Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences)

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative results of non-operative and operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures

ZHANG Bo-song1△, LI Wen-yi2, LIU Xing-hua1, WEI Jie1, HE Liang1, WANG Man-yi1   

  1. (1. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China; 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
  • Online:2017-10-18
  • Contact: ZHANG Bo-song E-mail:zhangbosong@sina.com

Abstract: Objective: To compare the difference between non-operative and operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Methods: From March 2005 to October 2012, 252 cases of humeral shaft fractures were treated and were adequately followed up. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into 2 groups: the non-operative group and the operative group. In the non-operative group, there were 76 cases treated with plaster/small splint fixation,meanwhile there were 176 cases treated with internal fixation either by plating or by nailing in the operative group. The follow-up parameters included: fracture healing rate, fracture union time, complications rate, Constant- Murley shoulder score and Mayo elbow score. Results: The mean follow-up period was (31.24±20.06) months (ranging 6 to 103 months). There were no statistical differences in age, open fracture number, fracture site and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification between the non-operative group and the operative group. The fracture healing rate: the non-operative group: 96.1%(72/76), the operative group: 97.7%(172/176), P=0.46; the fracture union time: the non-operative group: (10.24±2.93) weeks, the operative group: (10.69±2.51) weeks, P=0.22; the complication rate: the non-operative group: 5.3%(4/76),the operative group: 15.3%(27/176), P=0.03. The complications included: nonunion: the nonoperative group: 3.95%(3/76), the operative group: 2.3%(4/176), P=0.434; radial nerve palsies: the non-operative group: 0%(0/76), the operative group: 5.7%(10/176), P=0.035; bone split: the non-operative group: 0%(0/76), the operative group: 1.7%(3/176), P=0.556; elbow stiffness: the nonoperative group:1.3%(1/76), the operative group: 0.6%(1/176), P=1.000; shoulder pain: the nonoperative group:0%(0/76), the operative group: 5.1%(9/176), P=0.061. The ConstantMurley shoulder score: the non-operative group: 97.37±4.94, the operative group: 96.34±6.88, P=0.244. The Mayo elbow score: the non-operative group: 99.80±1.72, the operative group: 99.49±2.73,P=0.923. Conclusion: The results of non-operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures appeared with excellent results with lower complications rate compared with that of the operative treatment.

Key words: Humeral shaft fracture, Plaster, Small splint, Plate, Interlocking intramedullary nail

CLC Number: 

  • R683.41
[1] LIU Zhong-di, MA Ming-tai, CHEN Jian-hai, FU Zhong-guo, JIANG Bao-guo. “Time-angle measurement” reduction evaluation technique and clinical evaluation of proximal humerus fracture [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1003-1007.
[2] LI Xu, LI Feng-long, LU Yi, ZHU Yi-ming, GUO Si-yi, LI Yi-jun, JIANG Chun-yan. Clinical study on locking plate for the treatment of non-osteoporotic complex proximal humeral fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 855-860.
[3] ZHANG Bo-song, LI Wen-yi, LIU Xing-hua, WEI Jie, HE Liang, WANG Man-yi. Comparative results of non-operative and operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 851-854.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!