Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Analysis of risk factors for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after esophagectomy
Received date: 2017-06-23
Online published: 2018-12-18
Objective: To explore the incidence and risk factors for the acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after resection of esophageal carcinoma.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed 422 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine with eso-phageal carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2016 in Peking University Cancer Hospital. ALI/ARDS were diagnosed, the patients were divided into ALI/ARDS group and control group without ALI/ARDS, the differences of clinical features were contrasted between the two groups, and the multivariate Logistic regression modeling was used to identify the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS.Results:In the study, 41 ALI/ARDS cases were diagnosed, making up 9.7% (41/422) of all the enrolled patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparisons of the ALI/ARDS group and the control group indicated significant statistical differences in the average length of their hospital stay [(18.9±9.7) d vs. (14.8±3.6) d, P=0.011], the proportion of the patients who needed mechanical ventilation support [51.2% (21/41) vs. 9.4% (36/381), P<0.001] and in-hospital mortality [31.7% (13/41) vs. 5.0% (19/381), P<0.001]. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the patients with ALI/ARDS and without ALI/ARDS in smoking history (P=0.064), preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (P=0.020), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P=0.011), body weight index (BMI) (P=0.044), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification (P=0.049) and one lung ventilation duration (P=0.008), while multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC (OR=1.053, P=0.016, 95%CI 1.010-1.098), ASA physical status classification (OR=2.392, P=0.033, 95%CI 1.073-5.335) and one lung ventilation duration (OR=0.994, P=0.028, 95%CI 0.989-0.999) were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.Conclusion:ALI/ARDS was a serious complication in patients undergoing esophagectomy associated with increment in length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC, ASA classification and one lung ventilation duration were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy. Carefully assessing the patient before operation, shortening one lung ventilation duration were the key points in preventing ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.
Jia-xuan XU , Hong-zhi WANG , Jun DONG , Xiao-jie CHEN , Yong YANG , Ren-xiong CHEN , Guo-dong WANG . Analysis of risk factors for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after esophagectomy[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018 , 50(6) : 1057 -1062 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.06.021
| [1] | Licker M, de Perrot M, Spiliopoulos A , et al. Risk factors for acute lung injury after thoracic surgery for lung cancer[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003,97(6):1558-1565. |
| [2] | Levitt JE, Matthay MA . Clinical review: Early treatment of acute lung injury-paradigm shift toward prevention and treatment prior to respiratory failure[J]. Crit Care, 2012,16(3):223. |
| [3] | Brun-Buisson C, Minelli C, Bertolini G , et al. Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care units. Results from the ALIVE study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2004,30(1):51-61. |
| [4] | 马晓春, 王辰, 方强 , 等. 急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断和治疗指南(2006)[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2006,16(12):1-6. |
| [5] | 赫捷, 邵康 . 中国食管癌流行病学现状、诊疗现状及未来对策[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2011(7):501-504. |
| [6] | Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M , et al. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 1990,77(8):845-857. |
| [7] | Morita M, Otsu H, Kawano H , et al. Advances in esophageal surgery in elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2013,33(4):1641-1647. |
| [8] | Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT , et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition[J]. JAMA, 2012,307(23):2526-2533. |
| [9] | 杜斌 . 急性呼吸窘迫综合征的柏林定义: 究竟改变了什么[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013,34(2):201-203. |
| [10] | Eichenbaum KD, Neustein SM . Acute lung injury after thoracic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2010,24(4):681-690. |
| [11] | Tandon S, Batchelor A, Bullock R , et al. Peri-operative risk factors for acute lung injury after elective oesophagectomy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2001,86(5):633-638. |
| [12] | Misthos P, Katsaragakis S, Milingos N , et al. Postresectional pulmonary oxidative stress in lung cancer patients. The role of one-lung ventilation[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005,27(3):379-382. |
| [13] | 森山博史, 平田哲, 久保良彦 . 食道癌,肺癌手術周術期における血中エンドトキシン,顆粒球エラスターゼおよび凝固線溶系分子マーカーの変動[J]. 臨床病理, 1995,43(3):233-237. |
| [14] | Hackett NJ, De Oliveira GS, Jain UK , et al. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery[J]. Int J Surg, 2015(18):184-190. |
| [15] | 刘勇恩, 寇瑛琍 . 食管癌术后肺部并发症发生的原因及防治进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2008,15(2):138-142. |
| [16] | 刘丽霞, 胡振杰, 赵钗 . 食管癌手术前肺功能试验与术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的相关性[J]. 癌症, 2006,25(3):335-338. |
| [17] | Della RG, Coccia C . Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2013,26(1):40-46. |
| [18] | Rocker GM, Wiseman MS, Pearson D , et al. Neutrophil degranulation and increased pulmonary capillary permeability following oesophagectomy: a model of early lung injury in man[J]. Br J Surg, 1988,75(9):883-886. |
| [19] | Michelet P , D’Journo XB, Roch A, et al. Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a rando-mized controlled study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006,105(5):911-919. |
| [20] | Gao Q, Mok HP, Wang WP , et al. Effect of perioperative glucocorticoid administration on postoperative complications following esophagectomy: A meta-analysis[J]. Oncol Lett, 2014,7(2):349-356. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |