Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Multivariate analysis of varus after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Received date: 2019-12-31
Online published: 2021-04-21
Supported by
Beijing Jishuitan Hosptial Nova Program(XKXX2018)
Objective: To analyze the preoperative influencing factors of varus after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Methods: A total of 660 patients (767 knees) undergoing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in adult joint reconstruction surgery department of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusive criteria: diagnosis was osteoarthritis, single compartment lesions in the medial side of the knee; preoperative flexion deformity was less than 10°, active range of motion was greater than 90°; preoperative X-ray full-length images of both lower limbs showed less than 15° varus (Noyes method); anterior cruciate ligament was well functioned, The cartilage of lateral compartment of knee joint was intact. Exclusion criteria: combined with other inflammatory arthropathy; combined with extraarticular deformity; previous knee surgery history. The average age of the patients was (64.4±8.1) years, including 153 males and 497 females. The degree of post-operative varus was measured with Noyes method. The total patients were divided into varus group (Noyes≥3 °) and normal group (Noyes<3 °). Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), range of motion (ROM), preoperative flexion deformity (FD), American Knee Society pain score (AKS) and American Knee Society function score (AKS function) were recorded. The standard anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of knee joint and full-length lower extremity kinematic line films were taken by Sonialvision Safine Ⅱ (Shimadzu, Japan) multi-function digital tomography system. The image was measured by picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The following angles were measured preoperative Noyes angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and joint line converge angle (JLCA) were measured and analyzed. Results: Gender(P=0.346), operative side (P=0.619), age (P=0.746), BMI (P=0.142), preoperative ROM (P=0.102), preoperative knee pain score (P=0.131) and functional score (P=0.098) were not risk factors for postoperative varus. The influencing factors of postoperative varus were preoperative MPTA<84 ° (P= 0.018, OR= 3.712, 95%CI: 1.250-11.027), preoperative Noyes > 5°(P=0.000, OR= 3.105, 95%CI: 1.835-5.254), preoperative FD > 5° (P= 0.001, OR=1.976, 95%CI: 1.326-3.234). Pre-operative LDFA (P=0.146) and preoperative JLCA (P= 0.709) had no significant effect on postoperative kinematic line. Conclusion: Patients with severe preoperative varus, especially those with varus deformity mainly from the tibial side, and those with preoperative flexion deformity are more prone to get varus lower extremity kinematic line after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Song-jie JI , Ye HUANG , Xing-shan WANG , Jian LIU , Yong DOU , Xu JIANG , Yi-xin ZHOU . Multivariate analysis of varus after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2021 , 53(2) : 293 -297 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.02.010
| [1] | Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, et al. Results of unicom-partmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005,87(5):999-1006. |
| [2] | Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi YJ, et al. Differences in patient-reported outcomes between unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017,32(5):1453-1459. |
| [3] | van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, et al. Patients with isolated lateral osteoarthritis: Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee, 2016,23(6):968-974. |
| [4] | Ko YB, Gujarathi MR, Oh KJ. Outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies between fixed and mobile bearings focusing on complications[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2015,27(3):141-148. |
| [5] | Kim KT, Lee S, Kim TW, et al. The influence of postoperative tibiofemoral alignment on the clinical results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2012,24(2):85-90. |
| [6] | Bruni D, Iacono F, Russo A, et al. Minimally invasive unicom-partmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010,18(6):710-717. |
| [7] | Ewald FC. The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989,248(11):9-12. |
| [8] | Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D. Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1992,274(1):248-264. |
| [9] | Price AJ, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW, et al. A history of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2007,30(Suppl 5):7-10. |
| [10] | Choy WS, Kim KJ, Lee SK, et al. Mid-term results of oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2011,3(3):178-183. |
| [11] | Mercier N, Wimsey S, Saragaglia D. Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Int Orthop, 2010,34(8):1137-1143. |
| [12] | Kuipers BM, Kollen BJ, Bots PC, et al. Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartment knee replacement[J]. Knee, 2010,17(1), 48-52. |
| [13] | 及松洁, 黄野, 王达成, 等. 胫骨高位闭合截骨与开放截骨对胫骨后倾及髌骨高度的影响[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2020,40(10):1394-1398. |
| [14] | Aleto TJ, Berend ME, Ritter MA, et al. Early failure of unicom-partmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2008,23(2):159-163. |
| [15] | Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004,423(6):161-165. |
| [16] | Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, et al. Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1999,367(10):61-72. |
| [17] | Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1996,11(7):782-788. |
| [18] | Tashiro Y, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, et al. The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014,22(12):3142-3249. |
| [19] | Robinson BJ, Rees JL, Price AJ, et al. Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002,84(5):653-657. |
| [20] | Scott CE, Eaton MJ, Nutton RW, et al. Proximal tibial strain in medial unicompartmental knee replacements: a biomechanical study of implant design[J]. Bone Joint J, 2013,95B(10):1339-1347. |
| [21] | Sawatari T, Tsumura H, Iesaka K, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the influence of tibial component inclination[J]. J Orthop Res, 2005,23(3):549-554. |
| [22] | Simpson DJ, Price AJ, Gulati A, et al. Elevated proximal tibial strains following unicompartmental knee replacement: a possible cause of pain[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2009,31(7):752-757. |
| [23] | Pandit HG, Campi S, Hamilton TW, et al. Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017,25(3):694-702. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |