Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Effect of disinfectant with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients on the accuracy of dental impression
Received date: 2020-02-12
Online published: 2020-12-13
Supported by
Capital Health Research and Development Special Project(2018-2-4102)
Objective: To assess the effect of disinfectant (Cavicide) with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients disinfectant on dental impression accuracy. Methods: The effect of Cavicide on three impression materials (alginate, polyether and vinylpolysiloxane) were assessed using a standard model. The standard model was digitized by an extraoral scanner (IScan D103i, Imetric). For each kind of impression materials, thirty impressions were taken following the manufactures’ instruction in the same conditions. Subsequently, the impressions were randomly divided into three groups, with ten impressions in each group. After the impression taking was completed, the three groups underwent pure water rinse for 1 min (blank control, BC), 2% glutaraldehyde solution immersion disinfection for 30 min (glutaraldehyde, GD), and Cavicide solution spray disinfection for 5 min (Cavicide, CC), respectively. All the impressions were digitized by the extraoral scanner (IScan D103i, Imetric) after disinfection and exported to a dedicated three-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic Qualify 2014, Geomagic, USA). In the software, the digital models of the impressions were trimmed to teeth and then superimposed with the digitized standard model via best-fit alignment. Root mean square (RMS) was used to evaluate the deviations between the impression and the standard model. The deviation in the anterior and posterior regions was evaluated respectively. One-way ANOVA test and the LSD post-hoc test were used to compare the deviations between the three groups (P <0.05). The color map of each superimposition was saved for visual analysis. Results: For the polyether and vinylpolysiloxane materials, the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.933, P=0.827). For the alginate material, the difference in posterior region between group GD and group BC, as well as group GD and group CC were statistically significant (GD vs. BC, P=0.001; GD vs. CC, P=0.002), while the difference between group BC and group CC was not statistically significant (P=0.854). The visual analysis showed an obvious deviation in the buccal-lingual direction in group GD. Conclusion: Disinfectant (Cavicide) with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients using spray disinfection has no effect on the accuracy of the alginate, polyether and vinylpolysiloxane impressions.
Key words: Dental impression; Disinfection; Accuracy; Three-dimensional
Di XU , Dong-hao WEI , Ya-chi ZHANG , Ping DI , Ye LIN . Effect of disinfectant with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients on the accuracy of dental impression[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020 , 52(6) : 1112 -1116 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.06.021
| [1] | Alzain S. Effect of chemical, microwave irradiation, steam autoclave, ultraviolet light radiation, ozone and electrolyzed oxidizing water disinfection on properties of impression materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis study[J]. Saudi Dent J, 2020,32(4):161-170. |
| [2] | Sehulster L, Chinn RY. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. recommendations of CDC and the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee (HICPAC)[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2003,52(10):1-42. |
| [3] | 于明红, 姚美令, 韩晓鹏, 等. 卡瓦液Cavicide对口腔种植聚醚印模消毒效果的研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2016,21(3):111-112. |
| [4] | 马旭东, 张颖, 盛美春, 等. 一种口腔印模专用消毒剂对乙肝病毒活性及免疫原性的影响[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2017,34(7):628-630. |
| [5] | Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, et al. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(6):715-719. |
| [6] | de Villaumbrosia G, Martinez-Rus PF, Garcia-Orejas A, et al. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016,116(4):543-550. |
| [7] | Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2005,8(4):283-294. |
| [8] | Jagger DC, Vowles RW, McNally L, et al. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy and stability of some impression materials[J]. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2007,15(1):23-28. |
| [9] | 武红梅, 李长春, 江浩, 等. 不同消毒剂消毒口腔印模效果检测及其对印模尺寸稳定性的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2017,21(2):171-176. |
| [10] | 陆金星, 陈亚明, 章非敏, 等. 不同消毒方法对口腔琼脂藻酸钾印模精度的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2004,19(24):3-4. |
| [11] | Ulgey M, Gorler O, Yesilyurt G. Importance of disinfection time and procedure with different alginate impression products to reduce dimensional instability[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2020,23(3):284-290. |
| [12] | 陈树国, 李磊, 李长明, 等. 浸泡消毒藻酸钾印模对模型尺寸稳定性的影响[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2006,20(6):591-593. |
| [13] | Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2007,20(6):573-575. |
| [14] | Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2011,14(1):11-21. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |