Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 663-668. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.04.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Establishment of a mutation prediction model for evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy in renal carcinoma

Cai-peng QIN,Yu-xuan SONG,Meng-ting DING,Fei WANG,Jia-xing LIN,Wen-bo YANG,Yi-qing DU,Qing LI,Shi-jun LIU,Tao XU*()   

  1. Department of Urology, Peking University People' s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2022-04-03 Online:2022-08-18 Published:2022-08-11
  • Contact: Tao XU E-mail:xutao@pkuph.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81872086)

RICH HTML

 10   

PDF (PC)

133

Abstract:

Objective: To establish a mutation prediction model for efficacy assessment, the genomic sequencing data of renal cancer patients from the MSKCC (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) pan-cancer immunotherapy cohort was used. Methods: The genomic sequencing data of 121 clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the MSKCC pan-cancer immunotherapy cohort were obtained from cBioPortal database (http://www.cbioportal.org/) and they were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify mutated genes associated with ICI treatment efficacy, and we constructed a comprehensive prediction model for drug efficacy of ICI based on mutated genes using nomogram. Survival analysis and time-dependent receiver operator characteristic curves were performed to assess the prognostic value of the model. Transcriptome and genomic sequencing data of 538 renal cell carcinoma patients were obtained from the TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). Gene set enrichment analysis was used to identify the potential functions of the mutated genes enrolled in the nomogram. Results: We used multivariate Cox regression analysis and identified mutations in PBRM1 and ARID1A were associated with treatment outcomes in the patients with renal cancer in the MSKCC pan-cancer immunotherapy cohort. Based on this, we established an efficacy prediction model including age, gender, treatment type, tumor mutational burden (TMB), PBRM1 and ARID1A mutation status (HR=4.33, 95%CI: 1.42-13.23, P=0.01, 1-year survival AUC=0.700, 2-year survival AUC=0.825, 3-year survival AUC=0.776). The validation (HR=2.72, 95%CI: 1.12-6.64, P=0.027, 1-year survival AUC=0.694, 2-year survival AUC=0.709, 3-year survival AUC=0.609) and combination (HR=2.20, 95%CI: 1.14-4.26, P=0.019, 1-year survival AUC=0.613, 2-year survival AUC=0.687, 3-year survival AUC=0.526) sets confirmed these results. Gene set enrichment analysis indicated that PBRM1 was involved in positive regulation of epithelial cell differentiation, regulation of the T cell differentiation and regulation of humoral immune response. In addition, ARID1A was involved in regulation of the T cell activation, positive regulation of T cell mediated cyto-toxicity and positive regulation of immune effector process. Conclusion: PBRM1 and ARID1A mutations can be used as potential biomarkers for the evaluation of renal cancer immunotherapy efficacy. The efficacy prediction model established based on the mutation status of the above two genes can be used to screen renal cancer patients who are more suitable for ICI immunotherapy.

Key words: Renal cell carcinoma, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Gene mutation, Response evaluation

CLC Number: 

  • R737

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the included cohorts  n(%)"

Characteristic MSKCC immunotherapy cohort (ccRCC)
(n=121)		 Training set
(n=60)		 Model validation set
(n=61)		 P
Gender 0.56
  Male 90 (74.38) 46 (38.02) 44 (36.36)
  Female 31 (25.62) 14 (11.57) 17 (14.05)
Age 0.93
  >60 years 65 (53.72) 32 (26.45) 33 (27.27)
  ≤60 years 56 (46.28) 28 (23.14) 28 (23.14)
Drug type 0.45
  PD-1/PD-L1 94 (77.69) 45 (37.19) 49 (40.50)
  Combo* 27 (22.31) 15 (12.40) 12 (9.92)

Figure 1

Cox proportional hazard analysis to model association of mutations in PBRM1 and ARID1A with prognosis in patients who are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)"

Figure 2

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) A, GSEA between the wild-type and PBRM1 mutation groups; B, GSEA between the wild-type and ARID1A mutation groups."

Figure 3

Status of immune cell infiltration induced by mutation in PPBRM1 (A) and ARID1A (B)"

Figure 4

Construction of an integrated prognostic classifier model A nomogram based on age, gender, treatment type, tumor mutation burden (TMB), PBRM1 and ARID1A mutation status in the patients with renal cell carcinoma in MSKCC immune cohort (training set, n=60) (A), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting overall survival (OS) using the nomogram for the cohort(B), The OS curve with the nomogram for the cohort. The risk score is calculated according to the regression coefficient. According to the risk score, the cohort is divided into low-risk and high-risk score groups for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis(C), ROC curve and OS curve (D-E) of model validation set, ROC curve and OS curve entire set (F-G). FPR, false positive rate; TPR, true positive rate."

1 Sung H , Ferlay J , Siegel RL , et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71 (3): 209- 249.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
2 Moch H , Cubilla AL , Humphrey PA , et al. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs: Part A: Renal, penile, and testicular tumours[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 70 (1): 93- 105.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029
3 Ht C , McGovern F . Renal-cell carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353 (23): 2477- 2490.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043172
4 Bianchi M , Sun M , Jeldres C , et al. Distribution of metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma: A population-based analysis[J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23 (4): 973- 980.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr362
5 Everson TC , Cole WH . Spontaneous regression of cancer: Preliminary report[J]. Ann Surg, 1956, 144 (3): 366- 383.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-195609000-00007
6 Janiszewska AD , Poletajew S , Wasiutyński A . Spontaneous regression of renal cell carcinoma[J]. Contemp Oncol (Pozn), 2013, 17 (2): 123- 127.
7 Klapper JA , Downey SG , Smith FO , et al. High-dose interleukin-2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of response and survival in patients treated in the surgery branch at the National Cancer Institute between 1986 and 2006[J]. Cancer, 2008, 113 (2): 293- 301.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.23552
8 Motzer RJ , Escudier B , McDermott DF , et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 373 (19): 1803- 1813.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665
9 Motzer RJ , Tannir NM , McDermott DF , et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378 (14): 1277- 1290.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126
10 Plimack ER , Rini BI , Stus V , et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-426[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38 (Suppl 15): 5001.
11 Samstein RM , Lee CH , Shoushtari AN , et al. Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types[J]. Nat Genet, 2019, 51 (2): 202- 206.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0312-8
12 Braun DA , Hou Y , Bakouny Z , et al. Interplay of somatic alterations and immune infiltration modulates response to PD-1 blockade in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma[J]. Nat Med, 2020, 26 (6): 909- 918.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0839-y
13 McDermott DF , Huseni MA , Atkins MB , et al. Clinical activity and molecular correlates of response to atezolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma[J]. Nat Med, 2018, 24 (6): 749- 757.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0053-3
14 Braun DA , Ishii Y , Walsh AM , et al. Clinical validation of PBRM1 alterations as a marker of immune checkpoint inhibitor response in renal cell carcinoma[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2019, 5 (11): 1631- 1633.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3158
15 Motzer RJ , Banchereau R , Hamidi H , et al. Molecular subsets in renal cancer determine outcome to checkpoint and angiogenesis blockade[J]. Cancer cell, 2020, 38 (6): 803- 817.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.011
16 Hwang J , Kim H , Han J , et al. Identification of survival-specific genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using a customized next-generation sequencing gene panel[J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12 (1): 113.
doi: 10.3390/jpm12010113
17 Bui TO , Feugeas JP , Pamoukdjian F , et al. Genomics of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol, 2022, 81 (4): 349- 361.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.010
18 Zhou C , Niu Y , Ma T , et al. The predictive values of ARID1A mutations for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors are varied in different types of solid tumors[J]. Cancer Res, 2021, 81 (Suppl 13): 1641.
19 De Velasco G , Miao D , Voss MH , et al. Tumor mutational load and immune parameters across metastatic renal cell carcinoma risk groups[J]. Cancer Immunol Res, 2016, 4 (10): 820- 822.
doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0110
20 Chen DS , Mellman I . Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point[J]. Nature, 2017, 541 (7637): 321- 330.
doi: 10.1038/nature21349
21 Binnewies M , Roberts EW , Kersten K , et al. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy[J]. Nat Med, 2018, 24 (5): 541- 550.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x
[1] Yun-yi XU,Zheng-zheng SU,Lin-mao ZHENG,Meng-ni ZHANG,Jun-ya TAN,Ya-lan YANG,Meng-xin ZHANG,Miao XU,Ni CHEN,Xue-qin CHEN,Qiao ZHOU. Read-through circular RNA rt-circ-HS promotes hypoxia inducible factor 1α expression and renal carcinoma cell proliferation, migration and invasiveness [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(2): 217-227.
[2] Qi SHEN,Yi-xiao LIU,Qun HE. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of kidney: Clinicopathology and prognosis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(2): 276-282.
[3] Quan ZHANG,Hai-feng SONG,Bing-lei MA,Zhe-nan ZHANG,Chao-hui ZHOU,Ao-lin LI,Jun LIU,Lei LIANG,Shi-yu ZHU,Qian ZHANG. Pre-operative prognostic nutritional index as a predictive factor for prognosis in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(1): 149-155.
[4] Tian-yu CAI,Zhen-peng ZHU,Chun-ru XU,Xing JI,Tong-de LV,Zhen-ke GUO,Jian LIN. Expression and significance of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 628-635.
[5] Er-shu BO,Peng HONG,Yu ZHANG,Shao-hui DENG,Li-yuan GE,Min LU,Nan LI,Lu-lin MA,Shu-dong ZHANG. Clinicopathological features and prognostic analysis of papillary renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 615-620.
[6] Yi-cen YING,Qi TANG,Kai-wei YANG,Yue MI,Yu FAN,Wei YU,Yi SONG,Zhi-song HE,Li-qun ZHOU,Xue-song LI. Clinical features of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myositis in patients with urological cancer [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 644-651.
[7] Mei-ni ZUO,Yi-qing DU,Lu-ping YU,Xiang DAI,Tao XU. Correlation between metabolic syndrome and prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 636-643.
[8] Sheng-jie LIU,Hui-min HOU,Zheng-tong LV,Xin DING,Lu WANG,Lei ZHANG,Ming LIU. Bipolar androgen therapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: A report of 4 cases [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 766-769.
[9] GU Yang-chun,LIU Ying,XIE Chao,CAO Bao-shan. Pituitary immune-related adverse events induced by programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors in advanced lung cancer patients: A report of 3 cases [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 369-375.
[10] Yu TIAN,Xiao-yue CHENG,Hui-ying HE,Guo-liang WANG,Lu-lin MA. Clinical and pathological features of renal cell carcinoma with urinary tract tumor thrombus: 6 cases report and literature review [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 928-932.
[11] SUN Zheng-hui,HUANG Xiao-juan,DONG Jing-han,LIU Zhuo,YAN Ye,LIU Cheng,MA Lu-lin. Risk factors of renal sinus invasion in clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma patients undergoing nephrectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 659-664.
[12] YU Yan-fei,HE Shi-ming,WU Yu-cai,XIONG Sheng-wei,SHEN Qi,LI Yan-yan,YANG Feng,HE Qun,LI Xue-song. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of fumarate hydratase deficient renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 640-646.
[13] XIAO Ruo-tao,LIU Cheng,XU Chu-xiao,HE Wei,MA Lu-lin. Prognostic value of preoperative platelet parameters in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 647-652.
[14] FENG Ke,NI Jing-jing,XIA Yan-qing,QU Xiao-wei,ZHANG Hui-juan,WAN Feng,HONG Kai,ZHANG Cui-lian,GUO Hai-bin. Genetic analysis of three cases of acephalic spermatozoa syndrome caused by SUN5 mutation and the outcome of assisted reproductive technology [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 803-807.
[15] HAN Song-chen,HUANG Zi-xiong,LIU Hui-xin,XU Tao. Renal functional compensation after unilateral radical nephrectomy of renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 680-685.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(3): 288 -289 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(1): 93 -94 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(2): 97 -98 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(5): 431 -433 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(2): 214 -218 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2011, 43(1): 29 -33 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(6): 635 -639 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2003, 35(4): 429 -433 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2003, 35(5): 494 -498 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2003, 35(z1): 92 -94 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd