Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Single-stage repair of penile urethral stricture using combined dorsal onlay oral mucosa grafting with ventral onlay penile skin flap
Received date: 2019-03-13
Online published: 2019-09-03
Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of single-stage repair of penile urethral stricture using combined dorsal onlay oral mucosa grafting with ventral onlay penile skin flap.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical database of 22 male patients with penile urethral stricture who received single-stage repair using combined dorsal onlay oral mucosa grafting with ventral onlay penile skin flap from November 2015 to October 2018. All the cases had no complications, such as skin fistula. The causes of stricture included iatrogenic (14/22, 63.6%), inflammation (2/22, 9.1%) and idiopathic (6/22, 27.3%). A ventral urethrotomy was made in the segment of stricture and extended proximally and distally until the normal calibre urethra was encountered. The oral mucosa graft was secured to the corpus spongiosum in dorsal onlay fashion or underlying corpora cavernosum after resection of the severe scarred urethra. Then the prepared Orandi fasciocutaneous penile skin flap was secured to edges of corpus spon-giosum or oral mucosa graft. A 16 F or 14 F Foley catheter was left in situ for a minimum of 3 weeks, at which time a urethrogram was performed to look for extravasation, and the urethroscopy was performed if necessary. Success was defined as an open urethra with Qmax ≥15 mL/s and no need for further surgical intervention.Results: all the 22 patients with a mean age of 52.6 (18-73) years underwent the combined tissue-transfer technique. The mean length of the penile urethral stricture was 5.3 (2.5-10.0) cm and the mean preoperative Qmax was 6.7 mL/s. the mean length of oral mucosa grafts and fasciocutaneous skin flaps were 5.5 (3.2-10.5) cm and 6.0 (3.5-11.0) cm, respectively. The mean operation time was 225 (150-420) minutes and the mean evaluated blood loss was 53 (20.0-110.0) mL. The grafts included buccal mucosa (19/22, 86.4%) and lingual mucosa (3/22, 13.6%). The mean postoperative Q max was 21.2 (15-32) mL/s. A case of skin fistula and 2 cases of recurrent stricture were found, so the technique success rate was 81.8% (18/22) at a mean follow-up of 20.5 (5-51) months. The perioperative complications included 2 cases of infection and skin necrosis, which healed well after conservative treatment.Conclusion: Single-stage repair of penile urethral stricture using combined dorsal onlay oral mucosa grafting with ventral onlay penile skin flap appears to be an excellent option to repair penile urethral stricture with unsalvageable urethral plate and the penile skin is available. The present clinical series showed a successful rate of 81.8% (18/22).
Jian-wei WANG , Li-bo MAN , Guang-lin HUANG , Feng HE , Hai WANG , Hai-dong WANG , Xiao XU , Wei LI , Jian-po ZHAI , Zhen-hua LIU . Single-stage repair of penile urethral stricture using combined dorsal onlay oral mucosa grafting with ventral onlay penile skin flap[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019 , 51(4) : 641 -645 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.04.008
| [1] | McAninch JW, Morey AF . Penile circular fasciocutaneous skin flap in 1-stage reconstruction of complex anterior urethral strictures[J]. J Urol, 1998,159(4):1209-1213. |
| [2] | Morey AF . Urethral plate salvage with dorsal graft promotes successful penile flaponlay reconstruction of severe pendulous strictures[J]. J Urol, 2001,166(4):1376-1378. |
| [3] | Bayne DB, Gaither TW, Awad MA , et al. Guidelines of guidelines: a review of urethral stricture evaluation, management, and follow-up[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2017,6(2):288-294. |
| [4] | Horiguchi A . Substitution urethroplasty using oral mucosa graft for male anterior urethral stricture disease: current topics and reviews[J]. Int J Urol, 2017,24(7):493-503. |
| [5] | Erickson BA, Breyer BN , McAninch JW. Single-stage segmental urethral replacement using combined ventral onlay fasciocutaneous flap with dorsal onlay buccal grafting for long segment strictures[J]. BJU Int, 2012,109(9):1392-1396. |
| [6] | Greenwell TJ, Venn AF, Mundy AR . Changing practice in anteriorurethroplasty[J]. BJU Int, 1999,83(6):631-635. |
| [7] | Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S , et al. Male urethral stricture: American Urological Association Guideline[J]. J Urol, 2017,197(1):182-190. |
| [8] | Gelman J, Sohn W . 1-stage repair of obliterative distal urethral strictures with buccal graft urethral plate reconstruction and simultaneous onlay penile skin flap[J]. J Urol, 2011,186(3):935-938. |
| [9] | Djordjevic ML, Majstorovic M, Stanojevic D , et al. Combined buccal mucosa graft and dorsal penile skin flap for repair of severe hypospadias[J]. Urology, 2008,71(5):821-825. |
| [10] | Soliman MG, Abo Farha MA, El Abd AS , et al. Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosa graft versus penile skin flap for management of long anterior urethral strictures: a prospective randomized study[J]. Scand J Urol, 2014,48(5):466-473. |
| [11] | 满立波, 王建伟 . 图解尿道成形术[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 52-59. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |