and efficacy of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with solitary kidneys

Ming-rui WANG,Qi WANG,Hao HU(),Jin-hui LAI,Yong-xin HE,Jie XIONG,Xian-hui LIU,Shi-jun LIU,Ke-xin XU,Tao XU   

  1. Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2020-04-15 Online:2020-08-18 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Hao HU E-mail:huhao@bjmu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of patients with solitary kidney stones. Methods: The clinical data of 22 patients with solitary kidney stones treated with PCNL in Peking University People’s Hospital from September 2008 to June 2014, with the follow-up data of more than 5 years were analyzed retrospectively. Perioperative indicators, postoperative stone free rate (SFR) and incidence of complications were recorded. Ultrasonography was used to evaluate the long-term stones recurrence rate. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were used to assess the long-term renal function. Results: In this group of 22 patients, the average age was (50.3±11.8) years, with 10 cases of anatomic solitary kidneys, 12 functional solitary kidneys, and the median stone diameter was 1.65 (1.1-3.9) cm. All the patients had multiple stones, including 7 cases of staghorn stones. The median pre-operative serum creatinine was 104.5 (60.0-460.0) μmol/L, and the mean eGFR was (60.3±29.4) mL/min, showing no statistically significant difference compared with that before surgery. The mean operative time was (88.2±42.0) min, and there were 11 cases of single-channel and double-channel PCNL. The median serum creatinine on the first day after surgery was 102.0 (63.0-364.0) μmol/L, and the mean eGFR was (58.0±25.1) mL/min. The mean postoperative hospital stay was (8.7±5.2) days. In this group, 5 patients (22.7%) presented short-term complications, among which 4 patients presented postoperative infection and massive hemorrhage at the same time, which improved after conservative treatment, and 1 patient presented pleural injury and improved after closed thoracic drainage. Two patients (9.1%) developed long-term complications, and ureteral stricture occurred 3 months after operation, which improved after balloon dilatation. The median follow-up time was 6.2 (4.7-11.1) years. The median serum creatinine at the last follow-up was 104.0 (72.4-377.0) μmol/L, and the mean eGFR was (60.1±23.7) mL/min, showing no statistically significant difference compared with that before surgery. Renal function decreased in 6 patients (27.3%). Initial and final SFR were 72.7% and 100%, respectively. During the 6.2-year follow-up, 9 patients (40.9%) experienced recurrence of kidney stone. After stone recurrence, 13 lithotomy surgeries were performed, and the SFR by the latest follow-up was 63.6%. Conclusion: This study had the longest follow-up time for patients with solitary kidney stones after PCNL reported at home and abroad. Ultrasound-guided standard PCNL was safe and effective in the treatment of solitary kidney stones. Long-term follow-up results showed that the recurrence rate of kidney stones was still high, but the long-term renal function was stable after operation, and some patients showed mild renal function decline.

Key words: Solitary kidney, Kidney stones, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Standard, Long-term follow-up

CLC Number: 

  • R692.4
[1] Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis[J]. Eur Urol, 2016,69(3):475-482.
pmid: 26344917
[2] Jones DJ, Kellett MJ, Wickham JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the solitary kidney[J]. J Urol, 1991,145(3):477-480.
[3] Ruiz Marcellan FJ, Ibarz Servio L, Ramon Dalmau M. Treatment of lithiasis in the patient with a solitary kidney[J]. Eur Urol, 1988,15(1/2):13-17.
[4] Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine[J]. Nephron, 1976,16(1):31-41.
doi: 10.1159/000180580 pmid: 1244564
[5] El-Tabey NA, El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, et al. Long-term functional outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in solitary kidney[J]. Urology, 2014,83(5):1011-1015.
pmid: 24612617
[6] Piao S, Park J, Son H, et al. Evaluation of renal function in patients with a main renal stone larger than 1 cm and perioperative renal functional change in minimally invasive renal stone surgery: a prospective, observational study[J]. World J Urol, 2016,34(5):725-732.
pmid: 26226940
[7] Kim S, Chang Y, Lee YR, et al. Solitary kidney and risk of chronic kidney disease[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2019,34(9):879-888.
pmid: 31025238
[8] Fayad AS, Elsheikh MG, Mosharafa A, et al. Effect of multiple access tracts during percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: evaluation of risk factors for renal function deterioration[J]. J Endourol, 2014,28(7):775-779.
pmid: 24564455
[9] Li J, Xiao B, Hu W, et al. Complication and safety of ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 8,025 cases in China[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2014,127(24):4184-4189.
[10] Su B, Liang W, Hu W, et al. Long-term outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with solitary kidneys: a single-center experience[J]. World J Urol, 2019,37(5):951-956.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2458-5 pmid: 30255393
[11] Kupajski M, Tkocz M, Ziaja D. Modern management of stone disease in patients with a solitary kidney[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2012,7(1):1-7.
pmid: 23255993
[12] Kyriazis I, Panagopoulos V, Kallidonis P, et al. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. World J Urol, 2015,33(8):1069-1077.
pmid: 25218854
[13] Shi X, Peng Y, Li L, et al. Renal function changes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal calculi with a solitary kidney compared to bilateral kidneys[J]. BJU Int, 2018,122(4):633-638.
[14] van Vuuren SH, Sol CM, Broekhuizen R, et al. Compensatory growth of congenital solitary kidneys in pigs reflects increased nephron numbers rather than hypertrophy[J]. PLoS One, 2012,7(11):e49735.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049735 pmid: 23185419
[15] Patel R, Agarwal S, Sankhwar SN, et al. A prospective study assessing feasibility of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy in chronic kidney disease patients: What factors affect the outcome?[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2019,45(4):765-774.
[16] Kuzgunbay B, Gul U, Turunc T, et al. Long-term renal function and stone recurrence after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal insufficiency[J]. J Endourol, 2010,24(2):305-308.
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0362 pmid: 20039820
[1] DAI Xiang,ZUO Mei-ni,ZHANG Xiao-peng,HU Hao,XU Tao. Comparison of long-term outcomes in different managements of diverticular neck in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for diverticular calculi [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 704-709.
[2] SHEN Cheng, ZHANG Bo, HAN Wen-ke, LIN Jian, WANG Gang, ZHANG Xiao-chun, SONG Yi, ZHAO Zheng, ZHANG Zhong-yuan, JIN Jie, YU Wei. Percutaneous renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy guided by contrast enhanced ultrasound: a single-center preliminary experience in China [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1071-1075.
[3] YU Lu-ping, XU Tao. Analysis of development, safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of upper urinary tract calculi in pediatric patients [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(4): 626-631.
[4] KOU Yu-Hui, YIN Xiao-Feng, WANG Tian-Bing, JIANG Bao-Guo. Research and promotion of severe trauma rescue standard [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(2): 207-210.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 135 -140 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 505 -515 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .