Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 1082-1087. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.06.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of gastric emptying after drinking carbohydrates before cesarean section by gastric ultrasonography

Yue WEI1,Lan YAO1,Xi LU1,Jun WANG1,Li LIN2,Kun-peng LIU1,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2021-05-20 Online:2023-12-18 Published:2023-12-11
  • Contact: Kun-peng LIU E-mail:Liukunpeng@pkuih.edu.cn

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the effect of gastric antrum ultrasonography in evaluating gastric emptying after oral administration of 300 mL carbohydrates two hours before cesarean section, and to analyze the risk factors of gastric emptying in pregnant women. Methods: From August 2020 to February 2021, a total of 80 patients, aged 22-43 years, body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2, gestational age≥36 weeks, falling into American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for cesarean sections in Peking University International Hospital were recruited and divided into two groups: the intervention group (n=40)and the control group (n=40). In the intervention group, solid food was restricted after 22:00, the patients were required to take 300 mL carbohydrates two hours before cesarean section. In the control group, solid food and liquid intake were restricted after 22:00 the night before surgery. All the patients received assessment of preoperative feeling of thirst and starvation with visual analogue scale (VAS). The cross-sectional area (CSA)of gastric antrum was measured in supine position and right supine position before anesthesia, the gastric volume (GV)and the gastric volume/weight(GV/W)of the two groups was further calculated. Perlas A semi-quantitative grading assessments were performed in each patient. The blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at admission(T0), 5 minutes after anesthesia (T1), immediately after fetal delivery (T2) and at the end of the surgery (T3). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting during the operation and 24 hours after the operation were recorded. Results: One case in each group was excluded because the antrum was not clearly identified during the ultrasound assessments. In the semi-sitting position, the CSA was (5.07±1.73) cm2 in the intervention group vs. (5.24±1.96) cm2 in the control group, respectively; in the right lateral decubitus position, CSA was (7.32±2.17) cm2 in the intervention group vs. (7.25±2.24) cm2 in the control group, GV was (91.74±32.34) mL vs. (90.07±31.68) mL, GV/W was (1.27±0.40) mL/kg vs. (1.22±0.41) mL/kg, respectively; all the above showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed 0 in 20 patients (51.3%), 1 in 16 (41%), 2 in 3 (7.7%)in the intervention group and 0 in 22 (56.4%), 1 in 15 (38.5%), 2 in 2 (5.1%)in the control group, the proportion of Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). For the patients with Perlas A semi-quantitative grade 2 (3 cases in the intervention group and 2 cases in the control group), metoclopramide 0.2 mg/kg was intravenously injected before anesthesia. No aspiration case was observed in this study. The intervention group was endured less thirst and hunger (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood pressure and heart rate between the two groups at each time point (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea intraoperatively and postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasonography of gastric antrum can provide objective basis for evaluating gastric emptying of pregnant women perioperatively. 300 mL carbohydrates intake two hours before surgery, which does not increase GV and the risk of reflux aspiration, and is helpful in minimizing disturbance to the patient's physiological status, therefore leading to better clinical outcome.

Key words: Gastric ultrasonography, Gastric cross-sectional area, Gastric volume, Pregnant women

CLC Number: 

  • R614.3

Figure 1

Ultrasound image of the stomach when empty stomach with collapsed pylorus A, antrum; L, liver; Ao, aorta; U, uterus."

Figure 2

Ultrasound image of the stomach filled with clear liquids A, antrum; L, liver; Ao, aorta; U, uterus."

Table 1

Demographics of patients in two groups"

Items Intervention group (n=39) Control group (n=39) Statistical value P
Age/ years, ${\bar x}$±s 32.90±3.78 33.38±4.11 t=0.545 0.587
Height/ cm, ${\bar x}$±s 162.28±5.39 162.54±6.11 t=0.197 0.845
Weight/ kg, ${\bar x}$±s 72.34±8.61 74.59±12.34 t=0.932 0.354
BMI/(kg/m2), ${\bar x}$±s 27.49±3.26 28.16±3.83 t=0.827 0.411
ASA(Ⅰ/Ⅱ), n 11/28 7/32 χ2=1.156 0.282
Gestational age/ weeks, ${\bar x}$±s 38.75±1.00 38.50±0.85 t=-1.176 0.243
Fasting for solids/ h, ${\bar x}$±s 12.51±1.91 12.65±1.63 t=0.351 0.726
Fasting for clear liquids/ h, ${\bar x}$±s 3.06±0.84 11.26±2.39 t=20.168 0.000
Surgery time/ min, ${\bar x}$±s 46.56±15.18 43.31±14.89 t=0.076 0.342
Anesthesia time/ min, ${\bar x}$±s 89.31±15.66 85.44±19.54 t=-0.966 0.337
Fluid infusion volume/ mL, ${\bar x}$±s 1 148.72±233.81 1 166.67±384.80 t=0.076 0.804
Bleeding volume/ mL, ${\bar x}$±s 339.74±153.97 363.07±183.71 t=0.608 0.545

Table 2

Main ultrasound data in two groups"

Items Intervention group (n=39) Control group (n=39) Statistical value P
CSA in supine / mm2, ${\bar x}$±s 5.07±1.73 5.24±1.96 t=0.426 0.671
CSA in RLD / mm2, ${\bar x}$±s 7.32±2.17 7.25±2.24 t=-0.144 0.886
Gastric volume / mL, ${\bar x}$±s 91.74±32.34 90.07±31.68 t=-0.231 0.818
GV/W /(mL/kg),${\bar x}$±s 1.27±0.40 1.22±0.41 t=-0.534 0.595
Perlas A grade, n(%) χ2=0.327 0.849
  0 20 (51.3) 22 (56.4)
  1 16 (41.0) 15 (38.5)
  2 3 (7.7) 2 (5.1)

Table 3

Comparison of thirst VAS and starvation VAS in two groups"

Items Intervention group (n=39) Control group (n=39) Z P
Thirst VAS, M (P25P75) 2 (2, 2) 5 (3, 5) -7.335 < 0.001
Starvation VAS, M (P25P75) 1 (0, 2) 2 (2, 3) -4.864 < 0.001

Table 4

Comparison of hemodynamic variables in two groups"

Items Intervention group (n=39) Control group (n=39) t P
MAP at T0 / mmHg, ${\bar x}$±s 89.32±10.17 88.81±10.78 -0.216 0.829
HR at T0/ (beats/min),${\bar x}$±s 90.54±15.23 87.44±11.67 -1.010 0.316
MAP at T1/ mmHg, ${\bar x}$±s 75.68±9.89 78.86±9.23 1.468 0.146
HR at T1/ (beats/min),${\bar x}$±s 90.85±18.47 89.56±14.11 -0.344 0.731
MAP at T2/ mmHg, ${\bar x}$±s 80.51±9.15 81.65±12.63 0.455 0.650
HR at T2/ (beats/min),${\bar x}$±s 90.23±16.91 91.95±16.14 0.459 0.648
MAP at T3/ mmHg, ${\bar x}$±s 82.05±8.16 82.05±11.55 0.076 1.000
MAP at T3/ (beats/min),${\bar x}$±s 84.46±11.53 88.00±14.11 0.076 0.229

Table 5

Comparison of the incidence of hypotension intraoperatively, and the incidence of nausea in two groups"

Itmes Intervention group (n=39) Control group (n=39) χ2 P
Hypotension intraoperatively, n(%) 14 (35.9) 17 (43.6) 0.482 0.488
Nausea intraoperatively, n(%) 13 (33.3) 14 (35.9) 0.057 0.812
Nausea postoperatively, n(%) 1 (2.6) 2 (5.1) 0.347 0.556
1 Nygren J , Thacker J , Carli F , et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendation[J]. Clin Nutr, 2012, 31 (6): 801- 816.
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.012
2 Bouvet L , Mazoit JX , Chassard D , et al. Clinical assessment of the ultrasonographic measurement of antral area for estimating preoperative gastric content and volume[J]. Anesthesiology, 2011, 114 (5): 1086- 1092.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31820dee48
3 Perlas A , Davis L , Khan M , et al. Gastric sonography in the fasted surgical patient: A prospective descriptive study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2011, 113 (1): 93- 97.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821b98c0
4 Perlas A , Mitsakakis N , Liu L , et al. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination[J]. Anesth Analg, 2013, 116 (2): 357- 363.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318274fc19
5 van de Putte P , Perlas A . Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2014, 113 (1): 12- 22.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu151
6 Gola W , Domagala M , Cugowski A . Ultrasound assessment of gastric emptying and the risk of aspiration of gastric contents in the perioperative period[J]. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2018, 50 (4): 297- 302.
doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2018.0029
7 Apfelbaum JL , Hawkins JL , Agarkar M , et al. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on obstetric anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology[J]. Anesthesiology, 2016, 124 (2): 270- 300.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935
8 刘平, 干卓坤. 超声评估胃容量及胃内容物性质的研究[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2016, 24 (4): 285- 288.
9 Kruisselbrink R , Arzola C , Endersby R , et al. Intra- and interrater reliability of ultrasound assessment of gastric volume[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014, 121 (1): 46- 51.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000193
10 Perlas A , Chan VW , Lupu CM , et al. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume[J]. Anesthesiology, 2009, 111 (1): 82- 89.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a97250
11 Arzola C , Cubillos J , Perlas A , et al. Interrater reliability of qua-litative ultrasound assessment of gastric content in the third trimester of pregnancy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2014, 113 (6): 1018- 1023.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu257
12 Arzola C , Perlas A , Siddiqui NT , et al. Bedside gastric ultrasonography in term pregnant women before elective cesarean deli-very: A prospective cohort study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2015, 121 (3): 752- 758.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000818
13 Roukhomovsky M , Zieleskiewicz L , Diaz A , et al. Ultrasound examination of the antrum to predict gastric content volume in the third trimester of pregnancy as assessed by MRI: A prospective cohort study[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2018, 35 (5): 379- 389.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000749
14 Popivanov P , Irwin R , Walsh M , et al. Gastric emptying of carbohydrate drinks in term parturients before elective caesarean deli-very: An observational study[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2020, 41, 29- 34.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.07.010
15 王以瑞, 符新春, 郑芝, 等. 口服碳水化合物溶液的容量与足月产妇胃排空时间的关系[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98 (26): 2083- 2087.
16 Amaral CK , Benevides ML , Benevides MM , et al. Ultrasound assessment of gastric antrum in term pregnant women before elective cesarean section[J]. Rev Bras Anestesio, 2019, 69 (3): 266- 271.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.03.001
17 Hakak S , McCaul CL , Crowley L . Ultrasonographic evaluation of gastric contents in term pregnant women fasted for six hours[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2018, 34, 15- 20.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.01.004
18 Shiraishi T , Kurosaki D , Nakamura M , et al. Gastric fluid volume change after oral rehydration solution intake in morbidly obese and normal controls: A magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis[J]. Anesth Analg, 2017, 124 (4): 1174- 1178.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001886
[1] Yue WEI,Xi LU,Jing ZHANG,Kun-peng LIU,Yong-jun WANG,Lan YAO. Effect of preoperative carbohydrates intake on the gastric volume and the risk of reflux aspiration in patients positioning in trendelenburg undergoing gynecological laparoscopic procedures [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 893-898.
[2] Yun-fei XING,Chun-yi LIU,Wen-ying MENG,Jie ZHANG,Ming-yuan JIAO,Lei JIN,Lei JIN. Relationship between micronutrients supplementation during periconceptional period and serum concentration of vitamin E in the 1st trimester of gestational period [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(3): 434-442.
[3] SUN Ying, JIN Lei. Blood manganese levels among pregnant women and the associated factors in three counties of northern China [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(3): 463-468.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!