Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 1038-1042. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.06.020

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of two shaping methods for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation by Shikani optical stylet laryngoscope

XU Ting, LI Min△, XU Mao, GUO Xiang-yang   

  1. (Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2016-12-18 Published:2016-12-18
  • Contact: LI Min, E-mail: liminanesth@aliyun.com.cn

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of two different shaping methods for double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT).DLT was shaped with the rod of a Shikani optical stylet (SOS) with the tracheal orifice aligned with the convex aspect of the distal curvature or the concave aspect of the distal curvature. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery and required intubation with a left-sided DLT were enrolled in this study. They were randomized into two groups. They were intubated with a DLT, which was shaped with the rod of a SOS with its tracheal orifice aligned with the convex aspect of the distal curvature (group T) or the concave aspect of the distal curvature (group U). Time for SOS manipulation, intubation attempts, intubation resistance score, malposition of bronchial intubation, time for fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) identification of bronchial placement, total intubation time and oral mucosal or dental injury were recorded. Hoarseness and throat sore of the patients were evaluated 1 hour and 24 hours after surgery. Results: A total of 136 patients completed the study, with 68 in each group. Time for SOS manipulation was significantly shorter in group U [(35.1±6.1) s vs. 39.6±11.8) s, P=0.007]. First attempt success rate did not differ between the groups (92.6% vs.88.2%, P=0.561). Intubation resistance score was significantly lower in group U. Group T had fewer patients who suffered malposition of bronchial intubation than group U (4 vs.13, P=0.020) and cost less time for FOB identification of bronchial placement [(44.1±20.9) s vs.(53.6±29.2) s, P=0.032]. Total intubation time and the incidence of oral mucosal or dental injury did not differ between the groups. The severity and incidence of hoarseness were lower in group U than in group T 1 hour after surgery. The severity and incidence of sore throat were lower in group U than in group T 1 hour and 24 hours postoperatively. Conclusion: When lacing a left-sided DLT using a SOS, shaping the DLT with the tracheal orifice aligned with the concave aspect of the distal curvature saves SOS manipulation time, decreases the severity and incidence of postoperative hoarseness and sore throat. However, this modified shaping method increases the incidence of malposition of bronchial intubation and time for FOB identification of bronchial placement.

Key words: Intubation, intratracheal, Laryngoscopes, Validation studies

CLC Number: 

  • R614.2
[1] BAI Peng,HUAI Wei,XIA Tian,YANG Zhong-wei,GUO Xiang-yang,ZHOU Fang. Time comparison of artificial airway establishment in operating room and on slope using endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 166-169.
[2] GENG Zhi-yu,GAO Wei-hua,WANG Dong-xin. Clinical outcomes of vocal fold immobility after tracheal intubation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 337-340.
[3] ZHANG Qing-fen,ZHAO Hong,FENG Yi. Different anesthesia management in preterm infants undergoing surgeries for retinopathy of prematurity: A retrospective study [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 195-199.
[4] Yong-zheng HAN,Feng-yun JING,Mao XU,Xiang-yang GUO. Anesthesia management of cervical chordoma resection: A case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 981-983.
[5] CHENG Xiao-e, PENG Hui-zhen, HU Xue-xue, FENG Xiao-jing, MA Long-xian, JIANG Chang-yu, LIU Tao. Minocycline inhibits formalin-induced inflammatory pain and the underlying mechanism [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(5): 797-804.
[6] WANG Tian-jiao, LIU Yu, GUAN Ming. Intravenous sedation with midazolam and propofol target controlled infusion on patients’ perioperative anxiety under the mandibular third molar extraction [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1044-1049.
[7] ZHENG Yi-lin, SONG Wen-fang, WANG Dong-xin. Comparison between flexible laryngeal mask airway and reinforced tracheal tube used for lumbar vertebral surgery in prone position [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 262-266.
[8] LI Bing-yan, GENG Zhi-yu, WANG Dong-xin. Effect of dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative recovery for patients undergoing major spinal surgery during propofol anesthesia [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(3): 529-533.
[9] WANG Li-wei, MENG Xiu-li, GUO Xiang-yang, ZHAO Wei, WANG Zhen-yu. Influence of sevoflurane concentration and stimulation voltage on motor evoked potentials in intraspinal tumor surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(2): 297-303.
[10] XU Ting, LI Min, GUO Xiang-yang. Comparison of Shikani optical stylet and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(5): 853-858.
[11] QIU Min, ZONG Ya-nan, LU Jian, MA Lu-lin, ZHENG Qing, GUO Xiang-yang. Rocuronium anesthesia induced anaphylactic shock: a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(5): 885-887.
[12] LI Zhi-Hong, LIU Dan, HE Zi-Jing, FAN Zhi-Yi. Influence of dexamethasone on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(4): 685-689.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Author. English Title Test[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 351 -354 .