Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 838-843.

• Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Myocardial protection of remote ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

WANG Ning1,2,WANG Guisong1△,YU Haiyi1,MI Lin1,GUO Lijun1,GAO Wei1   

  1. WANG Ning1,2,WANG Gui-song1△,YU Hai-yi1,MI Lin1,GUO Li-jun1,GAO Wei1
  • Online:2014-12-18 Published:2014-12-18

Abstract: To evaluate the cardioprotection of remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPostC) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods:Forty-six STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI at Peking University Third Hospital from January to April 2014 were randomized to RIPostC group (n=23) and control group (n=23).The RIPostC protocol was started within 1 min after reflow by thrombus aspiration or balloon inflation and consisted of 3 cycles of 5 min/5 min ischemia/reperfusion by cuff inflation/deflation of the lower left limb. The enzymatic infarct size, rate of complete ST segment resolution, corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count (CTFC) in infarct-related artery (IRA) and plasma levels of malondialdehyde(MDA), endothelin-1(ET-1), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) of the two groups were compared. Results:There was no significant difference in enzymatic infarct size between the two groups (P>0.05). The rate of complete ST-segment resolution was significantly higher in RIPostC group than in control group (60.9%vs. 30.4%,P=0.04). There was a trend toward lower CTFC in RIPostC group than that in control group, but the difference was not statistically significant(28 ± 11 vs. 33 ± 11, P = 0.10). However, in the subgroup of anterior wall myocardial infarction CTFC in RIPostC group was significantly lower, compared with control group (25±9 vs. 39±10, P=0.01).There were lower plasma levels of MDA,ET-1,TNFα in RIPostC group than in control group at different time points after primary PCI (P<0.05). Conclusion:In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, RIPostC may improve myocardial perfusion and attenuate ischemia reperfusion injury with the underlying mechanisms involving reduction of oxidative stress, protection of endothelial function and inhibition of inflammatory response.

Key words: Ischemic postconditioning, Myocardial infarction, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Myocardial reperfusion injury

[1] Qing GAO,Yu CHEN,Gang LIU,Sheng-long CHEN,Sui-xin DONG. Clinical results after surgical treatment for non-selective case with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 1103-1107.
[2] XIA Jing-Gang, QU Yang, HU Shao-Dong, XU Ji, YIN Chun-Lin, XU Dong. Midterm follow-up outcomes of ticagrelor on acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(3): 494-498.
[3] CHEN Shao-Min, MOU Di, CUI Ming, REN Chuan, ZHANG Shu, GUO Li-Jun. Relationship between serum histamine levels and ST-segment resolution in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(6): 875-878.
[4] GONG Yan-Jun, HU Hao, JIANG Jie, HONG Tao, LI Jian-Ping, CHEN Ming, LIU Zhao-Ping, HUO Yong. Comparison of angiography-guided and fractional flow reserve-guided management strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention for intermediate coronary lesions [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(6): 844-847.
[5] XIA Jing-Gang, QU Yang, Hu-Shao-Dong, XU Ji, YIN Chun-Lin, XU Dong. Cardioprotective effect and mechanism of intensive lipid modulation on patients with coronary artery disease undergoing noncardiac surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(4): 601-605.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 135 -140 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 516 -520 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 304 -309 .