Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of ampullary polyps and the accuracy of forceps biopsy
Received date: 2020-02-09
Online published: 2021-02-07
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81500502);National Natural Science Foundation of China(81470905);Capital Characteristic Clinic Project(z171100001017091)
Objective: To distinguish the endoscopic and clinical features of ampullary polyps,to investigate the endoscopic cancer risk factors of ampullary polyps based on the compared differences of benign lesions and adenocarcinoma, and to assess the accuracy of forceps biopsy.Methods: Authors retrospectively analyzed the data extracted from patients treated with endoscopic papillectomy (EP) from January 2009 to May 2019 in the Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital. Endoscopic pictures and pathology reports were reevaluated and analyzed. Differences between benign and cancer groups were conducted.Results: In the study,42 cases were involved, 35 to 83 years old, containing 83.3% older than 50 years old patients. The histological types were as follows, 2 for inflammatory polyps (4.8%), 1 for neuroendocrine tumor (2.4%), 1 for hyperplastic polyp (2.4%), 5 for grade Ⅰ adenoma (11.9%), 10 for grade Ⅱ adenoma (23.8%), 4 for grade Ⅲ adenoma (9.5%) and 19 for adenocarcinoma (45.2%),and 90.5% were adenoma or adenocarcinoma. The average age of benign group (inflammatory polyps and adenomas) was (56.7±9.2), which was significantly younger than that of adenocarcinoma group [(66.0±9.8), P=0.004]. Tumor diameter in adenocarcinoma group[(2.3±0.8) cm] was significantly larger than that in benign group[(1.6±0.6) cm, P=0.002]. Benign lesions only showed Yamada type Ⅰ(57.1%)and type Ⅱ(42.9%). The percentage of Yamada type Ⅰ (36.8%)and type Ⅱ(31.6%) in adenocarcinoma group was lower than that in benign group. Moreover, Yamada type Ⅲ (31.5%) was only found in the adenocarcinoma group. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in Yamada types (P=0.046). Most of the benign lesions had clear boundary(18/21,85.7%). The percentage of clear boundary in adenocarcinoma group (2/19,10.5%) was significantly lower than that in the benign group (P<0.001). No significant differences were investigated in color (P=0.353) and surface (P=0.324) between benign and adenocarcinoma lesions. Pooling age, lesion diameter, Yamada type and clear boundary into Logistic regression analysis, only age (OR=1.186, 95%CI 1.025-1.373, P=0.022) and clear boundary (OR=66.218, 95%CI 3.421-1 281.840, P=0.006) were the independent cancer risk factors. Only 2 (10.5%) in the 19 cancer patients had positive biopsy results before EP. As compared with post-EP, 55.3% (21/38) biopsies were under-estimated, including 17 (17/19, 89.5%) adenocarcinomas and 4 (4/10, 40%) grade Ⅱ adenomas.Conclusion: adenoma and adenocarcinoma were the major histological type of ampullary po-lyps. Age and unclear boundary were the independent risk factors of ampullary adenocarcinoma. Forceps biopsy was not enough for ampullary polyp differentiation.
Ying-chun WANG , Yong-hui HUANG , Hong CHANG , Wei YAO , Xiu-e YAN , Ke LI , Yao-peng ZHANG , Wei ZHENG . Characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of ampullary polyps and the accuracy of forceps biopsy[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2021 , 53(1) : 204 -209 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.031
| [1] | Ridtitid W, Tan D, Schmidt SE, et al. Endoscopic papillectomy: risk factors for incomplete resection and recurrence during long-term follow-up[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2014,79(2):289-296. |
| [2] | Ridtitid W, Schmidt SE, Al-Haddad MA, et al. Performance characteristics of EUS for locoregional evaluation of ampullary lesions[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015,81(2):380-388. |
| [3] | Kang SH, Kim KH, Kim TN, et al. Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasms: retrospective analysis of a multicenter study[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2017,17(1):69. |
| [4] | El H, Coté GA. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of ampullary lesions[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2013,23(1):95-109. |
| [5] | 顾宗廷, 张永杰. 十二指肠乳头肿瘤的诊断与外科治疗[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2015,35(6):428-435. |
| [6] | Chathadi KV, Khashab MA, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015,82(5):773-781. |
| [7] | 陆鉴, 陆文洁, 吴育连. 十二指肠乳头肿瘤的临床特点及诊治分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2016,54(3):187-190. |
| [8] | Attila T, Parlak E, Alper E, et al. Endoscopic papillectomy of benign ampullary lesions: Outcomes from a multicenter study[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2018,29(3):325-334. |
| [9] | Wanders LK, East JE, Uitentuis SE, et al. Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013,14(13):1337-1347. |
| [10] | Kim HN, Kim KM, Shin JU, et al. Prediction of carcinoma after resection in subjects with ampullary adenomas on endoscopic biopsy[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2013,47(4):346-351. |
| [11] | 郝璐, 王伟, 施新岗, 等. 十二指肠乳头肿瘤内镜切除术的临床应用进展[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017,34(6):451-454. |
| [12] | Wee E, Lakhtakia S, Gupta R, et al. The diagnostic accuracy and strength of agreement between endoscopic ultrasound and histopathology in the staging of ampullary tumors[J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2012,31(6):324-332. |
| [13] | 张荣春, 陈杰, 于卫华, 等. 十二指肠乳头肿瘤内镜切除术[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2014,31(4):231-235. |
| [14] | Bourgeois N, Dunham F, Verhest A, et al. Endoscopic biopsies of the papilla of Vater at the time of endoscopic sphincterotomy: difficulties in interpretation[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 1984,30(3):163-166. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |