Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine for children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
Received date: 2017-09-29
Online published: 2018-12-18
Objective: To observe the preoperative sedation, the status of separation from parents, compliance with the mask, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative agitation of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) premedication on children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia.Methods:In the study, 60 children of American Society of Anesthesiology classification (ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ), aged 2-9 years, were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups. Thirty minutes before operation, control group received intranasal placebo (0.9% saline) 0.02 mL/kg, and DEX group received intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg. The preoperative sedation score, the status of separation from parents, comp-liance with the mask and hemodynamic parameters were recorded by an anesthesiologists until anesthesia induction. Recovery conditions, postoperative agitation were also recorded.Results:There was no signi-ficant difference between the two groups in patient characteristics, operation time, extubation time and recovery time. Compared with the children in control group, those in DEX group were significantly more sedated when they were separated from their parents (56.7% vs. 26.7%, P<0.05). Satisfactory compliance with mask application was 40% in control group vs. 73.3% in DEX group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidences of postoperative agitation and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Compared with control group, the heart rate (HR) of DEX group was decreased after 20 minutes of drug administration [(97.13±12.93) beats/min vs.(104.53±11.97) beats/min, P<0.05]. The changes of the HR and SpO2 in the two groups were within the normal range. There were no incidences of bradycardia and hypoxemia in either of the groups during study observation.Conclusion:Premedication with intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg for children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia produces good preoperative sedation. The levels of sedation, scores of parental separation and compliance with the mask were satisfied. The children have good recovery conditions, and no obvious postoperative agitation and respiratory depression after DEX administration. Intranasal DEX 2 μg/kg is an effective and safe alternative for premedication in children.
Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Administration; intranasal; Conscious sedation; Preoperative care; Child
Ling GAO , Yun LIU , Xu-dong YANG . Effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine for children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018 , 50(6) : 1078 -1082 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.06.024
| [1] | 夏斌, 秦满, 马文利 , 等. 693例儿童全身麻醉下牙齿治疗的特征分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013,45(6):984-988. |
| [2] | Kain ZN, Mayes LC , O’Connor TZ, et al. Preoperative anxiety in children. Predictors and outcomes[J]. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 1996,150(12):1238-1245. |
| [3] | Wstson AT, Visram A . Children’s preoperative anxiety and postoperative behavior[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2003,13(3):188-204. |
| [4] | Wolfe TR, Braude DA . Intranasl medication delivery for children: A brief review and update[J]. Pediatrics, 2010,126(3):532-537. |
| [5] | Peng K, Wu SR, Ji FH , et al. Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clinics, 2014,69(11):777-786. |
| [6] | Piao G, Wu J . Systematic assessment of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic agent: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2014,10(1):19-24. |
| [7] | Kuang H, Johnson JA, Mulqueen JM , et al. The efficacy of benzodiazepines as acute anxiolytics in children: A meta-analysis[J]. Depress Anxiety, 2017,34(10):888-896. |
| [8] | Deshmukh PV, Kulkami SS, Parchandekar MK , et al. Comparison of preanesthetic sedation in pediatric patients with oral and intranasal midazolam[J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2016,32(3):353-358. |
| [9] | Iirola T, Vilo S, Manner T , et al. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2011,67(8):825-831. |
| [10] | Lee Y, Kim J, Kim S , et al. Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a premedication for pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for dental treatment[J]. J Dent Anesth Pain Med, 2016,16(1):25-29. |
| [11] | Sheta SA, Al-Sarheed MA, Abdelhalim AA . Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Pediatric Anesth, 2014,24(2):181-189. |
| [12] | Yuen VM, Irwin MG, Hui TW , et al. A double-blind, crossover assessment of the sedative and analgesic effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine[J]. Anesth Analg, 2007,105(2):374-380. |
| [13] | Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG , et al. Optimal timing for the administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for premedication in children[J]. Anaesthesia, 2010,65(9):922-929. |
| [14] | Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG , et al. A randomised comparison of two intranasal dexmedetomidine doses for premedication in children[J]. Anaesthesia, 2012,67(11):1210-1216. |
| [15] | Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG , et al. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Anesth Analg, 2008,106(6):1715-1721. |
| [16] | Wolfe TR, Bemstone T . Intranasal drug delivery: An alternative to intravenous administration in selected emergency cases[J]. J Emerg Nurs, 2004,30(2):141-147. |
| [17] | Talon MD, Woodson LC, Sherwood ER , et al. Intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication is comparable with midazolam in burn children undergoing reconstructive surgery[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2009,30(4):599-605. |
| [18] | Jun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY , et al. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2017,64(9):947-961. |
| [19] | Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I , et al. Predicting which child-parent pair will benefit from parental presence during induction of anesthesia: A decision-making approach[J]. Anesth Analg, 2006,102(1):81-84. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |