Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 938-942. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Postoperative position change of fibular bone after reconstruction of maxillary defect using free fibular flap

Yi-fan KANG,Xiao-feng SHAN,Lei ZHANG,Zhi-gang CAI()   

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2018-10-15 Online:2020-10-18 Published:2020-10-15
  • Contact: Zhi-gang CAI E-mail:c2013xs@163.com

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the position change of the fibular bone after maxillary reconstruction by free fibular flap and to analyze the factors affecting the position change. Methods: Patients who underwent maxillary reconstruction by free fibular flap in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from November 2012 to November 2016 were enrolled in this study. CT scans 1 week and 1 year postoperatively were collected and stored in DICOM format. The ProPlan CMF software was used to reconstruct the CT scans and separate the maxilla and each segment of the fibular flap. The Geomagic Control software was used to measure the long axis direction vector of each fibular segment. And the position change direction was recorded. The patients were divided into groups according to the use of the fibula or titanium plate to reconstruct the zygomaticmaxillary buttress. Results: A total of 32 patients were enrolled. Among them, 21 were in the titanium plate group and 11 in the fibula bone group. The angle between the long axis of the fibular segment and the X axis in the X-Y plane was 95.65°±53.49° and 95.53°±52.77°, 1 week and 1 year postoperatively, and there was no statistical difference (P>0.05). The angle between the long axis of the fibular segment and the X axis in the X-Z plane was 96.88°±69.76° and 95.33°±67.42°, respectively, with statistical difference (P=0.0497). The angular changes of the long axis of the fibular segment in the titanium plate group and the fibular bone group were 3.23°±3.93° and 1.94°±1.78°, respectively, and the angular changes in the X-Z plane were 6.02°±9.89° and 3.27°±2.31°, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). The long axis changes of the fibular segment in the X-Y plane for reconstruction of the anterior alveolar, posterior alveolar, and buttress were 3.13°±3.78°, 2.56°±3.17°, and 5.51°±4.39°, respectively. There was a statistical difference (P = 0.023) between the posterior and buttress. In the X-Z plane, theses were 4.94°±4.75°, 5.26°±10.25°, 6.69°±6.52°, respectively. There was no statistical difference among the three groups (P>0.05). The main positional deviation directions of the titanium plate group and the fibular bone group were interior and superior sides, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: One year postoperatively, the position of the free fibular flap was changed compared with 1 week postoperatively. The position of the free fibular flap was mainly changed to the interior and superior sides.

Key words: Maxillary defect, Free fibular flap, Postoperative evaluation

CLC Number: 

  • R782.4

Figure 1

ProPlan CMF software was used to reconstruct the CT scans and separate the maxilla and each segment of the fibular flap"

Figure 2

Adjustment of maxilla model, make F-H plane parallel to the X-Y plane and make mid-sagittal plane parallel to the X-Z plane"

Figure 3

Aligning the maxilla model at 1 year postoperatively to the maxilla model at 1 week postoperatively"

Figure 4

Measuring the long axis direction vector of each fibular segment"

Table 1

Positional deviation directions of fibular segments"

Groups Interior side (n = 46) Exterior side (n = 15) P value
Superior side (n = 37) Inferior side (n = 9) Superior side ( n = 10) Inferior side (n = 5)
Titanium plate 21 5 3 2 0.775
Fibular bone 16 4 7 3
[1] Peng X, Mao C, Yu GY, et al. Maxillary reconstruction with the free fibula flap[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2005,115(6):1562.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000160691.63029.74 pmid: 15861059
[2] Kazaoka Y, Shinohara AK, Hasegawa T. Functional reconstruction after a total maxillectomy using a fibula osteocutaneous flap with osseointegrated implants[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1999,103(4):1244-1246.
doi: 10.1097/00006534-199904040-00021 pmid: 10088513
[3] Wijbenga JG, Schepers RH, Werker PM, et al. A systematic review of functional outcome and quality of life following reconstruction of maxillofacial defects using vascularized free fibula flaps and dental rehabilitation reveals poor data quality.[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2016,69(8):1024-1036.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.05.003 pmid: 27292287
[4] Sozzi D, Novelli G, Silva R, et al. Implant rehabilitation in fibula-free flap reconstruction: A retrospective study of cases at 1-18 years following surgery[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2017,45(10):1655.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.021 pmid: 28823690
[5] Frodel JL, Funk GF, Capper DT, et al. Osseointegrated implants: A comparative study of bone thickness in four vascularized bone flaps.[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1994,32(2):456-458.
[6] 王明一, 王慧珊, 杨劼, 等. 咬合引导的颌骨重建精确度分析及功能评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018,16(2):162-166.
[7] 沈毅, 孙坚, 李军, 等. 上颌骨功能性重建中用钛植入体重建颧上颌支柱的生物力学研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2011,9(3):198-203.
[8] 刘尚萍, 蔡志刚, 张杰, 等. 下颌骨缺损重建术后钛板相关并发症97例临床回顾研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2013,48(10):586-590.
[9] Wolff J. The classic: On the inner architecture of bones and its importance for bone growth[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010,468(4):1056.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1239-2 pmid: 20162387
[10] Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s law for clinicians[J]. Angle Orthod, 2004,74(1):3.
doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0003:AUOBPA>2.0.CO;2 pmid: 15038485
[11] Wilkman T, Apajalahti S, Wilkman E, et al. A comparison of bone resorption over time: An analysis of the free scapular, iliac crest, and fibular microvascular flaps in mandibular reconstruction[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017,75(3):616-621.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.009 pmid: 27725102
[12] Hölzle F, Watola A, Kesting MR, et al. Atrophy of free fibular grafts after mandibular reconstruction[J]. Plas Reconstr Surg, 2007,119(1):151.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000240703.02620.24
[13] Mertens C, Decker C, Engel M, et al. Early bone resorption of free microvascular reanastomized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: A comparison of iliac crest and fibula grafts[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2014,42(5):e217.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.08.010 pmid: 24269641
[14] Li L, Blake F, Heiland M, et al. Long-term evaluation after mandibular reconstruction with fibular grafts versus microsurgical fibular flaps[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007,65(2):281-286.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.08.009 pmid: 17236934
[15] Powell HR, Jaafar M, Bisase B, et al. Resorption of fibula bone following mandibular reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014,52(4):375-378.
pmid: 24613371
[16] Kang YF, Liang J, He Z, et al. Cortical bone resorption of fibular bone after maxillary reconstruction with a vascularized fibula free flap: A computed tomography imaging study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019,48:1009-1014.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.008 pmid: 30979515
[1] Ying HUANG,Zhi-yuan WU,Xing-hong ZHOU,Zhi-gang CAI,Jie ZHANG. Category of facial symmetry perception after maxillary reconstruction using anterolateral thigh flap [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 708-715.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!