Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 166-171. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of dual chamber round tissue expander in immediate breast reconstruction

Jianxun MA, Xi BU, Bi LI*()   

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2024-08-01 Online:2025-02-18 Published:2025-01-25
  • Contact: Bi LI E-mail:libi0377@sina.com

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the application value of dual chamber round tissue expander in immediate breast reconstruction. Methods: Sixteen patients, who had been provided immediate tissue expander/implant two-stage breast reconstruction using dual chamber round tissue expander in our hospital from March 2022 to October 2023, were involved in this study, and the relevant information was analyzed retrospectively. The overall design of the expander is a round shape, consisting of two equally divided semi-circular chambers. The two expansion chambers are connected by a silicone pad below and are respectively connected to their own water injection tubes. Both chambers are designed to expand unidirectionally towards the surface. The expansion principle, insertion process, and type of expander selection were investigated. The expansion effect and incidence of complications were summarized. The aesthetic effect of reconstructed breasts was evaluated from three aspects after stage Ⅱ surgery: the position of infra mammary fold, the breast protrusion, and the breast volume. Results: Among sixteen patients in this study, three patients were selected with the type of 400 mL expander and thirteen patients were given the type of 600 mL expander. The median time of tissue expansion was 4.0 (2.0, 5.0) months, with an average volume of expansion of (538.8±111.7) mL. The average expansion ratio of upper/lower chamber was 45.4%±8.4%. The position of the infra mammary fold needed not to be adjusted during the prosthesis exchange process. All the patients were applied anatomical prostheses, and the median volume of the prosthesis was 395 (345, 410) mL. One patient developed seroma during expansion period, who got improved after local aspiration. The average follow-up time was (9.0±3.6) months. 81.3% (13/16) of the patients achieved an aesthetic evaluation of "Good" in breast reconstruction, and 75.0% (12/16) of the patients got a grade Ⅰ or grade Ⅱ capsule contracture of the prosthesis. Conclusion: The application of dual chamber round tissue expander could effectively dilate the lower pole of the breast, personalize the expansion ratio of the upper and lower poles of the breast, and avoid the displacement of the expander during the expansion period. Therefore, it could provide a good foundation for subsequent prosthesis exchange.

Key words: Dual chamber tissue expander, Tissue expansion, Breast reconstruction

CLC Number: 

  • R655.8

Table 1

Summary of characteristics of sixteen patients undergoing dual chamber round tissue-expander/implant two-stage breast reconstruction"

Items Data
Age 44.3±8.1
Body mass index 25.0 (23.9, 26.0)
Clinical stage (breast cancer)  
    Stage 0 3 (18.7)
    Stage Ⅰ 9 (56.3)
    Stage Ⅱ 4 (25.0)
Final pathology  
    Invasive ductal carcinoma 12 (75.0)
    Ductal carcinoma in situ 4 (25.0)
Affected side  
    Right 10 (62.5)
    Left 6 (37.5)
Nipple-areola preserving  
    Yes 1 (6.2)
    No 15 (93.8)
Axillary lymph node dissection  
    Yes 4 (25.0)
    No 12 (75.0)
Chemotherapy  
    Yes 12 (75.0)
    No 4 (25.0)
Radiation  
    Yes 3 (18.7)
    No 13 (81.3)

Figure 1

Dual chamber round tissue expander A, the illustration of the expander; B, the physical sample of the expander."

Figure 2

The insertion process of the dual chamber round tissue expander A, determination of the size matching between the cavity and the expander; B, the expander is placed at the sub-pectoralis major muscle plane; C, the expander is covered by the serratus anterior muscle fascia on the lateral side; D, injections for both chambers are conducted intraoperatively; E, both ports are buried into the subcutaneous layer of the lateral chest."

Table 2

Relevant information on breast reconstruction of sixteen patients utilizing dual chamber round tissue expander"

Items Data
Type of expander  
    400 mL 3 (18.7)
    600 mL 13 (81.3)
Volume injected for expansion/mL 538.8±111.7
Period of expansion/months 4.0 (2.0, 5.0)
Upper/lower pole expansion ratio 45.4±8.4
Over expansion ratio 43.3 (41.4, 50.9)
Implant volume/mL 395 (345, 410)
Surgery of contralateral breast  
    Mastopexy 3 (18.8)
    Breast reduction 1 (6.3)
Follow-up/months 9.0±3.6
Recurrence or metastasis of tumor 0 (0)
Complication 1 (6.3)
Aesthetic evaluation of reconstructed breast  
    Good 13 (81.3)
    Fine 2 (12.5)
    Poor 1 (6.2)
Capsular contraction  
    ⅠA 1 (6.2)
    ⅠB 2 (12.5)
    Ⅱ 9 (56.3)
    Ⅲ 4 (25.0)

Figure 3

Perioperative photos of a patient undergoing dual chamber round tissue-expander/implant two-stage breast reconstruction A, photos of the patient before mastectomy in frontal, 45° oblique, and 90° lateral position; B, photos of the patient when she finished the tissue expansion, while the expanded side got similar shape with the contra-lateral side, which had a linear upper pole slope and a convex lower pole, and the expander, which was injected 260 mL into the upper chamber and 500 mL into the lower chamber, provided the reconstructed side a teardrop shape; C, intraoperative photos of the patients when the prosthesis exchange was finished, and two breasts achieved good symmetry in both lying and upright position; D, photos of the patient sixteen months after the final reconstruction in frontal, 45° oblique, and 90° lateral position, and the two breasts achieved good symmetry."

Figure 4

Perioperative photos of a patient undergoing dual chamber round tissue-expander/implant two-stage breast reconstruction with contralateral mastopexy A, photos of the patient before mastectomy in frontal, 45° oblique, and 90° lateral position; B, photos of the patient when she finished the tissue expansion, and the expander, which was injected 170 mL into the upper chamber and 340 mL into the lower chamber, provided the expanded side a water droplet appearance with a prominent lower pole, while the contralateral side got a moderate ptosis appearance; C, intraoperative photos of the patients, the expanded side was inserted a breast sizer which had the same volume and three-dimensional shape as the final prosthesis, and the contralateral side received temporary sutures to simulate the breast shape post-mastopexy, and two breasts achieved a good symmetry in upright position; D, photos of the patient six months after the final reconstruction in frontal, 45° oblique, and 90° lateral position, and the two breasts achieved good symmetry."

1 Xu F , Lei C , Cao H , et al. Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2021, 33 (1): 33- 41.
doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.04
2 Yang B , Ren G , Song E , et al. Current status and factors influencing surgical options for breast cancer in China: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of 110 hospitals[J]. Oncologist, 2020, 25 (10): e1473- e1480.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0001
3 马建勋, 夏有辰, 李比, 等. 组织扩张结合假体乳房重建的技术改进[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52 (1): 169- 176.
doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.027
4 Cordeiro PG , Jazayeri L . Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: An evolution of the conceptual and technical approach over a two-decade period[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016, 138 (1): 1- 11.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002243
5 Okumura S , Hyodo I , Iwata H , et al. Immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction without the use of acellular dermal matrix in Japanese breast cancer patients[J]. Breast Cancer, 2020, 27 (4): 759- 764.
doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01073-4
6 Spear SL , Baker JL Jr . Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1995, 96 (5): 1119- 1123.
doi: 10.1097/00006534-199510000-00018
7 Makiguchi T , Atomura D , Nakamura H , et al. Quantitative assessment and risk factors for chest wall deformity resulting from tissue expansion for breast reconstruction[J]. Breast Cancer, 2019, 26 (4): 446- 451.
doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-00942-3
8 Hammond DC , Perry LC , Maxwell GP , et al. Morphologic analysis of tissue-expander shape using a biomechanical model[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1993, 92 (2): 255- 259.
doi: 10.1097/00006534-199308000-00009
9 Pacella SJ . Evolution in tissue expander design for breast reconstruction: Technological innovation to optimize patient outcomes[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 142 (Suppl 4): S21- S30.
10 Bertozzi N , Pesce M , Santi P , et al. Tissue expansion for breast reconstruction: Methods and techniques[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2017, 21, 34- 44.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.048
11 Grimaldi L , Campana M , Brandi C , et al. Selective capsulotomies of the expanded breast as a remodelling method in two-stage breast reconstruction[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 2013, 47 (3): 185- 190.
doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2012.740412
12 Fischer LH , Nguyen D . Double-chamber tissue expanders optimize lower pole expansion in immediate breast reconstruction requiring adjuvant radiation therapy[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2016, 76 (Suppl 3): S171- S174.
13 Mallucci P , Branford OA . Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: Analysis of the ideal breast[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2012, 65 (1): 8- 16.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.08.006
14 Mallucci P , Branford OA . Population analysis of the perfect breast: A morphometric analysis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2014, 134 (3): 436- 447.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000485
[1] Jian-xun MA,You-chen XIA,Bi LI,Hong-mei ZHAO,Yu-tao LEI. Techniques enhancement for tissue expander/implant two-stage breast reconstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 169-176.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!