膀胱阴道瘘修补术后患者生存质量和心理状态调查

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.01.030

Abstract

CLC Number:

R713.3

志华李,燕波黄,秋颖庞,书慧于,宇珂陈,德润李. [J].Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(1): 190-193.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Figure 1

References 17

1	Angioli R , Penalver M , Muzii L , et al. Guidelines of how to manage vesicovaginal fistula[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2003, 48 (3): 295- 304. doi: 10.1016/S1040-8428(03)00123-9
2	De Ridder D . Vesicovaginal fistula: A major healthcare problem[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2009, 19 (4): 358- 361. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32832ae1b7
3	Zhang Q , Ye Z , Liu F , et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal transvesical repair of supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2013, 24 (2): 337- 342. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1850-8
4	唐渊, 虞巍, 肖云翔, 等. 经阴道和经腹术式治疗膀胱阴道瘘的疗效观察[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2014, 35 (1): 54- 57.
5	唐云华, 张向阳, 刘龙飞, 等. 5例腹腔镜下膀胱阴道瘘修补术的临床体会[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2015, 40 (3): 336- 340.
6	Javed A , Abdullah A , Faruqui N , et al. Doctor! Will I be dry? Factors determining recurrence after vesicovaginal fistula repair[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2015, 65 (9): 954- 959.
7	Gholami A , Araghi MT , Shamsabadi F , et al. Application of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) to patients with cataract[J]. Epidemiol Health, 2016, 38, e2016005. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2016005
8	Thombs BD , Benedetti A , Kloda L , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the depression subscale of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS-D) for detecting major depression: Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses[J]. BMJ Open, 2016, 6 (4): e011913. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011913
9	郝元涛, 方积乾, PowerMJ, 等. WHO生存质量评估简表的等价性评价[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2006, 20 (2): 71- 75.
10	范青, 季建林, 肖泽萍, 等. 综合医院焦虑抑郁量表在内科门诊病人中的应用[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 24 (5): 325- 328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.05.002
11	Khoder WY , Waidelich R , Becker AJ , et al. Patients' perception of surgical outcomes and quality of life after retroperitoneoscopic and open pyeloplasty[J]. Urol Int, 2014, 92 (1): 74- 82. doi: 10.1159/000352055
12	方积乾. 生存质量测定方法及应用[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2000: 6- 42.
13	Zhang L , Xia Y , Zhang Q , et al. The correlations of socioecono-mic status, disease activity, quality of life, and depression/anxiety in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Psychol Health Med, 2017, 22 (1): 28- 36. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1198817
14	Kelly J , Lynch M . A teamwork approach to obstetric fistula repair training in Uganda[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2012, 116 (3): 261- 263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.10.011
15	Khisa AM , Nyamongo IK . Still living with fistula: An exploratory study of the experience of women with obstetric fistula following corrective surgery in West Pokot, Kenya[J]. Reprod Health Matters, 2012, 20 (40): 59- 66.
16	董玉静, 尚少梅, 么莉, 等. 国外延续性护理模式研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2012, 12 (9): 20- 23.
17	Chang SF , Hung CH , Hsu YY , et al. The effectiveness of health education on maternal anxiety, circumcision knowledge, and nursing hours: A quasi-experimental study[J]. J Nurs Res, 2017, 25 (4): 296- 303.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(2): 181 -182 .
[2]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(6): 663 -665 .
[3]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(1): 39 -42 .
[4]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(6): 739 -745 .
[5]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(6): 600 -602 .
[6]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2000, 32(4): 300 .
[7]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(2): 146 -150 .
[8]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(4): 369 -373 .
[9]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(2): 126 -130 .
[10]	. [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2003, 35(6): 596 -599 .

Items	Patients with VVF (n=71)
Age/years, $\bar x \pm s$ (range)	49.27±7.55 (26-65)
Marriage status, n (%)
Unmarried	3 (4.2)
Married	68 (95.8)
Domicile, n (%)
Urban area	42 (59.2)
Countryside	29 (40.8)
Approach of surgery, n (%)
Transvaginal	46 (64.8)
Transabdominal	24 (33.8)
Other	1 (1.4)
Outcome of surgery, n (%)
Successful	58 (81.7)
Unsuccessful	13 (18.3)
Hospitalization days/d, Median (range)	17 (7-74)
Time of surgery, Median (range)	2 (1-4)

Group	QOL score	Physical health	Psychological health	Social relationships	Environment
Post surgery patients, $\bar x \pm s$	56.74±8.27	14.94±2.50	14.74±2.53	12.56±1.47	14.50±2.42
Norm, $\bar x \pm s$	55.06±2.08	15.32±2.30	15.40±2.06	16.15±2.08	13.23±1.89
Average deviation	1.69	-0.39	-0.66	-3.59	1.28
P value	0.090	0.196	0.032	<0.001	<0.001

Scale score	Patients with VVF (n=71), n (%)
Anxiety
0-7	54 (76.1)
8-10	5 (7.0)
11-21	12 (16.9)
Depression
0-7	53 (74.6)
8-10	14 (19.7)
11-21	4 (5.6)

Scale score	Patients with VVF (n=71), M (P₂₅, P₇₅)	Female outpatients (n=11 766), $\bar x \pm s$	P value (average deviation)
Anxiety	5.04 (2, 7)	3.37±2.81	0.001 (1.67)
Depression	4.32 (2, 8)	3.83±3.14	0.220 (0.49)

Group	Without urine leakage	With urine leakage	P valueS
QOL score	59.62±4.94	43.94±8.10	<0.001
Physical health	15.73±1.72	11.39±2.36	<0.001
Psychological health	15.63±2.45	10.77±2.17	<0.001
Social relationships	12.95±1.11	10.85±1.68	<0.001
Environment	15.30±1.50	10.94±2.58	<0.001
Anxiety	4.19±3.70	8.85±4.02	<0.001
Depression	3.50±2.89	8.00±2.89	<0.001

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 17

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10