Objective: To understand the differences between young male students who have sex with men (MSM) with and without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infection in acquired immure deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related knowledge and behavior, and to provide a scientific reference to make targeted and effective measures in AIDS prevention. Methods: Using snow balling sampling combined with participants’ referral, we conducted a questionnaire survey among 548 young MSM students (in whom there were both HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in Harbin, Tianjin, Xi’an, and Chongqing cities from April 2017 to March 2018. The chi-square test and binary Logistic regression were used to compare the differences in AIDS-related knowledge and behavior between males with and without HIV-infection. Results: A total of 583 questionnaires were obtained, of which 548 were valid, with an effective rate of 94.0%. Having a junior college education or below (P=0.002), a monthly consumption level of less than 2 000 RMB (P=0.021), and living off campus (P=0.004) were associated with being tested positive for HIV. In any period of schooling, receiving AIDS prevention education was a protective factor for HIV infection [Primary school OR=0.203 (0.073-0.561), junior high school OR=0.287 (0.142-0.581), senior high school OR=0.271 (0.142-0.518), and university OR=0.322 (0.168-0.616)]. There was no statistical difference between HIV positive and negative young MSM students in the cognition of “AIDS-related Knowledge for Public”(P=0.907) and “AIDS-related Knowledge for Youth”(P=0.782), with the awareness rate all about 90%. There was a statistical difference in the need for some specific knowledge (For “AIDS prevention and treatment policy”, P=0.012, for “Ways to identify and prevent high-risk sexual behavior”, P<0.001). HIV-positive males had a younger age of first sexual activity (P=0.006), had more sexual partners in the early (P<0.001) and had lower frequency of condom use (P<0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in the later number of sexual partners (P=0.247) and the frequency of condom use (For regular sex partners, P=0.735, and for casual sex partners, P=0.765), which might be related to the change of sexual behavior characteristics caused by HIV infection (For regular sex partners, P<0.001, and for casual sex partners, P=0.006). Conclusion: There was no statistical difference between HIV positive and negative young MSM students in the cognition of “AIDS-related Knowledge for Public” and “AIDS-related Knowledge for Youth”, which were both lower than 95% required by the state. However, the specificity in the knowledge needs was certainly shown. There was no significant difference in the recent sexual behavior between the two groups, but HIV positive students were more likely to have high-risk sexual behaviors in the early stage, so we should strengthen and move forward the sex education and AIDS prevention education with adjusted contents, and prevent high-risk sexual behaviors within young MSM students in the early stage.