Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Effects of bioactive glass on proliferation, differentiation and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells
Received date: 2019-02-13
Online published: 2021-04-21
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81870753)
Objective: To investigate the effects of phytic acid derived bioactive P2O5-SiO2-CaO gel-glasses (PSC) on the proliferation, differentiation and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro. Methods: HUVECs were cultured in PSC extracts, which were prepared with endothelial cell medium (ECM) at a gradient concentration of 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 2 g/L. Cells cultured in ECM were used as the control. The effect of PSC on HUVECs proliferation was assessed on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th and 10th days with (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl) 2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay (MTT), and the optimum PSC concentration for HUVECs proliferation was used in the following experiments. The subsequent experiments were divided into two groups. The experimental group used PSC extracts to culture HUVECs (PSC group) and the control group used ECM to culture HUVECs (ECM group). Gene expression of angiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), was detected on the 2nd, 4th and 7th days by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR). The morphology and number of tubules formation were observed at the 4th and 10th hours. Image J software was used for counting and quantitative analysis. Results: The results of MTT assay showed that 0.1 g/L PSC group had the most significant effect on promoting HUVECs proliferation. The optical density values of 0.1 g/L PSC group on the 5th and 7th days were significantly higher than those of the other PSC groups and the control group (P<0.05). The result of real-time RT-PCR showed that 0.1 g/L PSC extract up-regulated the mRNA expression of VEGF and bFGF significantly (P<0.05). On the 4th day, the gene expressions of VEGF and bFGF in PSC group were 1.59 and 1.45 times higher than those in ECM group respectively, and on the 7th day, the gene levels of VEGF and bFGF in PSC group were 1.98 and 1.37 times higher than those in ECM group respectively. The tubule formation assay showed that the maturity and density of the tubules in 0.1 g/L PSC group was much better than that in the ECM group at the 10th hour. The quantitative analysis by Image J indicated that the tubules number in PSC group (29.63±2.29) was higher than in the ECM group (20.13±2.36), with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion: PSC showed significant promoting effects on HUVECs’ proliferation, differentiation and angiogenesis in vitro.
Li-dong HUANG , Wei-yu GONG , Yan-mei DONG . Effects of bioactive glass on proliferation, differentiation and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2021 , 53(2) : 371 -377 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.02.023
| [1] | Hoppe A, Güldal NS, Boccaccini AR. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics[J]. Biomaterials, 2011,32(11):2757-2774. |
| [2] | Keothongkham K, Charoenphandhu N, Thongbunchoo J, et al. Evaluation of bioactive glass incorporated poly(caprolactone)-poly(vinyl alcohol) matrix and the effect of BMP-2 modification[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2017,74:47-54. |
| [3] | Nommeots-Nomm A, Labbaf S, Devlin A, et al. Highly degradable porous melt-derived bioactive glass foam scaffolds for bone regeneration[J]. Acta Biomater, 2017,57:449-461. |
| [4] | Fujishiro Y, Hench LL, Oonishi H. Quantitative rates of in vivo bone generation for Bioglass and hydroxyapatite particles as bone graft substitute[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 1997,8(11):649-652. |
| [5] | Santos MI, Reis RL. Vascularization in bone tissue engineering: physiology, current strategies, major hurdles and future challenges[J]. Macromol Biosci, 2010,10(1):12-27. |
| [6] | Rust KR, Singleton GT, Wilson J, et al. Bioglass middle ear prosjournal: long-term results[J]. Am J Otol, 1996,17(3):371-374. |
| [7] | Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, et al. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 1971,5(6):117-141. |
| [8] | Stanley HR, Hall MB, Clark AE, et al. Using 45S5 bioglass cones as endosseous ridge maintenance implants to prevent alveolar ridge resorption: a 5-year evaluation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1997,12(1):95-105. |
| [9] | Keles GC, Cetinkaya BO, Albayrak D, et al. Comparison of platelet pellet and bioactive glass in periodontal regenerative therapy[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2009,64(6):327-333. |
| [10] | Rahaman MN, Day DE, Bal BS, et al. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering[J]. Acta Biomater, 2011,7(6):2355-2373. |
| [11] | Day RM, Boccaccini AR, Shurey S, et al. Assessment of polyglycolic acid mesh and bioactive glass for soft-tissue engineering scaffolds[J]. Biomaterials, 2004,25(27):5857-5866. |
| [12] | Day RM. Bioactive glass stimulates the secretion of angiogenic growth factors and angiogenesis in vitro[J]. Tissue Eng, 2005,11(5/6):768. |
| [13] | Keshaw H, Forbes A, Day RM. Release of angiogenic growth factors from cells encapsulated in alginate beads with bioactive glass[J]. Biomaterials, 2005,26(19):4171-4179. |
| [14] | Andrade AL, Andrade SP, Domingues RZ. In vivo performance of a sol-gel glass-coated collagen[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2010,79(1):122-128. |
| [15] | Ghosh SK, Nandi SK, Kundu B, et al. In vivo response of porous hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate prepared by aqueous solution combustion method and comparison with bioglass scaffolds[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2008,86(1):217-227. |
| [16] | Nandi SK, Kundu B, Datta S, et al. The repair of segmental bone defects with porous bioglass: an experimental study in goat[J]. Res Vet Sci, 2009,86(1):162-173. |
| [17] | Ross EA, Batich CD, Clapp WL, et al. Tissue adhesion to bioactive glass-coated silicone tubing in a rat model of peritoneal dialysis catheters and catheter tunnels[J]. Kidney Int, 2003,63(2):702-708. |
| [18] | Choi HY, Lee JE, Park HJ, et al. Effect of synthetic bone glass particulate on the fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene orbital implants[J]. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006,22(2):121-125. |
| [19] | Day RM, Maquet V, Boccaccini AR, et al. In vitro and in vivo analysis of macroporous biodegradable poly (d,l-lactide-co-glyco-lide) scaffolds containing bioactive glass[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2005,75(4):778-787. |
| [20] | Keshaw H, Georgiou G, Blaker JJ, et al. Assessment of polymer/bioactive glass-composite microporous spheres for tissue regeneration applications[J]. Tissue Eng Part A, 2009,15(7):1451-1461. |
| [21] | Lei B, Shin KH, Noh DY, et al. Sol-gel derived nanoscale bioactive glass (NBG) particles reinforced poly (ε-caprolactone) composites for bone tissue engineering[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2013,33(3):1102-1108. |
| [22] | Li A, Qiu D. Phytic acid derived bioactive CaO-P2O5-SiO2 gel-glasses[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2011,22(12):2685-2691. |
| [23] | Zhu T, Ren H, Li A, et al. Novel bioactive glass based injectable bone cement with improved osteoinductivity and its in vivo evaluation[J]. Sci Rep, 2017,7(1):3622. |
| [24] | Rouwkema J, Khademhosseini A. Vascularization and angiogenesis in tissue engineering: beyond creating static networks[J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2016,34(9):733-745. |
| [25] | Mao C, Chen X, Miao G, et al. Angiogenesis stimulated by novel nanoscale bioactive glasses[J]. Biomed Mater, 2015,10(2):025005. |
| [26] | Cui CY, Wang SN, Ren HH, et al. Regeneration of dental-pulp complex-like tissue using phytic acid derived bioactive glasses[J]. RSC Adv, 2017,7(36):22063-22070. |
| [27] | Gorustovich AA, Roether JA, Boccaccini AR. Roether. Effect of bioactive glasses on angiogenesis: a review of in vitro and in vivo evidences[J]. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2010,16(2):199-207. |
| [28] | Leu A, Leach JK. Proangiogenic potential of a collagen/bioactive glass substrate[J]. Pharm Res, 2008,25(5):1222-1229. |
| [29] | Jones JR, Sepulveda P, Hench LL. Dose-dependent behavior of bioactive glass dissolution[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2010,58(6):720-726. |
| [30] | O’Donnell MD, Watts SJ, Law RV, et al. Effect of P2O5 content in two series of soda lime phosphosilicate glasses on structure and properties. Part Ⅰ: NMR[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2008,354(30):3554-3560. |
| [31] | Shie MY, Ding SJ, Chang HC. The role of silicon in osteoblast-like cell proliferation and apoptosis[J]. Acta Biomater, 2011,7(6):2604-2614. |
| [32] | Maeno S, Niki Y, Matsumoto H, et al. The effect of calcium ion concentration on osteoblast viability, proliferation and differentiation in monolayer and 3D culture[J]. Biomaterials, 2005,26(23):4847-4855. |
| [33] | Zhai W, Lu H, Chen L, et al. Silicate bioceramics induce angiogenesis during bone regeneration[J]. Acta Biomater, 2012,8(1):341-349. |
| [34] | Li H, Chang J. Stimulation of proangiogenesis by calcium silicate bioactive ceramic[J]. Acta Biomater, 2013,9(2):5379-5389. |
| [35] | Schwarz K. A bound form of silicon in glycosaminoglycans and polyuronides[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1973,70(5):1608-1612. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |