Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 807-813. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.05.011

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Pharmacokinetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in child-ren with primary nephrotic syndrome

HAN Ye1, DU Si-qian2, XIAO Hui-jie1, ZHOU Yin2, DING Jie1, DING Juan-juan3, CUI Yi-min2   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China;
    2.Department of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China;
    3.Department of Nephrology, Wuhan Children Hospital, Wuhan 430015, China
  • Received:2015-12-23 Online:2017-10-18 Published:2017-10-18
  • Supported by:
    We express our thanks to the children and their parents who participated in this study. We also acknowledge the support of the local clinical investigators and technicians who conducted the stu-dy. This work was not financially supported by institutional or pharmaceutical company grants.

Abstract: Objective: Tacrolimus prolonged-release(PR) formulation is a new once-daily formulation of the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus, which is currently used in adult liver or kidney transplant patients,and is also gradually widely used in children with nephrotic syndrome.The present study was undertaken to preliminarily investigate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of tacrolimus PR in pediatric nephrotic syndrome recipients. Methods: This single-center open-label prospective study was performed in pediatric nephrotic syndrome recipients. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected from eight pediatric subjects with nephrotic syndrome from Department of Pediatric Nephrology in Peking University First Hospital between June and August 2011. They followed administration of single oral doses of tacrolimus PR formulation at 0.02 mg/kg (n=2), 0.05 mg/kg (n=2) and 0.10 mg/kg (n=4). Blood samples were taken before the dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after drug intake. No other medicines or interacting food or drinks were taken during the study period. Blood concentrations were measured using an enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using WinNolin Phoenix software Version 6.0(Pharsight, Cary, NC,USA). Results: The pharmacokinetic data were best described by a non-compartment model. Pharmacokinetic parameters of tacrolimus PR formulation in the 3 ascending doses groups (0.02 mg/kg,0.05 mg/kg and 0.10 mg/kg) were as follows: the maximum drug concentrations (Cmax/D) were (1.7±1.0) μg/L, (3.1±1.9) μg/L, (8.0±3.5) μg/L, respectively;Areas under the drug concentration-time curve(AU0-∞/D) were (47.2±47.1) h·μg/L, (84.0±13.1) h·μg/L, (175.6±107.1) h·μg/L, respectively; Oral clearance rates were (0.8±0.9) L/(h·kg), (0.4±0.1) L/(h·kg), (1.9±1.3) L/(h·kg), respectively; Body weight normalized distribution volumes were (7.0±3.4) L/kg, (12.4±8.4) L/kg and (73.6±68.6) L/kg, respectively. Both mean Cmax normalized level for the administered dose(Cmax/D) and mean AU0-∞ normalized level for the administered dose (AU0-∞/D) were higher in the 0.05 mg/kg dosage group than in the 0.02 and 0.10 mg/kg dosage group. There were two peaks in the drug concentrations in every dose group;a primary peak appeared at the end of about 2 h followed by a small secondary peak at h 12, which was more noticeable in the 0.10 mg/kg dose group than in the two lower dosages. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic characteristics of tacrolimus PR formulation were initially explored in pediatric patients with nephritic syndrome. The data presented form a basis for subsequent larger scale studies on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus PR formulation in nephritic syndrome children.

Key words: Tacrolimus, Prolonged-release formulation, Once daily, Pediatrics, Pediatric pharmacology

CLC Number: 

  • R729
[1] Abdulnour HA, Araya CE, Dharnidharka VR. Comparison of generic tacrolimus and Prograf drug levels in a pediatric kidney transplant program[J].Pediatr Transplant, 2010, 14(8):1007-1011.
[2] Holt DW, Armstrong VW, Griesmacher A, et al. Federation of clinical chemistry international association of therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicology working group on immunosuppressive drug monitoring[J].Ther Drug Monit, 2002, 24(1):59-67.
[3] Zhao W, Fakhoury M, Baudouin V, et al.Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients[J].Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2013, 69(2): 189-195.
[4] van Hooff J, van der Walt I, Kallmeyer J, et al.Pharmacokinetics in stable kidney transplant recipients after conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus formulations[J].Ther Drug Monit, 2012, 34(1): 46-52.
[5] de Widdt SN, van Schaik RHN, Soldin OP, et al.The interactions of age, genetics, and disease severity on tacrolimus dosing requirements after pediatric kidney and liver transplantation[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2011, 67(12): 1231-1241.
[6] Montini G, Ujka F, Varagnolo C, et al.The pharmacokinetics and immunosuppressive response of tacrolimus in paediatric renal transplant recipients[J].Pediatr Nephrol, 2006, 21(5): 719-724.
[7] Zhao W, Elie V, Roussey G, et al.Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric kidney transplant recipients[J].Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2009, 86(6):609-618.
[8] Woillard JB, de Winter BC, Kamar N, et al.Population pharmacokinetic model and bayesian estimator for two tacrolimus formulations-twice daily prograf and once daily advagraf[J].Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2011, 71(3): 391-402.
[9] Lapeyraque AL, Kassir N, Théorêt Y, et al.Conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in pediatric kidney recipients: a pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2014, 29(6): 1081-1088.
[10] Fischer L, Truneáka P, Gridelli B, et al.Pharmacokinetics for once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplantation: A randomized, open-label trial[J]. Liver Transpl, 2011, 17(2): 167-177.
[11] Dirks NL, Huth B, Yates CR, et al.Pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants: a perspective on ethnic differences[J].Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2004, 42(12): 708-718.
[12] Mancinelli LM, Frassetto L, Floren LC, et al.The pharmacokine-tics and metabolic disposition of tacrolimus: a comparison across ethnic groups[J].Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2001, 69(1): 24-31.
[13] Wu P, Ni X, Wang M, et al.Polymorphisms in CYP3A5*3 and MDR1, and haplotype modulate response to plasma levels of tacrolimus in Chinese renal transplant patients[J]. Ann Transplant, 2011, 16(1): 54-60.
[14] Saint-Marcoux F, Debord J, Parant F, et al. Development and evaluation of a simulation procedure to take into account various assays for the bayesian dose adjustment of tacrolimus[J]. Ther Drug Monit, 2011, 33(2): 171-177.
[15] Kim JS, Aviles DH, Silverstein DM, et al.Effect of age,ethnicity,and glucocorticoid use on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant patients[J].Pediatr Transplant, 2005, 9(2): 162-169.
[16] Shi Y, Li Y, Tang J, et al. Influence of CYP3A4,CYP3A5 and MDR-1 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and early renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients[J].Gene, 2013, 512(2): 226-231.
[17] Zuo XC, Ng CM, Barrett JS, et al.Effects of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in Chinese adult renal transplant recipients: a population pharmacokine-tic analysis[J].Pharmacogenetic Genomics, 2013, 23(5): 251-261.
[18] Cizmarikova M, Podracka L, Klimcakova L, et al.MDR1 Polymorphisms and idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in Slovak children: preliminary results[J].Med Sci Monit, 2015, 21(1): 59-68.
[19] Chen Y, Zhao Y, Wang C, et al. Inhibition of p38 MAPK diminishes doxorubicin-induced drug resistence associated with P-glycoprotein in human leukemia K562 cells[J].Med Sci Monit, 2012, 18(10): 383-388.
[20] Stachowski J, Zanker CB, Runowski D, et al. Resistance to the-rapy in primary nephrotic syndrome: effect of MDR1 gene activity[J]. Pol Merkuriusz Lek, 2000, 8(46): 218-221.
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 927-929.
[2] WANG Fang, ZHANG Yan-qin, DING Jie, YU Li-xia. Detection of large deletions in X linked Alport syndrome using competitive multiplex fluorescence polymerase chain reaction [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 0, (): 760-767.
[3] HAN Ye, DU Si-qian, XIAO Hui-jie, ZHOU Ying, DING Jie, DING Juan-juan, CUI Yi-min. Pharmacokinetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in child-ren with primary nephrotic syndrome#br# [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 0, (): 807-813.
[4] WANG Fang, ZHANG Yan-qin, DING Jie, YU Li-xia. Detection of large deletions in X linked Alport syndrome using competitive multiplex fluorescence polymerase chain reaction [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 760-767.
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 0, (): 0-封三.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Author. English Title Test[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .