Effects of acid stimulation on saliva flow rate and compositions of human parotid and submandibular glands

  • Chao-lun CHEN ,
  • Jia-zeng SU ,
  • Guang-yan YU
Expand
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2021-10-09

  Online published: 2022-02-21

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(81974151);National Natural Science Foundation of China(82081240420);National Natural Science Foundation of China(82170977)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of acid stimulation on salivary flow rate and compositions of human parotid and submandibular glands, so as to provide basis for comprehensive evaluation of salivary gland function in both health and disease status. Methods: In the study, 210 healthy participants’ whole saliva samples were collected under passive drooling, and their parotid gland and submandibular gland secretions were collected by negative pressure suction. 2% citric acid was dropped on the tip of tongue every 1 min for acid stimulation for a total of 5 times to collect stimulated whole saliva, parotid and submandibular gland saliva. The collected saliva was weighed and saliva flow rate was calculated. The K+, Na+, Cl-, Ca2+, total protein, total phosphorus and α-amylase in saliva samples were detected by biochemical analyzer, and the changing features of flow rate and compositions of different kinds of saliva were compared and analyzed. Results: After acid stimulation, saliva flow rate significantly increased. The increase proportion of parotid gland saliva (10.7 folds) was much higher than that of submandibular gland saliva (2.9 folds). The concentrations of Na +, Cl-, Ca2+, total protein and α-amylase in parotid gland saliva increased significantly (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in total phosphorus and K + (P=0.89,P=0.34). The concentration of Na+ and Ca2+ in saliva of submandibular gland increased significantly(P<0.05), the concentration of total phosphorus decreased significantly(P<0.05), and the concentration of Cl- increased, but the difference was not significant(P=0.068). There was no significant difference in total protein, K+ and α-amylase (P=0.85,P=0.07,P=0.95). The compound secretion rate of total phosphorus in saliva of submandibular gland remained unchanged(P=0.066), while the secretion rate of K +, Na+, Cl-, Ca2+, total protein and α-amylase significantly increased(P<0.01). The compound secretion rate of K +, Na+, Cl-, Ca2+, total protein and total phosphorus and α-amylase in parotid gland saliva increased(P<0.01). The concentrations of Na +, Cl-, K+, total phosphorus, total protein and α-amylase in parotid were higher than those in submandibular gland (P<0.01), and the concentration of Ca 2+ in submandibular gland saliva was significantly higher than that in parotid (P<0.001). Conclusion: The response of parotid to acid stimulation is stronger, and the secretion of submandibular gland is more stable. Acid stimulation significantly influences the concentrations of electrolytes in saliva, and the composited secretion rate is an evaluation index to reflect both flow rate and composition concentration of saliva. The parotid gland plays an important role in the secretion of total protein, total phosphorus and α-amylase in saliva, and the submandibular gland is the main source of Ca2+ in saliva.

Cite this article

Chao-lun CHEN , Jia-zeng SU , Guang-yan YU . Effects of acid stimulation on saliva flow rate and compositions of human parotid and submandibular glands[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2022 , 54(1) : 89 -94 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.01.014

References

[1] Alvariño C, Bagan L, Murillo-Cortes J, et al. Stimulated whole salivary flow rate: the most appropriate technique for assessing salivary flow in Sjögren syndrome[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2021, 26(3):e404-e407.
[2] Edgar W. Saliva: its secretion, composition and functions[J]. Br Dent J, 1992, 172(8):305-312.
[3] Dawes C, Wong D. Role of saliva and salivary diagnostics in the advancement of oral health[J]. J Dent Res, 2019, 98(2):133-141.
[4] 菅朝慧, 马晓静, 包玉倩. 唾液检测在糖尿病中的临床应用进展[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2020, 12(1):3.
[5] 杨玥欣, 沈夏波, 武雅静, 等. 高脂血症大鼠下颌下腺水通道蛋白2和4的表达[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2018, 38(6):3.
[6] Werfalli S, Drangsholt M, Johnsen JM, et al. Saliva flow rates and clinical characteristics of patients with burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 50(9):1187-1194.
[7] Delporte C, Bryla A, Perret J. Aquaporins in salivary glands: from basic research to clinical applications[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2016, 17(2):166.
[8] Gill SK, Price M, Costa RJ. Measurement of saliva flow rate in healthy young humans: influence of collection time and mouthrinse water temperature[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2016, 124(5):447-453.
[9] Proctor GB, Shaalan AM. Disease-induced changes in salivary gland function and the composition of saliva[J]. J Dent Res, 2021, 100(11):1201-1209.
[10] Kondo Y, Nakamoto T, Jaramillo Y, et al. Functional differences in the acinar cells of the murine major salivary glands[J]. J Dent Res, 2015, 94(5):715-721.
[11] 王松灵, 朱宣智. 腮腺非肿瘤疾病唾液免疫球蛋白及电解质观察[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 1996, 31(4):198-200.
[12] Bundgaard M, Møller M, Poulsen JH. Localization of sodium pump sites in cat salivary glands[J]. J Physiol, 1977, 273(1):339-353.
[13] Dawes C, Chebib F. The influence of previous stimulation and the day of the week on the concentrations of protein and the main electrolytes in human parotid saliva[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1972, 17(9):1289-1301.
[14] Cook D, Dinudom A, Komwatana P, et al. Patch-clamp studies on epithelial sodium channels in salivary duct cells[J]. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2002, 36(2):105-113.
[15] Almássy J, Siguenza E, Skaliczki M, et al. New saliva secretion model based on the expression of Na-K pump and K channels in the apical membrane of parotid acinar cells[J]. Pflugers Arch, 2018, 470(4):613-621.
[16] Dawes C. The effects of flow rate and duration of stimulation on the concentrations of protein and the main electrolytes in human submandibular saliva[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1974, 19(10):887-895.
[17] Martinez J, Holzgreve H, Frick A. Micropuncture study of submaxillary glands of adult rats[J]. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere, 1966, 290(2):124-133.
[18] Schneyer L, Young J, Schneyer C. Salivary secretion of electrolytes[J]. Physiol Rev, 1972, 52(3):720-777.
[19] Roussa E. Channels and transporters in salivary glands[J]. Cell Tissue Res, 2011, 343(2):263-287.
[20] Kraaij S, Brand HS, van der Meij EH, et al. Biochemical composition of salivary stones in relation to stone- and patient-related factors[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2018, 23(5):540-544.
[21] Maier H, Triebel C, Heidland A. The flow-rate-dependent excretion of ionized calcium in pilocarpine-stimulated human submandibular saliva[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1983, 28(10):907-909.
[22] Ambudkar I. Calcium signaling defects underlying salivary gland dysfunction[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res, 2018, 1865(11):1771-1777.
[23] Odanaka H, Obama T, Sawada N, et al. Comparison of protein profiles of the pellicle, gingival crevicular fluid, and saliva: possible origin of pellicle proteins[J]. Biol Res, 2020, 53(1):3.
[24] Helmerhorst EJ, Oppenheim FG. Saliva: a dynamic proteome[J]. J Dent Res, 2007, 86(8):680-693.
Outlines

/