Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Risk factors and diagnostic value for ultrasound-detected tendon monosodium urate crystal deposition in patients with gout
Received date: 2020-09-11
Online published: 2021-02-07
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81771740)
Objective: To evaluate frequency and patterns, risk factors of MSU (monosodium urate) crystal deposition at lower extremity tendon by ultrasonography in gout patients, and to explore diagnostic value by ultrasonography.Methods: Patients diagnosed with gout and age matched healthy controls had ultrasound scanning of both feet and knees including joints and tendons (achilles, quadriceps, and patellar tendon). Readers who scored the ultrasound scans for MSU crystal deposition were blinded to the patients’ clinical diagnoses. Clinical characteristics were compared between positive and negative crystal deposition groups by US, and risk factors of MSU deposition in tendons were analyzed. Diagnostic values of MSU deposition were evaluated by ultrasonography according with positive MSU crystal in synovial fluid or tophi by polarized microscopy.Results: Eighty patients and eighty healthy controls were included. Thity-three patients (47.5%) had tophi by physical examination. The achilles tendon was the most commonly involved tendon site 41(51.2%), followed by the quadriceps tendons 22(27.5%), and patella tendon 10(12.5%). There were no MSU deposition in healthy control group at tendon by ultrasonography. Compared with negative MSU deposition at tendon site by ultrasonography, tendon MSU positive patients had longer mean gout duration [(87.3±40.9) months vs. (7.7±2.6) months, P=0.001];higher frequency of gout flare [2(1, 2) /year vs. 1(1,1) /year, P=0.001]; higher BMI [(26.3±2.5) kg/m2vs. (23.3±2.1) kg/m2, P=0.05]. Also, the mean serum uric acid and creatinine levels were higher in tendon MSU positive group [(584.6±87.6) μmol/L vs. (460.4±96.7) μmol/L, P=0.001] and [(90.9±33.3) μmol/L vs. (70.6±40.2) μmol/L, P=0.02] separately. Logistic regression analysis showed gout duration and flare frequency were independent risk factors for MSU deposition at tendon by ultrasonography (P<0.01). Joint or tophi aspirations were performed in all the eighty gout patients, and positive MSU crystals in synovial fluid analysis by polarized microscopy were defined as the golden standard of gout diagnosis. When compared with the golden standard, the sensitivity and specificity were 94.0% and 78.0% separately for MSU deposition at tendon by ultrasonography. Conclusion: Tendon involvement at the lower extremity tendons in gout is very common. Long gout disease duration and high frequency of gout flare are both independent risk factors of tendon MSU deposition by ultrasonography. Ultrasonography had good sensitivity and specificity for detecting tendinous tophi and aggregates.
Key words: Gout; Tendon; Sodium urate monohydrate; Ultrasonography; Diagnostic value
Yu WANG , Xue-rong DENG , Lan-lan JI , Xiao-hui ZHANG , Yan GENG , Zhuo-li ZHANG . Risk factors and diagnostic value for ultrasound-detected tendon monosodium urate crystal deposition in patients with gout[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2021 , 53(1) : 143 -149 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.022
| [1] | Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, et al. Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1977,20(3):895-900. |
| [2] | Filippou G, Pascart T, Iagnocco A. Utility of ultrasound and dual energy CT in crystal disease diagnosis and management[J]. Curr Rheumatol Rep, 2020,22(5):15. |
| [3] | Gutierrez M, Schmidt WA, Thiele RG, et al. International consensus for ultrasound lesions in gout: results of Delphi process and web-reliability exercise[J]. Rheumatology(Oxford), 2015,54(10):1797-1805. |
| [4] | 中华医学会内分泌学分会. 中国高尿酸血症与痛风诊疗指南(2019)[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2020,36(1):1-13. |
| [5] | Terslev L, Gutierrez M, Christensen R, et al. Assessing elementary lesions in gout by ultrasound: results of an OMERACT patient-based agreement and reliability exercise[J]. J Rheumatol, 2015,42(11):2149-2154. |
| [5] | Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. 2018 updated European League Against Rheumatism evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of gout[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020,79(1):31-38. |
| [6] | Neogi T, Jansen TLTA, Dalbeth N, et al. 2015 gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2015,74(10):1789-1798. |
| [7] | Ogdie A, Taylor WJ, Neogi T, et al. Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of gout in a multicenter study: comparison with monosodium urate monohydrate crystal analysis as the gold standard[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2017,69(2):429-438. |
| [8] | Naredo E, Uson J, Jiménez-Palop M, et al. Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2014,73(8):1522-1528. |
| [9] | Dalbeth N, Kalluru R, Aati O, et al. Tendon involvement in the feet of patients with gout: a dual-energy CT study[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2013,72(9):1545-1548. |
| [10] | Di Matteo A, Filippucci E, Cipolletta E, et al. The popliteal groove region: A new target for the detection of monosodium urate crystal deposits in patients with gout: an ultrasound study[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2019,86(1):89-94. |
| [11] | 邓雪蓉, 耿研, 张卓莉. 不同时期痛风性关节炎的超声特征比较[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2016,20(1):23-27. |
| [12] | Wang Y, Deng X, Xu Y, et al. Detection of uric acid crystal deposition by ultrasonography and dual-energy computed tomography: a cross-sectional study in patients with clinically diagnosed gout[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018,97(42):e12834. |
| [13] | Sun C, Qi X, Tian Y, et al. Risk factors for the formation of double-contour sign and tophi in gout[J]. J Orthop Surg, 2019,14(1):239. |
| [14] | Ventura-Ríos L, Sánchez-Bringas G, Pineda C, et al. Tendon involvement in patients with gout: an ultrasound study of prevalence[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2016,35(8):2039-2044. |
| [15] | Yuan Y, Liu C, Xiang X, et al. Ultrasound scans and dual energy CT identify tendons as preferred anatomical location of MSU crystal depositions in gouty joints[J]. Rheumatol Int, 2018,38(5):801-811. |
| [16] | Carroll M, Dalbeth N, Allen B, et al. Ultrasound characteristics of the achilles tendon in tophaceous gout: a comparison with age- and sex-matched controls[J]. J Rheumatol, 2017,44(10):1487-1492. |
| [17] | Wakefield RJ, Smith K, Wakefield SM, et al. Tendon paratenon involvement in patients with gout: an under-recognized ultrasound feature of tendinous gout [J/OL]. Joint Bone Spine, 2020[2020-07-01]. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.07.001. |
| [18] | Christiansen SN, ?stergaard M, Terslev L. Ultrasonography in gout: utility in diagnosis and monitoring[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2018,36(Suppl 5):61-67. |
| [19] | Peiteado D, Villalba A, Martín-Mola E, et al. Ultrasound sensitivity to changes in gout: a longitudinal study after two years of treatment[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2017,35(5):746-751. |
| [20] | Chhana A, Callon KE, Dray M, et al. Interactions between tenocytes and monosodium urate monohydrate crystals: implications for tendon involvement in gout[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2014,73(9):1737-1741. |
| [21] | Ray K. Tendon damage in gout: a role for MSU crystals[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2014,10(6):321. |
| [22] | Christiansen SN, ?stergaard M, Slot O, et al. Ultrasound for the diagnosis of gout: the value of gout lesions as defined by the outcome measures in rheumatology ultrasound group[J]. Rheu-matology(Oxford), 2021,60(1):239-249. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |