Establishment of a 3D printing system for bone tissue engineering scaffold fabrication and the evaluation of its controllability over macro and micro structure precision

  • Rong LI ,
  • Ke-long CHEN ,
  • Yong WANG ,
  • Yun-song LIU ,
  • Yong-sheng ZHOU ,
  • Yu-chun SUN
Expand
  • 1. Center for Digital Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Shinotech Co., Ltd, Beijing 100080, China

Received date: 2017-05-06

  Online published: 2019-02-26

Supported by

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51475004);the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFC1102900);the Project for Culturing Leading Talents in Scientific and Technological Innovation of Beijing(Z171100001117169);and Joint Grant from PKUHSC-KCL Joint Institute for Medical Research

Abstract

Objective: To establish a 3D printing system for bone tissue engineering scaffold fabrication based on the principle of fused deposition modeling, and to evaluate the controllability over macro and micro structure precision of polylactide (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL)scaffolds. Methods: The system was composed of the elements mixture-Ⅰ bioprinter and its supporting slicing software which generated printing control code in the G code file format. With a diameter of 0.3 mm, the nozzle of the bioprinter was controlled by a triaxial stepper motor and extruded melting material. In this study, a 10 mm×10 mm×2 mm cuboid CAD model was designed in the image ware software and saved as STL file. The file was imported into the slicing software and the internal structure was designed in a pattern of cuboid pore uniform distribution, with a layer thickness of 0.2 mm. Then the data were exported as Gcode file and ready for printing. Both polylactic acid (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) filaments were used to print the cuboid parts and each material was printed 10 times repeatedly. After natural cooling, the PLA and PCL scaffolds were removed fromthe platform and the macro dimensions of each one were measured using a vernier caliper. Three scaffolds of each material were randomly selected and scanned by a 3D measurement laser microscope. Measurements of thediameter of struts and the size of pores both in the interlayer overlapping area and non-interlayer overlapping area were taken. Results: The pores in the printed PLA and PCL scaffolds were regular and interconnected. The printed PLA scaffolds were 9.950 (0.020) mm long, 9.950 (0.003) mm wide and 1.970 (0.023) mm high, while the PCL scaffolds were 9.845 (0.025) mm long, 9.845 (0.045) mm wide and 1.950 (0.043) mm high. The struts of both the PLA and PCL parts became wider inthe interlayer overlapping area, and the former was more obvious. The difference between the designed size and the printed size was greatest in the pore size of the PLA scaffolds in interlayer overlapping area [(274.09 ± 8.35) μm)], which was 26.91 μm. However, it satisfied the requirements for research application. Conclusion: The self-established 3D printing system for bone tissue engineering scaffold can be used to print PLA and PCL porous scaffolds. The controllability of this system over macro and micro structure can meet the precision requirements for research application.

Cite this article

Rong LI , Ke-long CHEN , Yong WANG , Yun-song LIU , Yong-sheng ZHOU , Yu-chun SUN . Establishment of a 3D printing system for bone tissue engineering scaffold fabrication and the evaluation of its controllability over macro and micro structure precision[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019 , 51(1) : 115 -119 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.021

References

[1] Langer R, Vacanti JP . Tissue engineering[J]. Science, 1993,260(5110):920-926.
[2] Kneser U, Schaefer DJ, Polykandriotis E , et al. Tissue engineering of bone: the reconstructive surgeon’s point of view[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2006,10(1):7-19.
[3] Hutmacher DW . Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage[J]. Biomaterials, 2000,21(24):2529-2543.
[4] Jia A, Joanne EM, Ratima S , et al. Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues[J]. Engineering, 2015,1(2):261-268.
[5] Peltola SM, Melchels FP, Grijpma DW , et al. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes[J]. Ann Med, 2008,40(4):268-280.
[6] Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ , et al. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering[J]. Biomaterials, 2006,27(18):3413-3431.
[7] Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS , et al. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1970,4(3):433-456.
[8] Kuboki Y, Jin Q, Takita H . Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001,83(A Suppl 1Pt 2):S105-115.
[9] Tarawneh AM, Wettergreen M, Liebschner MAK . Computer-aided tissue engineering: benefiting from the control over scaffold micro-architecture[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2012,868:1-25.
[10] Campos Marin A, Lacroix D . The inter-sample structural variability of regular tissue-engineered scaffolds significantly affects the micromechanical local cell environment[J]. Interface Focus, 2015,5(2):20140097.
[11] Yu W, Hong Q, Hu G , et al. A Microfluidic-based multi-shear device for investigating the effects of low fluid-induced stresses on osteoblasts[J]. PLoS One, 2014,9(2):e89966.
[12] Tarafder S, Balla VK, Davies NM , et al. Microwave sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering[J]. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2013,7(8):631-641.
[13] 李树袆, 周苗, 赖毓霄 , 等. 三维打印聚乳酸-羟基乙酸/磷酸三钙骨修复支架的生物学评价[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2016,51(11):661-666.
[14] Bergsma JE, Bruijn WCD, Rozema FR , et al. Late degradation tissue response to poly(l-lactide) bone plates and screws[J]. Biomaterials, 1995,16(1):25-31.
[15] Böstman O, Hirvensalo E, Mäkinen J , et al. Foreign-body reactions to fracture fixation implants of biodegradable synthetic polymers[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1990,72(4):592-596.
[16] Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW . The return of a forgotten polymer & mdash; polycaprolactone in the 21st century[J]. Prog Polym Sci, 2010,35(10):1217-1256.
[17] Xu N, Ye X, Wei D , et al. 3D artificial bones for bone repair prepared by computed tomography-guided fused deposition modeling for bone repair[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014,6(17):14952-14963.
[18] Li Y, Wu ZG, Li XK , et al. A polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffold as an autograft-free spinal fusion cage in a sheep model[J]. Biomaterials, 2014,35(22):5647-5659.
Outlines

/