Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Evaluation of fracture strength of two kinds of zirconia all-ceramic crowns with different edge compensation angles
Received date: 2019-02-22
Online published: 2021-04-21
Supported by
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFB1106900);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFB1107200);Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research(2018-2-4103)
Objective: To evaluate the effects of different edge compensation angles on the fracture strength of multilayer zirconia all-ceramic crowns and traditional uniform zirconia all-ceramic crowns. Methods: The resin tooth preparation specimen of the mandibular first molar with a knife-edge was fabricated. A 3D digital model of the specimen was obtained by scanning it with a 3D dental model scanner. The 3D digital model was imported into computer aided design (CAD) software, and three 3D digital models of the full crown with the same surface shape are designed with the edge compensation angles of 30°, 45° and 60°, respectively. Then, the designed 3D digital model is imported into computer aided manufacturing (CAM) software. Three kinds of multilayer and homogeneous zirconia all-porcelain crowns with different edge compensation angles were fabricated,10 each for a total of 60. The fracture load of each crown was measured under the electronic universal testing machine. Results: Fracture load of multilayer and uniform zirconia all-ceramic crowns, (4 322.86±610.07) N and (5 914.12±596.80) N in the 30° group, (5 264.82±883.76) N and (5 220.83±563.38) N in the 45° group and (4 900.42±345.41) N and (5 050.22±560.24) N in the 60° group, respectively. The fracture load of multi-layer zirconia all-ceramic crowns in the 30° group was significantly lower than that of homogeneous zirconia all-ceramic crowns(P<0.05); there was no statistical significance in 45° group and 60° group(P>0.05). In the multi-layer zirconia all-ceramic crowns: the fracture load of the 30° group was significantly lower than that of the 45° group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the 30° group and the 60° group, the 45° group and the 60° group (P>0.05).In uniform zirconia full crown group: the 30° group was higher than the 45° group, the 30° group was higher than the 60° group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the 45° group and the 60° group (P>0.05). Conclusion: The fracture loads of three kinds of uniform and multilayer zirconia all ceramic crowns with different edge compensation angles can meet the clinical requirements. A smaller edge compensation angle is recommended when using traditional zirconia all-ceramic crowns, while 45° is recommended when using multi-layer zirconia all-ceramic crowns.
Xin YANG , Rong LI , Hong-qiang YE , Hu CHEN , Yong WANG , Yong-sheng ZHOU , Yu-chun SUN . Evaluation of fracture strength of two kinds of zirconia all-ceramic crowns with different edge compensation angles[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2021 , 53(2) : 402 -405 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.02.028
| [1] | 张富强. 口腔修复材料氧化锆陶瓷的研究与应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2006,26(10):1081-1084. |
| [2] | Choi YJ, Razzoog ME. Masking ability of zirconia with and without veneering porcelain[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013,22(2):98-104. |
| [3] | Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, et al. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: A review[J]. Dent Mater, 2011,27(1):97-108. |
| [4] | Spies BC, Balmer M, Jung RE, et al. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study[J]. J Dent, 2017,67:58-65. |
| [5] | Pihlaja J, N?p?nkangas R, Raustia A. Outcome of zirconia partial fixed dental prostheses made by predoctoral dental students: A clinical retrospective study after 3 to 7 years of clinical service[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016,116(1):40-46. |
| [6] | Chai H, Lee JW, Mieleszko AJ, et al. On the interfacial fracture of porcelain/zirconia and graded zirconia dental structures[J]. Acta Biomater, 2014,10(8):3756-3761. |
| [7] | 冯海兰, 徐军. 口腔修复学[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2013: 71-72. |
| [8] | 孙玉春, 李榕, 周永胜, 等. 三维打印在口腔修复领域中的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2017,52(6):381-385. |
| [9] | 朱黎黎. 不同牙合面厚度及锆材对全解剖式二氧化锆冠抗压强度的影响[D]. 河北:河北医科大学, 2015. |
| [10] | Yin R, Lee MH, Bae TS, et al. Effect of finishing condition on fracture strength of monolithic zirconia crowns[J]. Dent Mater, 2019,38(2):203-210. |
| [11] | Weigl P, Sander A, Wu Y, et al. In-vitro performance and fracture strength of thin monolithic zirconia crowns[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2018,10(2):79-84. |
| [12] | Nakamura K, Mouhat M, Nerg?rd JM, et al. Effect of cements on fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns[J]. Acta Biomater, 2016,2(1):12-19. |
| [13] | Zhang Y, Chai H, Lee JW, et al. Chipping resistance of graded zirconia ceramics for dental crowns[J]. J Dent Res, 2012,91(3):311-315. |
| [14] | Mitov G, Anastassova-Yoshida Y, Nothdurft FP, et al. Influence of the preparation design and artificial aging on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2016,8(1):30-36. |
| [15] | Comlekoglu M, Dundar M, Ozcan M, et al. Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns[J]. Oper Dent, 2009,34(5):586-592. |
| [16] | Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, et al. Effect of preparation design on the fracture resistance of zirconia crown copings[J]. Dent Mater, 2008,27(3):362-367. |
| [17] | Poggio CE, Dosoli R, Ercoli C. A retrospective analysis of 102 zirconia single crowns with knife-edge margins[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012,107(5):316-321. |
| [18] | Gibbs CH, Anusavice KJ, Young HM, et al. Maximum clenching force of patients with moderate loss of posterior tooth support: A pilot study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002,88(5):498-502. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |