Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 688-691. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Individual control of urine volume to improve stability of bladder volume in radiotherapy of urinary tumor

Hao WANG1,Shu-kun JIANG1,Ran PENG1,Yi HUANG2,(),Ming-qing WANG1,Jun-jie WANG1,Cheng LIU2,Fan ZHANG2,Lu-lin MA2   

  1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2020-03-16 Online:2020-08-18 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Yi HUANG E-mail:pku_huang@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Clinical Key Projects of Peking University Third Hospital(BYSY2018012)

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the training mode of individual urine volume control, to take indi-vidual expected urine volume as the goal of bladder control in patients with urinary system tumors, and to improve the accuracy of bladder control during radiotherapy by active training of bladder receptivity. Methods: Twenty-five patients of urinary system tumors were enrolled from May 2019 to September 2019, of whom, 21 patients had prostate cancer, and 4 had bladder cancer. Training of bladder filling started before CT simulation. The patients were required to take the individual bladder filling as the training goal, and the optimal bladder volume range was suggested to be 200-400 mL. After 2-4 weeks of training, the prescribed volume of the bladder was determined according to the patient’s bladder receptivity. The volume of the bladder was measured by images of plain CT and images 8-minutes after intravenous contrast injection. The patient’s bladder volume was measured using BladderScan before treatment. CBCT (Cone-beam CT) was performed, and bladder volume was measured before treatment. The bladder volume was measured again using BladderScan after treatment. Results: The mean bladder volume of simulation (VCT01) was (262±130) mL, ranging from 78 mL to 505 mL. The mean self-evaluation bladder volume before radiotherapy (VEVA01) was (238±107) mL, ranging from 100 mL to 400 mL. The mean BladderScan measured volume before radiotherapy (VBVI01) was (253±123) mL, ranging from 60 mL to 476 mL. The mean cone-beam CT measured volume before radiotherapy (VCBCT) was (270±120) mL, ranging from 104 mL to 513 mL. There was a correlation between VEVA01 and VBVI01, VCT01 and VBVI01, VCT01, and VBVI01, and there was no significant difference in paired t-test. There was a correlation between differences of self-evaluation bladder volume before radiotherapy(VEVA01) and simulation CT (VCT01) and differences of self-evaluation bladder volume before radiotherapy (VEVA01) and cone-beam CT (VCBCT), and there was no significant difference in paired samples by t-test. Conclusion: During radiotherapy for urinary system tumors, such as prostate cancer and bladder cancer, with the assistance of BladderScan, the patients could try to hold their urine moderately according to their conditions, and individualized bladder prescription may be beneficial to achieve stable bladder volume during radiotherapy.

Key words: Bladder volume, Radiotherapy, Urinary system tumor, Ultrasound scanner

CLC Number: 

  • R737

Table 1

Comparation of bladder volume of BladderScan, simulation CT and CBCT"

Items Correlation analysis Paired t test
Correlation index P value t value P value 95%CI
VCT01 vs. VBVI01 0.915 <0.001 0.890 0.382 -12.295-30.935
VBVI01 vs. VCBCT 0.940 <0.001 -2.506 0.081 -34.947-6.712
VCT01 vs. VCBCT 0.912 <0.001 -0.762 0.453 -30.099-13.859

Table 2

Difference comparation of bladder volume between BladderScan, simulation CT and CBCT"

Items Correlation analysis Paired t test
Correlation index P value t value P value 95%CI
VCT01-VBVI01 vs. VCT01-VCBCT 0.480 0.015 -0.431 0.670 -19.449- 12.729
VCT01-VBVI01 vs. VCBCT-VBVI01 0.226 0.277 -0.272 0.788 -19.566-15.006
VCT01-VCT02 vs. VBVI01-VBVI02 0.595 0.002 1.642 0.114 -3.235-28.435
[1] Rebecca LS, Kimberly DM, Ahmedin JD, et al. Cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020,70(1):7-30.
pmid: 31912902
[2] Scott CM, Karen H, Andrew L, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018,36(34):3411-3430.
[3] Chen Z, Yang ZZ, Wang JZ, et al. Dosimetric impact of different bladder and rectum filling during prostate cancer radiotherapy[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2016,11(103):1-8.
[4] Heng SP, Low SH, Sivamany K. The influence of the bowel and bladder preparation protocol for radiotherapy of prostate cancer using kilo-voltage cone beam CT: our experience[J]. Indian J Cancer, 2015,52(4):639-644.
[5] 穆娅莎·阿布力米提, 周卫兵, 刘海峰, 等. 盆腔肿瘤患者放疗前膀胱充盈稳定性训练及可靠性研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2016,25(2):146-149.
[6] 姜晓勃, 钟庆初, 黄群峰, 等. 盆腔肿瘤放疗中膀胱充盈一致性初步研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2016,25(6):598-601.
[7] Oscar CM, Vitali M, Austin H, et al. Associations between volume changes and spatial dose metrics for the urinary bladder durin local vs. pelvic irradiation for prostate cancer[J]. Acta Oncol, 2017,56(6):884-890.
[8] Rex C, Susan LT, Lei D, et al. Investigation of bladder dose and volume factors influencing late urinary toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007,67(4):1059-1065.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.042 pmid: 17241755
[9] 毛睿, 何艳芬, 齐洪志, 等. 膀胱充盈状态对宫颈癌术后调强放疗靶区和危及器官的影响[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2013,27(8):794-796.
[10] 任雪, 阎英, 徐莹, 等. 不同膀胱充盈度对前列腺癌放疗影响[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2018,46(4):439-441.
[11] Akila NV, Ellen DY, Lawrence BM, et al. Radiation dose-volume effects of the urinary bladder[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010,76(Suppl 3):S116-S122.
[12] Chang JS, Yoon HI, Cha HJ, et al. Bladder filling variations during concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients: early experience of bladder volume assessment using ultrasound scanner[J]. Radiat Oncol J, 2013,31(1):41-47.
pmid: 23620868
[13] Mahantshetty U, Deepak PK, Pranav C, et al. Transabdominal ultrasonography-defined optimal and definitive bladder-filling protocol with time trends during pelvic radiation for cervical cancer[J]. Technol Cancer Res Treat, 2017,16(6):917-922.
doi: 10.1177/1533034617709596 pmid: 28532243
[14] Hong IY, Yoonsun C, Jee SC, et al. Evaluating variations of bladder volume using an ultrasound scanner in rectal cancer patients during chemoradiation: is protocol-based full bladder maintenance using a bladder scanner useful to maintain the bladder volume[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(6):e0128791.
[15] Leah C, Vanessa C, Maree W, et al. Use of a prospective cohort study in the development of a bladder scanning protocol to assist in bladder filling consistency for prostate cancer patients receiving radiation therapy[J]. J Med Radiat Sci, 2016,63(3):179-185.
[1] SUN Hai-tao, YANG Rui-jie, JIANG Ping, JIANG Wei-juan, LI Jin-na, MENG Na, WANG Jun-jie. Dosimetric analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy for patients undergone breast-conserving operation [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 188-192.
[2] GUO Fu-xin, JIANG Yu-liang, JI Zhe, PENG Ran, SUN Hai-tao, WANG Jun-jie. 3D printed template-assisted and computed tomography image-guided 125-iodine seed implantation for supraclavicular metastatic tumor: a dosimetric study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(3): 506-511.
[3] LIU Xing-hua, JIANG Xie-yuan, GONG Mao-qi, ZHA Ye-jun. Effect of radiotherapy and indomethacin together in the prevention of recurrence of ectopic ossification around the elbow after resection [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(2): 230-233.
[4] JIANG Ping, ZHOU Shun,WANG Jun-jie, YANG Rui-jie, LIU Zi-yi, JIANG Shu-kun, WANG Wei. Errors in six degree-of-freedom pose estimation of spine tumors assessed by image guided radiotherapy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(6): 952-956.
[5] WANG Qing-guo, LI Xiao-mei, ZHANG Min, LI Hang, WEN Bing, LI Hong-zhen, GAO Xian-shu. Effect of two dose fractionations on postoperative radiotherapy of keloid: an analysis of 107 patients [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(1): 169-172.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 135 -140 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 505 -515 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 516 -520 .