Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Effects of CAD/CAM titanium alloy surface treatment and resin luting on shear bond strength and durability of composite resin
Received date: 2018-08-17
Online published: 2019-02-26
Supported by
Supported by the Capital Special Fund for Health Development and Scientific Research(2018-2-4102)
Objective: To assess the effects of two surface treatments (sandblasting, SB; microarc-oxidation, MAO) and resin luting on shear bond strength and durability of titanium alloy and composite-resin. Methods: Eighty cylindrical titanium alloy specimens with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 8 mm were fabricated by CAD/CAM technique. It was divided into two groups according to the surface treatment methods: sandblasting with Al2O3 particles on the surface of SB specimens; porous ceramic film structure could be formed on the surface of MAO specimens after surface treatment. Each group was classified into SB-resin luting-N group (not used), SB-resin luting-Y group (used), MAO-resin luting-N group (not used), MAO-resin luting-Y group (used) depending on whether or not resin luting was applied. Each specimen was bonded and cured with the Cemerage resin, and the shear bond strength after 0 and 5 000 thermocycling was tested. The results were statistically analyzed. The surface morphology of titanium alloy specimens before and after the shear bond strength test was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results:The shear bond strength between titanium alloy and composite-resin was the highest in the SB combined with resin luting group after 0 thermocycling (16.2±1.8) MPa; was the lowest in MAO group after 5 000 thermocycling (8.9±1.5) MPa. The shear bond strength of SB and MAO surface treatment methods combined without resin luting group after 5 000 thermocycling were (10.7±2.2) MPa and (8.9±1.5) MPa, which were statistically lower than those in the thermocycling 0 (P=0.000 and P=0.001). The shear bond strength of SB and MAO surface treatment methods combined with resin luting group after 5 000 thermocycling were (15.5±2.1) MPa and (11.7±1.3) MPa, respectively, which were lower than those in the thermocycling 0 group, but there was no statistical significance (P=0.087 and P=0.234). Conclusion: Both the surface treatment methods of SB and MAO combined with resin luting can improve the shear bond strength and durability of titanium alloy and composite-resin. The SB combined with resin luting is more significant. At present, the effect of SB is better than that of MAO due to the limitation of technical parameters of micro-arc oxidation.
Bei-bei LI , Ping DI . Effects of CAD/CAM titanium alloy surface treatment and resin luting on shear bond strength and durability of composite resin[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019 , 51(1) : 111 -114 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.020
| [1] | Guo CY, Tang ATH, Matinlinna JP . Insights into surface treatment methods of titanium dental implants[J]. J Adhes Sci Tech-nol, 2012,26(1/2/3):189-205. |
| [2] | Abduo J . Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review[J]. J Oral Implantlol, 2014,40(6):758-766. |
| [3] | Molitor P, Barron V, Young T . Surface treatment of titanium for adhesive bonding to polymer composites: a review[J]. Int J Adhes, 2001,21(2):129-136. |
| [4] | Egoshi T, Taira Y, Soeno K , et al. Effects of sandblasting, H2SO4/HCl etching, and phosphate primer application on bond strength of veneering resin composite to commercially pure titanium grade 4[J]. Dent Mater J, 2013,32(2):219-227. |
| [5] | Yang G, Xianyi L, Bai Y , et al. The effects of current density on the phase composition and microstructure properties of micro-arc oxidation coating[J]. J Alloy Compd, 2002,345(1/2):196-200. |
| [6] | Taira Y, Yanagida H, Matsumura H , et al. Adhesive bonding of titanium with a thione-phosphate dual functional primer and self-curing luting agents[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2000,108(5):456-460. |
| [7] | 马志玲, 刘杰 . 钛基底表面处理对钛-树脂粘接强度的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017,44(1):45-49. |
| [8] | Darvell BW, Samman N, Luk WK , et al. Contamination of titanium castings by aluminium oxide blasting[J]. J Dent, 1995,23(5):319-322. |
| [9] | Ban S, Taniki T, Sato H , et al. Acid etching of titanium for bonding with veneering composite resins[J]. Dent Mater J, 2006,25(2):382. |
| [10] | Nie X, Leyland A, Matthews A . Deposition of layered bioceramic hydroxyapatite/TiO2, coatings on titanium alloys using a hybrid technique of micro-arc oxidation and electrophoresis[J]. Surf Coat Tech, 2000,125(1/2/3):407-414. |
| [11] | 蒋百灵, 张菊梅, 时惠英 . 钛合金微弧氧化膜表面形貌对膜/环氧树脂结合强度的影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2004,14(4):539-542. |
| [12] | Tian J, Luo Z, Qi S , et al. Structure and antiwear behavior of micro-arc oxidized coatings on aluminum alloy[J]. Surf Coat Tech, 2002,154(1):1-7. |
| [13] | De SG, Hennig D, Aggarwal A , et al. The use of MDP-based materials for bonding to zirconia[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014,112(4):895-902. |
| [14] | Lindgren J, Smeds J, Sjögren G . Effect of surface treatments and aging in water on bond strength to zirconia[J]. Oper Dent, 2008,33(6):675-681. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |