Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (3): 530-536. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.03.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor in the treatment of spinal metastases

Yun-peng CUI1,Xue-dong SHI1,*(),Jia LIU2,Chuan MI1,Bing WANG1,Yuan-xing PAN1,Yun-fei LIN1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2020-10-22 Online:2023-06-18 Published:2023-06-12
  • Contact: Xue-dong SHI E-mail:992516215@qq.com

RICH HTML

 1   

PDF (PC)

99

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor in the treatment of patients with spinal metastases. Methods: In the study, 12 patients of spinal metastases treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed between June 2017 and October 2019. Among the 12 patients, 9 were males and 3 were females; the median age was 62.5 years [(65.1±2.9) years]. The decompression segment of 7 patients was located at the lower thoracic spine (including 1 patient with incomplete paraplegia) and the decompression segment of 5 patients was located at the lumbar spine; Tomita score was 6.0±0.6. Perioperative data of the patients were reviewed. Visual analog scale (VAS score), Karnofsky score, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score were compared before and after surgery. The patient's survival, adjuvant treatment, and internal fixation failure were observed in the follow-up period. Results: All the 12 patients had a successful operation with percuta-neous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor. The average operative time, blood loss, and blood transfused of the patients were (247.0±14.6) min, (804.2±222.3) mL and (500.0±100.0) mL, respectively. The average amount of drainage was (240.8±79.3) mL. Drainage tubes were pulled out early postoperative [(3.2±0.3) d], allowing early mobilization. The patients discharged (7.8±0.8) d postoperative. All the patients were followed up for 6-30 months, and the average overall survival time was (13.6±2.4) months. During the follow-up period, 2 patients experienced screw displacement, the internal fixation was stable after conservative treatment and no revision surgery was performed. The VAS of the patients was 7.1±0.2 before surgery, which decreased to 2.3±0.1 and 2.8±0.4 at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05). The Karnofsky score of the patients was 59.2±1.9 before surgery, which increased to 75.0±1.9 and 74.2±3.1 at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05). The ECOG of the patients was 2.3±0.2 before surgery, which decreased to 1.7±0.1 and 1.7±0.2 at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For selected patients with spinal metastases, minimally invasive surgical treatment of spinal metastases (percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation combined with expandable tubular retractor) can effectively relieve the clinical symptoms and improve the quality of life, with satisfactory clinical outcome.

Key words: Spinal, Metastasectomy, Minimally invasive surgical procedures, Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation

CLC Number: 

  • R738.1

Table 1

Demographics and preoperative data of 12 patients with spinal metastases"

Items Minimally invasive spine surgery (n=12)
Gender
  Female 3
  Male 9
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s 65.1±2.9
Primary tumor
  Renal 3
  Lung 3
  Prostate 2
  Multiple myeloma 2
  Uroepithelium 1
  Esophageal 1
Bilsky compression grade
  1c 3
  2 8
  3 1
ASIA grade
  D 1
  E 4
  Lesion locate below L1 7
Location of the lesion
  Lumbar 7
  Thoracic 5
Tomita score, ${\bar x}$±s 6.0±0.6
SINS score, ${\bar x}$±s 10.3±0.3
Karnofsky score, ${\bar x}$±s 59.2±1.9
ECOG grade, ${\bar x}$±s 2.3±0.2
VAS, ${\bar x}$±s 7.8±0.2

Figure 1

Long segment percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor in the treatment of patients with spinal metastases A 78-year-old female with uroepithelium cell carcinoma and multiple metastases suffered intractable low back and radiating pain. The patient performed percutaneous vertebro plasty (PVP) 2 months ago because of L4 metastasis, long-segment fixation. A, preoperative lumbar X-rays, MRI show bone destruction of the L4 vertebra, and an abnormal signal appears in the L4 vertebral body and spinal canal. The dural sac is significantly compressed. Chest CT showed left pleural effusion with atelectasis. B, during the operation, pedicle screws were inserted percutaneously, the scope of resection was confirmed under fluoroscopy, photos under the tubular retractor (dural sac compression was relieved) and the skin incision. C, postoperative X-ray shows stable internal fixation and bone cement position. D, postoperative CT and MRI shows the extent of surgical resection and degree of decompression."

Table 2

Surgical results of 12 patients with spinal metastases"

Items Minimally invasive spine surgery (n=12)
Operative time/min 247.0±14.6
  Tumors originating from the renal 282.7±33.7
  Others 235.1±15.0
Estimated blood loss/mL 804.2±222.3
  Tumors originating from the renal 1 900.0±458.3
  Others 438.9±79.8
Number of patients transfused 10 (83.3%)
Blood transfusion/mL 500.0±100.0
  Tumors originating from the renal 666.7±352.8
  Others 444.5±80.1
Perioperative complications
  Dural injury 2 (16.7%)
  Urinary tract infection 0
  Deep vein thrombosis 0
  Pneumonia 0
  Screw malposition 0
  Wound problem 0
Total amount of drainage/mL
  All patients 240.8±79.3
  Patients without dural injury 127.5±24.4
Postoperative drainage tube removal/d 3.2±0.3
Postoperative hospital stay/d 7.8±0.8

Figure 2

Short segment percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined expandable tubular retractor in the treatment of patients with spinal metastases An 80-year-old male with multiple myeloma presented intractable right lower extremity radiation pain, short-segment fixation. A, preoperative lumbar X-rays and MRI showed bone destruction of the L4 vertebra and abnormal signal appeared in L4 vertebral body and intervertebral foramen, L4 nerve root was squeezed. B, photos under the tubular retractor (nerve root compression was relieved) and the skin incision. C, postoperative X-ray shows good internal fixation and bone cement position. D, 12 months postoperation, radiology showed screws displacement at L3 and fresh vertebral compression fracture at L2. Percutaneous vertebra plasty (PVP) was performed at L2 and bone cement was used to increase the holding force of pedicle screws at L3. E, 24 months postoperation, X-ray shows screws was maintained stable. F, postoperative CT shows the extent of surgical resection."

Table 3

Follow-up data of 12 patients with spinal metastases"

Items Minimally invasive spine surgery (n=12)
Overall survival/months, ${\bar x}$±s 13.6±2.4
Screw displacement 2 (16.7%)
ASIA grade
  D 0
  E 5
  Lesion locate below L1 7
Subsequent treatment
  Targeted therapy 4
  Systemic therapy 4
  Radiotherapy 2
  None 2
Number of deaths 3 (25%)

Table 4

VAS and Karnofsky score before surgery and 6 months after surgery of 12 patients with spinal metastases"

Items Minimally invasive spine surgery (n=12)
VAS, ${\bar x}$±s
  Preoperation 7.1±0.2
  Discharge 2.6±0.1*
  3 months postoperation 2.3±0.1*
  6 months postoperation 2.8±0.4*
Karnofsky score, ${\bar x}$±s
  Preoperation 59.2±1.9
  3 months postoperation 75.0±1.9*
  6 months postoperation 74.2±3.1*
ECOG grade, ${\bar x}$±s
  Preoperation 2.3±0.2
  3 months postoperation 1.7±0.1*
  6 months postoperation 1.7±0.2*

Figure 3

Diagram of tubular retractor placement A, the tumor invaded the pedicle and facet joints, the retractor was placed close to the facet joint with a small tilt angle; B, the tumor does not invade the facet joint, but invades parts of the pedicle, the retractor was placed far away from the facet joint and had a larger tilt angle."

1 Siegel RL , Miller KD , Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2019[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019, 69 (1): 7- 34.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21551
2 中华医学会骨科学分会骨肿瘤学组. 骨转移瘤外科治疗专家共识[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2009, 29 (12): 1177- 1184.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2009.12.024
3 中华医学会骨科学分会骨肿瘤学组. 脊柱转移瘤外科治疗指南[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2019, 39 (12): 717- 726.
4 Kawahara N , Tomita K , Murakami H , et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: surgical techniques and related basic background[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2009, 40 (1): 47- 63.
doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2008.09.004
5 Tokuhashi Y , Matsuzaki H , Oda H , et al. A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30 (19): 2186- 2191.
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000180401.06919.a5
6 Spratt DE , Beeler WH , de Moraes FY , et al. An integrated multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of spinal metastases: An International Spine Oncology Consortium report[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18 (12): e720- e730.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30612-5
7 Laufer I , Rubin DG , Lis E , et al. The NOMS framework: Approach to the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors[J]. Oncologist, 2013, 18 (6): 744- 751.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0293
8 Paton GR , Frangou E , Fourney DR . Contemporary treatment strategy for spinal metastasis: The "LMNOP" system[J]. Can J Neurol Sci, 2011, 38 (3): 396- 403.
doi: 10.1017/S031716710001177X
9 Weigel B , Maghsudi M , Neumann C , et al. Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases: Postoperative outcome and quality of life[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1999, 24 (21): 2240- 2246.
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00012
10 Patchell RA , Tibbs PA , Regine WF , et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: A randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2005, 366 (9486): 643- 648.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66954-1
11 Jansson KA , Bauer HCF . Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases[J]. Eur Spine J, 2006, 15 (2): 196- 202.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0870-6
12 Finkelstein JA , Zaveri G , Wai E , et al. A population-based study of surgery for spinal metastases survival rates and complications[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2003, 85 (7): 1045- 1050.
13 Tian NF , Wu YS , Zhang XL , et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar the current evidence[J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22 (8): 174l- 1749.
14 Ge DH , Stekas ND , Varlotta CG , et al. Comparative analysis of two transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques: Open TLIF versus Wiltse MIS TLIF[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2019, 44 (9): E555- E560.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002903
15 Moussazadeh N , Rubin DG , McLaughlin L , et al. Short-segment percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with cement augmentation for tumor-induced spinal instability[J]. Spine J, 2015, 15 (7): 1609- 1617.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.037
16 Lau D , Chou D . Posterior thoracic corpectomy with cage reconstruction for metastatic spinal tumors: Comparing the mini-open approach to the open approach[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 23 (8): 217- 227.
17 Hansen-Algenstaedt N , Kwan MK , Algenstaedt P , et al. Compa-rison between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for patients with spinal metastasis: A prospective propensity score-matched study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42 (10): 789- 797.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001893
18 Lu VM , Alvi MA , Goyal A , et al. The potential of minimally invasive surgery to treat metastatic spinal disease versus open surge-ry: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 112, e859- e868.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.176
19 Nzokou A , Weil AG , Shedid D . Minimally invasive removal of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors using a nonexpandable tubular retractor: Clinical article[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013, 19 (6): 708- 715.
doi: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE121061
20 Tian F , Tu LY , Gu WF , et al. Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw instrumentation in treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97 (41): e12535.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012535
21 李长青, 张伟, 常献, 等. 小切口减压结合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗伴神经功能损害的胸腰椎骨折[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2014, 24 (5): 395- 399.
22 Zairi F , Arikat A , Allaoui M , et al. Minimally invasive decompression and stabilization for the management of thoracolumbar spine metastasis[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2012, 17 (1): 19- 23.
doi: 10.3171/2012.4.SPINE111108
23 Harel R , Doron O , Knoller N . Minimally invasive spine metastatic tumor resection and stabilization: New technology yield improved outcome[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015, 948373.
24 Hong CG , Cho JH , Suh DC , et al. Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: Mandatory or optional?[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2017, 15 (1): 45.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1118-3
25 Nandyala SV , Fineberg SJ , Pelton M , et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One surgeon's learning curve[J]. Spine J, 2014, 14 (8): 1460- 1465.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.045
[1] Li-jia MA,Pan-pan HU,Xiao-guang LIU. Spinal metastases combined with leptomeningeal metastasis: A case report [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(3): 563-566.
[2] Dan-feng ZHENG,Jun-yu LI,Jia-xi LI,Ying-shuang ZHANG,Yan-feng ZHONG,Miao YU. Pathologic features of paraspinal muscle biopsies in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(2): 283-291.
[3] Shu-heng ZHAI,Pan-pan HU,Xiao-guang LIU. Intraoperative ultrasound assisted circumferential decompression for multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in thoracic vertebrae [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(5): 1021-1027.
[4] LIN Guo-zhong,MA Chang-cheng,WU Chao,SI Yu. Microscopic resection of lumbar intraspinal tumor through keyhole approach: A clinical study of 54 cases [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 315-319.
[5] LI Jun,LIU Xu-hong,WANG Gong,CHENG Cheng,ZHUANG Hong-qing,YANG Rui-jie. Dosimetric effect of patient arm position on Cyberknife radiosurgery for spinal tumors [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 182-186.
[6] HOU Guo-jin,ZHOU Fang,TIAN Yun,JI Hong-quan,ZHANG Zhi-shan,GUO Yan,LV Yang,YANG Zhong-wei,ZHANG Ya-wen. Risk factors of recurrent kyphosis in thoracolumbar burst fracture patients treated by short segmental pedicle screw fixation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 167-174.
[7] YUAN Yuan,LANG Ning,YUAN Hui-shu. CT spectral curve in differentiating spinal tumor metastasis and infections [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 183-187.
[8] Bei-yu XU,Long-tao QI,Yu WANG,Chun-de LI,Hao-lin SUN,Shi-jun WANG,Zheng-rong YU,Yao ZHAO,Long-long LIU. Clinical efficacy of short-term halo-pelvic traction combined with surgery in the treatment of severe spinal deformities [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 875-880.
[9] Sheng-wei XIONG,Jie WANG,Wei-jie ZHU,Si-da CHENG,Lei ZHANG,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 794-798.
[10] Chang-cheng MA,Zhen-yu WANG,Guo-zhong LIN. Diagnosis and treatment of primary intraspinal abscess [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 275-280.
[11] Ya-long QIAN,Shuai XU,Hai-ying LIU. Lower limb ischemia cured by stimulation electrode implantation assisted with microendoscopic discectomy system: A case report [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 378-381.
[12] Wei-hao LI,Xue-min ZHANG,Zhi-bin HE,Xiao-ming ZHANG,Jing-jun JIANG,Tao ZHANG,Wei LI,Qing-le LI. Spinal cord stimulation for non-reconstructable chronic ritical limb ischemiae: a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 362-364.
[13] WANG Yong-qiang, LIU Xiao-guang，JIANG Liang, WEI Feng, YU Miao, WU Feng-liang, DANG Lei, ZHOU Hua, LIU Zhong-jun. Treatment of subcutaneous fistula secondary to cerebrospinal fluid leakage in thoracic spinal stenosis cases [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 657-661.
[14] MA Chang-cheng, LIN Guo-zhong, WANG Zhen-yu. Early surgical treatment of multi-segmet intramedullary cervical spinal cord ependymoma [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 847-850.
[15] YU Zheng-rong, LI Chun-de, ZHU Sai-nan, SUN Hao-lin, ZHAO Yao, QI Long-tao. Efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic nerve root decompression in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 252-255.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd