Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 672-677. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical outcomes of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery for bilateral upper urinary tract calculi

Jun-hui ZHANG(),Yi-hang JIANG,Yu-guang JIANG,Ji-qing ZHANG,Ning KANG   

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2020-04-22 Online:2020-08-18 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Jun-hui ZHANG E-mail:13501124191@163.com

Abstract:

Objective: To discuss the efficacy and safety of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES) for bilateral upper urinary tract calculi, and to summarize the initial experience. Methods: Patients diagnosed with bilateral upper urinary tract calculi who underwent SBES in the Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were enrolled retrospectively. The demographic and clinical data of the patients were recorded, and the operation status, stone free rate (SFR) and peri-operative complications were analyzed. The primary end point was SFR, and second end point was peri-operative complications. Results: A total of 23 patients underwent SBES, of which SBES was completed in 19 patients (12 males, and 7 females). The mean age was (41.3±12.0) years. Fourteen patients underwent modified supine position surgery and 4 patients in prone split-leg position. There was no statistical difference in the demographic and baseline clinical data of the patients in different positions. One patient underwent right percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and left endoscopic combined intra-renal surgery (ECIRS) in the prone split-leg position, while 18 patients received simul-taneous surgery with PCNL and contralateral retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS). The mean anesthesia and operation time was (128.7±26.5) min and (70.7±20.3) min, respectively, which was significantly longer in the patients with prone split-leg position than in the patients with modified supine position, anesthesia time in the patients with prone split-leg position and modified supine position: (148.4±20.4) min vs. (121.6±25.3) min, respectively, t=-2.121, P=0.049, while the operation time in the patients with prone split-leg position and modified supine position: (86.4±21.1) min vs. (65.1±17.4) min, respectively, t=-2.222, P=0.040. There was no significant difference between the two groups in indwelling of nephrostomy [prone split-leg position and modified supine position: (2.6±0.9) d vs. (2.1±1.0) d, respectively; t=-0.880, P=0.391] and the length of hospital stay [prone split-leg position and modified supine position: (6.0±2.7) d vs. (5.2±1.8) d, respectively; t=-0.731, P=0.475]. One month after the operation, the SFR was 78.9%, and 3 patients had minor peri-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades Ⅰ/Ⅱ) without any serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grades Ⅲ/Ⅳ/Ⅴ). Conclusion: The simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery would decrease the operation time and anesthesia exposure under the premise of ensuring the SFR, which is helpful to reduce the risk of peri-operative complications, especially to the patients who can not tolerate the second-stage or long-time operation.

Key words: Bilateral upper urinary tract calculi, Simultaneous surgery, Endoscopic surgery

CLC Number: 

  • R693+.4

Figure 1

Position of SBES and operation room setup A, B, prone split-leg position (n=5); C, D, modified supine position (n=14)."

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients"

Items Total (n=19) Modified supine position
(n=14)
Prone split-leg position
(n=5)
χ2/t P
Male/female, n 12/7 9/5 3/2 0.029 0.865
Age/years, x?±s 41.3±12.0 43.4±11.1 35.2±13.7 1.344 0.196
BMI/kg/m2, x?±s 26.5±4.5 26.0±4.7 28.0±3.9 -0.829 0.419
ASA score, x?±s 1.7±0.5 1.7±0.5 1.8±0.4 -0.355 0.727
Stone size/mm, x?±s
PCNL side 25.6±9.4 23.2±7.7 32.1±11.6 -1.921 0.072
RIRS side 18.2±7.4 17.8±7.8 19.1±6.8 -0.332 0.744
Hounsfield unit/HU, x?±s
PCNL side 937.0±317.0 998.2±319.7 765.6±264.4 1.452 0.165
RIRS side 946.3±368.1 1 012.9±389.1 759.7±242.5 1.350 0.195
Stone composition, n 3.661 0.300
Calcium oxalate 13 10 3
Magnesium Ammonium phosphate 3 2 1
Uric acid 2 2 0
Cystine 1 0 1

Figure 2

CT images of one patient with complicated bilateral upper urinary tract calculi A, the patient was diagnosed multiple stones in bilateral kidney and left ureter, and the stones were marked with red circles; B, CT images on the first day after SBES; C, CT images 1 month after SBES."

Table 2

Peri-operative data of patients"

Items Total (n=19) Modified supine position
(n=14)
Prone split-leg position
(n=5)
χ2/t P
Anesthesia time/min, x?±s 128.7±26.5 121.6±25.3 148.4±20.4 -2.121 0.049
Operation time/min, x?±s 70.7±20.3 65.1±17.4 86.4±21.1 -2.222 0.040
PCNL sheath (16F/24F), n 7/12 6/8 1/4 0.827 0.363
Indwelling of nephrostomy/d, x?±s 2.3±1.0 2.1±1.0 2.6±0.9 -0.880 0.391
SFR, n(%) 15(78.9) 11(78.6) 4(80.0) 0.005 0.946
Complication by Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ/Ⅱ, n 3 2 1 0.090 0.764
Length of hospital stay/d, x?±s 5.4±2.0 5.2±1.8 6.0±2.7 -0.731 0.475
[1] Scales CJ, Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States[J]. Eur Urol, 2012,62(1):160-165.
[2] Proietti S, de la Rosette J, Eisner B, et al. Bilateral endoscopic surgery for renal stones: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2017,69(5):432-445.
pmid: 28745038
[3] Bagrodia A, Raman JD, Bensalah K, et al. Synchronous bilateral percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: analysis of clinical outcomes, cost and surgeon reimbursement[J]. J Urol, 2009,181(1):149-153.
[4] Giusti G, Proietti S, Rodriguez-Socarras ME, et al. Simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES) for patients with bilateral upper tract urolithiasis: technique and outcomes[J]. Eur Urol, 2018,74(6):810-815.
pmid: 30017401
[5] Giusti G, Proietti S, Pasin L, et al. Simultaneous bilateral endoscopic manipulation for bilateral renal stones[J]. Urology, 2016,94:265-269.
[6] Chung SY, Chon CH, Ng CS, et al. Simultaneous bilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease in patients with significant comorbidities[J]. J Endourol, 2006,20(10):761-765.
pmid: 17094751
[7] Chon CH, Chung SY, Ng CS, et al. Simultaneous bilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery for bilateral complex upper tract stone disease[J]. Urology, 2005,65(3):572-574.
pmid: 15780379
[8] de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012,62(2):246-255.
pmid: 22487016
[9] Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6 336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2004,240(2):205-213.
pmid: 15273542
[10] Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK. Simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES) for bilateral urolithiasis: the future? Evidence from a systematic review[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2019,20(3):15.
pmid: 30790070
[11] Shen PF, Liu N, Wei WR, et al. Simultaneous ureteroscopic lithotripsy and contralateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ureteral calculi combined with renal staghorn calculi[J]. Int J Urol, 2015,22(10):943-948.
pmid: 26149937
[12] Kwon O, Park J, Cho MC, et al. Feasibility of single-session endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for ipsilateral large renal stones and retrograde intrarenal surgery for contralateral renal stones: Initial experience[J]. Int J Urol, 2017,24(5):377-382.
[13] Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, et al. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2016,30(7):754-763.
pmid: 27072075
[14] Liu X, Huang G, Zhong R, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under regional versus general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Urol Int, 2018,101(2):132-142.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Author. English Title Test[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .