Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Treatment of crossing vessels in laparoscopic pyeloplasty
Received date: 2019-04-09
Online published: 2019-09-03
Objective: To investigate the management of crossing vessels compression in laparoscopic pyeloplasty.Methods: From January 2016 to June 2018, a total of 21 patients who were admitted to Peking University People’s Hospital with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) associated with crossing vascular compression were reviewed. There were 15 males and 6 females who formed this group, with a mean age of (33.9±15.0) years. There were 4 cases of mild hydronephrosis, 12 cases of moderate hydronephrosis and 5 cases of severe hydronephrosis before operation. All the patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our hospital, including 13 on the left and 8 on the right. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes) were performed in all the patients. Hem-o-lok suspension (14 cases in the suspension group) or translocation of the crossing vessels (7 cases in the translocation group) were used for the intraoperative management of the crossing vessels. Double J tubes were removed 8 weeks postoperatively. The patient demographic data were collected (including operation time, treatment time of crossing vessels, intraoperative blood loss, time of drainage tube removal after operation, and average length of hospital stay), postoperative outcomes were evaluated and the patients were followed up regularly.Results: In all the patients, the crossing vessels were successfully reserved, and none of them were ligated intra-operatively. Mean operative times were (202.2±57.0) min. The duration of intraoperative treatment of crossing vessels was (10.5±3.2) min, (6.1±2.0) min in the suspension group, and (13.7±5.2) min in the translocation group, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss was (47.8±25.6) mL, postope-rative drainage time was (4.8±2.6) d, and length of hospital stay was (11.5±3.3) d. Postoperative slight urinary leakage occurred in 1 case. Preoperative pyelectasis of the affected side of all the patients was (3.4±1.7) cm, compared with postoperative pyelectasis of (1.9±1.3) cm. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Postoperative follow-up of all the patients was carried out until December 2018. There was no significant difference in kidney size in all the patients before or after the operations, and hydronephrosis was alleviated compared with that before surgery.Conclusion: For UPJO patients with crossing vascular compression, according to the location of the crossing vessels, Hem-o-lok suspension or vessel transposition can be adopted to relieve the crossing vascular compression and improve the success rate of the surgery.
Hai-yue ZHAO , Xiong-jun YE , Wei-nan CHEN , Li-zhe AN , Jun LIU , Liu-lin XIONG , Xiao-bo HUANG . Treatment of crossing vessels in laparoscopic pyeloplasty[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019 , 51(4) : 660 -664 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.04.011
| [1] | Ellerkamp V, Kurth RR, Schmid E , et al. Differences between intrinsic and extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction related to crossing vessels: histology and functional analyses[J]. World J Urol, 2016,34(4):577-583. |
| [2] | Zhang X, Li HZ, Wang SG , et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: experience with 50 eases[J]. Urology, 2005,66(3):514-517. |
| [3] | 张旭, 许凯, 张军 , 等. 后腹腔镜下Hellstr?m术治疗异位血管导致的肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2007,28(7):450-452. |
| [4] | 郭刚, 洪宝发, 符伟军 , 等. 肾迷走血管致肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻20例报告[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2003,18(12):721-723. |
| [5] | 王杭, 王国民 . CT尿路成像和IVU检查诊断泌尿系统疾病的比较研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2010,31(6):402-404. |
| [6] | Hellstr?m J, Giertz G, Lindblom K . Pathogenesis and treatment of hydronephrosis[J]. J Belge Drol, 1951,20(1):1-6. |
| [7] | 中华医学会小儿外科学分会内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻手术操作指南(2017版)[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2017,6(3):129-135. |
| [8] | 邱敏, 吴红章, 马潞林 , 等. 肾异位血管压迫引起肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014,52(9):702-705. |
| [9] | 宋宏程, 白继武, 黄澄如 , 等. 迷走血管压迫致梗阻性肾积水34例临床分析[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2009,8(6):3-5. |
| [10] | Boylu U, Oommen M, Lee BR , et al. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience[J]. J Urol, 2009,181(4):1751-1755. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |